Substituted-letter and transposed-letter effects in a masked priming paradigm with French developing readers and dyslexics

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Volumn 114, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 47-62

  Lété, Bernard ^a   Fayol, Michel ^b  

^a Lyon University   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ BLAISE PASCAL   (France)

Author keywords

Dyslexia; Masked priming; Orthographic processing; Reading development; Substituted letter priming; Transposed letter priming

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; DECISION MAKING; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; READING; RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CUES; DECISION MAKING; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84870653641     PISSN: 00220965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Acha J., Perea M. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: Evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. British Journal of Psychology 2008, 99:245-264.
2. Acha J., Perea M. On the role of consonants and vowels in visual-word processing. Evidence with a letter search paradigm. Language and Cognitive Processes 2010, 25:423-438.
3. Adams M.J. Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Bertrand D., Fluss J., Billard C., Ziegler J.C. Efficacité, sensibilité, spécificité: Comparaison de différents tests de lecture. Année Psychologique 2010, 110:299-320.
5. Borgwaldt S.R., Hellwig F.M., de Groot A.M.B. Onset entropy matters: Letter-to-phoneme mappings in seven languages. Reading and Writing 2005, 18:211-229.
6. Castles A., Davis C., Cavalot P., Forster K.I. Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: Masked form priming and transposed-letter effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2007, 97:165-182.
7. Castles A., Davis C., Forster K.I. Word recognition development in children: Insights from masked priming. Masked priming: The state of the art 2003, 345-360. Psychology Press, Hove, UK. S. Kinoshita, S. Lupker (Eds.).
8. Castles A., Davis C., Letcher T. Neighborhood effects on masked form-priming in developing readers. Language and Cognitive Processes 1999, 14:201-224.
9. Castles A., Nation K. How does orthographic learning happen?. From inkmarks to ideas: Challenges and controversies about word recognition and reading 2006, 151-179. Psychology Press, London. S. Andrews (Ed.).
10. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 2nd ed.
11. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 2001, 108:204-256.
12. Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
13. Davis C.J. The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review 2010, 117:713-758.
14. De Luca M., Burani C., Paizi D., Spinelli D., Zoccolotti P. Letter and letter-string processing in developmental dyslexia. Cortex 2010, 46:1272-1283.
15. Dufau S., Lété B., Touzet C., Glotin H., Ziegler J., Grainger J. A developmental perspective on visual word recognition: New evidence and a self-organising model. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2010, 22:669-694.
16. Ehri L. The development of spelling knowledge and its role in reading acquisition and reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1989, 22:356-365.
17. Ehri L.C. Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading 1995, 18:116-125.
18. Faust M.E., Balota D.A., Spieler D.H., Ferraro F.R. Individual differences in information processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin 1999, 125:777-799.
19. Forster K.I. Computational modeling and elementary process analysis in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:1292-1310.
20. Forster K.I., Davis C. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1984, 10:680-698.
21. Forster K.I., Davis C. The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:1-25.
22. Forster K.I., Davis C., Schoknecht C., Carter R. Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 1987, 39:211-251.
23. Forster K.I., Forster J.C. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2003, 35:116-124.
24. Frith U. Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. Surface dyslexia 1985, 301-331. Lawrence Erlbaum, London. K.E. Patterson, J.C. Marshall, M. Coltheart (Eds.).
25. Glotin H., Warnier P., Dandurand F., Dufau S., Lété B., Touzet C., et al. An adaptive resonance theory account of implicit learning of orthographic word forms. Journal of Physiology (Paris) 2010, 104:19-26.
26. Gomez P., Ratcliff R., Perea M. The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review 2008, 115:577-601.
27. Grainger J. Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:1-35.
28. Grainger J., van Heuven W. Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. The mental lexicon 2003, 1-24. Nova Science, New York. P. Bonin (Ed.).
29. Grainger J., Bouttevin S., Truc C., Bastien M., Ziegler J.C. Word superiority, pseudoword superiority, and learning to read: A comparison of dyslexic and normal readers. Brain and Language 2003, 87:432-440.
30. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:1158-1176.
31. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 1996, 103:518-565.
32. Grainger J., Lété B., Bertrand D., Dufau S., Ziegler J. Evidence for multiple routes in learning to read. Cognition 2012, 123:280-292.
