Orthographic and phonological contributions to reading development: Tracking developmental trajectories using masked priming

Developmental Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1026-1036

  Ziegler, Johannes C ^a,b   Bertrand, Daisy ^a,b,c   Lété, Bernard ^d   Grainger, Jonathan ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c University Aix Marseille   (France)

^d Lyon University   (France)

Author keywords

Dual route; Lexical decision; Pseudohomophone; Reading development; Transposed letter

Indexed keywords

CHILD; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE TEST; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; REPETITION PRIMING; SEMANTICS;

CHILD; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE TESTS; MALE; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; REPETITION PRIMING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 84897963147     PISSN: 00121649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0035187     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2008). The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: Evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 245-264.
2. Aghababian, V., & Nazir, T. A. (2000). Developing normal reading skills: Aspects of the visual processes underlying word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 123-150.
3. Alario, F. X., De Cara, B., & Ziegler, J. C. (2007). Automatic activation of phonology in silent reading is parallel: Evidence from beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 205-219.
4. Bijeljac-Babic, R., Millogo, V., Farioli, F., & Grainger, J. (2004). A developmental investigation of word length effects in reading using a new on-line word identification paradigm. Reading and Writing, 17, 411-431.
5. Booth, J. R., Perfetti, C. A., & MacWhinney, B. (1999). Quick, automatic, and general activation of orthographic and phonological representations in young readers. Developmental Psychology, 35, 3-19.
6. Bosman, A. M. T., & de Groot, A. M. B. (1996). Phonologic mediation is fundamental to reading: Evidence from beginning readers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Series A: Human Experimental Psychology, 49, 715-744.
7. Braun, M., Hutzler, F., Ziegler, J. C., Dambacher, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Pseudohomophone effects provide evidence of early lexicophonological processing in visual word recognition. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1977-1989.
8. Castles, A., Davis, C., Cavalot, P., & Forster, K. (2007). Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: Masked priming effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 165-182.
9. Castles, A., & Nation, K. (2006). How does orthographic learning happen? In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 151-179). Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
10. Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713-758.
11. Diependaele, K., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (2010). Fast phonology and the bimodal interactive activation model. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 764-778.
12. Doctor, E. A., & Coltheart, M. (1980). Children's use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning. Memory & Cognition, 8, 195-209.
13. Dufau, S., Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2012). How to say "no" to a nonword: A leaky competing accumulator model of lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1117-1128.
14. E-Prime Software (Version 2) [Computer software]. Sharpsburg, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
15. Farioli, F., Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (2011). PHOM: Une base de données de 14 000 pseudohomophones [PHOM: A database of 14,000 pseudohomophones]. L'Année Psychologique, 111, 725-751.
16. Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777-799.
17. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked non-word priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Series A: Human Experimental Psychology, 45, 353-372.
18. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
19. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301-330). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
21. Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263-279.
22. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-600.
23. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., & Schneider, W. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects and phonological recoding procedures in reading development in English and German. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 648-664.
24. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., & Schneider, W. (2003). Nonword reading across orthographies: How flexible is the choice of reading units? Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 235-247.
25. Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1-35.
26. Grainger, J., Dufau, S., Montant, M., Ziegler, J. C., & Fagot, J. (2012, April 13). Orthographic processing in baboons (Papio papio). Science, 336, 245-248.
27. Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17, 1021-1026.
28. Grainger, J., Lété, B., Bertrand, D., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. C. (2012). Evidence for multiple routes in learning to read. Cognition, 123, 280-292.
29. Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2.
30. Hannagan, T., & Grainger, J. (2012). Protein analysis meets visual word recognition: A case for string kernels in the brain. Cognitive Science, 36, 575-606.
31. Kohnen, S., & Castles, A. (2013). Pirates at parties: Letter position processing in developing readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 91-107.
32. Ktori, M., Grainger, J., Dufau, S., & Holcomb, P. J. (2012). The "electrophysiological sandwich": A method for amplifying ERP priming effects. Psychophysiology, 49, 1114-1124.
33. Lefavrais, J. (2005). Alouette-R: Test d'analyse de la lecture et de la dyslexie [Alouette-R: Test for the analysis of reading and dyslexia]. Paris, France: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
34. Lété, B., & Fayol, M. (2013). Substituted-letter and transposed-letter effects in a masked priming paradigm with French developing readers and dyslexics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 47-62.
35. Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary school readers. Behavior Research Methods Instruments, & Computers, 36, 156-166.
36. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994b). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
37. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994a). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331-353.
38. Lupker, S. J., & Davis, C. J. (2009). Sandwich priming: A method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 618-639.
39. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.
40. Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53, 97-145.
41. Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.
42. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., & Binder, K. S. (1998). Phonological codes and eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 476-497.
43. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.
44. Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Bechennec, D., & Serniclaes, W. (2003). Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading, and in spelling: A four-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 194-217.
45. Treiman, R., Goswami, U., & Bruck, M. (1990). Not all nonwords are alike: Implications for reading development and theory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 559-567.
46. Treiman, R., Sotak, L., & Bowman, M. (2001). The roles of letter names and letter sounds in connecting print and speech. Memory & Cognition, 29, 860-873.
47. Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
48. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243.
49. Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971-979.
50. Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3-29.
51. Ziegler, J. C., Hannagan, T., Dufau, S., Montant, M., Fagot, J., & Grainger, J. (2013). Transposed-letter effects reveal orthographic processing in baboons. Psychological Science, 24, 1609-1611.
52. Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Klueppel, D. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: Still a challenge for current word recognition models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 547-559.
53. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Ma-Wyatt, A., Ladner, D., & Schulte-Korne, G. (2003). Developmental dyslexia in different languages: Languagespecific or universal? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 169-193.
54. Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (in press). Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
55. Ziegler, J. C., Van Orden, G. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). Phonology can help or hurt the perception of print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 845-860.