PHOM: A database of 14,000 pseudo-homophones;PHOM: Une base de données de 14 000 pseudo-homophones

Annee Psychologique

Volumn 111, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 725-751

  Farioli, Fernand ^a   Grainger, Jonathan ^a   Ferrand, Ludovic ^b  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856330436     PISSN: 00035033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4074/S0003503311004052     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Ashby, J., Sanders, L. D., & Kingston, J. (2009). Skilled readers begin processing of sub-phonemic features by 80 ms during visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Biological Psychology, 80, 84-94.
2. Berent, I. (1997). Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: Regularity effects are not necessary evidence for assembly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1727-1742. (Pubitemid 127456199)
3. Berent, I., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A Rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102, 146-184.
4. Besner, D., & Davelaar, E. (1983). Suedohomofoan effects in visual word recognition: Evidence for phonological processing. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 300-305.
5. Besner, D., Twilley, L., McCann, R. S., & Seergobin, K. (1990). On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? Psychological Review, 97, 432-446.
6. Bonin, P., Fayol, M., & Peereman, R. (1998). Masked form priming in writing words from pictures: Evidence for direct retrieval of orthographic codes. Acta Psychologica, 99, 311-328. (Pubitemid 128424395)
7. Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1999). Frequency effects and lexical access: On the interpretation of null pseudo-homophone base-word frequency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 270-275.
8. Borowsky, R., Owen, W. J., & Masson, M. E. J. (2002). Diagnostics of phonological lexical processing: Pseudohomophone naming advantages, disadvantages, and base-word frequency effects. Memory & Cognition, 30, 969-987. (Pubitemid 35303482)
9. Bosman, A. M. T., & De Groot, A. M. B. (1996). Phonologic mediation is fundamental to reading: Evidence from beginning readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 715-744. (Pubitemid 126423069)
10. Braun, M., Hutzler, F., Ziegler, J. C., Dambacher, M., & Jacobs, A. J. (2009). Pseudohomophone effects provide evidence of early lexico-phonological processing in visual word recognition. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1977-1989.
11. Briesemeister, B. B., Hofmann, M. J., Tamm, S., Kuchinke, L., Braun, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). The pseudo-homophone effect: Evidence for an orthography-phonology conflict. Neuroscience Letters, 455, 124-128.
12. Brysbaert, M. (2001). Prelexical phonological coding of visual words in Dutch: Automatic after all. Memory & Cognition, 29, 765-773. (Pubitemid 34155684)
13. Bürki, A., Alario, F. X., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2011). Lexical representation of phonological variants: Evidence from pseudo-homophone effects in different regiolects. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 424-442.
14. Carreiras, M., Ferrand, L., Grainger, J., & Perea, M. (2005). Sequential effects of phonological priming in visual word recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 585-589. (Pubitemid 41284637)
15. Catach, N. (1995). L'orthographe Française. Paris: Nathan Université.
16. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance VI (pp. 535-555). London: Academic Press.
17. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A Dual Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256. (Pubitemid 33604132)
18. Coltheart, V., Laxon, V., Rickard, M., & Elton, C. (1988). Phonological recoding in reading for meaning by adults and children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 387-397.
19. Coltheart, V., Avons, S. E., Masterson, J., & Laxon, V. J. (1991). The role of assembled phonology in reading comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 19, 387-400.
20. Coltheart, V., Patterson, K., & Leahy, J. (1994). When a ROWS is a ROSE: Phonological effects in written word comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 917-955.
21. Daneman, M., & Stainton, M. (1991). Phonological recoding in silent reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 618-632.
22. Delattre, M., Bonin, P. & Barry, C. (2006). Written spelling to dictation: Sound-to-spelling regularity affects both writing latencies and durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1330-1340. (Pubitemid 44706773)
23. Dennis, I., Besner, D., & Davelaar, E. (1985). Phonology in visual word recognition: Their is more than meats the I. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. V. New York: Academic Press.
24. Diependaele, K., Ziegler, J., & Grainger, J. (2010). Fast phonology and the bimodal interactive activation model. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 764-778.
25. Ferrand, L. (1999). 640 homophones et leurs caractéristiques. L'Année psychologique, 99, 687-708.
26. Ferrand, L. (2007). Psychologie Cognitive de la lecture. Processus de base de la reconnaissance des mots écrits chez l'adulte. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.
27. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 353-372.
28. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1993). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation in the early phases of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 119-122.
29. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 365-382.
30. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1996). List context effects on masked phonological priming in the lexical decision task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 515-519. (Pubitemid 126421549)
31. Ferrand, L., Grainger, J., & Segui, J. (1994). A study of masked form priming in picture and word naming. Memory & Cognition, 22, 431-441. (Pubitemid 24219854)
32. Folk, J. R. (1999). Phonological codes are used to access the lexicon during silent reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 892-906.
33. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99. (Pubitemid 128770176)
34. Frost, R., Ahissar, M., Gotesman, R., & Tayeb, S. (2003). Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 346-378. (Pubitemid 36309119)
35. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., & Schneider, W. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects and phonological recoding procedures in reading development in English and German. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 648-664.
36. Grainger, J., Diependaele, K., Spinelli, E., Ferrand, L., & Farioli, F. (2003). Masked repetition and phonological priming within and across modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1256-1269. (Pubitemid 37514189)
37. Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218-233.
38. Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1996). Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 623-647. (Pubitemid 126164654)
39. Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P.J. (2006). The time-course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17, 1021-1026. (Pubitemid 44952673)
40. Grainger, J., Spinelli, E., & Ferrand, L. (2000). Effects of baseword frequency and orthographic neighborhood size in pseudohomophone naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 88-102.
41. Grainger, J. & Ziegler, J. (2007). Cross-code consistency effects in visual word recognition. In E. L. Grigorenko & A. Naples (Eds.) Single-word reading: Biological and behavioral perspectives (pp. 129-157). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Herdman, C. M., Lefevre, J.-A., & Greeham, S. L. (1994). Implicating the lexicon: Base-word frequency effects in pseudo-homophone naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 575-590.
