Enhanced visual feedback for slip prevention with a prosthetic hand

Prosthetics and Orthotics International

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 423-429

  Engeberg, Erik D ^a   Meek, Sanford ^b  

^a University of Akron   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Electromyogram; force control; prosthetic hand

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FALL RISK ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MALE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; THUMB; VELOCITY; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

ADULT; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; PRESSURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84874601358     PISSN: 03093646     EISSN: 17461553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0309364612440077     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Atkins D, Heard D, Donovan W. Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper-limb loss and their reported research priorities. J Prosthet Orthot. 1996 ; 8: 2-11
2. Kyberd P, Wartenberg C, Sandsjo L, Jonsson S, Gow D, Frid J, Almstrom C, Sperling L. Survey of upper-extremity prosthesis users in Sweden and the United Kingdom. J Prosthet Orthot. 2007 ; 19: 55-62
3. Childress D. Powered limb prostheses: their clinical significance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1973 ; 20: 200-207
4. Abul-Haj C, Hogan N. Functional assessment of control systems for cybernetic elbow prostheses-part ii: application of the technique. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1990 ; 37: 1037-1047
5. Engeberg E, Meek S. Adaptive sliding mode control for prosthetic hands to simultaneously prevent slip and minimize deformation of grasped objects. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech. :
6. Puchhammer G. The tactile slip sensor: integration of a miniaturized sensory device on an myoelectric hand. Orthopadie-Technik Quart. 2000 ;: 7-12
7. Muzumdar A Powered Upper Limb Prostheses. Berlin: Springer ; 2004 :
8. Connolly C. Prosthetic hands from touch bionics. Industrial Robot. 2008 ; 35: 290-293
9. Carrozza M, Suppo C, Sebastiani F, Massa B, Vecchi F, Lazzarini R, Cutkosky M, Dario P. The spring hand: development of a self-adaptive prosthesis for restoring natural grasping. Auto Robots. 2004 ; 16: 125-141
10. Wettels N, Parnandi A, Moon J, Loeb G, Sukhatme G. Grip control using biomimetic tactile sensing systems. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech. 2009 ; 14: 718-723
11. Cipriani C, Controzzi M, Carrozza M. The smarthand transradial prosthesis. J Neuro Eng Rehabil. 2011 ; 8: 1-13
12. Augurelle A, Smith A, Lejeune T, Thonnard J. Importance of cutaneous feedback in maintaining a secure grip during manipulation of hand-held objects. J Neurophysiol. 2003 ; 89: 665-671
13. Zafar M, Doren CV. Effectiveness of supplemental grasp-force feedback in the presence of vision. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2000 ; 38: 267-274
14. Horch K, Meek S, Taylor T, Hutchinson D. Object discrimination with an artificial hand using electrical stimulation of peripheral tactile and proprioceptive pathways with intrafascicular electrodes. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. :
15. Rossini P, Micera S, Benvenuto A, Carpaneto J, Cavallo G, Citi L, Cipriani C, Denaro L, Denaro V, Pino G, Ferreri F, Guglielmelli E, Hoffmann K, Raspopovic S, Rigosa J, Rossini L, Tombini M, Dario P. Double nerve intraneural interface implant on a human amputee for robotic hand control. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 ; 121: 777-783
16. Dillon G, Horch K. Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005 ; 13: 468-472
17. Meek S, Jacobsen S, Goulding P. Extended physiologic taction: Design and evaluation of a proportional force feedback system. J Rehabil Res Devel. 1989 ; 26: 53-62
18. Scott R, Brittain R, Caldwell R, Cameron A, Dunfield V. Sensory-feedback system compatible with myoelectric control. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1980 ; 18: 65-69
19. Pylatiuk C, Kargov A, Schulz S. Design and evaluation of a low-cost force feedback system for myoelectric prosthetic hands. J Prosthet Orthot. 2006 ; 18: 57-61
20. Philipson L. Adaptable myoelectric prosthetic control with functional visual feedback using microprocessor techniques. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1985 ; 23: 8-14
21. Griffin W, Provancher W, Cutkosky M. Feedback strategies for telemanipulation with shared control of object handling forces. Presence. 2005 ; 14: 720-731
22. Engeberg E, Meek S, Minor M. Hybrid force-velocity sliding mode control of a prosthetic hand. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008 ; 55: 1572-1581
23. Jezernik S, Wassink R, Keller T. Sliding mode closed-loop control of FES: controlling the shank movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 ; 51: 263-272
24. Engeberg E, Meek S. Improved grasp force sensitivity for prosthetic hands through force derivative feedback. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008 ; 55: 817-821
25. Engeberg E, Meek S. Backstepping and sliding mode control hybridized for a prosthetic hand. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2009 ; 17: 70-79
26. Farrell T, Weir R, Heckathorne C, Childress D. The effects of static friction and backlash on extended physiological proprioception control of a powered prosthesis. J Rehabil Res Devel. 2005 ; 42: 327-302
27. Slotine J. Tracking control of non-linear systems using sliding surfaces, with application to robot manipulators. Int J Control. 1983 ; 38: 465-492
28. Slotine J. Sliding controller design for nonlinear systems. Int J Control. 1984 ; 40: 421-430
29. Slotine J, Li W Applied Nonlinear Control. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall ; 2002 :
30. Khalil H Nonlinear Systems. 3 rd edn.Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2002. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall ; 2002 :
31. Sciavicco L, Siciliano B Modeling and Control of Robot Manipulators. 2 nd edn.New York: Springer, 2000. New York: Springer ; 2000 :
32. Netter F Atlas of Human Anatomy. 2 nd edn.New York: Reed Business Information, 1998. New York: Reed Business Information ; 1998 :
33. Johansson R, Westling G, Backstrom A, Flanagan J. Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. J Neurosci. 2001 ; 21: 6917-6932