33. Grainger J., Whitney C. Does the huamn mind raed wrods as a wlohe?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:58-59.
34. Grainger J., Ziegler J.C. Cross-code consistency effects in visual word recognition. Single-word reading: Biological and behavioral perspectives 2007, 129-157. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. E.L. Grigorenko, A. Naples (Eds.).
35. Masked priming: The state of the art 2003, Psychology Press, Hove, UK. S. Kinoshita, S.J. Lupker (Eds.).
36. Lefavrais P. Test de l'Alouette 1965, Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée (ECPA), Paris.
37. Lété, B., & Ducrot, S. (2008). Visuo-attentional processing by dyslexic readers in the Reicher-Wheeler task. Current Psychology Letters, 24, http://www.cpl.revues.org/document3523.html.
38. Lété B., Peereman R., Fayol M. Phoneme-to-grapheme consistency and word-frequency effects on spelling among first- to fifth-grade French children: A regression-based study. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 58:952-977.
39. Lété B., Sprenger-Charolles L., Colé P. Manulex: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary-school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2004, 36:156-166.
40. Lupker S.J., Perea M., Davis C.M. Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels, and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:93-116.
41. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88:375-407.
42. Metsala J., Ehri L.C. Word recognition in beginning literacy 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
43. Nation K., Angell P., Castles A. Orthographic learning via self-teaching in children learning to read English: Effects of exposure, durability, and context. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2007, 96:71-84.
44. O'Brien B.A., Wolf M., Miller L.T., Lovett M.W., Morris R. Orthographic processing efficiency in developmental dyslexia: An investigation of age and treatment factors at the sublexical level. Annals of Dyslexia 2011, 61:111-135.
45. Peereman R., Content A. LexOP: A lexical database with orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1999, 31:376-379.
46. Peereman R., Lété B., Sprenger-Charolles L. Manulex-infra: Distributional characteristics of grapheme-phoneme mappings, infra-lexical, and lexical units in child-directed written material. Behavior Research Methods 2007, 39:593-603.
47. Perea M., Acha J. Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. Acta Psychologica 2009, 130:127-137.
48. Perea M., Carreiras M. Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect?. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:69-92.
49. Perea M.L., Lupker S.J. Does jugde activate court? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31:829-841.
50. Perea M., Lupker S.J. Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 51:231-246.
51. Perea M., Lupker S.J. Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. Masked priming: The state of the art 2003, 97-120. Psychology Press, Hove, UK. S. Kinoshita, S. Lupker (Eds.).
52. Perry C., Ziegler J.C., Zorzi M. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP model of reading aloud. Psychological Review 2007, 114:273-315.
53. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., Patterson K.E. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 1996, 103:56-115.
54. Pratarelli M.E., Perry K.E., Galloway A.M. Automatic lexical access in children. New evidence from masked identity priming. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1994, 58:346-358.
55. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: Twenty years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422.
56. Schoonbaert S., Grainger J. Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes 2004, 19:333-367.
57. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 1989, 96:447-452.
58. Seymour P.H.K., Aro M., Erskine J.M. Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology 2003, 94:143-174.
59. Share D.L. Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition 1995, 55:151-218.
60. Share D. Orthographic learning at a glance. On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2004, 87:267-298.
61. Share D.L., Shalev C. Self-teaching in normal and disabled readers. Reading and Writing 2004, 17:769-800.
62. Shaywitz S.A., Gruen J., Mody M., Shaywitz B.A. Dyslexia. The handbook of child language disorders 2009, 115-139. Psychology Press, Boca Raton, FL. R.G. Schwartz (Ed.).
63. Treiman R. Spelling in normal children and dyslexics. Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention 1997, 191-219. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. B. Blachman (Ed.).
64. Whitney C. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8:221-243.
65. Ziegler J.C., Bertrand D., Tóth D., Csépe V., Reis A., Faísca L., et al. Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science 2010, 21:551-559.
66. Ziegler J.C., Goswami U. Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin 2005, 13:3-29.
67. Ziegler J.C., Jacobs A.M., Stone G.O. Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1996, 28:504-515.
68. Ziegler J.C., Stone G.O., Jacobs A.M. What is the pronunciation for _ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1997, 29:600-618.