Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: Review

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 187-211

  Holden, Maureen K ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVALESCENCE; DEVELOPMENTAL COORDINATION DISORDER; EYE HAND COORDINATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GAIT; GRIP STRENGTH; HEADACHE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; KINEMATICS; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MOTION SICKNESS; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; NAUSEA; PARKINSON DISEASE; PATIENT MOBILITY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; REVIEW; SENSORY STIMULATION; SIMULATION; SOMNOLENCE; STROKE; TELECOMMUNICATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VIRTUAL REALITY; VOMITING; WHEELCHAIR;

DISABLED PERSONS; EXERCISE; GAIT; HUMANS; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; ORTHOPEDICS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SOFTWARE; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; TELEMETRY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WHEELCHAIRS;

EID: 20544477178     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187     Document Type: Review

References (121)

1. Durlach, N.I., & Mavor, A.S. (eds.). (1995). Virtual reality: scientific and technological challanges. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2. Burdea, G.C., & Coiffet, P. (2003). Virtual reality technology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
3. Stanney, K.M. (ed.). (2002). Handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Nichols, S. (1999). Physical ergonomics of virtual environment use. Applied Ergonomics 30:79-90.
5. Stanney, K.M., Kennedy, R.S., Drexleer, J.M., et al. (1999). Motion sickness and proprioceptive after effects following virtual environment exposure. Applied Ergonomics 30:27-38.
6. Riva, G., Wiederhold, B., & Molinari, E. (eds.). (1998). Virtual environments in clinical psychology and neuroscience: methods and techniques in advanced patient-therapist interaction. Amsterdam: IOS Press, Section I, pp. 1-59. Online: http://www.cybertherapy.info/pages/book2.htm
7. Lewis, C.H., & Griffen, M.J. (1997). Human factors consideration in clinical applications of virtual reality. In: Riva, G. (ed.), Virtual reality in neuro-psychophysiology. Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 35-56.
8. Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D.J., DeFanti, T.A., et al. (1992). The CAVE automatic virtual environment. Communications of the ACM 38:64-72.
9. Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D.J., & DeFanti, T.A. (1993). Surround screen projection-based virtual reality: The design and implementation of the CAVE. Computer Graphics: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 135-142.
10. Nixon, MA., McCallum, B.C., Fright, W.R., et al. (1998). The effects of metals and interfering fields on electromagnetic trackers. Presence 7:204-218.
11. Gor, M., McCloy, R., Stone, R., et al. (2003). Virtual reality laparoscopic simulator for assessment in gynaecology. BJOG 110:181-187.
12. Ali, M.R., Mowery, Y., Kaplan, B., et al. (2002). Training the novice in laparoscopy. Surgical Endoscopy 16(12):1732-1736.
13. Bouzit, M., Burdea, G., Popescu, G., et al. (2002). The Rutgers Master II-new design force-feedback glove. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 7: 256-263.
14. Holden, M., & Dyar, T. (2002). Virtual environment training: a new tool for neurorehabilitation. Neurology Report 26:62-71.
15. Holden, M., & Todorov, E. (2002). Use of virtual environments in motor learning and rehabilitation. In: Stanney, K. (ed.), Handbook of virtual environment technology. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 999-1026.
16. Rizzo, A.A., Buckwalter, G., & van der Zaag, C. (2002). Virtual environment applications in clinical neuropsychology. In: Stanney, K. (ed.), Handbook of virtual environment technology. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1027-1064.
17. Rose, F.D., Attree, E.A., Brooks, B.M., et al. (1998). Virtual environments in brain damage rehabilitation: a rationale from basic neuroscience. In: Riva, G., Wiederhold, B.K. & Molinari, E. (eds.), Virtual environments in clinical psychology and neuroscience. Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 233-242.
18. Bilodeau, E.A., & Bilodeau, I.M. (1962). Motor skills learning. Annual Reviews of Psychology 13:243-280.
19. Nudo, R.J., Milliken, G.W., Jenkins, W.M., et al. (1996). Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience 16:785-807.
20. Merzenich, M.M., Nelson, R.J., Stryker, M.P., et al. (1984). Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology 224:591-605.
21. Miller, K.D., Keller, J.B., & Stryker, M.P. (1989). Ocular dominance column development: analysis and simulation. Science 245:605-615.
22. Allard, T., Clark, S.A., Jenkins, W.M., & Merzenich, M.M. (1991). Reorganization of somatosensory areas 3b representations in adult owl monkeys after digital syndactyly. Journal of Neurophysiology 66: 1048-1058.
