Erratum: High rates of gene flow by pollen and seed in oak populations across Europe (PLoS ONE (2014) 9:1 (e85130) DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0085130);High rates of gene flow by pollen and seed in oak populations across Europe

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Gerber, Sophie ^a,b   Chadoeuf, Joël ^c   Gugerli, Felix ^d   Lascoux, Martin ^e   Buiteveld, Joukje ^f   Cottrell, Joan ^g   Dounavi, Aikaterini ^d,l   Fineschi, Silvia ^h   Forrest, Laura L ^g,m   Fogelqvist, Johan ^e,n   Goicoechea, Pablo G ⁱ   Jensen, Jan Svejgaard ^j   Salvini, Daniela ^h,j   Vendramin, Giovanni G ^k   Kremer, Antoine ^a,b  

^a UMR 1202 BIOGECO   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^c Researches Center of Avignon   (France)

^d SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

^e UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^f WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^g FOREST RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^h CNR   (Italy)

ⁱ NEIKER and a Vaccine producing Commercial Company CZVSL   (Spain)

^j UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^k Institute of Biosciences and BioResources   (Italy)

^l Division of Forest Protection   (Germany)

^m ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

ⁿ SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT TREE; ARTICLE; CROSS FERTILIZATION; DENMARK; DNA DETERMINATION; EUROPE; FRANCE; GENE FLOW; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; ITALY; MATING SYSTEM; NETHERLANDS; NONHUMAN; OAK; PATERNITY; PATERNITY TEST; PLANT DISPERSAL; PLANT SEED; POLLEN; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SPAIN; SWEDEN; SWITZERLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EUROPE; GENE FLOW; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; POLLEN; QUERCUS; REPRODUCTION; SEEDLING; SEEDS; TREES;

EID: 84896296391     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091301     Document Type: Erratum

References (69)

