Determining skill level in myoelectric prosthesis use with multiple outcome measures

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1331-1348

  Bouwsema, Hanneke ^a   Kyberd, Peter J ^b   Hill, Wendy ^b   van der Sluis, Corry K ^a   Bongers, Raoul M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Amputation; Force control; Kinematics; Motor control; Myoelectric control; Rehabilitation; Skill level; Task perfor mance; Transradial; Upper limb prosthesis; Visual feedback

Indexed keywords

AMPUTATION; MOTOR CONTROL; MYOELECTRIC CONTROL; SKILL LEVELS; TASK PERFOR-MANCE; TRANSRADIAL; UPPER LIMBS; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

FORCE CONTROL; PATIENT REHABILITATION; PROSTHETICS; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

KINEMATICS;

ADULT; ARM AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GAZE; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; MALE; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MYOELECTRIC CONTROL; MYOELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED PROSTHESIS; OBJECT MANIPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SOUTHAMPTON HAND ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE;

ADULT; AMPUTATION; ARM; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOMECHANICS; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84872719533     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 19381352     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2011.09.0179     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Wright V. Prosthetic outcome measures for use with upper limb amputees: A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature, 1970 to 2009. J Prosthet Orthot. 2009;21(Suppl 9):P3-P63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0b013e3181ae9637
2. Desmond DM, MacLachlan M. Factor structure of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) with individuals with acquired upper limb ampu-tations. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(7):506-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000166885.16180.63
3. Hill W, Kyberd PJ, Hermansson L, Hubbard S, Stavdahl Ø, Swanson S. Upper limb prosthetic outcome measures (ULPOM): A working group and their findings. J Prosthet Orthot. 2009;21(Suppl 9):P69-P82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0b013e3181ae970b
4. Lindner HY, Nätterlund BS, Hermansson LM. Upper limb prosthetic outcome measures: review and content comparison based on International Classification of Functioning, Dis-ability and Health. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010;34(2):109-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03093641003776976
5. Light CM, Chappell PH, Kyberd PJ. Establishing a stan-dardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and pros-thetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(6):776-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.32737
6. Miller LA, Swanson S. Summary and recommendations of the academy's state of the science conference on upper limb prosthetic outcome measures. J Prosthet Orthot. 2009; 21(Suppl 9):P83-P89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0b013e3181ae974d
7. Bertels T, Schmalz T, Ludwigs E. Objectifying the func-tional advantages of prosthetic wrist flexion. J Prosthet Orthot. 2009;21:74-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0b013e3181a10f46
8. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM. Movement characteristics of upper extremity prostheses during basic goal-directed tasks. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010; 25(6):523-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.02.011
9. Carey SL, Jason Highsmith M, Maitland ME, Dubey RV. Compensatory movements of transradial prosthesis users during common tasks. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23(9):1128-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.05.008
10. Carey SL, Dubey RV, Bauer GS, Highsmith MJ. Kinematic comparison of myoelectric and body powered prostheses while performing common activities. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009;33(2):179-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03093640802613229
11. Dromerick AW, Schabowsky CN, Holley RJ, Monroe B, Markotic A, Lum PS. Effect of training on upper-extremity prosthetic performance and motor learning: a single-case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(6):1199-1204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.058
12. Fraser C, Wing AW. A case study of reaching by a user of a manually-operated artificial hand. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1981;5(3):151-56.
13. Wing AM, Fraser C. The contribution of the thumb to reaching movements. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1983;35(Pt 2):297-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640748308402135
14. Latash ML, Anson JG. What are "normal movements" in atypical populations? Behav Brain Sci. 1996;19:55-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041467
15. Smurr LM, Gulick K, Yancosek K, Ganz O. Managing the upper extremity amputee: a protocol for success. J Hand Ther. 2008;21(2):160-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2007.09.006
16. Blank A, Okamura AM, Kuchenbecker KJ. Identifying the role of proprioception in upper-limb prosthesis control: Studies on targeted motion. ACM Trans Appl Percept. 2010;7(3):1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1773965.1773966
17. Hermansson LM, Fisher AG, Bernspång B, Eliasson A-C. Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control: a new Rasch-built measure of prosthetic hand control. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(3):166-71.
18. Land MF, Hayhoe M. In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision Res. 2001;41(25-26):3559-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00102-X
19. Schot WD, Brenner E, Smeets JB. Robust movement seg-mentation by combining multiple sources of information. J Neurosci Methods. 2010;187(2):147-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.01.004
20. Kyberd PJ, Murgia A, Gasson M, Tjerks T, Metcalf C, Chappell PH, Warwick K, Lawson SE, Barnhill T. Case studies to demonstrate the range of applications of the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure. Br J Occup Ther. 2009;72:212-18.
21. van Lunteren A, van Lunteren-Gerritsen GH, Stassen HG, Zuithoff MJ. A field evaluation of arm prostheses for uni-lateral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1983;7(3):141-51.
22. Bernstein NA. On dexterity and its development. In: Latash ML, Turvey MT, Bernstein NA, editors. Dexterity and its development. Mahway (NJ): L. Erlbaum Associates; 1996. p. 3-244.
23. Latash LP, Latash ML. A new book by N. A. Bernstein: "On dexterity and its development." J Mot Behav. 1994; 26(1):56-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1994.9941662
24. Beek PJ. Toward a theory of implicit learning in the perceptual-motor domain. Int J Sport Psychol. 2000;31: 547-54.
25. Bongers RM, Zaal FT, Jeannerod M. Hand aperture pat-terns in prehension. Hum Mov Sci. 2012;31(3):487-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2011.07.014