Patterns of pollen and seed dispersal in a small, fragmented population of the wind-pollinated tree Araucaria angustifolia in southern Brazil

Heredity

Volumn 99, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 580-591

  Bittencourt, J V M ^a   Sebbenn, A M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b Instituto Florestal de Sao Paulo   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Araucaria angustifolia; Coniferous; Gene flow; Microsatellite loci; Spatial genetic structure

Indexed keywords

CONIFEROUS TREE; FRAGMENTATION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENOTYPE; PATERNITY; POLLEN; POLLINATION; SEED DISPERSAL; VEGETATION MAPPING;

ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CONIFER; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PLANT SEED; POLLEN; POPULATION DENSITY; WIND;

BRAZIL; CONIFEROPHYTA; GENE FLOW; POLLEN; POPULATION DENSITY; SEEDS; WIND;

BRAZIL; PARANA; SOUTH AMERICA;

ARAUCARIA ANGUSTIFOLIA;

EID: 36348936809     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801019     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Adams WT (1992). Gene dispersal within forest tree populations. Forest Sci 6: 217-240.
2. Adams WT, Burczyk J (2000). Magnitude and implications of gene flow in gene conservation reserves. In: Young A, Boshier D, Boyle T (eds). Forest Conservation Genetics: Principles and Practice. CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, Australia. pp 215-224.
3. Adams WT, Hipkins VD, Burczyk J, Randall WK (1997). Pollen contamination trends in a maturing Douglas-fir seed orchard. Can J For Res 27: 131-134.
4. Auler NMF, Reis MS, Guerra MP, Nodari RO (2002). The genetics and conservation of Araucaria angustifolia: I. Genetic structure and diversity of natural populations by of means of non-adaptive variation in the state of Santa Catarina. Genet Mol Biol 25: 329-338.
5. Bacles CFE, Burczyk J, Lowe AJ, Ennos RA (2005). Historical and contemporary mating patterns in remnant populations of the forest tree Fraxinus excelsior L. Evolution 59: 979-990.
6. Buiteveld J, Bakker EG, Bovenshen J, Vries SMG (2001). Paternity analysis in a seed orchard of Quercus robur L. and estimation of the amount of background pollination using microsatellite markers. Forest Genet 8: 331-337.
7. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Birkes DS, Chalupka W (2006). Using genetic markers to direct estimate gene flow and reproductive success parameters in plants on the basis of naturally regenerated seedlings. Genetics 173: 363-372.
8. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Shimizu JY (1996). Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a natural knobcone pine (Pinus attenuata Lemmon) stand. Heredity 77: 251-260.
9. Burczyk J, DiFazio SP, Adams WT (2004a). Gene flow in forest trees: how far do genes really travel? Forest Genet 11: 1-14.
10. Burczyk J, Lewandowski A, Chalupka W (2004b). Local pollen dispersal and distance gene flow in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Forest Ecol Manage 197: 39-48.
11. Carvalho PER (2003). Espicies Arbσreas Brasileiras. Embrapa Informaηγo Tecnolsσgica. EMBRAPA-CNPF, Brasnlia DF, Cockerham CC (1969). Variance of gene frequencies. Evolution 23: 72-84.
12. Cascante A, Quesada M, Lobo JJ, Fuchs EA (2002). Effects of dry tropical forest fragmentation on the reproductive success and genetic structure of the tree Samanea saman. Cons Biol 16: 137-147.
13. Cockerham CC (1969). Variance of gene frequencies. Evolution 23: 72-84.
14. Cockerham CC, Weir BS (1993). Estimation of gene flow from F-statistic. Evolution 47: 855-863.
15. Degen B (2006). Genetic data analysis and numerical test. GDA-NT. Beta version 1.0. Available from b.degen@holz.uni-hamburg.de.
16. Degen B, Streiff R, Ziegenhagen B (1999). Comparative study of genetic variation and differentiation of two pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) stands using microsatellite and allozyme loci. Heredity 83: 597-603.
