Identifying inhibitory compounds in lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates using an exometabolomics approach

BMC Biotechnology

Volumn 14, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Zha, Ying ^a,b   Westerhuis, Johan A ^b,c   Muilwijk, Bas ^a   Overkamp, Karin M ^a   Nijmeijer, Bernadien M ^a   Coulier, Leon ^a,b   Smilde, Age K ^b,c   Punt, Peter J ^a,b  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b Netherlands Metabolomics Centre (NMC)   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

(n)PLS model; Double cross validation; EA GC MS; EC GC MS; Fermentation; Inhibitor; Lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysate; Metabolomics

Indexed keywords

CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; FERMENTATION; STRAW; WOOD PRODUCTS; YEAST;

CROSS VALIDATION; EA-GC-MS; EC-GC-MS; INHIBITOR; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; METABOLOMICS; PLS MODELING;

BIOMASS;

5 HYDROXYMETHYLFURFURAL; ACETIC ACID ETHYL ESTER; ACID; ALDEHYDE DERIVATIVE; ALKALINE; BAGASSE; CARBOHYDRATE; CHLOROFORMIC ACID ETHYL ESTER; FURFURAL; HYDROPEROXIDE; LIGNOCELLULOSE; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS HYDROLYSATE; PERACETIC ACID; PHENYLACETALDEHYDE; SORBIC ACID; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VANILLIN;

ARTICLE; BARLEY; BARLEY STRAW; BATCH FERMENTATION; BIOMASS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORN STOVER; DERIVATIZATION; DILUTION; EXOMETABOLOMICS; FERMENTATION INHIBITION; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; MAIZE; MASS FRAGMENTOGRAPHY; METABOLOMICS; NONHUMAN; OAK; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SAWDUST; STATISTICAL MODEL; STRAW; SUGARCANE; WHEAT; WHEAT STRAW; WILLOW; WILLOW WOOD CHIP; WOOD CHIP;

BIOMASS; CHROMATOGRAPHY; FERMENTATION; INHIBITORS; LIGNOCELLULOSE; STRAW; WOOD PRODUCTS; YEASTS;

