Fine-scale spatial genetic structure in mixed oak stands with different levels of hybridization

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1207-1219

  Valbuena Carabaña, Maria ^a   González Martínez, Santiago C ^b   Hardy, Oliver J ^c   Gil, Luis ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Fine scale spatial genetic structure; Historical gene dispersal; Hybrid zones; Introgression; Microsatellites; Quercus

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; HYBRIDIZATION; OAK; PLANT LEAF; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION GENETICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SPAIN; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

GENE FLOW; GENETICS, POPULATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PLANT LEAVES; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION DENSITY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUERCUS; SPAIN; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

QUERCUS; QUERCUS PETRAEA; QUERCUS PYRENAICA;

EID: 33847656735     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03231.x     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Anderson E (1948) Hybridization of the habitat. Evolution, 2, 1-9.
2. Anderson EC, Thompson EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics, 160, 1217-1229.
3. Arnold ML (1997) Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.
4. Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Petit RJ, Kremer A (1996) Mating system and asymmetric hybridization in a mixed stand of European oaks. Evolution, 50, 900-908.
5. Belahbib N, Pemonge M-H, Ouassou A, Sbay H, Kremer Petit RJ (2001) Frequent cytoplasmic exchanges between oak species that are not closely related: Quercus suber and Q. ilex in Morocco. Molecular Ecology, 10, 2003-2012.
6. Berg EE, Hamrick JL (1995) Fine-scale genetic structure of a turkey oak forest. Evolution, 49, 110-120.
7. Boavida LC, Silva JP, Feijó JA (2001) Sexual reproduction in the cork oak (Quercus suber L). II. Crossing intra- and interspecific barriers. Sexual Plant Reproduction, 14, 143-152.
8. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Moran GF, Griffin AR (2002) Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2379-2391.
9. Campbell RB (1986) The interdependence of mating structure and inbreeding depression. Theoretical Population Biology, 30, 232-244.
10. Carney SE, Wolf DE, Rieseberg LH (2000) Hybridisation and forest conservation. In: Forest Conservation Genetics: Principles and Practice (eds Young A, Boshier DH, Boyle TJ.), pp. 167-182. CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.
11. Craft KJ, Ashley MV, Koenig WD (2002) Limited hybridization between Quercus lobata and Quercus douglasii (Fagaceae) in a mixed stand in central coastal California. Americal Journal of Botany, 89, 1792-1798.
12. Crawford TJ (1984) The estimation of neighbourhood parameters for plant populations. Heredity, 52, 273-283.
13. Dodd RS, Afzal-Rafii Z (2004) Selection and dispersal in a multispecies oak hybrid zone. Evolution, 58, 261-269.
14. Doligez A, Baril C, Joly HI (1998) Fine scale spatial genetic structure with nonuniform distribution of individuals. Genetics, 148, 905-919.
15. Dow BD, Ashley MV (1996) Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Molecular Ecology, 5, 615-627.
16. n microsatellites in the bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 91, 137-141.
17. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 12, 13-15.
18. Dumolin-Lapégue S, Kremer A, Petit RJ (1999) Are chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA variation species independent in oaks? Evolution, 53, 1406-1413.
19. Dutech C, Sork VL, Irwin AJ, Smouse PE, Davis FW (2005) Gene flow and fine-scale genetic structure in a wind-pollinated tree species, Quercus lobata (Fagaceaee). American Journal of Botany, 92, 252-261.
20. Endler JA (1977) Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton New Jersey.
21. Ennos RA (1994) Estimating the relative rates of pollen and seed migration among plant populations. Heredity, 72, 250-259.
22. Epperson BK (1990) Spatial autocorrelation of genotypes under directional selection. Genetics, 124, 757-771.
23. Epperson BK (1993) Recent advances in correlation analysis of spatial patterns of genetic variation. Evolutionary Biology, 27, 95-155.
24. Epperson BK (2003) Geographical Genetics. Princeton University Press, Princeton New Jersey.
25. Epperson BK (2005) Estimating dispersal from short distance spatial autocorrelation. Heredity, 95, 7-15.
