Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Bouwsema, Hanneke ^a   Van Der Sluis, Corry K ^a   Bongers, Raoul M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Amputee; Grip force control; Kinematics; Motor control; Myoelectric control; Rehabilitation; Skill level; Task performance; Transradial; Upper limb prosthesis; Visual feedback

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC HAND; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; HAND FUNCTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; LEARNING; MALE; MYOELECTRIC CONTROL; NORMAL HUMAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; RIGIDITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; TRAINING; VELOCITY; YOUNG ADULT; ARM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; TEACHING;

ARM; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; TEACHING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84897607076     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-16     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. The roles of predisposing characteristics, established need, and enabling resources on upper extremity prosthesis use and abandonment. Biddiss E, Chau T, Disabil Rehabil Assist Tech 2007 2 71 84 10.1080/17483100601138959
2. Considerations for developing an evidence-based practice in orthotics and prosthetics. Ramstrand N, Brodtkorb TH, Prosth Orthot Int 2008 32 93 102 10.1080/03093640701838190
3. The use of preparatory/evaluation/training prostheses in developing evidence-based practice in upper limb prosthetics. Brenner CD, Brenner JK, J Prosth Orthot 2008 20 70 82 10.1097/JPO.0b013e31817c59fb
4. Effect of training on upper-extremity prosthetic performance and motor learning: a single-case study. Dromerick AW, Schabowsky CN, Holley RJ, Monroe B, Markotic A, Lum PS, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008 89 1199 204 10.1016/j.apmr.2007. 09.058 18503820
5. Feedforward control strategies of subjects with transradial amputation in planar reaching. Metzger AJ, Dromerick AW, Schabowsky CN, Holley RJ, Monroe B, Lum PS, J Rehabil Res Dev 2010 47 201 212 10.1682/JRRD.2009.06.0075 20665346
6. Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey. Østlie K, LesjØ IM, Franklin RJ, Garfelt B, Skjeldal OH, Magnus P, Disabil Rehabil: Assist Techn 2011 7 294 303
7. Trans-radial upper extremity amputees are capable of adapting to a novel dynamic environment. Schabowsky CN, Dromerick AW, Holley RJ, Monroe B, Lum PS, Exp Brain Res 2008 188 589 601 10.1007/s00221-008-1394-9 18443766
8. Movement characteristics of upper extremity prostheses during basic goal-directed tasks. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM, Clin Biomech 2010 25 523 529 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.02.011
9. Compensatory movements of transradial prosthesis users during common tasks. Carey SL, Highsmith MJ, Maitland ME, Dubey RV, Clin Biomech 2008 23 1128 1135 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.05.008
10. Kinematic comparison of myoelectric and body powered prostheses while performing common activities. Carey SL, Dubey RV, Bauer GS, Highsmith MJ, Prosthet Orthot Int 2009 33 179 186 10.1080/03093640802613229 19367522
11. Performance of above elbow body-powered prostheses in visually guided unconstrained motion tasks. Doeringer JA, Hogan N, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1995 42 621 631 10.1109/10.387202 7790019
12. Kinematic evaluation of terminal devices for kayaking with upper extremity amputation. Highsmith MJ, Carey SL, Koelsch KW, Lusk CP, Maitland ME, J Prosth Orthot 2007 19 84 90 10.1097/JPO.0b013e31806ada2f
13. Characterization of compensatory trunk movements during prosthetic upper limb reaching tasks. Metzger AJ, Dromerick AW, Holley RJ, Lum PS, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012 93 2029 2034 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.011 22449551
14. The role of variability in practice structure when learning to use an upper-extremity prosthesis. Weeks DL, Anderson DI, Wallace SA, J Prosthet Orthot 2003 15 84 92 10.1097/00008526-200307000-00006
15. Control processes in motor skills. Schmidt RA, Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1976 4 229 261 828577
16. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Krakauer JW, Curr Opin Neurol 2006 19 84 90 10.1097/01.wco.0000200544.29915.cc 16415682
17. Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Hubbard IJ, Parsons MW, Neilson C, Carey LM, Occ Ther Int 2009 16 175 189 10.1002/oti.275
18. Qualitative and quantitative change in the dynamics of motor learning. Liu YT, Mayer-Kress G, Newell KM, J Exp Psych: Human Perc Perf 2006 32 380 393
19. How is a motor skill learned? Change and invariance at the levels of task success and trajectory control. Shmuelhof L, Krakauer JW, Mazzoni P, J Neurophys 2012 108 578 594 10.1152/jn.00856.2011
20. Motor learning and occupational therapy: the organization of practice. Jarus T, Am J Occ Ther 1994 48 810 816 10.5014/ajot.48.9.810
21. Motor learning: a practical framework for paediatric physiotherapy. Larin HM, Phys Theor Pract 1998 14 33 47 10.3109/09593989809070042
22. Application of motor learning principles in occupational therapy. Poole JL, Am J Occ Ther 1991 45 531 537 10.5014/ajot.45.6.531
23. Time scales in motor learning and development. Newell KM, Liu YT, Mayer-Kress G, Psych Rev 2001 108 57 82
24. Spacing practice sessions across days benefits the learning of motor skills. Shea CH, Lai Q, Black C, Park JH, Hum Mov Sci 2000 19 737 760 10.1016/S0167-9457(00)00021-X
25. Influence of task-oriented training content on skilled arm-hand performance in stroke: a systematic review. Timmermans AAA, Spooren AIF, Kingma H, Seelen HAM, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010 24 858 870 10.1177/ 1545968310368963 20921325
26. A case study of reaching by a user of a manually-operated artificial hand. Fraser C, Wing AW, Prosthet Orthot Int 1981 5 151 156 7329778
27. The contribution of the thumb to reaching movements. Wing AW, Fraser C, Q J Exp Psychol 1983 35A 297 309
28. Skill acquisition: action, movement, and neuromotor processes. Gentile AM, Movement Science: Foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publication, J. Carr & R. Shepherd, 2 2000 111 188
29. Motor control and motor learning: implications for treatment of individuals post stroke. Gilmore PE, Spaulding SJ, Phys Occ Ther Ger 2001 20 1 15
30. A field evaluation of arm prostheses for unilateral amputees. Van Lunteren A, van Lunteren-Gerritsen GH, Stassen HG, Zuithoff MJ, Prosthet Orthot Int 1983 7 141 151 6647010
31. Managing the upper extremity amputee: a protocol for success. Smurr LM, Gulick K, Yanosek K, Ganz O, J Hand Ther 2008 21 160 175 10.1197/j.jht.2007.09. 006 18436138
32. Precision-grip force changes in anatomical and prosthetic limb during predictable load increases. Weeks DL, Wallace SA, Noteboom JT, Exp Brain Res 2000 132 404 410 10.1007/s002210000337 10883390
33. The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control. Saunders I, Vijayakumar S, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011 8 60 10.1186/1743-0003-8-60 22032545
34. Complete 3D kinematics of upper extremity functional tasks. Van Andel CJ, Wolterbeek N, Doorenbosch CAM, Veeger HEJ, Harlaar J, Gait Posture 2008 27 120 127 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.03.002 17459709
35. Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. Light CM, Chappell PH, Kyberd PJ, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 83 776 783 10.1053/apmr.2002.32737 12048655
36. The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) website. http://www.shap.ecs.soton.ac.uk/
37. Robust movement segmentation by combining multiple sources of information. Schot WD, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ, J Neurosci Meth 2010 187 147 155
38. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion-Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. Wu G, van der Helm FCT, Veeger HEJ, Makhsous M, Van Roy R, Anglin C, Nagels J, Karduna AR, McQuade K, Wang X, Werner FW, Buchholz B, J Biomech 2005 38 981 992 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042 15844264
39. Joint angle variability and co-variation in a reaching with a rod task. Van der Steen MC, Bongers RM, Exp Brain Res 2011 208 411 422 10.1007/s00221-010-2493-y 21127846
40. Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Bakeman R, Behav Res Methods 2005 37 379 384 10.3758/BF03192707 16405133