BIOMASS; CELLULOSE; FERMENTATION; FLAVONES; FURALDEHYDE; HORDEUM; LIGNIN; METABOLOMICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PLANT STEMS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SALIX; TRITICUM; WOOD; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84897390996     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6750-14-22     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Galbe M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Lidén G, Zacchi G. Bio-ethanol - the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends Biotechnol 2006, 24:549-556. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.10.004, 17050014.
2. González-García S, Moreira MT, Feijoo G. Comparative environmental performance of lignocellulosic ethanol from different feedstocks. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2010, 14:2077-2085.
3. Jørgensen H, Kristensen JB, Felby C. Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities. Biofuel Bioprod Bior 2007, 1:119-134.
4. van Dyk JS, Pletschke BI. A review of lignocellulose bioconversion using enzymatic hydrolysis and synergistic cooperation between enzymes-Factors affecting enzymes, conversion and synergy. Biotechnol Adv 2012, 30:1458-1480. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.03.002, 22445788.
5. Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresource Technol 2010, 101:4851-4861.
6. Gupta R, Khasa YP, Kuhad RC. Evaluation of pretreatment methods in improving the enzymatic saccharification of cellulosic materials. Carbohyd Polym 2011, 84:1103-1109.
7. Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresource Technol 2002, 83:1-11.
8. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresource Technol 2000, 74:25-33.
9. Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biot 2004, 66:10-26.
10. Panagiotopoulos IA, Bakker RR, de Vrije T, Koukios EG. Effect of pretreatment severity on the conversion of barley straw to fermentable substrates and the release of inhibitory compounds. Bioresource Technol 2011, 102:11204-11211.
11. Zha Y, Muilwijk B, Coulier L, Punt PJ. Inhibitory compounds in lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates during hydrolysate fermentation processes. J Bioprocess Biotechniq 2012, 2. doi:10.4172/2155-9821.1000112.
12. Huang H, Guo X, Li D, Liu M, Wu J, Ren H. Identification of crucial yeast inhibitors in bio-ethanol and improvement of fermentation at high pH and high total solids. Bioresource Technol 2011, 102:7486-7493.
13. Heer D, Sauer U. Identification of furfural as a key toxin in lignocellulosic hydrolysates and evolution of a tolerant yeast strain. Microb Biotechnol 2008, 1:497-506. 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2008.00050.x, 3815291, 21261870.
14. Thomsen MH, Thygesen A, Thomsen AB. Identification and characterization of fermentation inhibitors formed during hydrothermal treatment and following SSF of wheat straw. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2009, 83:447-455. 10.1007/s00253-009-1867-1, 19194701.
15. Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K. Fermentation Inhibitors in Ethanol Processes and Different Strategies to Reduce Their Effects. Biofuels: Alternative Feedstocks and Conversion Processes 2011, 287-311. USA: Academic Press, Pandey A, Larroche C, Ricke SC, Dussap C, Gnansounou E.
16. Almeida JRM, Modig T, Petersson A, Hähn-Hägerdal B, Lidén G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Chem Technol Biot 2007, 82:340-349.
17. Jönsson L, Alriksson B, Nilvebrant N. Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6:16. 10.1186/1754-6834-6-16, 3574029, 23356676.
18. Zha Y, Punt PJ. Exometabolomics approaches in studying the application of lignocellulosic biomass as fermentation feedstock. Metabolites 2013, 3:119-143.
19. Chen SF, Mowery RA, Castleberry VA, van Walsum G, Chambliss CK. High-performance liquid chromatography method for simultaneous determination of aliphatic acid, aromatic acid and neutral degradation products in biomass pretreatment hydrolysates. J Chromatogr A 2006, 1104:54-61. 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.11.136, 16376896.
20. Klinke HB, Olsson L, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. Potential inhibitors from wet oxidation of wheat straw and their effect on ethanol production of saccharomyces cerevisiae: Wet oxidation and fermentation by yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 2003, 81:738-747. 10.1002/bit.10523, 12529889.
