Efficient long-distance gene flow into an isolated relict oak stand

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 464-472

  Buschbom, Jutta ^a   Yanbaev, Yulay ^b   Degen, Bernd ^a  

^a Federal Research Centre for Forestry and Forest Products   (Germany)

^b Bashkirian State Medical University   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

distribution range dynamics; landscape fragmentation; Quercus robur; reproductive connectivity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GENE FLOW; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; NONHUMAN; OAK; POLLEN; POLLINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DEMOGRAPHY; DNA PRIMERS; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POLLINATION; QUERCUS; RUSSIA; WIND;

QUERCUS ROBUR;

EID: 79959505035     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esr023     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Aitken SN, Yeaman S, Holliday JA, Wang T, Curtis-McLane S. 2008. Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evol Appl. 1:95-111.
2. Anderson LL, Hu FS, Nelson DM, Petit R, Paige KN. 2006. Ice-age endurance: DNA evidence of a white spruce refugium in Alaska. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103(33):12447-12450. (Pubitemid 44267279)
3. Ashley MV. 2010. Plant parentage, pollination, and dispersal: how DNA microsatellites have altered the landscape. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 29:148-161.
4. Bacles CFE, Burczyk J, Lowe AJ, Ennos RA. 2005. Historical and contemporary mating patterns in remnant populations of the forest tree Fraxinus excelsior L. Evolution. 59(5):979-990. (Pubitemid 40728430)
5. Bacles CFE, Ennos RA. 2008. Paternity analysis of pollen-mediated gene flow for Fraxinus excelsior L. in a chronically fragmented landscape. Heredity. 101:368-380.
6. Belmonte J, Alarcón M, Avila A, Scialabba E, Pino D. 2008. Long-range transport of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) pollen to Catalonia (north-eastern Spain). Int J Biometeorol. 52:675-687.
7. Bittencourt JWM, Sebbenn AM. 2007. Patterns of pollen and seed dispersal in a small, fragmented population of the wind-pollinated tree Araucaria angustifolia in southern Brazil. Heredity. 99:580-591. (Pubitemid 350146918)
8. Bridle JR, Vines TH. 2006. Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail? Trends Ecol Evol. 22(3):140-147. (Pubitemid 46273823)
9. Cecchi L, Torrigiani Malaspina T, Albertini R, Zanca M, Ridolo E, Usberti I, Morabito M, Dall Aglio P, Orlandini S. 2007. The contribution of longdistance transport to the presence of Ambrosia pollen in central northern Italy. Aerobiologia. 23:145-151. (Pubitemid 47300263)
10. Cheddadi R, Vendramin GG, Litt T, Francois L, Kageyama M, Lorentz S, Laurent JM, de Beaulieu JL, Sadori L, Jost A, et al. 2006. Imprints of glacial refugia in the modern genetic diversity of Pinus sylvestris. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 15:271-282.
11. Chung MY, Nason J, Chung MG, Kim K-J, Park C-W, Sun B-Y, Pak J-H. 2002. Landscape-level spatial genetic structure in Quercus acutissima (Fagaceae). Am J Bot. 89(8):1229-1236. (Pubitemid 34915471)
12. Chybicki IJ, Burczyk J. 2010. Realized gene flow within mixed stands of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) L. revealed at the stage of naturally established seedling. Mol Ecol. 19:2137-2151.
13. Cornuet JM, Luikart G. 1996. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics. 144:2001-2014. (Pubitemid 26427944)
14. Craft KJ, Ashley MV. 2007. Landscape genetic structure of bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa) savannas in Illinois. For Ecol Manag. 239:13-20. (Pubitemid 46107780)
15. Dow BD, Ashley MV. 1996. Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Mol Ecol. 5(5):615-627. (Pubitemid 27102782)
16. Dow BD, Ashley MV. 1998. High levels of gene flow in bur oak revealed by paternity analysis using microsatellites. J Hered. 89:62-70. (Pubitemid 28093805)
17. Ducousso A, Bordacs S. 2004. EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for genetic conservation and use for pedunculate and sessile oaks (Quercus robur and Q. petraea). Rome (Italy): International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.