23. Recanzone, G.H., Merzenich, M.M., Jenkins, W.M., et al. (1992). Topographic reorganization of the hand representation in cortical area 3b of owl monkeys trained in a frequency discrimination task. Journal of Neurophysiology 67:1031-1056.
24. Dinse, H.R., Recansone, G.H., & Merzenich, M.M. (1993). Alterations in correlated activity parallel ICMS-induced representational plasticity. Neuro-Report 5:173-176.
25. Padoa Schioppa, C., Li, C.-S.R., & Bizzi, E. (2002). Neuronal correlates of kinematics-to-dynamics transformation in the supplementary motor area. Neuron 36:751-765.
26. Li, C.-S.R., Padoa Schioppa, C., & Bizzi, E. (2001). Neuronal correlates of motor performance and motor learning in the primary motor cortex of monkeys adapting to an external force field. Neuron 30:593-607.
27. Gandolfo, F., Li, C.-S.R., Benda, B.J., et al. (2000). Cortical correlates of learning in monkeys adapting to a new dynamical environment. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA 97:2259-2263.
28. Wise, S.P., Moody, S.L., Blomstrom, K.J., et al. (1998). Changes in motor cortical activity during visuomotor adaptation. Experimental Brain Research 121:285-299.
29. Kleim, J.A., Barbay, S., Cooper, N.R., et al. (2002). Motor learning-dependent synaptogenesis is localized to functionally reorganized motor cortex. Neurobiology of Learning & Memory 77:63-77.
30. Greenough, W.T., Larson, J.R., & Withers, G.S. (1985). Effects of unilateral and bilateral training in a reaching task on dendritic branching of neurons in the rat motor-sensory forelimb cortex. Behavioral and Neural Biology 44:301-314.
31. Kleimm, J.A. Lussnig, E., Schwarz, E.R., et al. (1996). Synaptogenesis and FOS expression in the motor cortex of the adult rat after motor skill learning. Journal of Neuroscience 16:4529-4535.
32. Hess, G., & Donoghue, J.P. (1994). Long-term potentiation of horizontal connections provides a mechanism to reorganize cortical motor maps. Journal of Neurophysiology 71:2543-2547.
33. Keller, A., Iriki, A., & Asanuma, H. (1990). Identification of neurons producing LTP in the cat motor cortex: intracellular recordings and labeling. Journal of Comparative Neurology 300:47-60.
34. Plautz, E.J., Milliken, G.W., & Nudo, R.J. (2000). Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiology of Learning & Memory 74:27-55.
35. Kleim, J.A., Cooper, N.R., & VandenBerg, P.M. (2002). Exercise induces angiogenesis but does not alter movement representations within rat motor cortex. Brain Research 934:1-6.
36. Nudo, R., & Milliken, G.W. (1996). Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology 75:2144-2149.
37. Nudo, R., Wise, S.P., SiFuentes, F., et al. (1996). Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272:1791-1794.
38. Nudo, R. (2003). Adaptive plasticity in motor cortex: implications for rehabilitation after brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 41:7-10.
39. Goldberg, S. (1994). Training dismounted soldiers in a distributed interactive virtual environment. U.S. Army Research Institute Newsletter 14:9-12.
40. Lampton, D.R., Knerr, B.W., Goldberg, S.L., et al. (1994). The virtual environment performance assessment battery (VEPAD): development and evaluation. Presence 3:145-157.
41. Regian, J.W., Shebilske, W.L., & Monk, J.M. (1992). Virtual reality: an instructional medium for visual spatial tasks. Journal of Communication 7:131-145.
42. Theasby, P.J. (1992). The virtues of virtual reality. GEC Review 7:131-145.
43. Lintern, G., Roscoe, J.M., Koonce, J.M., et al. (1990). Transfer of landing skills in begining flight simulation. Human Factors 32:319-327.
44. Lintern, G., Roscoe, J.M., Koonce, J.M., et al. (1990). Display principles, control dynamics and environmental factors in pilot training and transfer. Human Factors 32:299-317.
45. Bliss, J.P., Tidwell, P.D., & Guest, M.A. (1997). The effectiveness of virtual reality for administering spatial navigation training to firefighters. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6:73-86.
46. Todorov, E., Shadmer, R., & Bizzi, E. (1997). Augmented feedback presented in a virtual environment accelerates learning of a difficult motor task. Journal of Motor Behavior 29:147-158.
47. Rose, F.D., Attree, E.A., Brooks, B.M., et al. (2000). Training in virtual environments: transfer to real world tasks and equivalence to real task training. Ergonomics 43:494-511.