21. Larsson S, Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Tengborg C, Stenberg K, Zacchi G, Nilvebrant NO. The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood. Enzyme Microb Technol 1999, 24:151-159.
22. Jönsson LJ, Palmqvist E, Nilvebrant N, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Detoxification of wood hydrolysates with laccase and peroxidase from the white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1998, 49:691-697.
23. Martinez A, Rodriguez ME, York SW, Preston JF, Ingram LO. Effects of Ca(OH)2 treatments ('overliming') on the composition and toxicity of bagasse hemicellulose hydrolysates. Biotechnol Bioeng 2000, 69:526-536. 10.1002/1097-0290(20000905)69:5<526::AID-BIT7>3.0.CO;2-E, 10898862.
24. Roessner U, Bowne J. What is metabolomics all about?. Biotechniques 2009, 46:363-365. 10.2144/000113133, 19480633.
25. Fiehn O. Metabolomics - the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Mol Biol 2002, 48:155-171. 10.1023/A:1013713905833, 11860207.
26. van der Werf MJ, Jellema RH, Hankemeier T. Microbial metabolomics: replacing trial-and-error by the unbiased selection and ranking of targets. J Ind Microbiol Biot 2005, 32:234-252.
27. Braaksma M, Bijlsma S, Coulier L, Punt PJ, van der Werf MJ. Metabolomics as a tool for target identification in strain improvement: the influence of phenotype definition. Microbiology 2011, 157:147-159. 10.1099/mic.0.041244-0, 20847006.
28. Krishnan A, Williams LJ, McIntosh AR, Abdi H. Partial least squares (PLS) methods for neuroimaging: a tutorial and review. Neuroimage 2011, 56:455-475. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.034, 20656037.
29. Bro R. Multiway calibration. Multilinear PLS. J Chemometrics 1996, 10:47-61.
30. Smilde AK. Comments on multilinear PLS. J Chemometrics 1997, 11:367-377.
31. Westerhuis J, Hoefsloot H, Smit S, Vis D, Smilde A, van Velzen E, van Duijnhoven J, van Dorsten F. Assessment of PLSDA cross validation. Metabolomics 2008, 4:81-89.
32. Smit S, van Breemen MJ, Hoefsloot HCJ, Smilde AK, Aerts JMFG, de Koster CG. Assessing the statistical validity of proteomics based biomarkers. Anal Chim Acta 2007, 592:210-217. 10.1016/j.aca.2007.04.043, 17512828.
33. Zha Y, Slomp R, Groenestijn J, Punt PJ. Preparation and Evaluation of Lignocellulosic Biomass Hydrolysates for Growth by Ethanologenic Yeasts. Microbial Metabolic Engineering: Methods and Protocols 2012, 245-259. USA: Humana Press, Qiong C, Volume 834.
34. Brejning J, Jespersen L. Protein expression during lag phase and growth initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int J Food Microbiol 2002, 75:27-38. 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00726-7, 11999115.
35. Kuyper M, Winkler AA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Minimal metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient anaerobic xylose fermentation: a proof of principle. FEMS Yeast Res 2004, 4:655-664. 10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.01.003, 15040955.
36. Humpula JF, Chundawat SPS, Vismeh R, Jones AD, Balan V, Dale BE. Rapid quantification of major reaction products formed during thermochemical pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass using GC-MS. J Chromatogr B 2011, 879:1018-1022.
37. Ranatunga TD, Jervis J, Helm RF, McMillan JD, Hatzis C. Identification of inhibitory components toxic toward Zymomonas mobilis CP4(pZB5) xylose fermentation. Appl Biochem Biotech 1997, 67:185-198.
38. Andersson CA, Bro R. The n-way toolbox for MATLAB. Chemometrics Intellig Lab Syst 2000, 52:1-4.
39. Taherzadeh MJ, Gustafsson L, Niklasson C, Lidén G. Conversion of furfural in aerobic and anaerobic batch fermentation of glucose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng 1999, 87:169-174. 10.1016/S1389-1723(99)89007-0, 16232445.
40. Liu ZL, Slininger PJ, Dien BS, Berhow MA, Kurtzman CP, Gorsich SW. Adaptive response of yeasts to furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and new chemical evidence for HMF conversion to 2,5-bis-hydroxymethylfuran. J Ind Microbiol Biot 2004, 31:345-352.
41. Klinke HB, Ahring BK, Schmidt AS, Thomsen AB. Characterization of degradation products from alkaline wet oxidation of wheat straw. Bioresource Technol 2002, 82:15-26.
42. Millati R, Niklasson C, Taherzadeh MJ. Effect of pH, time and temperature of overliming on detoxification of dilute-acid hydrolyzates for fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Process Biochem 2002, 38:515-522.
