Effect of feedback during virtual training of grip force control with a myoelectric prosthesis

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Bouwsema, Hanneke ^a   Van Der Sluis, Corry K ^a   Bongers, Raoul M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; MALE; MATCHING TEST TASK; MUSCLE STIMULATOR; MYOELECTRIC CONTROL; OBJECT TEST TASK; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCENTAGE TEST TASK; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PICTURE TEST TASK; PINCH STRENGTH; PLYOMETRICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRACKING TEST TASK; VIRTUAL REALITY; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; HAND STRENGTH; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ARM; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84901410443     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098301     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM (2014) Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis. J NeuroEng Rehabil 11: 16. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-16
2. Dakpa R, Heger H (1997) Prosthetic management and training of adult upper limb amputees. Curr Orthop 11: 193-202. doi:10.1016/S0268-0890(97)90034-7 (Pubitemid 27404115)
3. Smurr LM, Gulick K, Yancosek K, Ganz O (2008) Managing the upper extremity amputee: A protocol for success. J Hand Ther 21: 160-176. doi:10.1197/j.jht.2007.09.006 (Pubitemid 351626497)
4. Schmidt RA, Lee TD (2005) Motor control and learning: A behavioural emphasis (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
5. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH (1995) Motor control: Theory and practical applications. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
6. Adams JA (1987) Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychol Bull 101: 41-74. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.41
7. Gilmore PE, Spaulding SJ (2001) Motor control and motor learning: Implications for treatment of individuals post stroke. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 20: 1-15. doi:10.1080/J148v20n01-01 (Pubitemid 35244819)
8. Bernstein NA (1996) On dexterity and its development. In LatashML, Turvey MT, editors. Dexterity and its development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 3-241.
9. Cohen R, Sternad D (2009) Variability in motor learning: Relocating, channeling and reducing noise. Exp Brain Res 193: 69-83. doi:10.1007/s00221-008- 1596-1
10. Müller H, Sternad D (2004) Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: Three components of skill improvement. J Exp PsycholHum Percept Perform 30: 212-233. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.1.212 (Pubitemid 38213808)
11. Newell KM, Liu Y, Mayer-Kress G (2001) Time scales in motor learning and development. Psychol Rev 108: 57-82. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.57 (Pubitemid 33604126)
12. Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G (2002) Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30: 26-31. doi:10.1097/00003677-200201000-00006 (Pubitemid 34272900)
13. Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G (2007) Toward a new theory of motor synergies. Motor control 11: 276-308.
14. Agnew P, Shannon G (1981) Training-program for a myo-electrically controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback-system. Am J Occup Ther 35: 722-727. doi:10.5014/ajot.35.11.722
15. Antfolk C, Balkenius C, Lundborg G, Rosén B, Sebelius F (2010) Design and technical construction of a tactile display for sensory feedback in a hand prosthesis system. Biomed Eng Online 9: 50. doi:10.1186/1475-925X-9-50
16. Antfolk C, Balkenius C, Lundborg G, Rosén B, Sebelius F (2010) A tactile display system for hand prostheses to discriminate pressure and individual finger localization. J Med Biol Eng 30: 355-360. doi:10.5405/jmbe.766
17. Antfolk C, D'Alonzo M, Rosén B, Lundborg G, Sebelius F, et al. (2013). Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics. Expert Rev Med Devices 10: 45-54. doi:10.1586/ERD.12.68
18. Blank A, Okamura AM, Kuchenbecker KJ (2010) Identifying the role of proprioception in upper-limb prosthesis control: Studies on targeted motion. Trans Appl Percept 7: Article No.15. doi:10.1145/1773965.1773966
