Leaf morphological differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea is stable across western European mixed oak stands

Annals of Forest Science

Volumn 59, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 777-787

  Kremer, Antoine ^a   Dupouey, Jean Luc ^a   Deans, J Douglas ^b   Cottrell, Joan ^c   Csaikl, Ulrike ^d   Finkeldey, Reiner ^e   Espinel, Santiago ^f   Jensen, Jan ^g   Kleinschmit, Jochen ^h   Van Dam, Barbara ⁱ   Ducousso, Alexis ^a   Forrest, Ian ^c   Lopez De Heredia, U ^j   Lowe, Andrew J ^b   Tutkova, Marcela ^d   Munro, Robert C ^b   Steinhoff, Sabine ^h   Badeau, Vincent ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^c FOREST RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^d ARC SEIBERSDORF RESEARCH GMBH   (Austria)

^e SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

^f NEIKER and a Vaccine producing Commercial Company CZVSL   (Spain)

^g DANISH FOREST LANDSCAPE RES INST   (Denmark)

^h Niedersächische Forstliche   (Germany)

ⁱ WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^j UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

more..

Author keywords

Leaf; Morphology; Quercus petraea; Quercus robur; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

LEAF MORPHOLOGY; MATERNAL EFFECT; MIXED FOREST; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

EUROPE;

QUERCUS; QUERCUS PETRAEA; QUERCUS ROBUR;

EID: 0005110709     PISSN: 12864560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/forest:2002065     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aas G., Taxonomical impact of morphological variation in Quercus robur and Q. petraea: a contribution to the hybrid controversy, Ann. Sci. For. 50 (1993) 107-114.
2. Aas G., Die Behaarung der Blätter von Traubeneiche und Stieleiche (Quercus petraea und Quercus robur): Variabilität und taxonomische Bedeutung, Mitt. Fortsl. Versuchanst. Rheinland-Pfalz 34 (1995) 297-309.
3. Aas G., Friedrich K., Untersuchungen zur morphologischen Unterscheidung von Stiel-und Traubeneicheln, Forstw. Cbl. 110 (1991) 349-357.
4. Bacilieri R., Ducousso A., Kremer A., Genetical, morphological, ecological and phenological differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. robur L. in a mixed stand of northwest of France, Silvae genet. 44 (1995) 1-10.
5. Bacilieri R., Ducousso A., Petit R.J., Kremer A., Mating system and asymmetric hynridization in a mixed stand of European oaks, Evolution 50 (1996) 900-908.
6. Benzécri J.P., Correspondence analysis handbook, Dekker M., New York, 1992, 665 p.
7. Bodénès C., Joandet S., Laigret F., Kremer A., Detection of genomic regions differentiating two closely related oak species Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. robur L., Heredity 78 (1997) 433-444.
8. Borovics A., Separability of pedunculate oak and sessile oak aggregate: a contribution to the hybrid and small species estimation, Proceedings of the Forest Research Institute 89 (1999) 93-110.
9. Carlisle A., Brown A.M.F., The assessment of the taxonomic status of mixed oaks (Quercus ssp.) populations, Watsonia 6 (1965) 120-127.
10. Cousens J.E., Variation of some diagnostic characters of the sessile and pedunculate oaks and their hybrids in Scotland, Watsonia 5 (1963) 273-286.
11. Dupouey J.L., Le Bouler H., Discrimination morphologique des glands de chênes sessile (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl) et pédonculé (Q. robur L.), Ann. Sci. For. 46 (1989) 187-194.
12. Dupouey J.L., Badeau V., Morphological variability of oaks (Quercus robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. pubescens Willd) in northeastern France: preliminary results, Ann. Sci. For. 50 (1993) 35-40.
13. Elsner G., Preliminary variability of oak stands (Quercus petraea and Quercus robur) in northem Germany, Ann. Sci. For. 50 (1993) 228-232.
14. Grandjean G., Sigaud P., Contribution à la taxonomie et à l'écologie des chênes du Berry, Ann. Sci. For. 44 (1987) 35-66.
15. Iestwaart J.H., Feij A.E., A multivariate analysis of introgression between Q. robur and Q. petraea in The Netherlands, Acta Bot. Neerl. 38 (1989) 313-325.
16. Kissling P., Les poils des quatre espèces de chênes du Jura (Quercus pubescens, Q. petraea, Q. robur et Q. cerris), Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges 87 (1977) 1-18.
17. Kissling P., Un réseau de corrélations entre les chênes (Quercus L.) du Jura, Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges. 90 (1980a) 1-28.
18. Kissling P., Clef de détermination des chênes médio-européens (Quercus L.), Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges. 90 (1980b) 29-44.
19. Kleinschmit J., Kleinschmit J.G.R., Quercus robur-Quercus petraea: a critical review of the species concept, Glas. sumske Pokuse 37 (2000) 441-452.
20. Kleinschmit J.R.G., Bacilieri R., Kremer A., Roloff A., Comparison of morphological traits of pedunculate oak (Q. robur L.) and sessile oak (Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl., Silvae Genet. 44 (1995) 256-269.
21. Kremer A., Petit R.J., Ducousso A., Structure of gene diversity, gene flow and gene conservation in Quercus petraea, in: Turok J., Kremer A., de Vries S. (Eds.), First Euforgen meeting on social broadleaves, IPGRI, 1998, pp. 133-144.
22. Minihan V.B., Rushton B.S., The taxonomic status of oaks (Quercus ssp.) in Breen Wood, Co Antrim, Northern Ireland, Watsonia 15 (1984) 27-32.
23. Moreau F., Kleinschmit J.R.G., Kremer A., Molecular differentiation between Q. petraea and Quercus robur assessed by random amplified DNA fragments, Forest. Genet. 1 (1994) 51-64.
24. Muir G., Fleming C.C., Schlötterer C., Species status of hybridizing oaks, Nature 405 (2000) 1016.
25. Olsson U., A morphological analysis of phenotypes in populations of Quercus (Fagaceae) in Sweden, Bot. Not. 128 (1975a) 55-68.
26. Olsson U., The structure of stellate trichomes and their taxonomic implication in some Quercus species (Fagaceae), Bot. Not. 128 (1975b) 412-424.
27. Rieseberg L.H., Ellstrand N.C., What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization, Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12 (1993) 213-241.
28. Rushton B.S., Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.: a multivariate approach to the hybrid problem. 1. Data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, Watsonia 12 (1978) 81-101.
29. Rushton B.S., Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.: a multivariate approach to the hybrid problem. 2. The geographical distribution of population types, Watsonia 12 (1979) 209-224.
30. Rushton B.S., An analysis of variation of leaf characters in Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. population samples from Northem Ireland, Irish Forest. 40 (1983) 52-77.
31. Safou O., Saint Martin M., Le trichome de quelques Quercus périméditerranéens, Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. 136 (1989) 291-304.
32. Samuel R., Pinsker W., Ehrendorfer F., Electrophoretic analysis of genetic variation within and between populations of Quercus cerris, Q. pubescens, Q. petraea, and Q. robur (Fagaceae) from eastern Austria, Bot. Acta 108 (1995) 290-299.
33. SAS Institute Inc., SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 4th ed., Vol. 2, 1989, 1848 p.
34. Wigston D.L., The distribution of Q. robur L., Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and their hybrids in southwestern England. 1. The assessment of the taxonomic status of populations from leaf characters, Watsonia 10 (1975) 345-369.
35. Zanetto A., Roussel G., Kremer A., Geographic variation of inter-specific differentiation between Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl., Forest genet. 1 (1994) 111-123.