43. Almeida JRM, Modig T, Röder A, Lidén G, Gorwa-Grauslund M. Pichia stipitis xylose reductase helps detoxifying lignocellulosic hydrolysate by reducing 5-hydroxymethyl-furfural (HMF). Biotechnol Biofuels 2008, 1:12. 10.1186/1754-6834-1-12, 2464581, 18547412.
44. Wierckx N, Koopman F, Bandounas L, de Winde JH, Ruijssenaars HJ. Isolation and characterization of Cupriavidus basilensis HMF14 for biological removal of inhibitors from lignocellulosic hydrolysate. Microb Biotechnol 2010, 3:336-343. 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00158.x, 3815375, 21255332.
45. Koopman F, Wierckx N, de Winde JH, Ruijssenaars HJ. Identification and characterization of the furfural and 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural degradation pathways of Cupriavidus basilensis HMF14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:4919-4924. 10.1073/pnas.0913039107, 2841868, 20194784.
46. Tofighi A, Azin M, Assadi MM, Assadi-rad MHA, Nejadsattari T, Fallahian MR. Inhibitory effect of high concentrations of furfural on industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int J Environ Res 2010, 4:137-142.
47. Li Q, Metthew Lam LK, Xun L. Biochemical characterization of ethanol-dependent reduction of furfural by alcohol dehydrogenases. Biodegradation 2011, 22:1227-1237. 10.1007/s10532-011-9477-x, 21526389.
48. Allen S, Clark W, McCaffery JM, Cai Z, Lanctot A, Slininger P, Liu ZL, Gorsich S. Furfural induces reactive oxygen species accumulation and cellular damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 2010, 3:2. 10.1186/1754-6834-3-2, 2820483, 20150993.
49. Ask M, Bettiga M, Mapelli V, Olsson L. The influence of HMF and furfural on redox-balance and energy-state of xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6:22. 10.1186/1754-6834-6-22, 3598934, 23409974.
50. Larsson S, Quintana-Sáinz A, Reimann A, Nilvebrant NO, Jönsson LJ. Influence of lignocellulose-derived aromatic compounds on oxygen-limited growth and ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Biochem Biotech 2000, 84-86:617-632.
51. Jørgensen H. Effect of nutrients on fermentation of pretreated wheat straw at very high dry matter content by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2009, 153:44-57. 10.1007/s12010-008-8456-0, 19093228.
52. Mabee WE, McFarlane PN, Saddler JN. Biomass availability for lignocellulosic ethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35:4519-4529.
53. Zhang YHP. What is vital (and not vital) to advance economically-competitive biofuels production. Process Biochem 2011, 46:2091-2110.
54. Dunn WB, Ellis DI. Metabolomics: current analytical platforms and methodologies. TRAC-Trend Anal Chem 2005, 24:285-294.
55. Keating JD, Panganiban C, Mansfield SD. Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds. Biotechnol Bioeng 2006, 93:1196-1206. 10.1002/bit.20838, 16470880.
56. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification. Bioresource Technol 2000, 74:17-24.
57. Mira NP, Lourenço AB, Fernandes AR, Becker JD, Sá-Correia I. The RIM101 pathway has a role in Saccharomyces cerevisiae adaptive response and resistance to propionic acid and other weak acids. FEMS Yeast Res 2009, 9:202-216. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00473.x, 19220866.
58. Stratford M, Plumridge A, Archer DB. Decarboxylation of sorbic acid by spoilage yeasts is associated with the PAD1 gene. Appl Environ Microb 2007, 73:6534-6542.
59. Pavillard ER, Wright EA. An antibiotic from maggots. Nature 1957, 180:916-917.
60. van Hoek P, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Effect of specific growth rate on fermentative capacity of baker's yeast. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998, 64:4226-4233. 106631, 9797269.
61. Rajalahti T, Arneberg R, Berven FS, Myhr K, Ulvik RJ, Kvalheim OM. Biomarker discovery in mass spectral profiles by means of selectivity ratio plot. Chemometrics Intellig Lab Syst 2009, 95:35-48.
62. Kvalheim OM. Interpretation of partial least squares regression models by means of target projection and selectivity ratio plots. J Chemometrics 2010, 24:496-504.
63. Hendriks MMWB, van Eeuwijk FA, Jellema RH, Westerhuis JA, Reijmers TH, Hoefsloot HCJ, Smilde AK. Data-processing strategies for metabolomics studies. TRAC-Trend Anal Chem 2011, 30:1685-1698.
64. van den Berg R, Hoefsloot HCJ, Westerhuis J, Smilde A, van der Werf MJ. Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genomics 2006, 7:142. 10.1186/1471-2164-7-142, 1534033, 16762068.