48. Brooks, B., McNeil, J.E., Rose, F.D., et al. (1999). Route learning in a case of amnesia: a preliminary investigation into the efficacy of training in a virtual environment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 9:63-76.
49. Baddeley, A.D., & Wilson, B.A. (1994). When implicit learning fails: amnesia and the problem of error elimination. Neuropsychologia 32:53-68.
50. Webster, J.S., McFarland, PT., Rapport, L.J., et al. (2001). Computer-assisted training for improving wheelchair mobility in unilateral neglect patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 82: 769-775.
51. Jaffe, D.L., Brown, D.A., Pierson-Carey, C.D., et al. (2004). Stepping over obstacles to improve walking in individuals with post-stroke hemiplegia. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 41:283-292.
52. Morasso, P. (1981). Spatial control of arm movements. Experimental Brain Research 42:223-227.
53. Flash, T., & Hogan, N. (1985). The coordination of the arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. Journal of Neuroscience 7:1688-1703.
54. Bizzi, E., Mussa-Ivaldi, F.A., & Shadmehr, R. (1996). System for Human Trajectory Learning in Virtual Environments. U.S. patent no. 5,554,033. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
55. Holden, M.K. (2001). Neurorehabilitation using "learning by imitation" in virtual environments. In: Smith, J.S.G., Harris, D., & Koubek, R.J. (eds.), Usability evaluation and interface design: cognitive engineering, intelligent agents and virtual reality. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 624-628.
56. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., et al. (1999). Resonance behaviors and mirror neurons. Archives Italiennes de Biologie 137:85-100.
57. Holden, M., Todorov, E., Callahan, J., et al. (1999). Virtual environment training improves motor performance in two patients with stroke: case report. Neurology Report 23:57-67.
58. Holden, M.K., Dyar, T., Schwamm, L., et al. (2005). Virtual environment-based telerehabilitation in patients with stroke. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments (in press, 14[2] April).
59. Fugl-Meyer, A.R., Jaasko, L., Leyman, I., et al. (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandanavian Journal of Rehabilitation 7:13-31.
60. Mahurin, R.K., Debettignies, B.J., & Pirozzolo, F.J. (1991). Structured assessment of independent living skills: preliminary report of a performance measure of functional abilities in dementia. Journal of Gerontology 46:58-66.
61. Holden, M.K., Dyar, T., Callahan, J., et al. (2001). Quantitative assessment of motor generalization in the real world following training in a virtual environment in patients with stroke. Neurology Report 25:129-130.
62. Holden, M.K., Dyar, T., Callahan, J., et al. (2000). Motor learning and generalization following virtual environment training in a patient with stroke. Neurology Report 24:170-71.
63. Morris, D.M., Uswatte, G., Crago, J.E., et al. (2001). The reliability of the Wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 82: 750-755.
64. Wolf, S.L., Catlin, P.A., Ellis, M., et al. (2001). Assessing the Wolf motor function test as an outcome measure for research with patients post-stroke. Stroke 32:1635-1639.
65. Jack, D., Boian, R., Merians, A.S., et al. (2001). Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 9:308-318.
66. Boian, R.F., Sharma, A., Han, C., et al. (2002). Virtual reality-based post-stroke hand rehabilitation: medicine meets virtual reality. Newport Beach, CA. IOS Press.
67. Merians, A.S., Jack, D., Boian, R., et al. (2002). Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Physical Therapy 82:898-915.
68. Wolf, S.L., Blanton, S., Baer, H., et al. (2002). The emergence of repetitive task practice in upper extremity neurorehabilitation of patients with stroke: a critical review of constraint induced movement therapy and mechanisms related to TMS. The Neurologist 8:325-338.
69. Taub, E., & Wolf, S.L. (1997). Constraint induction techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 4:38-61.
70. Jebsen, R.H., Taylor, N., Trieschmann, R.B., et al. (1969). An objective and standardized test of hand function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 50:311-319.
71. Adamovich, S.V., Merians, A.S., Boian, R., et al. (2003). A virtual reality-based exercise system for hand rehabilitation post-stroke. Presented at the 2nd International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation, Piscataway, NJ.
72. Broeren, J., Georgsson, M., Rydmark, M., et al. (2002). Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation with the assistance of haptics and telemedicine. Presented at the 4th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality & Associated Technologies, Veszprem, Hungary.
73. Hilton, D., Cobb, S., Pridmore, T., et al. (2002). Virtual reality and stroke rehabilitation: a tangible interface to an everyday task. Presented at the 4th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality & Associated Technologies, Veszprem, Hungary.
74. Piron, L., Cenni, E, Tonin, P., et al. (2001). Virtual reality as an assessment tool for arm motor deficits after brain lesions. Studies in Health Technology and Infomatics 81:386-392.