41. Cohen J, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences New York: Academic Press 2 1988
42. Magill RA, Motor Learning and Control: concepts and applications Boston Mass: Mcgraw Hill Higher Education 8 2007
43. A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Magill RA, Hall KG, Hum Mov Sci 1990 9 241 249 10.1016/0167- 9457(90)90005-X
44. Contextual interference: a meta-analytic study. Brady F, Percept Mot Skills 2004 99 116 126 15446636
45. The role of order of practice in learning to handle an upper-limb prosthesis. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008 89 1759 1764 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.046 18675393
46. The effects of the amount and variability of practice on the learning of multi-segmented motor task. Proteau L, Blandin Y, Alain C, Dorion A, Acta Psychol 1994 85 61 74 10.1016/0001-6918(94)90020-5
47. Prosthetic management and training of upper limb amputees. Dakpa R, Heger H, Curr Orthop 1997 11 193 202 10.1016/S0268-0890(97)90034-7
48. A comparison of the grip force distribution in natural hands and in prosthetic hands. Kargov A, Pylatiuk C, Martin J, Schulz S, Döderlein L, Disabil Rehabil 2004 26 705 711 10.1080/09638280410001704278 15204492
49. Compliant grasp in a myoelectric hand prosthesis. Okundo R, Yoshida M, Akazawa K, IEEE Eng Med Biol 2005 24 48 56
50. Testing a prosthetic haptic feedback simulator with an interactive force matching task. Chatterjee A, Chaubey P, Martin J, Thakor N, J Prosth Orthot 2008 20 27 34 10.1097/01.JPO.0000311041.61628.be
51. Identifying the role of perception in upper limb prosthesis control: studies on targeted motion. Blank A, Okamura AM, Kuchenbecker KJ, ACM Trans Appl Perc 2010 7 15
52. Manipulation of a fragile object. Gorniak SL, Zatsiorsky VM, Latask ML, Exp Brain Res 2010 202 413 430 10.1007/s00221-009-2148-z 20043148
53. Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics. Antfolk C, D'Alonzo M, Rosen B, Lundborg G, Sebelius F, Cipriani C, Expert Rev Med Devices 2013 10 45 54 10.1586/erd.12.68 23278223
54. Enhanced visual feedback for slip prevention with a prosthetic hand. Engeberg ED, Meek S, Prosthet Orthot Int 2012 36 423 429 10.1177/ 0309364612440077 22402709
55. Making sense of artificial hands. Chappell PH, J Med Eng Technol 2011 35 1 18 10.3109/03091902.2010.526983 21117865
56. Time scales in motor learning and development. Newell KM, Liu Y-T, Mayer-Kress G, Psychol Rev 2001 108 57 82 11212633
57. Task goals and change in dynamical degrees of freedom with motor learning. Newell KM, Broderick MP, Deutsch KM, Slifkin AB, J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2003 29 379 387 12760622
58. On dexterity and its development. Bernstein NA, Dexterity and its development Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Latash ML, Turvey MT, 1996 3 244
59. Motor control theories and their applications. Latash ML, Levin MF, Scholz JP, Schöner G, Medicina 2010 46 382 392 20944446
60. Variability in motor learning: relocating, channeling and reducing noise. Cohen RG, Sternad D, Exp Brain Res 2009 193 69 83 10.1007/s00221-008-1596-1 18953531
61. Changes in the structure of children's isometric force variability with practice. Deutsch KM, Newell KM, J Exp Child Psychol 2004 88 319 333 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.04.003 15265679
62. Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: three components of skill improvement. Müller H, Sternad D, J Exp Psychol. 2004 30 212 233
63. Toward a new theory of motor synergies. Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G, Motor Control 2007 11 276 308 17715460
64. The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Scholz JP, Schöner G, Exp Brain Res 1999 126 289 306 10.1007/s002210050738 10382616
65. Case studies to demonstrate the range of applications of the Southampton hand assessment procedure. Kyberd PJ, Murgia A, Gasson M, Tjerks T, Metcalf C, Chappell PH, Warwick K, Lawson SEM, Barnhill T, Brit J Occup Ther 2009 72 212 218
66. Determining skill level in myoelectric prosthesis use with multiple outcome measures. Bouwsema H, Kyberd PJ, Hill W, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM, J Rehab Res Dev 2012 49 1331 1348 10.1682/JRRD.2011.09.0179