43. Herdman, C. M., Lefevre, J.-A., & Greeham, S. L. (1996). Base-word frequency and pseudo-homophone naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 1044-1061.
44. Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (1998). MROMp: An interactive activation multiple readout model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A.M. Jacobs (Eds.). Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147-188). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 358-394.
46. Jared, D., Levy, B. A., & Rayner, K. (1999). The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: Evidence from proofreading and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 219-264.
47. Johnston, R. S., & Thompson, B. G. (1989). Is dependence on phonological information in children's reading a product of instructional approach? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 131-145.
48. Kwantes, P. J., & Marmurek, H. H. (2007). Controlling lexical contributions to the reading of pseudo-homophones. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 373-378.
49. Lee, Y.-A., Binder, K. S., Kim, J.-O., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1999). Activation of phonological codes during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 948-964.
50. Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Evidence for the use of assembled phonology in accessing the meaning of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 573-592. (Pubitemid 128548235)
51. Marmurek, H. H., & Kwantes, P. J. (1996). Reading words and wirds: Phonology and lexical access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 696-714.
52. Martin, R. C. (1982). The pseudohomophone effect: The role of visual similarity in nonword decisions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 395-409.
53. McCann, R. S., & Besner, D. (1987). Reading pseudo-homophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 14-24.
54. McCann, R. S., Besner, D., & Davelaar, E. (1988). Word recognition and identification: Do word-frequency effects reflect lexical access? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 693-706.
55. New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., & Pallier, C. (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate words frequencies: Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 661-677.
56. Pallier, C. (1995). Rôle de la syllabe dans la perception de la parole: études attentionnelles. PhD thesis. Paris: École des hautes études en sciences sociales.
57. Perfetti, C. A., & Bell, L. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and masked priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 473-485.
58. Perfetti, C. A., Bell, L., & Delaney, S. (1988). Automatic phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 59-70.
59. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modelling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273-315.
60. Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2005). Does conalprime CANAL more than cinal? Masked phonological priming effects in Spanish with the lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 33, 557-565. (Pubitemid 46207080)
61. Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53, 97-145. (Pubitemid 44063953)
62. Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358, 534 nonwords: the ARC nonword database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 1339-1362.
63. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., & Binder, K. S. (1998). Phonological codes and eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 476-497. (Pubitemid 128549086)
64. Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A. (1995). Phonological codes are automatically activated during reading: Evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm. Psychological Science, 6, 26-30.
65. Reynolds, M., & Besner, D. (2005). Basic processes in reading: A critical review of pseudo-homophone effects in reading aloud and a new computational account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 622-646. (Pubitemid 43119952)
66. Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., & Rubenstein, M. (1971). Evidence for phonemic coding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 645-657.
67. Seidenberg, M. S., Petersen, A., MacDonald, M. C., & Plaut, D. C. (1996). Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 48-62. (Pubitemid 126491299)
68. Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocen-tricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an "outlier" orthography: Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584-615.
69. Stone, G. O., & Van Orden, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 744-774.
70. Taft, M. (1982). An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules? Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
71. Taft, M., & Russell, B. (1992). Pseudohomophone naming and the word frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 51-71.
72. Tan, L. H., & Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Phonological and associative inhibition in the early stages of English word identification: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 59-69.
73. Transler, C., & Reitsma, P. (2005). Phonological coding in reading of deaf children: pseudo-homophone effects in lexical decision. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 525-542. (Pubitemid 41712578)
74. Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound and reading. Memory and Cognition, 15, 181-198.
75. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
76. Van Orden, G. C. (1991). Phonological mediation is fundamental to reading. In Besner, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (Eds.). Basic Processes in Reading. Visual Word Recognition (pp. 238-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
77. Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C., & Hale, B. L. (1988). Word indentification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 371-386.
78. Van Orden, G. C., & Kloos, H. (2005). The question of phonology and reading. In M.S., Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The Science of Reading: A Handbook (pp. 61-78). London: Blackwell Publishing.
79. Van Orden, G. C., Stone, G. O., Garlington, K. L., Markson, L. R., Pinnt, G. S., Simonfy, C. M., & Brichetto, T. (1992). "Assembled" phonology and reading: A case study in how theoretical perspective shapes empirical investigation. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning (pp. 249-292). North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
80. Wheat, K. L., Cornelissen, P. L., Frost, S. J., & Hansen, P. C. (2010). During visual word recognition, phonology is accessed within 100 ms and may be mediated by a speech production code: Evidence from magnetoencephalography. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 5229-5233.
81. Xu, B., & Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Nonstrategic subjective threshold effects in phonemic masking. Memory & Cognition, 27, 26-36. (Pubitemid 29110626)
82. Ziegler, J. C., Ferrand, L., Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., & Grainger, J. (2000). Visual and phonological codes in letter and word recognition: Evidence from incremental priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 671-692.
83. Ziegler, J. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (1995). Phonological information provides early sources of constraint in the processing of letter strings. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 567-593.
84. Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Klüppel, D. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: Still a challenge for current word recognition models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 547-559. (Pubitemid 33594818)
85. Ziegler, J. C., Van Orden, G. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). Phonology can help or hurt the perception of print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 845-860. (Pubitemid 127456147)