Quantitative analysis of the modes of growth inhibition by weak organic acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 23, 2012, Pages 8377-8387

  Ullah, Azmat ^a   Orij, Rick ^a   Brul, Stanley ^a   Smits, Gertien J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACID STRESS; ANTI-FUNGAL ACTIVITY; ANTI-FUNGAL PROPERTIES; CHARGE INTERACTIONS; CYTOSOLS; FOOD AND BEVERAGE INDUSTRY; GROWTH INHIBITION; INTRACELLULAR PH; LIPOPHILICITY; MICROBIAL GROWTH; NATURALLY OCCURRING; ORGANIC ANIONS; PROPIONIC; PROTON TRANSPORT; SHELF LIFE; WEAK ACIDS; WEAK ORGANIC ACIDS; YEAST CELL;

ACETIC ACID; ACIDIFICATION; ALUMINUM CORROSION; BEVERAGES; CELL MEMBRANES; IONS; ORGANIC ACIDS; RESTORATION;

YEAST;

ABC TRANSPORTER; ANTIFUNGAL AGENT; CARBOXYLIC ACID; FOOD PRESERVATIVE; GROWTH INHIBITOR; PDR12 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; PMA1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; PROTON TRANSPORTING ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ACIDIFICATION; BREWING INDUSTRY; FOOD INDUSTRY; GROWTH RATE; INHIBITION; ORGANIC ACID; PH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; YEAST;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOSOL; DRUG EFFECT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PH; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS; ATP-BINDING CASSETTE TRANSPORTERS; CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; CYTOSOL; FOOD PRESERVATIVES; GROWTH INHIBITORS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; PROTON-TRANSLOCATING ATPASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84870830687     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02126-12     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abbott DA, et al. 2007. Generic and specific transcriptional responses to different weak organic acids in anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 7:819-833.
2. Bom IJ, Klis FM, De Nobel H, Brul S. 2001. A new strategy for inhibition of the spoilage yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zygosaccharomyces bailii based on combination of a membrane-active peptide with an oligosaccharide that leads to an impaired glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-dependent yeast wall protein layer. FEMS Yeast Res. 1:187-194.
3. Booth IR, Kroll RG. 1989. The preservation of foods by low pH. Elsevier Applied Science, New York, NY.
4. Bracey D, Holyoak CD, Coote PJ. 1998. Comparison of the inhibitory effect of sorbic acid and amphotericin B on Saccharomyces cerevisiae: is growth inhibition dependent on reduced intracellular pH? J. Appl. Microbiol. 85:1056-1066.
5. Breeuwer P, Drocourt JL, Rombouts FM, Abee T. 1994. Energydependent, carrier-mediated extrusion of carboxyfluorescein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae allows rapid assessment of cell viability by flow cytometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:1467-1472.
6. Casal M, Cardoso H, Leao C. 1996. Mechanisms regulating the transport of acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 142:1385-1390.
7. Casal M, Paiva S, Queiros O, Soares-Silva I. 2008. Transport of carboxylic acids in yeasts. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 32:974-994.
8. Reference deleted
9. Dashper SG, Reynolds EC. 1996. Lactic acid excretion by Streptococcus mutans. Microbiology 142:33-39.
10. Eklund T. 1989. Organic acids and esters, p 161-200. In Gould GW (ed), Mechanisms of action of food preservation procedures. Elsevier Applied Science, London, United Kingdom.
11. Fernandes AR, Mira NP, Vargas RC, Canelhas I, Sa-Correia I. 2005. Saccharomyces cerevisiae adaptation to weak acids involves the transcription factor Haa1p and Haa1p-regulated genes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 337:95-103.
12. Freese E, Sheu CW, Galliers E. 1973. Function of lipophilic acids as antimicrobial food additives. Nature 241:321-325.
13. Gancedo C. 1971. Inactivation of fructose-1,6-diphosphatase by glucose in yeast. J. Bacteriol. 107:401-405.
14. Gancedo JM, Gancedo C. 1986. Catabolite repression mutants of yeast. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 32:179-187.
15. Grossmann G, Opekarova M, Malinsky J, Weig-Meckl I, Tanner W. 2007. Membrane potential governs lateral segregation of plasma membrane proteins and lipids in yeast. EMBO J. 26:1-8.
16. Hatzixanthis K, et al. 2003. Moderately lipophilic carboxylate compounds are the selective inducers of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pdr12p ATP-binding cassette transporter. Yeast 20:575-585.
17. Hazan R, Levine A, Abeliovich H. 2004. Benzoic acid, a weak organic acid food preservative, exerts specific effects on intracellular membrane trafficking pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:4449-4457.
18. Hazelwood LA, et al. 2006. A new physiological role for Pdr12p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: export of aromatic and branched-chain organic acids produced in amino acid catabolism. FEMS Yeast Res. 6:937-945.
19. Holyoak CD, Bracey D, Piper PW, Kuchler K, Coote PJ. 1999. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae weak-acid-inducible ABC transporter Pdr12 transports fluorescein and preservative anions from the cytosol by an energy-dependent mechanism. J. Bacteriol. 181:4644-4652.
20. +-ATPase and optimal glycolytic flux are required for rapid adaptation and growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of the weak-acid preservative sorbic acid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:3158-3164.
21. Hough JS, Briggs DE, Stevens R, Young TW. 1982. Beer flavour and beer quality, p 838-876. In Hough JS (ed), Malting and brewing science, vol 2. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom.
22. Jasnos L, Sliwa P, Korona R. 2005. Resolution and repeatability of phenotypic assays by automated growth curve analysis in yeast and bacteria. Anal. Biochem. 344:138-140.