18. Dumolin S, Demesure B, Petit R. 1995. Inheritance of chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes in pedunculate oak investigated with an efficient PCR method. Theor Appl Genet. 91:1253-1256.
19. El Mousadik A, Petit RJ. 1996. High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic to Morocco. Theor Appl Genet. 92:832-839. (Pubitemid 26270161)
20. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online. 1:47-50.
21. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 131:479-491.
22. Fénart S, Austerlitz F, Cuguen J, Arnaud JF. 2007. Long distance pollenmediated gene flow at a landscape level: the weed beet as a case study. Mol Ecol. 16:3801-3813. (Pubitemid 47397329)
23. Fernández-M JF, Sork VL. 2007. Genetic variation in fragmented forest stands of the Andean oak Quercus humboldtii Bonpl. (Fagaceae). Biotropica. 39:72-78. (Pubitemid 46066469)
24. Garza JC, Williamson EG. 2001. Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol. 10:305-318. (Pubitemid 32232339)
25. Geber MA. 2008. To the edge: studies of species range limits. New Phytol. 178:228-230. (Pubitemid 351441670)
26. Gerber S, Chabrier P, Kremer A. 2003. FaMoz: a software for parentage analysis using dominant, codominant and uniparentally inherited markers. Mol Ecol Notes. 3:479-481. (Pubitemid 37078226)
27. Hampe A, Petit R. 2005. Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol Lett. 8:461-467. (Pubitemid 40641134)
28. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol. 16:1099-1106.
29. Kaufman SR, Smouse PE, Alvarez-Buylla ER. 1998. Pollen-mediated gene flow and differential male reproductive success in a tropical pioneer tree, Cecropia obtusifolia Bertol. (Moraceae): a paternity analysis. Heredity. 81:164-173. (Pubitemid 28403811)
30. Kittelson PM, Pinahs C, Dwyer J, Ingersoll A, Mans E, Rieke J, Rutman B, Volenec M. 2009. Age structure and genetic diversity of four Quercus macrocarpa (Michx.) populations in fragmented oak savanna along the Central Minnesota river valley. Am Midl Nat. 161:301-312.
31. Kramer AT, Ison JL, Ashley MV, Howe HF. 2008. The paradox of forest fragmentation genetics. Conserv Biol. 22(4):878-885.
32. Ledig FT, Hodgskiss PD, Johnson DR. 2005. Genic diversity, genetic structure, and mating system of Brewer spruce (Pinaceae), a relict of the Arcto-Tertiary forest. Am J Bot. 92(12):1975-1986. (Pubitemid 43194525)
33. Leimu R, Fischer M. 2008. A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS One. 3(12):e4010.
34. Lepais O, Léger V, Gerber S. 2006. High throughput microsatellite genotyping in oak species. Silvae Genet. 55:238-240. (Pubitemid 44475737)
35. Lopez S, Rousset F, Shaw FH, Shaw RG, Ronce O. 2008. Migration load in plants: role of pollen and seed dispersal in heterogeneous landscapes. J Evol Biol. 21:294-309. (Pubitemid 350256620)
36. Magri D. 2010. Persistence of tree taxa in Europe and Quarternary climate changes. Quat Int. 219:145-151.
37. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol. 7:639-655. (Pubitemid 28235973)
38. Mosseler A, Rajora OP, Major JE, Kim K-H. 2004. Reproductive and genetic characteristics of rare, disjunct pitch pine populations at the northern limits of its range in Canada. Conserv Genet. 5:571-583. (Pubitemid 40099326)
39. Muir G, Lowe AJ, Fleming CC, Vogl C. 2004. High nuclear genetic diversity, high levels of outcrossing and low differentiation among remnant populations of Quercus petraea at the margin of its range in Ireland. Ann Bot. 93(6):691-697. (Pubitemid 41295594)
40. Nakanishi A, Tomaru N, Yoshimaru H, Kawahara T, Manabe T, Yamamoto S. 2004. Patterns of pollen flow and genetic differentiation among pollen pools in Quercus salicina in a warm temperate old-growth evergreen broad-leaved forest. Silvae Genet. 53(5-6):258-264. (Pubitemid 40764477)
41. Nakanishi A, Tomaru N, Yoshimaru H, Manabe T, Yamamoto S. 2005. Interannual genetic heterogeneity of pollen pools accepted by Quercus salicina individuals. Mol Ecol. 14:4469-4478. (Pubitemid 44943724)
42. Nakanishi A, Tomaru N, Yoshimaru H, Manabe T, Yamamoto S. 2009. Effects of seed- and pollen-mediated gene dispersal on genetic structure among Quercus salicina saplings. Heredity. 102:182-189.
43. Nielsen R, Tarpy DR, Reeve HK. 2003. Estimating effective paternity number in social insects and the effective number of alleles in a population. Mol Ecol. 12:3157-3164. (Pubitemid 37425083)
