Frequent long-distance gene flow in a rare temperate forest tree (Sorbus domestica) at the landscape scale

Heredity

Volumn 103, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 476-482

  Kamm, U ^a,b   Rotach, P ^b   Gugerli, F ^a   Siroky, M ^a,b   Edwards, P ^b   Holderegger, R ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Functional connectivity; Landscape genetics; Long distance pollen flow; Paternity analysis; Pollen dispersal; Seed dispersal

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST; CONNECTIVITY; DICOTYLEDON; DISPERSAL; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; PARENTAGE; PATERNITY; POLLEN; SEED DISPERSAL; SUBPOPULATION; TEMPERATE FOREST;

ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; SORBUS; TEMPERATURE; TREE;

ECOSYSTEM; GENE FLOW; POLLEN; SORBUS; TEMPERATURE; TREES;

ANIMALIA; HEXAPODA; SORBUS; SORBUS DOMESTICA;

EID: 70549108075     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.70     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aguilar R, Ashworth L, Galetto L, Aizen MA (2006). Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 9: 968-980.
2. Austerlitz F, Dick C, Dutech C, Klein EK, Oddou-Muratorio S, Smouse P et al. (2004). Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Mol Ecol 13: 937-954.
3. Bacles CFE, Ennos RA (2008). Paternity analysis of pollenmediated gene flow for Fraxinus excelsior L. in a chronically fragmented landscape. Heredity 101: 368-380.
4. Bacles CFE, Lowe AJ, Ennos RA (2006). Effective seed dispersal across a fragmented landscape. Science 311: 628.
5. Barengo N, Rudow A, Schwab P (2001). Förderung seltener Baumarten auf der Schweizer Alpennordseite. BUWAL: Bern.
6. Chase MR, Moller C, Kesseli R, Bawa KS (1996). Distant gene flow in tropical trees. Nature 383: 398-399.
7. De Nettancourt D (2001). Incompatibility and Incongruity in Wild and Cultivated Plants. Springer: Berlin.
8. Deguilloux FM, Dumolin-Lapègue S, Gielly L, Grivet D, Petit RJ (2003). A set of primers for the amplification of chloroplast microsatellites in Quercus. Mol Ecol Notes 3: 24-27.
9. Demesure B, Sodzi N, Petit RJ (1995). A set of universal primers for amplification of polymorphic non-coding regions of mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA in plants. Mol Ecol 4: 129-131.
10. Dumolin-Lapègue S, Pemonge MH, Petit RJ (1997). An enlarged set of consensus primers for the study of organelle DNA in plants. Mol Ecol 6: 393-397.
11. Dunphy BK, Hamrick JL (2005). Gene flow among established Puerto Rican populations of the exotic tree species, Albizia lebbeck. Heredity 94: 418-425.
12. Ellstrand NC (1992). Gene flow among seed plant populations. New Forests 6: 241-256.
13. Garcia C, Arroyo JM, Godoy JA, Jordano P (2005). Mating patterns, pollen dispersal, and the ecological maternal neighbourhood in a Prunus mahaleb L. population. Mol Ecol 14: 1821-1830.
14. Gianfranceschi L, Seglias N, Tarchini R, Komjanc M, Gessler C (1998). Simple sequence repeats for the genetic analysis of apple. Theor Appl Genet 96: 1069-1076.
15. Godoy JA, Jordano P (2001). Seed dispersal by animals: exact identification of source trees with endocarp DNA microsatellites. Mol Ecol 10: 2275-2283.
16. Grivet D, Heinze B, Vendramin GG, Petit RJ (2001). Genome walking with consensus primers: application to the large single copy region of chloroplast DNA. Mol Ecol Notes 1: 345-349.
17. Hardesty BD, Hubbell SP, Bermingham E (2006). Genetic evidence of frequent long-distance recruitment in a vertebrate- dispersed tree. Ecol Lett 9: 516-525.
18. Hoebee SE, Arnold U, Düggelin C, Gugerli F, Brodbeck S, Rotach P et al. (2007). Mating patterns and contemporary gene flow by pollen in a large continuous and a small isolated population of the scattered forest tree Sorbus torminalis. Heredity 99: 47-55.
19. Holderegger R, Häner R, Csencsics D, Angelone S, Hoebee SE (2008). S-allele diversity suggests no mate limitation in small populations of a self-incompatible plant. Evolution 62: 2922-2928.
20. Holderegger R, Wagner HH (2008). Landscape genetics. Bio Science 58: 199-207.
21. Klein EK, Lavigne C, Gouyon PH (2006). Mixing of propagules from discrete sources at long distance: comparing a dispersal tail to an exponential. BMC Biology 6: 3.
22. Kramer AT, Ison JL, Ashley MV, Howe HF (2008). The paradox of forest fragmentation genetics. Conserv Biol 22: 878-885.
23. Kreyer D, Oed A, Walther-Hellwig K, Frankl R (2004). Are forests potential landscape barriers for foraging bumblebees? Landscape scale experiments with Bombus terrestris agg. and Bombus pascuorum (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Biol Conserv 116: 111-118.
24. Larson BMH, Barrett SCH (2000). A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biol J Linn Soc 69: 503-520.
25. Liebhard R, Gianfranceschi L, Koller B, Ryder CD, Tarchini R, Van de Weg E et al. (2002). Development and characterisation of 140 new microsatellites in apple (Malus-domestica Borkh.). Mol Breeding 10: 217-241.