1. Shea K (2007) How the Wood Moves. Science 315: 1231-1232.
2. Savolainen O, Pyhäjärvi T, Knürr T (2007) Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 38: 595-619.
3. Hanewinkel M, Cullmann DA, Schelhaas MJ, Nabuurs GJ, Zimmermann NE (2013) Climate change may cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land. Nature Clim Change 3: 203-207.
4. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Lexer C, Steinkellner H, Gloessl J, et al. (1999) Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed stand of Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Mol Ecol 8: 831-841. (Pubitemid 29266889)
5. Valbuena-Carabaña M, González-Martínez S, Hardy S, Gil L (2007) Fine-scale spatial genetic structure in mixed oak stands with different levels of hybridization. Mol Ecol 16: 1207-1219. (Pubitemid 46354193)
6. Salvini D, Bruschi P, Fineschi S, Grossoni P, Kjær ED, et al. (2009) Natural hybridisation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus pubescens Willd. within an Italian stand as revealed by microsatellite fingerprinting. Plant Biology 11: 758-765.
7. Curtu A, Gailing O, Finkeldey R (2009) Patterns of contemporary hybridization inferred from paternity analysis in a four-oak-species forest. BMC Evol Biol 9: 284.
8. Chybicki IJ, Burczyk J (2010) Realized gene flow within mixed stands of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) L. revealed at the stage of naturally established seedling. Mol Ecol 19: 2137-2151.
9. Moran EV, Clark JS (2012) Between-site differences in the scale of dispersal and gene flow in red oak. PLoS One 7: e36492.
10. Lepais O, Petit R, Guichoux E, Lavabre J, Alberto F, et al. (2009) Species relative abundance and direction of introgression in oaks. Mol Ecol 18: 2228-2242.
11. Dupouey J, Badeau V (1993) Morphological variability of oaks (Quercus robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt) Liebl, Quercus pubescens Willd) in northern France: preliminary results. Ann sci for 50: 35s-40s.
12. Kremer A, Dupouey J, Douglas Deans J, Cottrell J, Csaikl U, et al. (2002) Leaf morphological differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea is stable across western European mixed oak stands. Ann Forest Sci 59: 777-787. (Pubitemid 36803446)
13. Curtu A, Gailing O, Finkeldey R (2007) Evidence for hybridization and introgression within a species-rich oak (Quercus spp.) community. BMC Evol Biol 7: 218.
14. Dow BD, Ashley MV, Howe HF (1995) Characterization of highly variable (GA/CT)n microsatellites in the bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Theor Appl Genet 91: 137-141.
15. n-microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea . Plant Mol Biol 33: 1093-1096.
16. n Microsatellite Loci from Quercus Robur. Hereditas 129: 183-186.
17. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Kremer A (1998) Organisation spatiale de la diversité génétique et flux polliniques dans une chênaie mixte. Genet Sel Evol 30: S137-S152. (Pubitemid 28527592)
18. Gugerli F, Walser JC, Dounavi K, Holderegger R, Finkeldey R (2007) Coincidence of small-scale spatial discontinuities in leaf morphology and nuclear microsatellite variation of Quercus petraea and Q. robur in a mixed forest. Ann Bot 99: 713-722. (Pubitemid 47355872)
19. Saintagne C, Bodénès C, Barreneche T, Pot D, Plomion C, et al. (2003) Distribution of genomic regions differentiating oak species assessed by QTL detection. Heredity 92: 20-30. (Pubitemid 38106557)
20. Klein E, Desassis N, Oddou-Muratorio S (2008) Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. IV. Whole interindividual variance of male fecundity estimated jointly with the dispersal kernel. Mol Ecol 17: 3323-3336. (Pubitemid 352030128)
21. Gerber S, Mariette S, Streiff R, Bodénès C, Kremer A (2000) Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis. Mol Ecol 9: 1037-1048. (Pubitemid 30613150)
22. Gerber S, Chabrier P, Kremer A (2003) FAMOZ: a software for parentage analysis using dominant, codominant and uniparentally inherited markers. Mol Ecol Notes 3: 479-481. (Pubitemid 37078226)
23. Marshall T, Slate J, Kruuk L, Pemberton J (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7: 639-655. (Pubitemid 28235973)
24. Dow B, Ashley M (1996) Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Mol Ecol 5: 615-627. (Pubitemid 27102782)
25. Oddou-Muratorio S, Klein E, Austerlitz F (2005) Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. II. Pollen dispersal and heterogeneity in mating success inferred from parent-offspring analysis. Mol Ecol 14: 4441-4452. (Pubitemid 44943721)
26. Nakanishi A, Tomaru N, Yoshimaru H, Manabe T, Yamamoto S (2005) Interannual genetic heterogeneity of pollen pools accepted by Quercus salicina individuals. Mol Ecol 14: 4469-4478. (Pubitemid 44943724)
27. Robledo-Arnuncio J, García C (2007) Estimation of the seed dispersal kernel from exact identification of source plants. Mol Ecol 16: 5098-5109. (Pubitemid 350157761)
28. Clark J (1998) Why trees migrate so fast: confronting theory with dispersal biology and the paleo record. Am Nat 152: 204-224.
29. Efron B, Tibshirani R (1994) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC. 436 p.
30. Diggle P (1983) Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns. London: Academic Press. 148 p.
31. Jamieson A, Taylor S (1997) Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. Anim Genet 28: 397-400. (Pubitemid 28209328)
32. Chapuis MP, Estoup A (2007) Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol 24: 621-631.
33. Tufto J, Engen S, Hindar K (1997) Stochastic dispersal processes in plant populations. Theor Popul Biol 52: 16-26. (Pubitemid 27451571)
34. Dow B, Ashley M (1998) High levels of gene flow in bur oak revealed by paternity analysis using microsatellites. J Hered 89: 62-70. (Pubitemid 28093805)
35. Nakanishi A, Tomaru N, Yoshimaru H, Kawahara T, Manabe T, et al. (2004) Patterns of pollen flow and genetic differentiation among pollen pools in Quercus salicina in a warm temperate old-growth evergreen broad-leaved forest. Silvae Genet 53: 258-264. (Pubitemid 40764477)
36. Craft KJ, Ashley MV (2010) Pollen-mediated gene flow in isolated and continuous stands of bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa (Fagaceae). Am J Bot 97: 1999-2006.