44. Ohsawa T, Tsuda Y, Saito Y, Sawada H, Ide Y. 2006. Genetic diversity and gene flow of Quercus crispula in a semi-fragmented forest together with neighboring forests. Silvae Genet. 55(4-5):160-169. (Pubitemid 44475729)
45. Pakkad G, Ueno S, Yoshimaru H. 2008. Gene flow and mating system in a small population of Quercus semiserrata Roxb. (Fagaceae). For Ecol Manag. 255:3819-3826.
46. Petit R, Hampe A. 2006. Some evolutionary consequences of being a tree. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 37:187-214. (Pubitemid 44907617)
47. Petit R, Hu FS, Dick CW. 2008. Forests of the past: a window to future changes. Science. 320:1450-1452. (Pubitemid 351929390)
48. Petit RJ, Brewer S, Bordacs S, Burg K, Cheddadi R, Coart E, Cottrell J, Csaikl UM, van Dam B, Deans JD, et al. 2002. Identification of refugia and post-glacial colonization routes of European white oaks based on chloroplast DNA and fossil pollen evidence. For Ecol Manag. 156:49-74. (Pubitemid 34196760)
49. Pickup M, Young AG. 2008. Population size, self-incompatibility and genetic rescue in diploid and tetraploid races of Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides (Asteraceae). Heredity. 100:268-274. (Pubitemid 351282125)
50. Pluess AR, Sork VL, Dolan B, Davis FW, Grivet D, Merg K, Papp J, Smouse PE. 2009. Short distance pollen movement in a wind-pollinated tree, Quercus lobata (Fagaceae). For Ecol Manag. 258:735-744.
51. Ranta H, Kubin E, Siljamo P, Sofiev M, Linkosalo T, Oksanen A, Bondestam K. 2006. Long distance pollen transport cause problems for determining the timing of birch pollen season in Fennoscandia by using phenological observations. Grana. 45:297-304. (Pubitemid 46324022)
52. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Gil L. 2005. Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity. 94(1):13-22. (Pubitemid 40020163)
53. Rousseau DD, Patrick S, Ferrier J, Jolly D, Andreasen T, Ascanius SE, Hendriksen S-E, Poulsen U. 2008. Long-distance pollen transport fromNorth America to Greenland in spring. J Geophys Res Biosci. 113(G2):G02013.
54. Schueler S, Schlünzen KH, Scholz F. 2004. Viability of oak pollen and its implications for long distance gene flow. Trees Struct Funct. 19:154-161. (Pubitemid 40306912)
55. Schuster WS, Mitton JB. 2000. Paternity and gene dispersal in limber pine (Pinus flexilis James). Heredity. 84:348-361. (Pubitemid 30236599)
56. Shepherd LD, Perrie LR, Brownsey PJ. 2007. Fire and ice: volcanic and glacial impacts on the phylogeography of the New Zealand forest fern Asplenium hookerianum. Mol Ecol. 16:4536-4549. (Pubitemid 47620512)
57. Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature. 163:688.
58. Sork VL, Davis FW, Smouse PE, Apsit VJ, Dyer RJ, Fernandez JF, Kuhn B. 2002. Pollen movement in declining populations of California Valley oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone? Mol Ecol. 11:1657-1668. (Pubitemid 35022235)
59. Sork VL, Smouse PE. 2006. Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree populations. Landsc Ecol. 21:821-836. (Pubitemid 44167403)
60. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Lexer C, Steinkellner H, Gloessl J, Kremer A. 1999. Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Mol Ecol. 8:831-841. (Pubitemid 29266889)
61. Tollefsrud MM, Kissling R, Gugerli F, Johnsen Ø, Skrøppa T, Cheddadi R, van der Knaap WO, Latalowa M, Terhürne-Berson R, Litt T, et al. 2008. Genetic consequences of glacial survival and postglacial colonization in Norway spruce: combining analysis of mitochondrial DNA and fossil pollen. Mol Ecol. 17:4134-4150.
62. Valbuena-Carabaña M, González-Martínez SC, Sork VL, Collada C, Soto A, Goicoechea PG, Gil L. 2005. Gene flow and hybridization in a mixed oak forest (Quercus pyrenaica Willd. and Quercus petraea (Matts.) Liebl.) in central Spain. Heredity. 95:457-465. (Pubitemid 41719998)
63. Walter H, Breckle S-W. 1986. Spezielle Ö kologie der gemässigten and arktischen Zonen Euro-Nordasiens: Zonobiom VI - IX. Stuttgart (Germany): Gustav Fischer Verlag. p. 587.
64. Wang H, Sork VL, Wu J, Ge J. 2010. Effect of patch size and isolation on mating patterns and seed production in an urban population of Chinese pine (Pinus tabulaeformis Carr.). For Ecol Manag. 260:965-974.
65. Willi Y, Fischer M. 2005. Genetic rescue in interconnected populations of small and large size of the self-incompatible Ranunculus reptans. Heredity. 95:437-443. (Pubitemid 41719995)