Influence of augmented feedback on coordination strategies

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 317-330

  Ranganathan, Rajiv ^a   Newell, Karl ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Concurrent feedback; Guidance hypothesis; Knowledge of results; Motor variability; Redundancy; Uncontrolled manifold

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR COORDINATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; ORIENTATION; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67650290318     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.41.4.317-330     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-150.
2. Adams, J. A. (1987). Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 41-74.
3. Anderson, D. I., Magill, R. A., & Sekiya, H. (1994). A reconsideration of the trials-delay of knowledge of results paradigm in motor skill learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 286-290.
4. Anderson, D. I., Magill, R. A., Sekiya, H., & Ryan, G. (2005). Support for an explanation of the guidance effect in motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 231-238.
5. Annett, J. (1969). Feedback and human behaviour. Middlesex, England: Penguin.
6. Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
7. Bilodeau, I. M. (1966). Information feedback. In E. A. Bilodeau (Ed.), Acquisition of skill (pp. 225-296). New York: Academic Press.
8. Cusumano, J. P., & Cesari, P. (2006). Body-goal variability mapping in an aiming task. Biological Cybernetics, 94, 367-379.
9. Johnson, R. E., & Rosenthal, E. (1968). Influence of guessing on measurements of immediate and delayed retention. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 175-180.
10. Kelso, J. A. S., Southard, D. L., & Goodman, D. (1979, March 9). On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science, 203, 1029-1031.
11. Kudo, K., Tsutsui, S., Ishikura, T., Ito, T., & Yamamoto, Y. (2000). Compensatory coordination of release parameters in a throwing task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 337-345.
12. Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1999). The role of reduced frequency of knowledge of results during constant practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70, 33-40.
13. Latash M. L., Scholz, J. P., & Schöner, G. (2002). Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 20, 26-31.
14. Latash, M. L., Scholz, J. P., & Schöner, G. (2007). Toward a new theory of motor synergies. Motor Control, 11, 276-308.
15. Lavery, J. J. (1962). Retention of simple motor skills as a function of type of knowledge of results. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 16, 300-311.
16. Lavery, J. J., & Suddon, F. H. (1962). Retention of simple motor skills as a function of the number of trials by which KR is delayed. Perceptual Motor Skills, 15, 231-237.
17. Lee, T. D., White, M. A., & Carnahan, H. (1990). On the role of knowledge of results in motor learning: Exploring the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 191-208.
18. Mackrous, I., & Proteau, L. (2007). Specificity of practice results from differences in movement planning strategies. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 181-193.
19. Marteniuk, R. G., MacKenzie, C. L, & Baba, D. M. (1984). Bimanual movement control: Information processing and interaction effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 335-365.
20. Müller, H., & Sternad, D. (2004). Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: Three components of skill improvement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 212-233.
21. Newell, K. M. (1974). Knowledge of results and motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 6, 235-244.
22. Newell, K. M. (1976). Knowledge of results and motor learning. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 4, 195-228.
23. Newell, K. M., & Carlton, M. J. (1987). Augmented information and the acquisition of isometric tasks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 4-12.
24. Park, J. H., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Reduced-frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: A test of the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 287-296.
25. Proteau, L. (1992). On the specificity of learning and the role of visual information for movement control. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and Motor Control (pp. 67-103). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
26. Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R. G., Girouard, Y. , & Dugas, C. (1987). On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive training. Human Movement Science, 6, 181-199.
27. Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R. G., & Lévesque, L. (1992). A sensorimotor basis for motor learning: Evidence indicating specificity of practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 557-575.
28. Ranganathan, R., & Newell, K. M. (2008). Motor synergies: Feedback and error compensation within and between trials. Experimental Brain Research, 186, 561-570.
29. Rousseeuw, P. J., & Van Zomeren, B. C. (1990). Unmasking mul-tivariate outliers and leverage points. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 633-639.
30. Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386.
31. Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
32. Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience (pp. 59-75). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
33. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
34. Schmidt, R. A., & Wulf, G. (1997). Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning: Implications for training and simulation. Human Factors, 39, 509-525.
35. Scholz, J. P., & Schöner, G. (1999). The uncontrolled manifold concept: Identifying control variables for a functional task. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 289-306.
36. Schöner, G. (1995). Recent developments and problems in human movement science and their conceptual implications. Ecological Psychology, 7, 291-314.
37. Seashore, R. H., & Bavelas, A. (1941). The functioning of knowledge of results in Thorndike's line-drawing experiment. Psychological Review, 48, 155-164.
38. Sherwood, D. E. (1988). Effects of bandwidth knowledge of results on movement consistency. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 535-542.
39. Swinnen, S. P. (1996). Information feedback for motor skill learning: A review. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in motor learning and control. (pp. 37-66). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
40. Swinnen, S. P., Nicholson, D. E., Schmidt, R. A., & Shapiro, D. C. (1990). Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 706-716.
41. Thorndike, E. L. (1931). Human learning. New York: Canterbury.
42. Todorov, E., & Jordan, M. I. (2002). Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1226-1235.
43. Vander Linden, D. W., Cauraugh, J. H., & Greene, T. A. (1993). The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled subjects. Physical Therapy, 73, 79-87.
44. Winstein, C. J., Pohl, P. S., Cardinale, C., Green, A., Scholtz, L., & Waters, C. S. (1996). Learning a partial-weight-bearing skill: Effectiveness of two forms of feedback. Physical Therapy, 76, 985-993.
45. Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677-691.
46. Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad and the ugly. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport (pp. 121-144). Oxford, England: Routledge.