Intermanual transfer in training with an upper-limb myoelectric prosthesis simulator: A mechanistic, randomized, pretest-posttest study

Physical Therapy

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 22-31

  Romkema, Sietske ^a   Bongers, Raoul M ^a   van der Sluis, Corry K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPUTATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARM; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; AMPUTATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); UPPER EXTREMITY; YOUNG ADULT;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84872007745     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: 15386724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20120058     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007; 31:236-257.
2. Dudkiewicz I, Gabrielov R, Seiv-Ner I, et al. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:60-63.
3. Kyberd PJ, Davey JJ, Morrison JD. A survey of upper-limb prosthesis users in Oxfordshire. J Prosthet Orthot. 1998;10:85-91.
4. Plettenburg DH, ed. Upper Extremity Prosthetics, Current Status and Evaluation. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Delft University Press; 2002.
5. Atkins D. Adult upper limb prosthetic training. In: Bowker HK, Michael JW, eds. Atlas of Limb Prosthetics: Surgical, Prosthetic, and Rehabilitation Principles. 2nd ed. Rosemont, IL: Mosby-Year Book; 1992: 277-292.
6. Dakpa R, Heger H. Prosthetic management and training of adult upper limb amputees. Curr Orthop. 1997;11:193-202.
7. Gaine WJ, Smart C, Bransby-Zachary M. Upper limb traumatic amputees: review of prosthetic use. J Hand Surg Br. 1997;22: 73-76.
8. Malone JM, Fleming LL, Roberson J, et al. Immediate, early, and late postsurgical management of upper-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1984;21:33-41.
9. Weeks DL, Wallace SA, Anderson DI. Training with an upper-limb prosthetic simulator to enhance transfer of skill across limbs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:437-443.
10. Hicks RE, Gualtieri CT, Schoeder SR. Cognitive and motor components of bilateral transfer. Am J Psychol. 1983;96:223-228.
11. Karni A, Meyer G, Rey-Hipolito C, et al. The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:861-868.
12. Kumar S, Mandal MK. Bilateral transfer of skill in left-and right-handers. Laterality. 2005;10:337-344.
13. Lee M, Hinder MR, Gandevia SC, Carroll TJ. The ipsilateral motor cortex contributes to cross-limb transfer of performance gains after ballistic motor practice. J Physiol. 2010;558(pt 1):201-212.
14. Schmidt RA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol Rev. 1975;82: 225-260.
15. Shea CH, Wulf G. Schema theory: a critical appraisal and reevaluation. J Mot Behav. 2005;37:85-101.
16. Inui N. Lateralization of bilateral transfer of visuomotor information in righthanders and left-handers. J Mot Behav. 2005;37:275-283.
17. Park JH, Shea CH. Effector independence. J Mot Behav. 2002;34:253-270.
18. Teixeira LA. Timing and force components in bilateral transfer of learning. Brain Cogn. 2000;44:455-469.
19. Christou EA, Rodriguez TM. Time but not force is transferred between ipsilateral upper and lower limbs. J Mot Behav. 2008;40:186-189.
20. Bongers RM, Kyberd PJ, Bouwsema H, et al. Bernstein's levels of construction of movements applied to upper limb prosthetics. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012;24:67-76.
21. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM. Learning to control opening and closing a myoelectric hand. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:1442-1446.
22. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM. The role of order of practice in learning to handle an upper-limb prosthesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1759-1764.
23. Bouwsema H, Kyberd PJ, Hill W, et al. Determining skill level in myoelectric prosthesis use with multiple outcome measures. J Rehabil Res Dev. In press.
24. Parlow SE, Kinsbourne M. Asymmetrical transfer of training between hands: implications for interhemispheric communication in normal brain. Brain Cogn. 1989; 11:98-113.
25. Morris T, Newby NA, Wininger M, Craelius W. Inter-limb transfer of learned ankle movements. Exp Brain Res. 2009;192:33-42.
26. Parker-Taillon D, Kerr R. Manual asymmetries within the performance of a complex motor task. Hum Move Sci. 1989;8:33.
27. van Lunteren A, van Lunteren-Gerritsen GH, Stassen HG, Zuithoff MJ. A field evaluation of arm prostheses for unilateral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1983;7: 141-151.
28. Light CM, Chappell PH, Kyberd PJ. Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83: 776-783.
29. Bakeman R. Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav Res Methods. 2005;37:379-384.
30. Olejnik S, Algina J. Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychol Methods. 2003;8:434-447.
31. Cohen J. Statistical Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1988.
32. Wang J, Sainburg RL. Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92:349-360.
33. Byrd R, Gibson M, Gleason MH. Bilateral transfer across ages 7 to 17 years. Percept Mot Skills. 1986;62:87-90.
34. Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Donchin O, Gazzaniga MS, Shadmehr R. Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89:168-176.
35. Freeman GL. Studies in the psychophysiology of transfer: III. Bilateral practice effects in normal and mirror writing. J Exp Psychol. 1933;16:144-160.
36. Ammons RB, Ammons CH. Bilateral transfer of rotary pursuit skill. Am Psychol. 1951; 6:294-301.
37. Parlow SE, Kinsbourne M. Asymmetrical transfer of braille acquisition between hands. Brain Lang. 1990;39:319-330.
38. Taylor HG, Heilman KM. Left-hemisphere motor dominance in righthanders. Cortex. 1980;16:587-603.
39. Park JH, Shea CH. Effect of practice on effector independence. J Mot Behav. 2003;35:33-40.
40. Kelso JA, Zanone PG. Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer across different effector systems. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002;28:776-797.
41. Kantak SS, Winstein CJ. Learningperformance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: a focused review and perspective. Behav Brain Res. 2012; 228:219-231.
42. Sainburg RL, Ghez C, Kalakanis D. Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. J Neurophysiol. 1999;81:1045-1056.
43. Schabowsky CN, Dromerick AW, Holley RJ, et al. Trans-radial upper extremity amputees are capable of adapting to a novel dynamic environment. Exp Brain Res. 2008;188:589-601.
44. Schöner G. Dynamic theory of actionperception patterns: the "moving room" paradigm. Biol Cybern. 1991;64:455-462.
45. Zaal FT, Bootsma RJ, van Wieringen PC. Coordination in prehension. Informationbased coupling of reaching and grasping. Exp Brain Res. 1998;119:427-435.
46. Pereira EA, Raja K, Gangavalli R. Effect of training on interlimb transfer of dexterity skills in healthy adults. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90:25-34.