Establishment of a replication fork barrier following induction of DNA binding in mammalian cells

Cell Cycle

Volumn 13, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1607-1616

  Beuzer, Paolo ^a   Quivy, Jean Pierre ^a   Almouzni, Geneviev̀e ^a  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

DNA damage repair; DNA replication; Genome instability; LacO LacI; Replication fork block; TetO TetR

Indexed keywords

53BP1 PROTEIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; HISTONE H2AX; LACO PROTEIN; TETO PROTEIN; TETR PROTEIN; TOPBP1 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CARRIER PROTEIN; H2AFX PROTEIN, HUMAN; HISTONE; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; SIGNAL PEPTIDE; TOPBP1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; TP53BP1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR P53 BINDING PROTEIN 1;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BINDING; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; FEMALE; HELA CELL LINE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MAMMAL CELL; MICRONUCLEUS; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; ANIMAL; DNA REPLICATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PHOSPHORYLATION; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ANIMALS; CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; HISTONES; HUMANS; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MICE; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PHOSPHORYLATION; S PHASE; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR P53-BINDING PROTEIN 1;

EID: 84900543040     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.28627     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Bell SD, Méchali M, DePamphilis ML, eds. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2013. DNA REPLICATION. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2013.
2. Stephens PJ, Greenman CD, Fu B, Yang F, Bignell GR, Mudie LJ, Pleasance ED, Lau KW, Beare D, Stebbings LA, et al. Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 2011; 144:27-40; PMID:21215367; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.055
3. Lord CJ, Ashworth A. The DNA damage response and cancer therapy. Nature 2012; 481:287-94; PMID:22258607; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10760
4. Branzei D, Foiani M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11:208-19; PMID:20177396; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nrm2852
5. Cox MM, Goodman MF, Kreuzer KN, Sherratt DJ, Sandler SJ, Marians KJ. The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature 2000; 404:37-41; PMID:10716434; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35003501
6. Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 2010; 40:179-204; PMID:20965415; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019
7. Groth A, Rocha W, Verreault A, Almouzni G. Chromatin challenges during DNA replication and repair. Cell 2007; 128:721-33; PMID:17320509; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.030
8. Jasencakova Z, Scharf AN, Ask K, Corpet A, Imhof A, Almouzni G, Groth A. Replication stress interferes with histone recycling and predeposition marking of new histones. Mol Cell 2010; 37:736-43; PMID:20227376; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.molcel.2010.01.033
9. Petermann E, Helleday T. Pathways of mammalian replication fork restart. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11:683-7; PMID:20842177; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nrm2974
10. Soutoglou E, Dorn JF, Sengupta K, Jasin M, Nussenzweig A, Ried T, Danuser G, Misteli T. Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nat Cell Biol 2007; 9:675-82; PMID:17486118; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ ncb1591
11. Lopes J, Debrauwère H, Buard J, Nicolas A. Instability of the human minisatellite CEB1 in rad-27Delta and dna2-1 replication-deficient yeast cells. EMBO J 2002; 21:3201-11; PMID:12065432; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/ cdf310
12. Walter J, Newport J. Initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication: origin unwinding and sequential chromatin association of Cdc45, RPA, and DNA polymerase alpha. Mol Cell 2000; 5:617-27; PMID:10882098; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097- 2765(00)80241-5
13. Brewer BJ, Fangman WL. A replication fork barrier at the 3? end of yeast ribosomal RNA genes. Cell 1988; 55:637-43; PMID:3052854; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/0092-8674(88)90222-X
14. Arcangioli B, Klar AJ. A novel switch-activating site (SAS1) and its cognate binding factor (SAP1) required for efficient mat1 switching in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J 1991; 10:3025-32; PMID:1915277
15. Lambert S, Carr AM. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers. Biochimie 2005; 87:591-602; PMID:15989976; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi. 2004.10.020
