Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 831-841

  Streiff, R ^a   Ducousso, A ^a   Lexer, C ^c   Steinkellner, H ^b   Gloessl, J ^b   Kremer, A ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Differentiation; Dispersion; Gene flow; Microsatellite; Pollen; Quercus

Indexed keywords

FOREST; GENETIC DIVERSITY; PATERNITY; PLANT REPRODUCTION; POLLINATION;

QUERCUS PETRAEA; QUERCUS ROBUR;

EID: 0033034284     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00637.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aas G (1991) Kreuzungversuche mit Stiel- und Traubeneichen (Quercus robur L. und Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.). Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung, 162, 141-145.
2. Adams WT, Birkes DS (1991) Estimating mating patterns in forest tree populations. In: (eds Fineschi S, Malvoti ME, Cannata F, Hattemer HH) Biochemical Markers in the Population Genetics of Forest Trees, pp. 157-172. SPB Academic Publishers, The Hague.
3. Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Kremer A (1995) Genetic, morphological, ecological and phenological differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. in a mixed stand of northwest of France. Silvae Genetica, 44, 1-10.
4. Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Petit RJ, Kremer A (1996) Mating system and asymmetric hybridization in a mixed stand of European oaks. Evolution, 50, 900-908.
5. Baradat P, Marpeau A, Bernard-Dagan C (1984) Les terpènes du pin maritime, aspects biologiques et génétiques VI. Estimation du taux moyen d'autofécondation et mise en évidence d'écarts à la panmixie dans un verger à graines de semis. Annales des Sciences Forestières, 41, 107-134.
6. Campbell DR (1991) Comparing pollen dispersal and gene flow in a natural population. Evolution, 45, 1965-1968.
7. Castaing JP, Vergeron P (1974) Principes et méthodes d'étude expérimentale de la dispersion du pollen de pin maritime dans le massif landais. Pollen et Spores, XV, 255-280.
8. Devlin B, Roeder K, Ellstrand NC (1988) Fractional paternity assignment: theoretical development and comparison to other methods. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 76, 369-380.
9. Di Giovanni F, Kevan PG (1991) Factors affecting pollen dynamics and its importance to pollen contamination: a review. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21, 1155-1170.
10. Dow BD, Ashley MV (1996) Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak Quercus macrocarpa. Molecular Ecology, 5, 615-627.
11. n microsatellites in the bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 91, 137-141.
12. Ennos RA (1994) Estimating the relative rates of pollen and seed migration among plant populations. Heredity, 72, 250-259.
13. Handel SN (1983) Pollination ecology, plant population structure, and gene flow. In: (ed. Real L) Pollination Biology, pp. 163-211. Academic Press, New York.
14. Lahtinen MJ, Pulkkinen P, Helander ML (1996) Potential gene flow by pollen between English oak (Quercus robur L.) stands in Finland. Forestry Studies, 28, 47-50.
15. Levin DA (1981) Dispersal versus gene flow in plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 68, 233-253.
16. Levin DA, Kerster HW (1974) Gene flow in seed plants. Evolutionary Biology, 7, 139-220.
17. Loveless MD, Hamrick JL (1984) Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecological Systems, 15, 65-95.
18. Lumaret R, Yacine A, Berrod A, Romane F, Li TX (1991) Mating system and genetic diversity in holm oak (Quercus ilex L Fagaceae). In: (eds Fineschi S, Malvolti ME, Cannata F, Hattemer HH) Biochemical Markers in the Population Genetics of Forest Trees, pp. 149-153. SPB Academic Publishers, The Hague.
19. Meagher TR (1986) Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. 1. Identification of the mostlikely male parent. The American Naturalist, 128, 199-215.
20. Meagher TR, Thompson E (1987) Analysis of parentage for naturally established seedlings of Chamaelirium luteum (Liliaceae). Ecology, 68, 803-812.
21. Nei M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.
22. Petit RJ, Kremer A, Wagner DB (1993) Finite island model for organelle and nuclear genes in plants. Heredity, 71, 630-641.
23. Pohl F (1934) Freilandversuche zur Bestäubungsökologie der Stieleiche. Beiträge zur morphologie und biologie des pollens. Beihefte zum Botanischem Centralblatt, 51, 673-691.
24. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2), a population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248-249.
25. Roeder K, Devlin B, Lindsay BG (1989) Applications of maximum likelihood methods to population genetic data for the estimation of individual fertilities. Biometrics, 45, 363-379.
26. Sharp W, Chisman HH (1961) Flowering and fruiting in the white oaks. I. Staminate flowering through pollen dispersal. Ecology, 42, 365-372.
27. Smouse PE, Chakraborty R (1986) The use of restriction fragment length polymorphisms in paternity analysis. American Journal of Human Genetics, 38, 918-939.
28. Smouse PE, Meagher TR (1994) Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae). Genetics, 136, 313-322.
29. Stanley RG, Linskens HF (1974) Pollen: Biology, Biochemistry and Management. Springer, Berlin.
30. n microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea. Plant Molecular Biology, 33, 1093-1096.
31. n microsatellite loci between Quercus species. Molecular Ecology, 6, 1189-1194.
32. Streiff R, Labbe T, Bacilieri R, Steinkellner H, Gloessl J, Kremer A (1998) Within population genetic structure in Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. assessed with isozymes and microsatellites. Molecular Ecology, 7, 317-328.
33. Tauber M (1977) Investigations of aerial pollen transport in a forested area. Dansk Botanisk Arkiv, 32, 1-121.
34. Wright J (1969) Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 2. The Theory of Gene Frequencies. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
35. Wright JW (1952) Pollen dispersion of some forest trees. United States Department of Agriculture, Notheastern Forest Experiment Station, paper 46.
36. Zanetto A, Kremer A (1995) Geographical structure of gene diver- sity in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. I. Monolocus patterns of variation. Heredity, 75, 506-517.
37. Zanetto A, Roussel G, Kremer A (1994) Geographic variation of inter-specific differentiation between Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Forest Genetics, 1, 111-123.