75. Boian, R.F., Deutsch, J.E., Lee, C.S., et al. (2003). Haptic effects for virtual reality-based post-stroke rehabilitation. Presented at the 11th Symposium on Haptic Inerfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems, Los Angeles.
76. Boian, R.F., Lee, C.S., Deutch, J.E., et al. (2002). Virtual reality-based system for ankle rehabilitation post stroke. Presented at the 1st International Workshop on Virtual Reality Rehabilitation (Mental Health, Neurological, Physical, Vocational), VRMHR 2002, Lausanne, Switzerland.
77. Deutsch, J.E., Latonio, J., Burdea, G.C., et al. (2001). Post-stroke rehabilitation with the Rutgers Ankle system: a case study. Presence 10:416-430.
78. Boian, R.E, Kourtev, H., Erickson, K, et al. (2003). Dual Stewart-platform gait rehabilitation system for individuals post-stroke. Presented at the 2nd International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation, Piscataway, NJ.
79. Yoon, J., Ryu, J., & Burdea, G. (2003). Design and analysis of a novel virtual walking machine. Presented at the 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for VE and Teleoperator Systems, Los Angeles.
80. Connor, B.B., Wing, A.M., Humphreys, G.W., et al. (2002). Errorless learning using haptic guidance: research in cognitive rehabilitation following stroke. Presented at the 4th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality & Associated Techologies, Veszprem, Hungary.
81. Wilson, B.A., Baddeley, A.D., Evans, J.J., et al. (1994). Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impaired people. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 4:307-326.
82. Wilson, B.A., & Evan, J.J. (1996). Error-free learning in the rehabilitation of individuals with memory impairments. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 11:54-64.
83. Rose, F.D., Brooks, B.M., Attree, E.A., et al. (1999). A preliminary investigation into the use of virtual environments in memory retraining after vascular brain injury: indications for future strategy? Disability and Rehabilitation 21:548-554.
84. Foreman, N., Orencas, C. Nicholas, E., et al. (1989). Spatial awareness in seven to 11-year-old physically handicapped children in mainstream schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education 4:171-178.
85. Wilson, P.N., Foreman, N., & Tlauka, M. (1996). Transfer of spatial information from a virtual to a real environment in physically disabled children. Disability and Rehabilitation 18:663-637.
86. Broeren, J., Lundberg, M., Molen, T., et al. (2003). Virtual reality and haptics as an assessment tool for patients with visuospatial neglect: a preliminary study. In: Burdea, G., Thalmann, D., & Lewis, J.A. (eds.), 2nd International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University, pp. 27-32.
87. Halligan, P.W., Marshall, J.C., & Wade, D.T. (1989). Visuospatial neglect: underlying factors and test sensitivity. Lancet 2:908-911.
88. Tham, KT.R. (1996). The baking tray task: a test of spatial neglect. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 6: 19-25.
89. Holden, M.K., Dettwiler, A., Dyar, T., et al. (2002). Virtual environment training improves functional movement in patients with acquired brain injury. Presented at the American Society of Neurorehabilitation, Philadelphia.
90. Holden, M., Dettwiler, A., Dyar, T., et al. (2001). Retraining movement in patients with acquired brain injury using a virtual environment. In: Westwood, H.M.H., Mogel, G.T., Stredney, D., et al. (eds.), Medicine meets virtual reality. Newport Beach, CA: IOS Press, pp. 192-198.
91. Davies, R.C., Lofgren, E., Wallergard, M., et al. (2002). Three applications of virtual reality for brain injury rehabilitation of daily tasks. Presented at the 4th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality & Associated Technologies, Veszprem, Hungary.
92. Zhang, L., Abreu, B.C., Seale, G.S., et al. (2003). A virtual reality environment for evaluation of daily living skill in brain injury rehabilitation: reliability and validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 84:1118-1124.
93. Prothero, J. (1993). The treatment of Akinesia using virutal images [Master's thesis]. Seattle: University of Washington.
94. Weghorst, S., Prothero, J., Furness, T., et al. (1994). Virtual images in the treatment of Parkinson's disease akinesia. Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II 242-243.
95. Weghorst, S. (1997). Augmented reality and Parkinson's disease. Communications of the ACM Aug: 47-48.
96. Emmett, A. (1994). Virtual reality helps stead the gait of Parkinson's patients. Computer Graphics World 17-18.
97. Riess, T.W.S. (1995). Augmented reality in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. In: Morgan, K., Satava, M., Sieburg, H.B., et al. (eds.), Interactive technology and the new paradigm for healthcare. Amsterdam: IOS Press pp. 298-302.