16. Gahn TA, Schildkraut CL. The Epstein-Barr virus origin of plasmid replication, oriP, contains both the initiation and termination sites of DNA replication. Cell 1989; 58:527-35; PMID:2547525; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092- 8674(89)90433-9
17. Ermakova OV, Frappier L, Schildkraut CL. Role of the EBNA-1 protein in pausing of replication forks in the Epstein-Barr virus genome. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:33009-17; PMID:8955146; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.51.33009
18. Frappier L. EBNA1 and host factors in Epstein-Barr virus latent DNA replication. Curr Opin Virol 2012; 2:733-9; PMID:23031715; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.coviro.2012.09.005
19. Hong M, Murai Y, Kutsuna T, Takahashi H, Nomoto K, Cheng CM, Ishizawa S, Zhao QL, Ogawa R, Harmon BV, et al. Suppression of Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) by RNA interference inhibits proliferation of EBV-positive Burkitt's lymphoma cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2006; 132:1-8; PMID:16180023; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-005-0036-x
20. Kypr J, Kejnovská I, Renciuk D, Vorlícková M. Circular dichroism and conformational polymorphism of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:1713-25; PMID:19190094; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp026
21. Bochman ML, Paeschke K, Zakian VA. DNA secondary structures: stability and function of G-quadruplex structures. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 13:770-80; PMID:23032257; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg3296
22. Myung K, Datta A, Chen C, Kolodner RD. SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination. Nat Genet 2001; 27:113-6; PMID:11138010; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/83673
23. Prado F, Aguilera A. Impairment of replication fork progression mediates RNA polII transcription-associated recombination. EMBO J 2005; 24:1267-76; PMID:15775982; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600602
24. Takeuchi Y, Horiuchi T, Kobayashi T. Transcription-dependent recombination and the role of fork collision in yeast rDNA. Genes Dev 2003; 17:1497-506; PMID:12783853; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1085403
25. Zaratiegui M, Vaughn MW, Irvine DV, Goto D, Watt S, Bähler J, Arcangioli B, Martienssen RA. CENP-B preserves genome integrity at replication forks paused by retrotransposon LTR. Nature 2011; 469:112-5; PMID:21151105; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09608
26. Mirkin SM. DNA structures, repeat expansions and human hereditary disorders. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006; 16:351-8; PMID:16713248; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2006.05.004
27. Carr AM, Paek AL, Weinert T. DNA replication: failures and inverted fusions. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2011; 22:866-74; PMID:22020070; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.10.008
28. Jones RM, Petermann E. Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response. Biochem J 2012; 443:13-26; PMID:22417748; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/ BJ20112100
29. Alabert C, Groth A. Chromatin replication and epigenome maintenance. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012; 13:153-67; PMID:22358331; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nrm3288
30. Ozeri-Galai E, Lebofsky R, Rahat A, Bester AC, Bensimon A, Kerem B. Failure of origin activation in response to fork stalling leads to chromosomal instability at fragile sites. Mol Cell 2011; 43:122-31; PMID:21726815; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.019
31. Dietzel S, Belmont AS. Reproducible but dynamic positioning of DNA in chromosomes during mitosis. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3:767-70; PMID:11483964; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35087089
32. Barnhart MC, Kuich PH, Stellfox ME, Ward JA, Bassett EA, Black BE, Foltz DR. HJURP is a CENP-A chromatin assembly factor sufficient to form a functional de novo kinetochore. J Cell Biol 2011; 194:229-43; PMID:21768289; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201012017
33. Soutoglou E, Misteli T. Activation of the cellular DNA damage response in the absence of DNA lesions. Science 2008; 320:1507-10; PMID:18483401; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1159051
34. Mund A, Schubert T, Staege H, Kinkley S, Reumann K, Kriegs M, Fritsch L, Battisti V, Ait-Si-Ali S, Hoffbeck AS, et al. SPOC1 modulates DNA repair by regulating key determinants of chromatin compaction and DNA damage response. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:11363-79; PMID:23034801; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ nar/gks868
