Learning Within Scripted and Nonscripted Peer-Tutoring Sessions: The Malaysian Context

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 67-77

  Ismail, Hairul N ^a   Alexander, Joyce M ^b  

^a SCHOOL OF PHYSICS   (Malaysia)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Educational reform in Malaysia; Scripted and non scripted peer tutoring; Student centered learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 29044450462     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: 19400675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JOER.99.2.67-77     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ahmad, S. H. (1997, June). Smart schools: The way forward. Paper presented at Discovery Malaysia 1997 Conference, Kulala Lumpur, Malaysia.
2. Allen, V. L. (1976). Children as tutors: Theory and research on tutoring. New York: Academic.
3. Bargh, J. A., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 593-604.
4. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
5. Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
6. Cohen, S., & Willis, T A., (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
7. Damon, W. (1984). Peer education: The untapped potential. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 5, 331-343.
8. DeMarco, J. (1993). Peer helping skills: A leader’s guide to training peer helpers and peer tutors for middle and high school. Minneapolis, MN: Johnson Institute.
9. Dimant, R. J., & Bearison, D. J. (1991). Development of formal reasoning during successive peer interaction. Developmental Psychology, 27, 277-284.
10. Enright, S., & Alexrod, S. (1995). Peer tutoring: Applied behavior analysis working in the classroom. School Psychology Quarterly, 10(1), 29-40.
11. Fantuzzo, J. W., Riggio, R. W., Connelly, R., & Dimeff, L. A. (1989). Effects of reciprocal tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 173-177.
12. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Bentz, J., Phillips, N. B., & Hamlett, C. L. (1994). The nature of student interactions during peer tutoring with and without prior training and experience. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 75-103.
13. Gartner, A., & Riessman, F. (1993). Peer tutoring: Toward a new model. ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education, Report No. EDO-SP-93-2. Washington, DC: (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED362506)
14. Hassan, M. B. (1994). Media selection for knowledge transfer: Theory and practice among Malaysian agricultural extension agencies. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Science, 54(7-A), 2369.
15. Hinkle, D. E., & McLaughlin, G. W. (1984). Selection of models in contingency tables: A reexamination. Research in Higher Education, 21, 415-423.
16. Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Maruyama, G. (1983). Interdependence and interpersonal attribution among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals: A theoretical foundation and meta-analysis of the research. Review of Educational Research, 53(1), 5-54.
17. King, A. (1989). Effects of self-questioning training on college students’ comprehension of lectures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 366-381.
18. King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31 (2), 338-368.
19. King, A. (1997). ASK to THINK-TEL WHY: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 32, 221-235.
20. King, A. (1998). Transactive peer tutoring: Distributing cognition and metacognition. Educational Psychologist, 10, 57-76.
21. King, A., Staffieri, A., & Adelgais, A., (1998). Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 134-152.
22. Lambiotte, J. G., Dansereau, D. F., O’Donnell, A. M., Young, M. D., Skaggs, L. P., Hall, R. H., et al. (1987). Manipulating cooperative scripts for teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 424-430.
23. Lepper, M. R., Aspinwall, L. G., Mumme, D. L., & Chabay, R. W. (1990). Self-perception and social perception processes in tutoring: Subtle social control strategies of exert tutors. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Self-inference processes: The Ontario symposium (pp. 217-237). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Levin, H., & Meister, G. (1986). Is CAI cost effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 745-749.
25. Mugny, G., & Doise, W. (1978). Socio-cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 181-192.
26. Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science (Report R-3928-NSF). Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
27. Onn, F. C. (1998, July 10). UPSR based on smart school concept by 2001. New Straits Times, p. 9.
28. Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
29. Razak, N. T. (1997, April 11). Smart schools era to begin in 1999. The Star, p. 11.
30. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 49, 71-82.
32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in the society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Wagner, L. (1982). Peer teaching: Historical perspectives. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
34. Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-39.
35. Whitman, N. (1988). Peer teaching: To teach is to learn twice. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education. Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED305016)
36. Wolfe, J. A., Fantuzzo, J. W., Wolfe, P. K. (1986). The effects of reciprocal peer management and group contingencies on the arithmetic proficiency of underachieving students. Behavior Therapy, 17, 253-265.