Quantifying prosthesis control improvements using a vibrotactile representation of grip force

2008 IEEE Region 5 Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Chatterjee, Aniruddha ^a   Chaubey, Pravin ^b   Martin, Jay ^b   Thakor, Nitish V ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^b Martin Bionics Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMG CONTROL; EXPLORATION TASKS; FEEDBACK CHANNELS; GRASPING FORCE; GRIP FORCE; HAPTIC DISPLAYS; HAPTIC FEEDBACKS; IMPROVED PERFORMANCE; MYOELECTRIC PROSTHESES; PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS; PROSTHESIS CONTROL; SENSORY INFORMATION; VIBROTACTILE; VIBROTACTILE STIMULATION;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; HAPTIC INTERFACES; MYOELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED PROSTHETICS;

PROSTHETICS;

EID: 51849139929     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/TPSD.2008.4562727     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. McLaughlin, M., J.P. Hespanha, and G.S. Sukhatme, Introduction to Haptics, in Touch in Virtual Environments. 2002, MISC Press Multimedia Series (Prentice Hall): Upper Saddle River, NJ. p. 1-31.
2. Stone, R.J. Haptic Feedback: A Brief History From Telepresence to Virtual Reality. in Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Haptic Human-Computer Interaction. 2000.
3. Benali, K.M., et al. Tactile Interfaces: A State of the Art Survey. in International Symposium on Robotics. 2004. Paris, France.
4. Weir, R.F., Design of artificial arms and hands for prosthetic applications, in Standard Handbook of Biomedical Engineering and Design, M. Kutz, Editor. 2003, McGraw-Hill: New York. p. 32.1-32.61.
5. Roeschlein, R.A. and E. Domholdt, Factors related to successful upper extremity prosthetic use. Prosthet Orthot Int, 1989. 13(1): p. 14-8.
6. Shannon, G.F., A comparison of alternative means of providing sensory feedback on upper limb prostheses. Med Biol Eng, 1976. 14(3): p. 289-94.
7. Shannon, G.F., A myoelectrically-controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback. Med Biol Eng Comput, 1979. 17(1): p. 73-80.
8. Sueda, O. and H. Tamura. Sensory device for the artificial arm. in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering. 1969. Chicago.
9. Pylatiuk, C., et al. Progress in the development of a multifunctional hand prosthesis. in Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2004.
10. Meek, S.G., S.C. Jacobsen, and P.P. Goulding, Extended physiologic taction: design and evaluation of a proportional force feedback system. J Rehabil Res Dev, 1989. 26(3): p. 53-62.
11. Patterson, P.E. and J.A. Katz, Design and evaluation of a sensory feedback system that provides grasping pressure in a myoelectric hand. J Rehabil Res Dev, 1992. 29(1): p. 1-8.
12. Atkins, D.J., D.C.Y. Heard, and W.H. Donovan, Epidemiologic Overview of Individuals with Upper-Limb Loss and Their Reported Research Priorities. J Prosth Orth, 1996. 8(1): p. 2-11.
13. Kaczmarek, K.A., et al., Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 1991. 38(1): p. 1-16.
14. Mountcastle, V.B., R.H. LaMotte, and G. Carli, Detection thresholds for stimuli in humans and monkeys: comparison with threshold events in mechanoreceptive afferent nerve fibers innervating the monkey hand. J Neurophysiol, 1972. 35(1): p. 122-36.
15. LaMotte, R.H. and V.B. Mountcastle, Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements. J Neurophysiol, 1975. 38(3): p. 539-59.
16. Cholewiak, R.W. and A.A. Collins, Vibrotactile localization on the arm: effects of place, space, and age. Percept Psychophys, 2003. 65(7): p. 1058-77.
17. Brisben, A.J., The perception and neural coding of complex vibrotactile stimuli. 1997, The Johns Hopkins University: Baltimore, MD.
18. Weisenberger, J.M., Sensitivity to amplitude-modulated vibrotactile signals. J Acoust Soc Am, 1986. 80(6): p. 1707-15.