26. Franco J (1990) Quercus. In: Flora Ibérica. Plantas Vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares, Vol. II: 15-36 (eds Castroviejo S, Lainz M, López-González G, Montserrat P, Muñoz Garmendia F, Paiva J y Villar L). CSIC, Madrid.
27. Gil L, Jiménez MP, Díaz-Fernández PM (1994) Quercus complex in Spain: an overview of its present state. In: Inter- and Intra-Specific Variation in European Oaks: Evolutionary Implications and Practical Consequences, Brussels, June 15-16, 1994. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
28. González Martínez SC, Gerber S, Cervera MT, Martínez-Zapater JM, Gil L, Alía R (2002) Seed gene flow and fine-scale structure in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) using nuclear microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 104, 1290-1297.
29. Gonźlez-Rodríguez A, Arias DM, Valencia S, Oyama K (2004) Morphological and RAPD analysis of hybridization between Quercus affinis and Q. laurina (Fagaceae), two Mexican red oaks. American Journal of Botany, 91, 401-409.
30. Hardy OJ (2003) Estimation of pairwise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation-by-distance processes using dominant genetic markers. Molecular Ecology, 12, 1577-1588.
31. Hardy OJ, Maggia L, Bandou E, Breyne P, Caron H, Chevallier M-H, Doligez A, Dutech C, Kremer A, Latouche-Hallé C, Troispoux V, Veron V, Degen B (2006) Fine-scale genetic structure and gene dispersal inferences in ten neotropical tree species. Molecular Ecology, 15, 559-571.
32. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (1999) Isolation by distance in a continuous population: reconciliation between spatial autocorrelation and population genetics models. Heredity, 83, 145-154.
33. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2001) Patterns of allozymic variation in diploid and tetraploid Centaurea jacea at different spatial scales. Evolution, 55, 943-954.
34. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGEDI: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2, 618-120.
35. Heuertz M, Vekemans X, Hausman J-F, Palada M, Hardy OJ (2003) Estimating seed versus pollen dispersal from spatial genetic structure in the common ash. Molecular Ecology, 12, 2483-2495.
36. Himrane H, Camarero JJ, Gil-Pelegrín E (2004) Morphological and ecophysiological variation of the hybrid oak Quercus subpyrenaica (Q. faginea × Q. pubescens). Trees-Structure and Function, 18, 566-575.
37. Howard DJ, Britch SC, Braswell WE (2003) Evolution in hybrid zones. Chapter 5. In: The Evolution of Population Biology (eds Singh RK, Uyenoyama MK). Cambridge University Press.
38. Hy FC (1895) Sur quelques chênes hybrides des environs d'Angers. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France, 42, 552-559.
39. Ishihama F, Ueno S, Tsumura Y, Washitani I (2005) Gene flow and inbreeding depression inferred from fine-scale genetic structure in an endangered heterostylous perennial, Primula sieboldii. Molecular Ecology, 14, 983-990.
40. Jones AG, Ardren WR (2003) Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 12, 2511-2523.
41. n microsatellite loci from Quercus robur. Hereditas, 129, 183-186.
42. Kleinschmit JRG, Bacilieri R, Kremer A, Roloff A (1995) Comparison of morphological traits of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) and sessile oak [Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl]. Silvae Genetica, 44, 256-269.
43. Latta RG, Linhart YB, Fleck D, Elliot M (1998) Direct and indirect estimates of seed versus pollen movement within a population of ponderosa pine. Evolution, 52, 61-67.
44. Levin DA (1984) Inbreeding depression and proximity- dependent crossing success in Phlox drummondii. Evolution, 38, 116-127.
45. Linhart YB, Mitton JB, Sturgeon KB, Davis ML (1981) Genetic variation in space and time in a population of ponderosa pine. Heredity, 46, 407-426.
46. Loiselle BA, Sork VL, Nason J, Graham C (1995) Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understorey shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany, 82, 1420.1425.
47. Malécot G (1950) Quelques schémas probabilistes sur la variabilité des populations naturelles. Annales de l'Université de Lyon A, 13, 37-60.
48. Meagher TR, Vassiliadis C (2003) Spatial geometry determines gene flow in plant populations. In: Genes in the Environment (eds Hails R, Beringer J, Godfray HCJ), pp. 76-90. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