37. Bittencourt JVM, Sebbenn AM (2007) Patterns of pollen and seed dispersal in a small, fragmented population of the wind-pollinated tree Araucaria angustifolia in southern Brazil. Heredity 99: 580-591. (Pubitemid 350146918)
38. Kollmann J, Schill H (1996) Spatial patterns of dispersal, seed predation and germination during colonization of abandoned grassland by Quercus petraea and Corylus avellana. Vegetatio 125: 193-205.
39. Meagher T (1991) Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum . II. Patterns of male reproductive success. Am Nat 137: 738-752.
40. Aldrich PR, Hamrick JL (1998) Reproductive dominance of pasture trees in a fragmented tropical forest mosaic. Science 281: 103-105. (Pubitemid 28354053)
41. Lepais O, Gerber S (2011) Reproductive patterns shape introgression dynamics and species succession within the european white oak species complex. Evolution 65: 156-170.
42. Steinitz O, Troupin D, Vendramin GG, Nathan R (2011) Genetic evidence for a Janzen-Connell recruitment pattern in reproductive offspring of Pinus halepensis trees. Mol Ecol 20: 4152-4164.
43. Moran EV, Clark JS (2012) Causes and consequences of unequal seedling production in forest trees: a case study in red oaks. Ecology 93: 1082-1094.
44. Rodríguez-Muñoz R, Bretman A, Slate J, Walling CA, Tregenza T (2010) Natural and sexual selection in a wild insect population. Science 328: 1269-1272.
45. Pakkad G, Ueno S, Yoshimaru H (2008) Gene flow pattern and mating system in a small population of Quercus semiserrata Roxb. (Fagaceae). Forest Ecol Manag 255: 3819-3826.
46. Karl SA (2008) The effect of multiple paternity on the genetically effective size of a population. Mol Ecol 17: 3973-3977.
47. Yazdani R, Muona O, Rudin D, Szmidt AE (1985) Genetic structure of a Pinus sylvestris L. seed-tree stand and naturally regenerated understory. Forest Sci 31: 430-436. (Pubitemid 17244347)
48. Garcia C, Arroyo J, Godoy J, Jordano P (2005) Mating patterns, pollen dispersal, and the ecological maternal neighbourhood in a Prunus mahaleb L. population. Mol Ecol 14: 1821-1830. (Pubitemid 40623416)
49. Grivet D, Smouse PE, Sork VL (2005) A novel approach to an old problem: tracking dispersed seeds. Mol Ecol 14: 3585-3595.
50. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Birkes DS, Chybicki IJ (2006) Using genetic markers to directly estimate gene flow and reproductive success parameters in plants on the basis of naturally regenerated seedlings. Genetics 173: 363-372. (Pubitemid 43800208)
51. Buschbom J, Yanbaev Y, Degen B (2011) Efficient long-distance gene flow into an isolated relict oak stand. J Hered 102: 464-472.
52. Moran EV, Clark JS (2011) Estimating seed and pollen movement in a monoecious plant: a hierarchical Bayesian approach integrating genetic and ecological data. Mol Ecol 20: 1248-1262.
53. Burczyk J, Adams W, Moran G, Griffin A (2002) Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Mol Ecol 11: 2379-2391. (Pubitemid 35301908)
54. Austerlitz F, Dutech C, Smouse PE, Davis F, Sork VL (2007) Estimating anisotropic pollen dispersal: a case study in Quercus lobata. Heredity 99: 193-204. (Pubitemid 47123474)
55. Goto S, Shimatani K, Yoshimaru H, Takahashi Y (2006) Fat-tailed gene flow in the dioecious canopy tree species Fraxinus mandshurica var. japonica revealed by microsatellites. Mol Ecol 15: 2985-2996. (Pubitemid 44215468)
56. Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Kremer A (1996) Comparison of morphological characters and molecular markers for the analysis of hybridization in sessile and pedunculate oak. Ann Sci For 53: 79-91. (Pubitemid 3023965)
57. Petit R, Bodénès C, Ducousso A, Roussel G, Kremer A (2003) Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytol 161: 151-164. (Pubitemid 38047056)
58. Lepais O (2008) Étude de la dynamique d'hybridation dans le complexe d'espèces des chênes blancs (chênes pédonculés - Quercus robur, sessiles - Q. petraea, pubescents - Q. pubescens, tauzins - Q. pyrenaica). Thèse de l'École Doctorale Sciences et Environnements, Université de Bordeaux I, 278 p.
59. Gonzalez-Rodriguez A, Bain J, Golden J, Oyama K (2004) Chloroplast DNA variation in the Quercus affinis-Q-laurina complex in Mexico: geographical structure and associations with nuclear and morphological variation. Mol Ecol 13: 3467-3476. (Pubitemid 39415679)
60. Neophytou C, Aravanopoulos FA, Fink S, Dounavi A (2011) Interfertile oaks in an island environment. II. Limited hybridization between Quercus alnifolia Poech and Q. coccifera L. in a mixed stand. Eur J Forest Res 130: 623-635.
61. Hewitt G (2000) The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405: 907-913.
62. Austerlitz F, Dick C, Dutech C, Klein E, Oddou-Muratorio S, et al. (2004) Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Mol Ecol 13: 937-954. (Pubitemid 38390598)
63. Kamm U, Rotach P, Gugerli F, Siroky M, Edwards P, et al. (2009) Frequent long-distance gene flow in a rare temperate forest tree (Sorbus domestica) at the landscape scale. Heredity 103: 476-482.
64. Bossema I (1979) Jays and oaks: an eco-ethological study of a symbiosis. Behaviour 70: 1-117.
65. Niggemann M, Wiegand T, Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Bialozyt R (2012) Marked point pattern analysis on genetic paternity data for uncertainty assessment of pollen dispersal kernels. J Ecol 100: 264-276.
66. Janzen DH (1970) Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. Am Nat 104: 501-528.
67. Connell J (1971) On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in forest trees. In: den Boer P, Gradwell G, editors. Dynamics of populations. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation. pp. 298-312.
68. Koskela J, Lefèvre F, Schueler S, Kraigher H, Olrik DC, et al. (2013) Translating conservation genetics into management: Pan-European minimum requirements for dynamic conservation units of forest tree genetic diversity. Biol Conserv 157: 39-49.
69. Leonarduzzi C, Leonardi S, Menozzi P, Piotti A (2012) Towards an optimal sampling effort for paternity analysis in forest trees: what do the raw numbers tell us? iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry: 18-25.