Coincidence of small-scale spatial discontinuities in leaf morphology and nuclear microsatellite variation of Quercus petraea and Q. robur in a mixed forest

Annals of Botany

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 713-722

  Gugerli, F ^a   Walser, J C ^a,b   Dounavi, K ^a,c   Holderegger, R ^a   Finkeldey, R ^a,d  

^a SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

^c Forest Research Institute of Baden Wuerttemberg FVA   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Genetic boundaries; Leaf morphology; Local genetic differentiation; Nuclear microsatellites; Quercus spp.; Spatial analysis

Indexed keywords

DECIDUOUS TREE; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENOTYPE; HYBRID; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; MIXED FOREST; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SPATIAL VARIATION;

QUERCUS; QUERCUS PETRAEA; QUERCUS ROBUR;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HISTOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OAK; PLANT LEAF; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TREE;

BAYES THEOREM; GENOTYPE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PLANT LEAVES; QUERCUS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TREES; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 34249940962     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcm006     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Anderson E. 1948. Hybridization of the habitat. Evolution 2: 1-9.
2. Bacilieri R, Labbé T, Kremer A. 1994. Intraspecific genetic structure in a mixed population of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. robur L. Heredity 73: 130-141.
3. Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Petit RJ, Kremer A. 1996. Mating system and asymmetric hybridization in a mixed stand of European oaks. Evolution 50: 900-908.
4. Bakker EG, Van Dam BC, Van Eck HJ, Jacobsen E. 2001. A discrimination between Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. based on species-indicative AFLP markers. Forest Genetics 8: 315-322.
5. Barreneche T, Casasoli M, Russell K, Akkak A, Meddour H, Plomion C, et al. 2004. Comparative mapping between Quercus and Castanea using simple-sequence repeats (SSRs). Theoretical & Applied Genetics 108: 558-566.
6. Bodénès C, Labbé T, Pradère S, Kremer A. 1997. General vs. local differentiation between two closely related white oak species. Molecular Ecology 6: 713-724.
7. Buiteveld J, Bakker EG, Bovenschen J, de Vries SMG. 2001. Paternity analysis in a seed orchard of Quercus robur L. and estimation of the amount of background pollination using microsatellite markers. Forest Genetics 8: 331-337.
8. Coart E, Lamote V, De Loose M, Van Bockstaele E, Lootens P, Roldán-Ruiz I. 2002. AFLP markers demonstrate local genetic differentiation between two indigenous oak species [Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.] in Flemish populations. Theoretical & Applied Genetics 105: 431-439.
9. Cottrell JE, Munro RC, Tabbener HE, Milner AD, Forrest GI, Lowe AJ. 2003. Comparison of fine-scale genetic structure using nuclear microsatellites within two British oakwoods differing in population history. Forest Ecology and Management 176: 287-303.
10. Craft KJ, Ashley MV, Koenig WD. 2002. Limited hybridization between Quercus lobata and Quercus douglasii (Fagaceae) in a mixed stand in central coastal California. American Journal of Botany 89: 1792-1798.
11. Davies S, White A, Lowe AJ. 2004. An investigation into effects of longdistance seed dispersal on organelle population genetic structure and colonization rate: a model analysis. Heredity 93: 566-576.
12. Deguilloux M-F, Dumolin-Lapègue S, Gielly L, Grivet D, Petit RJ. 2003. A set of primers for the amplification of chloroplast microsatellites in Quercus. Molecular Ecology Notes 3: 24-25.
13. Deguilloux M-F, Pemonge M-H, Petit RJ. 2004. Use of chloroplast microsatellites to differentiate oak populations. Annals of Forest Science 61: 825-830.
14. n microsatellites in the bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Theoretical & Applied Genetics 91: 137-141.
15. Dumolin-Lapègue S, Kremer A, Petit RJ. 1999. Are chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA variation species independent in oaks? Evolution 53: 1406-1413.
16. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
17. Feuillat F, Dupouey J-L, Sciama D, Keller R. 1997. A new attempt at discrimination between Quercus petraea and Quercus robur based on wood anatomy. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 343-351.
18. Finkeldey R, Mátyás G. 2003. Genetic variation of oaks (Quercus spp.) in Switzerland. 3. Lack of impact of postglacial recolonization history on nuclear gene loci. Theoretical & Applied Genetics 106: 346-352.
19. Fox GA. 2003. Assortative mating and plant phenology: evolutionary and practical consequences. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5: 1-18.
20. Galloway LF. 2005. Maternal effects provide phenotypic adaptation to local environmental conditions. New Phytologist 166: 93-100.
21. Gömöry D, Yakovlev I, Zhelev P, Jedináková J, Paule L. 2001. Genetic differentiation of oak populations within the Quercus robur/Quercus petraea complex in Central and Eastern Europe. Heredity 86: 557-563.
22. González-Rodríguez A, Arias DM, Valencia S, Oyama K. 2004. Morphological and RAPD analysis of hybridization between Quercus affinis and Q. laurina (Fagaceae), two Mexican red oaks. American Journal of Botany 91: 401-409.
23. Goudet J. 1995. FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity 86: 485-486.
24. Howard DJ, Preszler RW, Williams J, Fenchel S, Boecklen WJ. 1997. How discrete are oak species? Insights from a hybrid zone between Quercus grisea and Quercus gambelii. Evolution 51: 747-755.