19. Chappell PH (2011) Making sense of artificial hands. J Med Eng Technol35: 1-18. doi:10.3109/03091902.2010.526983
20. Engeberg ED, Meek S (2012) Enhanced visual feedback for slip prevention with a prosthetic hand. Prosthet Orthot Int 36: 423-429. doi:10.1177/ 0309364612440077
21. Antfolk C, Balkenius C, Rosén B, Lundborg G, Sebelius F (2010) SmartHand tactile display: A new concept for providing sensory feedback in hand prostheses.J Plast Surg Hand Surg 44: 50-53. doi:10.3109/02844310903259090
22. Peerdeman B, Boere D, Witteveen H, in't Veld RH, Hermens H, et al. (2011) Myoelectric forearm prostheses: State of the art from a user-centered perspective. J Rehabil Res Dev 48: 719-737. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2010.08.0161
23. Pylatiuk C, Kargov A, Schulz S (2006) Design and evaluation of a low-cost force feedback system for myoelectric prosthetic hands. J Prosthet Orthot 18: 57-61. doi:10.1097/00008526-200604000-00007 (Pubitemid 44510417)
24. Chatterjee A, Chaubey P, Martin J, Thakor N (2008) Testing a prosthetic haptic feedback simulator with an interactive force matching task. J Prosthet Orthot 20: 27-34. doi:10.1097/01.JPO.0000311041.61628
25. Chatterjee A, Chaubey P, Martin J, Thakor NV (2008) Quantifying prosthesis control improvements using a vibrotactile representation of grip force. IEEE Region 5 Conference 1-5: April 17-20. doi:10.1109/TPSD.2008.4562727
26. Sebelius F, Axelsson M, Danielsen N, Schouenborg J, Laurell T (2005) Realtime control of a virtual hand. Technol Disabil 17: 131-10.
27. Dingwell JB, Mah CD, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2004) Experimentally confirmed mathematical model for human control of a non-rigid object. J Neurophysiol 91: 1158-1170. doi:10.1152/jn.00704.2003 (Pubitemid 38250400)
28. Flanagan JR, Bowman MC, Johansson RS (2006) Control strategies in object manipulation tasks. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16: 650-659. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.10. 005 (Pubitemid 44791926)
29. Mah CD, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2003) Evidence for a specific internal representation of motion-force relationships during object manipulation. Biol Cybern 88: 60-72. doi:10.1007/s00422-002-0347-9
30. Westling G, Johansson R (1984) Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 53: 277-284. doi:10.1007/BF00238156 (Pubitemid 14177905)
31. Kriz G, Hermsdörfer J, Marquardt C, Mai N (1995) Feedback-based training of grip force control in patients with brain damage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76: 653-659. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80635-0
32. Melendez-Calderon A, Masia L, Gassert R, Sandini G, Burdet E (2011) Force field adaptation can be learned using vision in the absence of proprioceptive error. IEEE Trans Neural Syst RehabilEng19: 298-306. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2011. 2125990
33. Bouwsema H, Kyberd PJ, Hill W, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM (2012) Determining skill level in myoelectric prosthesis use with multiple outcome measures. J Rehabil Res Dev 49: 1331-17. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2011.09.0179
34. Meek SG, Jacobsen SC, Goulding PP (1989) Extended physiologic taction: Design and evaluation of a proportional force feedback system. J Rehabil Res Dev: 26, 53-62. (Pubitemid 19189051)
35. Saunders I, Vijayakumar S (2011) The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control. J NeuroEng Rehabil 8: 60. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-8-60
36. Weeks D, Wallace S, Noteboom J (2000) Precision-grip force changes in the anatomical and prosthetic limb during predictable load increases. Exp Brain Res 132: 404-410. doi:10.1007/s002210000337 (Pubitemid 30330217)
37. Zafar M, Van Doren C (2000) Effectiveness of supplemental grasp-force feedback in the presence of vision. Med Biol Eng Comp 38: 267-274. doi:10.1007/BF02347046 (Pubitemid 30352922)
38. Anderson F, Bischof WF (2012) Augmented reality improves myoelectric prosthesis training. Proc9th Intl Conf. Disabil Virt Reality Ass Technol, Laval, France.