26. Lowe AJ, Boshier D, Ward M, Bacles CFE, Navarro C (2005). Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation; reconciling empirical evidence and predicted theory for neotropical trees. Heredity 95: 255-273.
27. Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003). Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 189-197.
28. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998). Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7: 639-655.
29. Meagher T (1986). Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. 1. Identification of most-likely male parents. Am Nat 128: 199-215.
30. Mohanty A, Martin JP, Anguinagalde I (2002). Population genetic analysis of European Prunus spinosa (Rosaceae) using chloroplast DNA markers. Am J Bot 89: 1223-1228.
31. Myers JA, Vellend M, Gardescu S, Marks PL (2004). Seed dispersal by white-tailed deer: implications for long-distance dispersal, invasion, and migration of plants in eastern North America. Oecologia 139: 35-44.
32. Nason JD, Herre EA, Hamrick JL (1998). The breeding structure of a tropical keystone plant resource. Nature 391: 685-687.
33. Nathan R (2005). Long-distance dispersal research: building a network of yellow brick roads. Div Distrib 11: 125-130.
34. Nathan R (2006). Long-distance dispersal of plants. Science 313: 786-788.
35. Oddou-Muratorio S, Aligon C, Decroocq S, Plomion C, Lamant T, Mush DB (2001). Microsatellite primers for Sorbus torminalis and related species. Mol Ecol Notes 1: 297-299.
36. Oddou-Muratorio S, Klein EK, Austerlitz F (2005). Pollen flow in the wild service tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. II. Pollen dispersal and heterogeneity in mating success inferred from parent-offspring analysis. Mol Ecol 14: 4441-4452.
37. Oddou-Muratorio S, Klein EK, Demesure-Musch B, Austerlitz F (2006). Real-time patterns of pollen flow in the wild service tree, Sorbus torminalis (Rosaceae). III. Mating patterns and the ecological maternal neighborhood. Am J Bot 93: 1650-1659.
38. Ollerton J, Johnson SD, Hingston AB (2006). Geographical variation in diversity and specificity of pollination. In: Ollerton J, Waser NM (eds). Plant-Pollinator Interactions- from Specialization to Generalization. University of Chicago Press: Chicago. pp 283-309.
39. Raspé O (2001). Inheritance of the chloroplast genome in Sorbus aucuparia L. (Rosaceae). J Hered 96: 507-509.
40. Raspé O, Findlay C, Jacquemart AL (2000). Biological flora of the British Isles: Sorbus aucuparia L. J Ecol 88: 910-930.
41. Raspé O, Kohn JR (2002). S-allele diversity in Sorbus aucuparia and Crataegus monogyna (Rosaceae:Maloideae). Heredity 86: 458-465.
42. Reusch TBH, Wood TE (2007). Molecular ecology of global change. Mol Ecol 16: 3973-3992.
43. Robertson A, Newton AC, Ennos RA (2004). Multiple hybrid origins, genetic diversity and population genetic structure of two endemic Sorbus taxa on the Isle of Arran, Scotland. Mol Ecol 13: 123-134.
44. Sang T, Crawford DJ, Stuessy TF (1997). Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Am J Bot 84: 1120-1136.
45. Slate J, Marshall T, Pemberton J (2000). A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference program CERVUS. Mol Ecol 9: 801-808.
46. Slavov GT, Howe GT, Gyaourowa AV, Birkes DS, Adams SWT (2005). Estimating pollen flow using SSR markers and paternity exclusion: accounting for mistyping. Mol Ecol 14: 3109-3121.
47. Sork VL, Nason J, Campbell DR, Fernandez JF (1999). Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends Ecol Evol 14: 219-224.
48. Sork VL, Smouse PE (2006). Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree populations. Land Ecol 21: 821-836.
49. Steffan-Dewenter I, Kuhn A (2003). Honeybee foraging in differentially structured landscapes. Proc R Soc London 270: 569-575.
50. Ward M, Dick CW, Gribel R, Lowe AJ (2005). To self or not to selfy A review of outcrossing and pollen-mediated gene flow in neotropical trees. Heredity 95: 246-254.
51. White GM, Boshier DH, Powell W (2002). Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: an example from Swietenia humilis (Zuccarini). Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 99: 2038-2042.
52. Williams CG, Davis BH (2005). Rate of transgene spread via long-distance seed dispersal in Pinus taeda. Forest Ecol Manage 217: 95-102.
53. Wohlgemuth T, Bürgi M, Scheidegger C, Schütz M (2002). Dominance reduction of species through disturbance-a proposed management principle for central European forests. Forest Ecol Manage 166: 1-15.
54. Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Sawamura Y, Manabe T, Kotobuki K, Hayashi T et al. (2002a). Simple sequence repeats for genetic analysis in pear. Euphytica 124: 129-137.
55. Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Shoda M, Ban Y, Hayashi T, Matsuta N (2002b). Development of microsatellite markers in the Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai). Mol Ecol Notes 2: 14-16. (Pubitemid 34287097)