35. Jegou T, Chung I, Heuvelman G, Wachsmuth M, Görisch SM, Greulich-Bode KM, Boukamp P, Lichter P, Rippe K. Dynamics of telomeres and promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies in a telomerase-negative human cell line. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20:2070-82; PMID:19211845; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E08-02-0108
36. Payne BT, van Knippenberg IC, Bell H, Filipe SR, Sherratt DJ, McGlynn P. Replication fork blockage by transcription factor-DNA complexes in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:5194-202; PMID:17000639; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1093/nar/gkl682
37. Vilette D, Uzest M, Ehrlich SD, Michel B. DNA transcription and repressor binding affect deletion formation in Escherichia coli plasmids. EMBO J 1992; 11:3629-34; PMID:1396563
38. Possoz C, Filipe SR, Grainge I, Sherratt DJ. Tracking of controlled Escherichia coli replication fork stalling and restart at repressor-bound DNA in vivo. EMBO J 2006; 25:2596-604; PMID:16724111; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj. emboj.7601155
39. Sofueva S, Osman F, Lorenz A, Steinacher R, Castagnetti S, Ledesma J, Whitby MC. Ultrafine anaphase bridges, broken DNA and illegitimate recombination induced by a replication fork barrier. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:6568-84; PMID:21576223; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr340
40. Rogakou EP, Boon C, Redon C, Bonner WM. Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J Cell Biol 1999; 146:905- 16; PMID:10477747; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.146.5.905
41. Sirbu BM, Couch FB, Feigerle JT, Bhaskara S, Hiebert SW, Cortez D. Analysis of protein dynamics at active, stalled, and collapsed replication forks. Genes Dev 2011; 25:1320-7; PMID:21685366; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad. 2053211
42. Yamane K, Kawabata M, Tsuruo T. A DNA-topoisomerase-II-binding protein with eight repeating regions similar to DNA-repair enzymes and to a cell-cycle regulator. Eur J Biochem 1997; 250:794-9; PMID:9461304; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00794.x
43. Mordes DA, Cortez D. Activation of ATR and related PIKKs. Cell Cycle 2008; 7:2809-12; PMID:18769153; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.7.18.6689
44. Bunting SF, Callén E, Wong N, Chen HT, Polato F, Gunn A, Bothmer A, Feldhahn N, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Cao L, et al. 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell 2010; 141:243-54; PMID:20362325; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.012
45. Chapman JR, Sossick AJ, Boulton SJ, Jackson SP. BRCA1-associated exclusion of 53BP1 from DNA damage sites underlies temporal control of DNA repair. J Cell Sci 2012; 125:3529-34; PMID:22553214; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/ jcs.105353
46. Difilippantonio S, Gapud E, Wong N, Huang CY, Mahowald G, Chen HT, Kruhlak MJ, Callen E, Livak F, Nussenzweig MC, et al. 53BP1 facilitates long-range DNA end-joining during V(D)J recombination. Nature 2008; 456:529-33; PMID:18931658; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07476; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature07476
47. Harrigan JA, Belotserkovskaya R, Coates J, Dimitrova DS, Polo SE, Bradshaw CR, Fraser P, Jackson SP. Replication stress induces 53BP1-containing OPT domains in G1 cells. J Cell Biol 2011; 193:97-108; PMID:21444690; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201011083
48. Lukas C, Savic V, Bekker-Jensen S, Doil C, Neumann B, Pedersen RS, Grøfte M, Chan KL, Hickson ID, Bartek J, et al. 53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13:243-53; PMID:21317883; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2201
49. Dimitrova N, Chen YC, Spector DL, de Lange T. 53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility. Nature 2008; 456:524-8; PMID:18931659; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07433
50. Lowndes NF. The interplay between BRCA1 and 53BP1 influences death, aging, senescence and cancer. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010; 9:1112-6; PMID:20724228; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.07.012
51. Dimitrova DS, Berezney R. The spatio-temporal organization of DNA replication sites is identical in primary, immortalized and transformed mammalian cells. J Cell Sci 2002; 115:4037-51; PMID:12356909; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00087
52. Ryba T, Battaglia D, Pope BD, Hiratani I, Gilbert DM. Genome-scale analysis of replication timing: from bench to bioinformatics. Nat Protoc 2011; 6:870-95; PMID:21637205; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2011.328
53. Jacome A, Fernandez-Capetillo O. Lac operator repeats generate a traceable fragile site in mammalian cells. EMBO Rep 2011; 12:1032-8; PMID:21836640; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2011.158