49. Moore WS (1977) An evaluation of narrow hybrid zones in vertebrates. Quarterly Review of Biology, 52, 263-277.
50. Pardo F, Gil L, Pardos JA (2004) Structure and composition of pole-stage stands developed in an ancient wood pasture in central Spain. Forestry, 77, 67-74.
51. Petit RJ, Duminil J, Fineschi S, Hampe A, Salvini D, Vendramin GG (2005) Comparative organization of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear diversity in plant populations. Molecular Ecology, 14, 689-701.
52. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945-959.
53. Rieseberg LH (1995) The role of hybridization in evolution: old wine in new skins. American Journal of Botany, 82, 944-953.
54. Rieseberg LH, Ellstrand NC (1993) What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about hybridization? Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 12, 213-241.
55. Rieseberg LH, Archer MA, Wayne RK (1999) Transgressive segregation, adaptation, and speciation. Heredity, 83, 363-372.
56. Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics, 145, 1219-1228.
57. Rousset F (1999) Genetic differentiation within and between two habitats. Genetics, 151, 397-407.
58. Rousset F (2000) Genetic differentiation between individuals. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 13, 58-62.
59. Rousset F (2001) Inference from spatial population genetics. In: Handbook of Statistical Genetics (eds Balding D, Bishop M, Cannings C), pp. 239.269. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester.
60. Rousset F (2004) Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations. Princeton University Press, Princeton New Jersey.
61. Smouse PE, Dyer RJ, Westfall RD, Sork VL (2001) Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. I. Male gamete heterogeneity among females. Evolution, 55, 260-271.
62. Sork VL, Huang S, Wiener E (1993) Macrogeographic and fine scale genetic structure in a North American oak species, Quercus rubra L. Annales Des Sciences Forestieres, 50 (Suppl.) 1, 261-270.
63. Sork VL, Davis FW, Smouse PE, Apsit VJ, Dyer RJJ, Fernandez M, Kuhn B (2002) Pollen movement in declining populations of California Valley Oak, Quercus lobata: Where have all the fathers gone?. Molecular Ecology, 11, 1657-1668.
64. Stacy EA (2001) Cross-fertility in two tropical tree species: evidence of inbreeding depression within populations and genetic divergence among populations. American Journal of Botany, 88, 1041-1051.
65. Steinhoff S (1998) Controlled crosses between pedunculate and sessile oak: results and conclusion. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 169, 163-168.
66. n-microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea. Plant Molecular Biology, 33, 1093-1096.
67. Streiff R, Labbe T, Bacilieri R, Steinkellner H, Glossl J, Kremer A (1998) Within-population genetic structure in Quercus robur L. & Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. assessed with isozymes and microsatellites. Molecular Ecology, 7, 317-328.
68. Tovar-Sánchez E, Oyama K (2004) Natural hybridization and hybrid zones between Quercus crassifolia and Quercus crassipes (Fagaceae) in Mexico: morphological and molecular evidence. American Journal of Botany, 91, 1352-1363.
69. Vähä JP, Primmer CR (2005) Efficiency of model-based Bayesian methods for detecting hybrid individuals under different hybridization scenarios and with different number of loci. Molecular Ecology, 15, 63-72.
70. Valbuena-Carabaña M, González-Martínez S, Sork VL, Collada C, Soto A, Goicoechea PG, Gil L (2005) Gene flow and hybridisation in a mixed oak forest (Quercus pyrenaica Willd. and Quercus petraea (Matts.) Liebl.) in central Spain. Heredity, 95, 457-465.
71. Vekemans X, Hardy OJ (2004) New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations. Molecular Ecology, 13, 921-935.
72. Vekemans X, Lefebvre C (1997) On the evolution of heavy-metal tolerant populations in Armeria maritima: evidence from allozyme variation and reproductive barriers. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10, 175-191.
73. Vicioso C (1950) Revisión del Género Quercus en España. Ministerio de Agricultura, Madrid.
74. ST ≠ (4Nm + 1). Heredity, 82, 117-125.
75. Whittemore AT, Schaal BA (1991) Interespecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 88, 2540-2544.
76. Williams JH, Williams JB, Howard DJ (2001) Reproductive processes in two oak (Quercus) contact zones with different levels of hybridisation. Heredity, 87, 680-690.
77. Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics, 28, 114-138.