98. Albani, G., Pignatti, R., Bertella, L., et al. (2002). Common daily activities in the virtual environment: a preliminary study in parkinsonian patients. Neurological Sciences 23:S49-S50.
99. Mesulam, M.M. (1985). Principles of behavioral neurology. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
100. Key, A. (1941) L'examen psychologique dans le cas d'encephalopathie traumatique. Archives of Psychology 28:296-340.
101. Cooper, R.A., Spaeth, D.M. Jones, D.K., et al. (2002). Comparison of virtual and real electric powered wheelchair driving using a position sensing joystick and an isometric joystick. Medical Engineering & Physics 24:703-708.
102. Fehr, L., Langbein, W.E., & Skaar, S.B. (2000). Adequacy of power wheelchair control interfaces for persons with severe disabilities: a clinical survey. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 37:353-360.
103. Gourlay, D., Lun, K.C., Lee, Y.N., et al. (2000). Virtual reality for relearning daily living skills. International Journal of Medical Infomatics 60:225-261.
104. McComas, J., & Sveistrup, H. (2002). Virtual reality applications for prevention, disability awareness, and physical therapy rehabilitation in neurology: our recent work. Neurology Report 26:55-61.
105. McComas, J., MacKay, M., & Pivik, J. (2002). Effectiveness of virtual reality for teaching pedestrian safety. CyberPsychology & Behavior 5:185-190.
106. Kizony, R., Katz, N., Weingarden, H., et al. (2002). Immersion without encumbrance: adapting a virtual reality system for the rehabilitation of individuals with stroke and spinal cord injury. Presented at the 4th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality & Associated Technologies, Veszprem, Hungary.
107. Whitney, S.L., Sparto, P.J., Brown, K.E., et al. (2002). The potential use of virtual reality in vestibular rehabilitation: preliminary findings with the BNAVE. Neurology Report 26:72-78.
108. Keshner, E.A.K. (2000). The influence of an immersive virtual environment on the segmental organization of postural stabilizing responses. Journal of Vestibular Research 10:207-219.
109. Kenyon, R.V., DeFanti, T.A., & Sandin, D.J. (1995). Visual requirements for virtual environment generation. Journal of Soc. Inform. Display 3:211-214.
110. Girone, M., Burdea, G., Bouzit, M., et al. (2000). Orthopedic rehabilitation using the "Rutgers Ankle" interface. In: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality. Newport Beach, CA: IOS Press, pp. 89-95.
111. Girone, M., Burdea, G., Bouzit, M., et al. (2001). A Stewart Platform-based system for ankle telerehabilitation. Autonomous Robots 10:203-212.
112. Deutsch, J.E., Latonio, J., Burdea, G.G., et al. (2001). Rehabilitation of musculoskeletal injuries using the Rutgers Ankle haptic interface: three case reports. Eurohaptics Conference, Birmingham, UK, pp. 11-16.
113. Rosen, M. (1999). Telerehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation 12:11-26.
114. Holden, M.K., Dyar, T., Schwamm, L., et al. (2003). Home-based telerehabilitation using a virtual environment system. In: Burdea, G., Thalmann, D., Lewis, J.A. (eds.), 2nd International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University, pp. 4-12.
115. Dyar, T.A., & Holden, M.K. (2005). Telerehabilitation system for motor training: design and development. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development (in review).
116. Piron, L., Tonin, P., Atzori, A., et al. (2003). A virtual reality-based motor tele-rehabilitation system. In: Burdea, G., Thalmann, D., Lewis, J.A. (eds.), 2nd International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University, pp. 21-26.
117. Reinkensmeyer, D.J., Pang, C.T., Nessler, J.A., et al. (2002). Web-based telerehabilitation for the upper extremity after stroke. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 10:102-108.
118. Burdea, G., Popescu, V, Hentz, V., et al. (2000). Virtual reality-based orthopedic telerehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 8:430-432.
119. Popescu, V.G., Burdea, G.G., Bouzit, M., et al. (2000). A virtual-reality-based telerehabilitation system with force feedback. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 4:45-51.
120. Holden, M.K., Dyar, T., Schwamm, L., et al. (2003). Telerehabilitation: development and initial testing of a remotely operated computerized motor training system to provide patients with home-based therapy via the Internet. Neurology Report 26:198.
121. Holden, M.K., Dyar, T., Dayan-Cimadoro, L., et al. (2004). Virtual environment training in the home via telerehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 85(8):E12. Available: 〈www.archives-pmr. org〉.