17. Dow BD, Ashley MV (1996). Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of sampling in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Mol Ecol 5: 615-627.
18. Dow BD, Ashley MV (1998). High levels of gene flow in bur oak revealed by paternity analysis using microsatellites. J Hered 89: 62-70.
19. Dutech C, Sork VL, Irwin A, Smouse PE, Davis FW (2005). Gene flow and fine-scale genetic structure in a wind-pollinated tree species, Quercus lobata (Fagaceae). Am J Bot 92: 252-261.
20. Dyer RJ, Sork LJ (2001). Pollen pool heterogeneity in short-leaf pine, Pinus echinata Mill. Mol Ecol 10: 859-866.
21. El-Kassaby YA, Jaquish B (1996). Population density and mating pattern in western larch. J Hered 87: 438-443.
22. Friedman ST, Adams WT (1985). Estimation of gene flow into two seed orchards of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Theor Appl Genet 69: 609-615.
23. Godoy JA, Jordano P (2001). Seed dispersal by animal: exact identification of source trees with endocarp DNA microsatellites. Mol Ecol 10: 2275-2283.
24. Gonzαlez-Martνnez SC, Gerber S, Cervera MT, Martνnez-Zapater JM, Gil L, Alνa R (2002). Seed gene flow and finescale structure in a Mediterranean pine (Pinus pinastes Ait.) using nuclear microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet 104: 1290-1297.
25. Goto S, Shimatani K, Yoshimaru H, Takahashi Y (2006). Fat-tailed gene flow in the dioecious canopy tree species Fraxinus mandshurica var. japonica revealed by microsatellites. Mol Ecol 15: 2985-2996.
26. Hamrick JL (2004). Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. Forest Ecol Manage 197: 323-335.
27. Hamrick JL, Murawski DA, Nason JD (1993). The influence of seed dispersal mechanisms on the genetic structure of tropical tree populations. Vegetation 107/108: 281-297.
28. Hardy O, Vekemans X (2002). SPAGeDI: a versatile computer program to analyze spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2: 618-620.
29. Hardy OJ, Gonzαlez-Martνnez S, Colas B, Friville H, Mignot A, Olivieri I (2004). Fine-scale genetic structure and gene dispersal in Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). II. Correlated paternity within and among sibships. Genetics 168: 1601-1614.
30. Harju AM, Nikkanen T (1996). Reproductive success of orchard and non-orchard pollen during different stages of pollen shedding in a Scots pine seed orchard. Can J For Res 26: 1096-1102.
31. Jones FA, Hubbell SP (2006). Demographic spatial genetic structure of the Neotropical tree, Jacaranda copaia. Mol Ecol 15: 3205-3217.
32. Jump AS, Penuelas J (2006). Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation in a wind-pollinated tree. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 8096-8100.
33. Levin DA (1988). The paternity pool plants. Am Nat 132: 309-317.
34. Lian C, Miwa M, Hogetsu T (2001). Outcrossing and paternity analysis of Pinus densiflora (Japanese red pine) by microsatellite polymorphism. Heredity 87: 88-98.
35. Lindgren D, Mullin TJ (1998). Relatedness and status number in seed orchard crops. Can J For Res 28: 276-283.
36. Loiselle BA, Sork VL, Nason J, Graham C (1995). Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). Am J Bot 82: 1420-1425.
37. Mantovani A, Morellato LPC, Reis MS (2006a). Fenologia reprodutiva e produηγo de sementes em Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Kuntze. Rev Bras Bot 27: 787-796.
38. Mantovani A, Morellato LPC, Reis MS (2006b). Internal genetic structure and outcrossing rate in a natural population of Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Kuntze. J Hered 97: 466-472.
39. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998). Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7: 639-655.
40. Mazza MCM, Bittencourt JV (2000). Extraηγo de DNA de tecido de Araucaria angustifolia (Araucariacea). Bol Pesq Flor 41: 12-17.
