Estimating anisotropic pollen dispersal: A case study in Quercus lobata

Heredity

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 193-204

  Austerlitz, F ^a   Dutech, C ^b,e   Smouse, P E ^c   Davis, F ^d   Sork, V L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UMR 1202 BIOGECO   (France)

Author keywords

Anisotropy; Gene flow; Genetic structure; Neighbourhood; Quercus lobata; TwoGener

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; DECIDUOUS TREE; DETECTION METHOD; DISPERSAL; ESTIMATION METHOD; MODELING; POLLEN; POLLINATION; WIND DIRECTION;

QUERCUS LOBATA;

EID: 34547222905     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800983     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adams WT, Birkes DS (1991). Estimating mating patterns in forest tree populations. In: Fineschi S, Malvolti ME, Cannata F, Hattemer HH (eds). Biochemical Markers in the Population Genetics of Forest Trees. SPB Academic Publishing: Hague, the Netherlands. pp 152-172.
2. Adams WT, Griffin AR, Moran GF (1992). Using paternity analysis to measure effective pollen dispersal in plant populations. Am Nat 140: 762-780.
3. Austerlitz F, Dick CW, Dutech C, Klein EK, Oddou-Muratorio S, Smouse PE et al. (2004). Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Mol Ecol 13: 937-954.
4. ft, pollen dispersal and inter-females distance. Genetics 157: 851-857.
5. Austerlitz F, Smouse PE (2002). Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. IV. Estimating the dispersal parameter. Genetics 161: 355-363.
6. Bateman AJ (1947). Contamination of seed crops II. Wind pollination. Heredity 1: 235-246.
7. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Moran GF, Griffin AR (2002). Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Mol Ecol 11: 2379-2391.
8. Burczyk J, Adams W, Shimizu J (1996). Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a natural knobcone pine (Pinus attenuata Lemmon) stand. Heredity 77: 251-260.
9. Burczyk J, Koralewski JE (2005). Parentage versus two-generation analyses for estimating pollen-mediated gene flow in plant populations. Mol Ecol 14: 2525-2537.
10. Burczyk J, Lewandowski A, Chalupka W (2004). Local pollen dispersal and distant gene flow in Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.). Forest Ecol Manage 197: 39-48.
11. Burczyk J, Prat D (1997). Male reproductive success in Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) France: the effects of spatial structure and flowering characteristics. Heredity 79: 638-647.
12. Couvet D (2002). Deleterious effects of restricted gene flow in fragmented populations. Cons Biol 16: 369-376.
13. Dow BD, Ashley MV, Howe HF (1995). Characterization of highly variable (GA/CT)(n) microsatellites in the bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Theor Appl Genet 91: 137-141.
14. Dutech C, Sork VL, Irwin AJ, Smouse PE, Davis FW (2005). Gene flow and fine-scale genetic structure in a wind-pollinated tree species Quercus lobata (Fagaceaee). Amer J Botany 92: 252-261.
15. Fernández-M JF, Sork VL (2007). Genetic variation in fragmented forest stands of the Andean Oak Quercus humboldtii Bonpl. (Fagaceae). Biotropica 39: 72-78.
16. Irwin AJ, Hamrick JL, Godt MJW, Smouse PE (2003). A multiyear estimate of the effective pollen donor pool for Albizia julibrissin. Heredity 90: 187-194.
17. Klein EK, Lavigne C, Picault H, Renard M, Gouyon P-H (2006). Pollen dispersal of oilseed rape: estimation of the dispersal function and effects of field dimension. J Appl Ecol 43: 141-151.
18. Ledig FT (1992). Human impacts on genetic diversity in forest ecosystems. Oikos 63: 87-108.
19. Lian C, Miwa M, Hogetsu T (2001). Outcrossing and paternity analysis of Pinus densiflora (Japanese red pine) by microsatellite polymorphism. Heredity 87: 88-98.
20. Lowe AJ, Boshier D, Ward M, Bacles CFE, Navarro C (2005). Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation; reconciling empirical evidence and predicted theory for neotropical trees. Heredity 95: 255-273.
21. Meagher TR, Belanger FC, Day PR (2003). Using empirical data to model transgene dispersal. Philos Trans Royal Soc London B 358: 1157-1162.
22. Meagher TR, Vassiliadis C (2003). Spatial geometry determines gene flow in plant populations. In: Hails RS, Beringer JE, Godfray HCJ (eds). Genes in the Environment. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford. pp 76-90.
23. Nason JD, Aldrich PR, Hamrick JL (1997). Dispersal and the dynamics of genetic structure in fragmented tropical tree populations. In: Laurance WF, Bierregaard Jr RO (eds). Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. University of Chicago Press: Chicago. pp 304-320.
24. Nakanishi A, Tomaru N, Yoshimaru H, Manabe T, Yamamoto S (2005). Interannual genetic heterogeneity of pollen pools accepted by Quercus salicina individuals. Mol Ecol 14: 4469-4478.
25. Nichols RA, Hewitt GM (1994). The genetic consequences of long distance dispersal during colonization. Heredity 72: 312-317.
26. Oddou-Muratorio S, Klein EK, Austerlitz F (2005). Real-time patterns of pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. II. Pollen dispersal and heterogeneity in mating success inferred from parent-offspring analysis. Mol Ecol 14: 4441-4452.
27. Ogden GL (1975). Differential response of two oak species to far inland advection of sea-salt spray aerosol. PhD dissertation Thesis, University of California.
28. Pavlik BM, Muick PC, Johnson SG, Popper M (1991). Oaks of California. Cachuma Press and the California Oak Foundation: Los Olivos.
29. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Gil L (2005). Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity 94: 13-22.
30. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Austerlitz F, Smouse PE (in press) Poldisp: a software package for indirect estimation of contemporary pollen dispersal. Mol Ecol Notes (in press).
31. Shen H, Rudin D, Lindgren D (1981). Study of the pollination pattern in a Scots pine seed orchard by means of isoenzyme analysis. Silvae Genetica 30: 7-15.
32. Smouse PE, Dyer RJ, Westfall RD, Sork VL (2001). Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. I. Male gamete heterogeneity among females. Evolution 55: 260-271.
33. Smouse PE, Meagher TR, Kobak CJ (1999). Parentage analysis in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae): why do some males have higher reproductive contributions? J Evol Biol 12: 1069-1077.
34. Smouse PE, Sork VL (2004). Measuring pollen flow in forest trees: an exposition of alternative approaches. For Ecol Manage 197: 21-38.
35. Sork VL, Davis FW, Smouse PE, Apsit VJ, Dyer RJ, Fernández-M JF et al. (2002). Pollen movement in declining populations of California Valley oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone? Mol Ecol 11: 1657-1668.
36. Sork VL, Nason J, Campbell DR, Fernández-M JF (1999). Landscape approaches to the study of gene flow in plants. Trends Ecology Evol 142: 219-224.
37. Steinkellner H, Lexer C, Turetschek E, Glossl J (1997). Conservation of (GA)(n) microsatellite loci between Quercus species. Mol Ecol 6: 1189-1194.
38. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Lexer C, Steinkellner H, Gloessl J, Kremer A (1999). Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.). Liebl. Mol Ecol 8: 831-841.
39. Tufto J, Engen S, Hindar K (1997). Stochastic dispersal processes in plant populations. Theor Pop Biol 52: 16-26.
40. Weir BS (1996). Genetic Data Analysis II. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland.
41. Wolfram S (1999). The Mathematica Book, 4th edn. Wolfram Media/Cambridge University Press: Champaign, IL/CA.
42. Wright S (1943). Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138.
43. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996). The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 413-418.