Experimentally Confirmed Mathematical Model for Human Control of a Non-Rigid Object

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 1158-1170

  Dingwell, Jonathan B ^a   Mah, Christopher D ^b,c   Mussa Ivaldi, Ferdinando A ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOTOR CONTROL; NEUROSCIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; STEREOTYPY;

ALGORITHMS; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOVEMENT; ROBOTICS; TOUCH;

EID: 1342301644     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00704.2003     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alexander RM. A minimum energy cost hypothesis for human arm trajectories. Biol Cybern 76: 97-105, 1997.
2. Bhushan N and Shadmehr R. Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields. Biol Cybern 81: 39-60, 1999.
3. Bock O. Load compensation in human goal-directed arm movements. Behav Brain Res 41: 167-177, 1990.
4. Bock O. Early stages of load compensation in human aimed arm movements. Behav Brain Res 55: 61-68, 1993.
5. Dingwell JB, Mah CD, and Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Manipulating objects with internal degrees-of-freedom: evidence for model-based control. J Neurophysiol 88: 222-235, 2002.
6. Dizio P and Lackner JR. Motor adaptation to coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. J Neurophysiol 74: 1787-1792, 1995.
7. Dupuy MA, Mottet D, and Ripoll H. The regulation of release parameters in underarm precision throwing. J Sports Sci 18: 375-382, 2000.
8. Engelbrecht SE. Minimum principles in motor control. J Math Psychol 45: 497-542, 2001.
9. Flanagan JR and Lolley S. The inertial anisotropy of the arm is accurately predicted during movement planning. J Neurosci 21: 1361-1369, 2001.
10. Flanagan JR, Nakano E, Imamizu H, Osu R, Yoshioka T, and Kawato M. Composition and decomposition of internal models in motor learning under altered kinematic and dynamic environments. J Neurosci 19: 1-5, 1999.
11. Flanagan JR, Vetter P, Johansson RS, and Wolpert DM. Prediction precedes control in motor learning. Curr Biol 13: 146-150, 2003.
12. Flash T and Hogan N. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5: 1688-1703, 1985.
13. Gomi H and Kawato M. Equilibrium-point control hypothesis examined by measured arm stiffness during multijoint movement. Science 272: 117-120, 1996.
14. Gribble PL and Scott SH. Overlap of internal models in motor cortex for mechanical loads during reaching. Nature 417: 938-941, 2002.
15. Harris CM and Wolpert DM. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394: 780-784, 1998.
16. Hogan N. An organizing principal for a class of voluntary movements. J Neurosci 4: 2745-2754, 1984.
17. Hogan N, Bizzi E, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, and Flash T. Controlling multijoint motor behavior. Exercise Sport Sci Rev 15: 153-190, 1987.
18. Huang F, Gillespie RB, and Kuo AD. Haptic feedback and human performance in a dynamic task. Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, Orlando, FL. IEEE, 2002, p. 330.
19. Karniel A and Inbar GF. A model for learning human reaching movements. Biol Cybern 77: 173-183, 1997.
20. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, and Ghez C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2: 1026-1031, 1999.
21. Krylow AM and Rymer WZ. Role of intrinsic muscle properties in producing smooth movements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44: 165-176, 1997.
22. Lackner JR and Dizio P. Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J Neurophysiol 72: 299-313, 1994.
23. Lynch KM and Mason MT. Dynamic nonprehensile manipulation: controllability, planning, and experiments. Int J Robotics Res 18: 64-92, 1999.
24. Mah CD and Mussa-Ivaldi F. Evidence for a specific internal representation of the motion-force relationships during object manipulation. Biol Cybern 88: 60-72, 2003a.
25. Mah CD and Mussa-Ivaldi F. Generalization of object manipulation skills learned without limb motion. J Neurosci 23: 4821-4825, 2003b.
26. Marion JB and Thornton ST. Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1995.
27. McIntyre J, Zago M, Berthoz A, and Lacquaniti F. Does the brain model Newton's laws? Nat Neurosci 4: 693-694, 2001.
28. Mehta B and Schaal S. Forward models in visuomotor control. J Neurophysiol 88: 942-953, 2002.
29. Miall RC and Wolpert DM. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks 9: 1265-1279, 1996.
30. Nakano E, Imamizu H, Osu R, Uno Y, Gomi H, Yoshioka T, and Kawato M. Quantitative examinations of internal representations for arm trajectory planning: minimum commanded torque change model. J Neurophysiol 81: 2140-2155, 1999.
31. Nelson WL. Physical principles for economics of skilled movements. Biol Cybern 46: 135-147, 1983.
32. Schaal S and Atkeson CG. Open loop stable control strategies for robot juggling. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Atlanta, GA: 1993, p. 913-918.
33. Schaal S, Sternad D, and Atkeson CG. One-handed juggling: a dynamical approach to a rhythmic movement task. J Mot Behav 28: 165-183, 1996.
34. Shadmehr R and Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224, 1994.
35. Sternad D, Duarte M, Katsumata H, and Schaal S. Dynamics of a bouncing ball in human performance. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys 63: 011902, 2001.
36. Thoroughman KA and Shadmehr R. Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407: 742-747, 2000.
37. Todorov E and Jordan MI. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5: 1226-1235, 2002.
38. Uno Y, Kawato M, and Suzuki R. Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement: minimum torque-change Model. Biol Cybern 61: 89-101, 1989.
39. Wolpert DM and Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3: 1212-1217, 2000.
40. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, and Jordan MI. Are arm trajectories Planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? Exp Brain Res 103: 460-470, 1995a.
41. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, and Jordan MI. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269: 1880-1882, 1995b.