41. Meagher TR, Thompson E (1986). The relationship between single parents and parent pair genetic likelihoods in genealogy reconstruction. Theor Pop Biol 29: 87-106.
42. Meagher TR, Thompson E (1987). Analysis of parentage for naturally established seedlings of Chamaelirim luteum (Liliaceae). Ecology 68: 803-812.
43. Pakkanen A, Nikkanen T, Pulkkinen P (2000). Annual variation in pollen contamination and outcrossing in a Picea abies seed orchard. Scand J For Res 15: 399-404.
44. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Gil L (2005). Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity 94: 13-22.
45. Salgueiro F, Caron H, De Sousa MIF, Kremer A, Margis R (2005). Characterization of nuclear microsatellite loci in South American Araucariaceae species. Mol Ecol Notes 5: 256-258.
46. Sato T, Isakio Y, Osumi K, Goto S (2006). Effect of gene flow on spatial genetic structure in the riparian canopy tree Cercidiphyllun japonicum revealed by microsatellite analysis. Heredity 96: 79-84.
47. Schnabel A, Nason JD, Hamrick JL (1998). Understanding the population genetic structure of Gleditsia triacanthos L: seed dispersal and variation in female reproductive success. Mol Ecol 7: 819-832.
48. Schuster WSF, Mitton JB (2000). Paternity and gene dispersal in limber pine (Pinus flexilis James). Heredity 84: 348-361.
49. Smith DB, Adams WT (1983). Measuring pollen contamination in clonal seed orchards with the aid of genetic markers. In: Bongarten BC, Yates HO (eds). Proceedings of the 17th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference; 6-9 June 1983; pp, 69-77. Athens: Georgia, USA. The National Technical Information Service: Springfield, 1983, pp, 69-77.
50. Smouse PE, Sork VL (2004). Measuring pollen flow in forest trees: an exposition of alternative approaches. Forest Ecol Manage 197: 21-38.
51. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995). Biometry: Principles and Practices of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman and Company: New York.
52. Sork VL, Smouse PE (2006). Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree populations. Landscape Ecol 21: 821-836.
53. Sousa VA, Hattemer HH (2003). Pollen dispersal and gene flow by pollen in Araucaria angustifolia. Austr J Bot 51: 309-317.
54. Sousa VA, Robinson IP, Hattemer HH (2003). Variation and population structure at enzyme gene loci in Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze. Silvae Genet 53: 12-19.
55. Sousa VA, Sebbenn AM, Hattemer H, Ziehe M (2005). Correlated mating in populations of a dioecious Brazilian conifer, Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze. Forest Genet 12: 107-119.
56. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Lexer C, Steinkellner H, Gloessl J, Kremer A (1999). Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Mol Ecol 8: 831-841.
57. Valbuena-Carabana M, Gonzαlez-Martνnez SC, Sork VL, Collada C, Soto A, Goicoechea PG et al. (2005). Gene flow and hybridization in a mixed oak forest (Quercus pyrenaica Willd. and Quercus petraea (Matts.) Liebl.) in central Spain. Heredity 95: 457-465.
58. Wang K, Hattemer HH (2001). Dispersal of seed and effective pollen in small stands of European beach (Fagus sylvatica). In: Müller-Starck G, Schubert R (eds). Genetic Response of Forest Systems to Changing Environmental Conditions, vol. 70. Kluwer Academic Publishers: London. pp 259-269.
59. White GM, Boshier DH, Powell W (1999). Genetic variation within a fragmented population of Swietenia humilis Zucc. Mol Ecol 8: 1899-1909.
60. Wright S (1943). Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138.
61. Wright S (1965). The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.
62. Xie CY, Knowles P (1994). Mating system and effective pollen immigration in a Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) plantation. Silvae Genet 43: 48-52.