23. Krebs HA, Wiggins D, Stubbs M, Sols A, Bedoya F. 1983. Studies on the mechanism of the antifungal action of benzoate. Biochem. J. 214:657-663.
24. +-ATPase leads to glucosedependent activation. J. Biol. Chem. 282:35471-35481.
25. Miesenbock G, De Angelis DA, Rothman JE. 1998. Visualizing secretion and synaptic transmission with pH-sensitive green fluorescent proteins. Nature 394:192-195.
26. Mira NP, Becker JD, Sa-Correia I. 2010. Genomic expression program involving the Haa1p-regulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae response to acetic acid. OMICS 14:587-601.
27. Mira NP, Teixeira MC, Sa-Correia I. 2010. Adaptive response and tolerance to weak acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a genome-wide view. OMICS 14:525-540.
28. Mollapour M, Piper PW. 2007. Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation targets the yeast Fps1 aquaglyceroporin for endocytosis, thereby rendering cells resistant to acetic acid. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:6446-6456.
29. Mollapour M, Shepherd A, Piper PW. 2008. Novel stress responses facilitate Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth in the presence of the monocarboxylate preservatives. Yeast 25:169-177.
30. +-ATPase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1469:133-157.
31. Neal AL, Weinstock JO, Lampen JO. 1965. Mechanisms of fatty acid toxicity for yeast. J. Bacteriol. 90:126-131.
32. Nilsson A, et al. 2001. The catabolic capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is preserved to a higher extent during carbon compared to nitrogen starvation. Yeast 18:1371-1381.
33. Orij R, Postmus J, Ter Beek A, Brul S, Smits GJ. 2009. In vivo measurement of cytosolic and mitochondrial pH using a pH-sensitive GFP derivative in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a relation between intracellular pH and growth. Microbiology 155:268-278.
34. Orij R, et al. 2012. Genome-wide analysis of intracellular pH reveals quantitative control of cell division rate by pHc in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol. 13:R80.
35. Pampulha ME, Loureiro-Dias MC. 1989. Combined effect of acetic acid, pH and ethanol on intracellular pH of fermenting yeast. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31:547-550.
36. Papadimitriou MN, Resende C, Kuchler K, Brul S. 2007. High Pdr12 levels in spoilage yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) correlate directly with sorbic acid levels in the culture medium but are not sufficient to provide cells with acquired resistance to the food preservative. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 113:173-179.
37. Parsons AB, et al. 2004. Integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction data links bioactive compounds to cellular target pathways. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:62-69.
38. Pearce AK, Booth IR, Brown AJ. 2001. Genetic manipulation of 6-phosphofructo-1-kinase and fructose 2,6-bisphosphate levels affects the extent to which benzoic acid inhibits the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 147:403-410.
39. Piper P, Calderon CO, Hatzixanthis K, Mollapour M. 2001. Weak acid adaptation: the stress response that confers yeasts with resistance to organic acid food preservatives. Microbiology 147:2635-2642.
40. Piper P, et al. 1998. The pdr12 ABC transporter is required for the development of weak organic acid resistance in yeast. EMBO J. 17:4257-4265.
41. Piper PW. 1999. Yeast superoxide dismutase mutants reveal a prooxidant action of weak organic acid food preservatives. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 27:1219-1227.
42. +-ATPase. Cell Stress Chaperones 2:12-24.
43. Pitt JI, Hocking AD. 2009. Fungi and food spoilage, 3rd ed. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
44. Porat Z, Wender N, Erez O, Kahana C. 2005. Mechanism of polyamine tolerance in yeast: novel regulators and insights. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 62: 3106-3116.
45. Serrano R. 1983. In vivo glucose activation of the yeast plasma membrane ATPase. FEBS Lett. 156:11-14.
46. +-ATPase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 266:1383-1389.
47. Sikkema J, de Bont JA, Poolman B. 1995. Mechanisms of membrane toxicity of hydrocarbons. Microbiol. Rev. 59:201-222.
48. Steels H, James SA, Roberts IN, Stratford M. 2000. Sorbic acid resistance: the inoculum effect. Yeast 16:1173-1183.
49. Stratford M. 1999. Traditional preservatives: organic acids, p 1729-1737. In Robinson RK, Batt CA, Patel PD (ed), Encyclopedia of food microbiology, vol 3. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
50. Stratford M, Anslow PA. 1998. Evidence that sorbic acid does not inhibit yeast as a classic 'weak acid preservative.' Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 27:203-206.
51. Stratford M, Plumridge A, Nebe-von-Caron G, Archer DB. 2009. Inhibition of spoilage mould conidia by acetic acid and sorbic acid involves different modes of action, requiring modification of the classical weakacid theory. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 136:37-43.
52. Toussaint M, et al. 2006. A high-throughput method to measure the sensitivity of yeast cells to genotoxic agents in liquid cultures. Mutat. Res. 606:92-105.
53. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, Van Dijken JP. 1992. Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 8:501-517.
54. +-ATPase in the plasma membrane of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is activated during growth latency in octanoic acid-supplemented medium accompanying the decrease in intracellular pH and cell viability. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:779-783.
55. Warringer J, Blomberg A. 2003. Automated screening in environmental arrays allows analysis of quantitative phenotypic profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 20:53-67.
56. Young BP, et al. 2010. Phosphatidic acid is a pH biosensor that links membrane biogenesis to metabolism. Science 329:1085-1088.