54. Chan KL, Hickson ID. New insights into the formation and resolution of ultra-fine anaphase bridges. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2011; 22:906-12; PMID:21782962; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.07.001
55. Hoffelder DR, Luo L, Burke NA, Watkins SC, Gollin SM, Saunders WS. Resolution of anaphase bridges in cancer cells. Chromosoma 2004; 112:389-97; PMID:15156327; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-004-0284-6
56. Aiyar A, Aras S, Washington A, Singh G, Luftig RB. Epstein-Barr Nuclear Antigen 1 modulates replication of oriP-plasmids by impeding replication and transcription fork migration through the family of repeats. Virol J 2009; 6:29; PMID:19265546; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-6-29
57. Kobayashi T, Horiuchi T. A yeast gene product, Fob1 protein, required for both replication fork blocking and recombinational hotspot activities. Genes Cells 1996; 1:465-74; PMID:9078378; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2443.1996. d01-256.x
58. Mirkin EV, Mirkin SM. Replication fork stalling at natural impediments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2007; 71:13-35; PMID:17347517; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ MMBR.00030-06
59. Codlin S, Dalgaard JZ. Complex mechanism of site-specific DNA replication termination in fission yeast. EMBO J 2003; 22:3431-40; PMID:12840005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg330
60. Dalgaard JZ, Klar AJ. A DNA replication-arrest site RTS1 regulates imprinting by determining the direction of replication at mat1 in S. pombe. Genes Dev 2001; 15:2060-8; PMID:11511538; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.200801
61. Eydmann T, Sommariva E, Inagawa T, Mian S, Klar AJ, Dalgaard JZ. Rtf1-mediated eukaryotic site-specific replication termination. Genetics 2008; 180:27-39; PMID:18723894; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.089243
62. Lee BS, Grewal SI, Klar AJ. Biochemical interactions between proteins and mat1 cis-acting sequences required for imprinting in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:9813-22; PMID:15509785; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.22.9813- 9822.2004
63. Soria G, Polo SE, Almouzni G. Prime, repair, restore: the active role of chromatin in the DNA damage response. Mol Cell 2012; 46:722-34; PMID:22749398; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.002
64. Probst AV, Dunleavy E, Almouzni G. Epigenetic inheritance during the cell cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:192-206; PMID:19234478; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2640
65. Corpet A, Almouzni G. Making copies of chromatin: the challenge of nucleosomal organization and epigenetic information. Trends Cell Biol 2009; 19:29-41; PMID:19027300; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2008.10.002
66. Sarkies P, Murat P, Phillips LG, Patel KJ, Balasubramanian S, Sale JE. FANCJ coordinates two pathways that maintain epigenetic stability at G-quadruplex DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:1485-98; PMID:22021381; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr868
67. Sarkies P, Sale JE. Cellular epigenetic stability and cancer. Trends Genet 2012; 28:118-27; PMID:22226176; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2011.11. 005
68. Janicki SM, Tsukamoto T, Salghetti SE, Tansey WP, Sachidanandam R, Prasanth KV, Ried T, Shav-Tal Y, Bertrand E, Singer RH, et al. From silencing to gene expression: real-time analysis in single cells. Cell 2004; 116:683-98; PMID:15006351; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00171-0
69. Martini E, Roche DM, Marheineke K, Verreault A, Almouzni G. Recruitment of phosphorylated chromatin assembly factor 1 to chromatin after UV irradiation of human cells. J Cell Biol 1998; 143:563-75; PMID:9813080; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1083/jcb.143.3.563
70. Taddei A, Maison C, Roche D, Almouzni G. Reversible disruption of pericentric heterochromatin and centromere function by inhibiting deacetylases. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3:114-20; PMID:11175742; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35055010
71. Guenatri M, Bailly D, Maison C, Almouzni G. Mouse centric and pericentric satellite repeats form distinct functional heterochromatin. J Cell Biol 2004; 166:493-505; PMID:15302854; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200403109
72. Corpet A, De Koning L, Toedling J, Savignoni A, Berger F, Lemaître C, O'Sullivan RJ, Karlseder J, Barillot E, Asselain B, et al. Asf1b, the necessary Asf1 isoform for proliferation, is predictive of outcome in breast cancer. EMBO J 2011; 30:480-93; PMID: 21179005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj. 2010.335