Case report of modified box and blocks test with motion capture to measure prosthetic function

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 49, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1163-1174

  Hebert, Jacqueline S ^a,b   Lewicke, Justin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b GLENROSE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Kinematics; Motion; Movement; Outcome and process assessment; Outcome measures; Rehabilitation outcome; Traumatic amputation; Treatment outcome; Upper limb

Indexed keywords

MOTION; MOVEMENT; OUTCOME MEASURES; PROCESS ASSESSMENTS; REHABILITATION OUTCOMES; TRAUMATIC AMPUTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOMES; UPPER LIMBS;

BIOMECHANICS; KINEMATICS; RESEARCH; SURGERY; TESTING;

PROSTHETICS;

ADULT; ARM AMPUTATION; ARM PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; BODY POWERED PROSTHESIS; CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC LIMB PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION STORAGE; KINEMATICS; KNEE AMPUTATION; LIMB MOVEMENT; MALE; MODIFIED BOX AND BLOCKS TEST; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; MUSCLE REINNERVATION; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; TARGETED MUSCLE REINNERVATION;

AMPUTATION; ARM; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION; MOVEMENT; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84874324965     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 19381352     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0207     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hill W, Kyberd P, Hermansson LN, Hubbard S, Stavdahl Ø, Swanson S. Upper limb prosthetic outcome measures (ULPOM): a working group and their findings. J Prosthet Orthot. 2009;21(9):69-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0b013e3181ae970b
2. World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, Disability and health: ICF Beginner's Guide (WHO/EIP/GPE/CAS/01.3). Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 2002.
3. Miller LA, Swanson S. Summary and recommendations of the Academy's State of the Science Conference on upper limb prosthetic outcome measures. J Prosthet Orthot. 2009;21(9): 83-89 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0b013e3181ae974d
4. Wright V. Prosthetic outcome measures for use with upper limb amputees: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature, 1970-2009. J Prosthet Orthot. 2009;21:3-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0b013e3181ae96371173
5. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39(6):386-91. [PMID:3160243] http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.39.6.386
6. Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, Dutil E, Mercier L. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(7):751-55. [PMID:8024419]
7. Mendes MF, Tilbery CP, Balsimelli S, Moreira MA, Cruz AM. [Box and block test of manual dexterity in normal subjects and in patients with multiple sclerosis]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2001;59(4):889-94 Portuguese. [PMID:11733833] http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2001000600010
8. Canny ML, Thompson JM, Wheeler MJ. Reliability of the box and block test of manual dexterity for use with patients with fibromyalgia. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63(4):506-10. [PMID:19708480] http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.63.4.506
9. Kuiken TA, Miller LA, Lipschutz RD, Lock BA, Stubblefield K, Marasco PD, Zhou P, Dumanian GA. Targeted reinnervation for enhanced prosthetic arm function in a woman with a proximal amputation: a case study. Lancet. 2007;369(9559):371-80. [PMID:17276777] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60193-7
10. Hijjawi JB, Kuiken TA, Lipschutz RD, Miller LA, Stubblefield KA, Dumanian GA. Improved myoelectric prosthesis control accomplished using multiple nerve transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(7):1573-78. [PMID:17102730] http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000242487.62487.fb
11. Miller LA, Stubblefield KA, Lipschutz RD, Lock BA, Kuiken TA. Improved myoelectric prosthesis control using targeted reinnervation surgery: a case series. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008;16(1):46-50. [PMID:18303805] http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2007.911817
12. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM. Movement characteristics of upper extremity prostheses during basic goal-directed tasks. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010; 25(6):523-29. [PMID:20362374] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.02.011
13. Doeringer JA, Hogan N. Performance of above elbow bodypowered prostheses in visually guided unconstrained motion tasks. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995;42(6):621-31. [PMID:7790019] http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/10.387202
14. Miller LA, Lipschutz RD, Stubblefield KA, Lock BA, Huang H, Williams TW 3rd, Weir RF, Kuiken TA. Control of a six degree of freedom prosthetic arm after targeted muscle reinnervation surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89(11):2057-65. [PMID:18996233] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.05.016
15. Kuiken TA, Li G, Lock BA, Lipschutz RD, Miller LA, Stubblefield KA, Englehart KB. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. JAMA. 2009;301(6):619-28. [PMID:19211469] http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.116
16. Black N, Biden EN, Rickards J. Using potential energy to measure work related activities for persons wearing upper limb prostheses. Robotica. 2005;23(3):319-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0263574704001341.
17. Murgia A, Kyberd PJ, Chappell PH, Light CM. Marker placement to describe the wrist movements during activities of daily living in cyclical tasks. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004;19(3):248-54 [PMID:15003339] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.11.012
18. Williams S, Schmidt R, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. An upper body model for the kinematical analysis of the joint chain of the human arm. J Biomech. 2006;39(13):2419-29. [PMID:16159659] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.023
19. van Andel CJ, Wolterbeek N, Doorenbosch CA, Veeger DH, Harlaar J. Complete 3D kinematics of upper extremity functional tasks. Gait Posture. 2008;27(1):120-27. [PMID:17459709] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.03.002
20. Wu G, van der Helm FC, Veeger HE, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C, Nagels J, Karduna AR, McQuade K, Wang X, Werner FW, Buchholz B; International Society of Biomechanics. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion-Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech. 2005;38(5):981-92 [PMID:15844264] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042
21. Rau G, Disselhorst-Klug C, Schmidt R. Movement biomechanics goes upwards: from the leg to the arm. J Biomech. 2000;33(10):1207-16. [PMID:10899329] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00062-2
22. Hermansson LM, Fisher AG, Bernspång B, Eliasson AC. Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control: a new Rasch-built measure of prosthetic hand control. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(3):166-71 [PMID:16040474]
23. Carey SL, Jason Highsmith M, Maitland ME, Dubey RV. Compensatory movements of transradial prosthesis users during common tasks. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008; 23(9):1128-35. [PMID:18675497] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.05.008
24. Carey SL, Dubey RV, Bauer GS, Highsmith MJ. Kinematic comparison of myoelectric and body powered prostheses while performing common activities. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009;33(2):179-86. [PMID:19367522] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03093640802613229
25. Stein RB, Walley M. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983;64(6):243-48. [PMID:6860093]