39. Dawson MR, Fahimi F, Carey JP (2012) The development of a myoelectric training tool for above-elbow amputees. Open Biomed Eng J 6: 5-10. doi:10.2174/1874230001206010005
40. Ranganathan R, Newell K (2009) Influence of augmented feedback on coordination strategies. J Mot Behav 41: 317-330. doi:10.3200/JMBR.41.4.317-330
41. Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB (1984) Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychol Bull 95: 355-386. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355
42. Cirstea M, Levin M (2007) Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 21: 398-411. doi:10.1177/1545968306298414 (Pubitemid 47246436)
43. Shute VJ (2008) Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res 78: 153-189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795
44. Holden M (2005) Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: Review. Cyberpsychol Behav 8: 187-211. doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187
45. Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Tunik E, Merians AS (2009) Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: A review. Neuro Rehabil 25: 29-44. doi:10.3233/NRE-2009-0497
46. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM (2010) Learning to control opening and closing a myoelectric hand. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91: 1442-1446. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.025.
47. Romkema S, Bongers RM, van der Sluis CK (2013) Intermanual transfer in training with an upper-limb myoelectric prosthesis simulator: a mechanistic, randomized, pretest-posttest study. Phys Ther 93: 22-31. Doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120058
48. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K (1985) Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 39: 386-391. doi:10.5014/ajot.39.6.386
49. Heckathorne C (1992) Components for adult externally powered systems. Atlas of Limb Prosthetics: Surgical, Prosthetic, and Rehabilitation Principles, 2, 151-174.
50. Park J, Shea CH. Wright DL (2000) Reduced-frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: A test of the guidance hypothesis. J Mot Behav 32: 287-296.
51. Schmidt RA, Young DE, Swinnen S, Shapiro DC (1989) Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 15: 352. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.2.352
52. Van Vliet PM, Wulf G (2006) Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence? Disabil Rehabil 28: 831-840. doi:10.1080/ 09638280500534937
53. Proteau L (2005) Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a video-aiming task. Exp Brain Res161: 441-456. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-2090-z
54. Gordon K, Ferris D (2004) Proportional myoelectric control of a virtual object to investigate human efferent control. Exp Brain Res 159: 478-486. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-1970-6 (Pubitemid 40064289)
55. Kurillo G, Zupan A, Bajd T (2004) Force tracking system for the assessment of grip force control in patients with neuromuscular diseases. Clin Biomech 19: 1014-1021. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.07.003 (Pubitemid 39505071)
56. Kurillo G, Gregorič M, Goljar N, Bajd T (2005) Grip force tracking system for assessment and rehabilitation of hand function. Technol Health Care 13: 137-149. (Pubitemid 41202293)
57. Goodman JS, Wood RE, Hendrickx M (2004) Feedback specificity, exploration, and learning. J Appl Psychol 89: 248, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2. 248.
58. Proteau L (1992) On the specificity of learning and the role of visual information for movement control. In Proteau L, Elliot D, editors.Vision and motor control. Amsterdam: North-Holland. pp. 67-103.
59. Resnik L, Etter K, Klinger SL, Kambe C (2011) Using virtual reality environment to facilitate training with advanced upper-limb prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Dev 48: 707-718. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2010.07.0127
60. Dawson MR, Carey JP, Fahimi F (2011) Myoelectric training systems. Exp Rev Med Dev 8: 581-589. doi:10.1586/ERD.11.23
61. Subramanian SK, Lourenço CB, Chilingaryan G, Sveistrup H, Levin MF (2013) Arm motor recovery using a virtual reality intervention in chronic stroke randomized control trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27: 13-23. doi:10.1177/1545968312449695
62. Soechting JF, Flanders M (1989) Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 62: 582-594. (Pubitemid 19208085)
63. Soechting JF, Flanders M (1989) Errors in pointing are due to approximations in sensorimotor transformations. J Neurophysiol 62: 595-608. (Pubitemid 19208086)
64. Hebert JS, Lewicke JJ (2012) Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture to measure prosthetic function. J Rehabil Res Dev 49: 1163-1174.