25. Ishida TA, Hattori K, Sato H, Kimura MT. 2003. Differentiation and hybridization between Quercus crispula and Q. dentata (Fagaceae): insights from morphological traits, amplified fragment length polymorphism markers, and leafminer composition. American Journal of Botany 90: 769-776.
26. Jensen JS, Olrik DC, Siegismund HR, Lowe AJ. 2003. Population genetics and spatial autocorrelation in an unmanaged stand of Quercus petraea in Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 18: 295-304.
27. Jiggins CD, Mallet J. 2000. Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 250-255.
28. (n) microsatellite loci from Quercus robur. Hereditas 129: 183-186.
29. Kelleher CT, Hodkinson TR, Douglas GC, Kelly DL. 2005. Species distinction in Irish populations of Quercus petraea and Q. robur: morphological versus molecular analyses. Annals of Botany 96: 1237-1246.
30. Kremer A, Dupouey JL, Deans JD, Cottrell J, Csaikl U, Finkeldey R, et al. 2002. Leaf morphological differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea is stable across western European mixed oak stands. Annals of Forest Science 59: 777-787.
31. Lexer C, Kremer A, Petit RJ. 2006. Shared alleles in sympatric oaks: recurrent gene flow is a more parsimonious explanation than ancestral polymorphism. Molecular Ecology 15: 2007-2012.
32. Lexer C, Kremer A, Petit RJ. Shared alleles in sympatric oaks: recurrent gene flow is a more parsimonious explanation than ancestral polymorphism. Molecular Ecology, in press.
33. Lowe AJ, Harris S, Ashton P. 2004. Ecological genetics: design, analysis and application. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
34. Manni F, Guérard E, Heyer E. 2004. Geographic patterns of (genetic, morphologic, linguistic) variation: how barriers can be detected by "Monmonier's algorithm". Human Biology 76: 173-190.
35. Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27: 209-220.
36. Mariette S, Cottrell JE, Csaikl UM, Goikoechea P, König A, Lowe AJ, et al. 2002. Comparison of levels of genetic diversity detected with AFLP and microsatellite markers within and among mixed Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. robur L. stands. Silvae Genetica 51: 72-79.
37. Mátyás G, Sperisen C. 2001. Chloroplast DNA polymorphisms provide evidence for postglacial recolonisation of oaks (Quercus spp.) across the Swiss Alps. Theoretical & Applied Genetics 102: 12-20.
38. Monmonier MS. 1973. Maximum-difference barriers: an alternative numerical regionalization method. Geographical Analysis 5: 245-261.
39. Muir G, Schlötterer C. 2005. Evidence for shared ancestral polymorphism rather than recurrent gene flow at microsatellite loci differentiating two hybridizing oaks (Quercus spp.). Molecular Ecology 14: 549-561.
40. Muir G, Schlötterer C. 2006. Moving beyond single-locus studies to characterize hybridization between oaks (Quercus spp.). Molecular Ecology 15: 2301-2304.
41. Muir G, Fleming CC, Schlötterer C. 2000. Species status of hybridizing oaks. Nature 405: 1016.
42. Muir G, Lowe AJ, Fleming CC, Vogl C. 2004. High nuclear genetic diversity, high levels of outcrossing and low differentiation among remnant populations of Quercus petraea at the margin of its range in Ireland. Annals of Botany 93: 691-697.
43. Nason JD, Ellstrand NC, Arnold ML. 1992. Patterns of hybridization and introgression in populations of oaks, manzanitas, and irises. American Journal of Botany 79: 101-111.
44. Paetkau D, Waits LP, Clarkson PL, Craighead L, Strobeck C. 1997. An empirical evaluation of genetic distance statistics using microsatellite data from bear (Ursidae) populations. Genetics 147: 1943-1957.
45. Petit RJ, Brewer S, Bordács S, Burg K, Cheddadi R, Coart E, et al. 2002a. Identification of refugia and post-glacial colonisation routes of European white oaks based on chloroplast DNA and fossil pollen evidence. Forest Ecology and Management 156: 49-74.
46. Petit RJ, Csaikl UM, Bordács S, Burg K, Coart E, Cottrell J, et al. 2002b. Chloroplast DNA variation in European white oaks: phylogeography and patterns of diversity based on data from over 2600 populations. Forest Ecology and Management 156: 5-26.
47. Petit RJ, Bodénès C, Ducousso A, Roussel G, Kremer A. 2003. Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytologist, 161: 151-164.
48. Ponton S, Dupouey J-L, Bréda N, Feuillat F, Bodénès C, Dreyer E. 2001. Carbon isotope discrimination and wood anatomy variations in mixed stands of Quercus robur and Quercus petraea. Plant, Cell and Environment 24: 861-868.
49. Ponton S, Dupouey J-L, Bréda N, Dreyer E. 2002. Comparison of wateruse efficiency of seedlings from two sympatric oak species: genotype x environment interactions. Tree Physiology 22: 413-422.
50. Ponton S, Dupouey J-L, Dreyer E. 2004. Leaf morphology as species indicator in seedlings of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.: modulation by irradiance and growth flush. Annals of Forest Science 61: 73-80.
51. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
52. Rushton BS. 1993. Natural hybridization within the genus Quercus L. Annales des Sciences Forestières 50: p73s-90s.
53. Saintagne C, Bodénès C, Barreneche T, Pot D, Plomion C, Kremer A. 2004. Distribution of genomic regions differentiating oak species assessed by QTL detection. Heredity 92: 20-30.
54. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L. 2000. Arlequin 2.000: a software for population genetic data analysis. Geneva: Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Department of Ecology and Anthropology, University of Geneva.
55. Scotti-Saintagne C, Mariette S, Porth I, Goicoechea PG, Barreneche T, Bodénès C, et al. 2004. Genome scanning for interspecific differentiation between two closely related oak species [Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.]. Genetics 168: 1615-1626.
56. SPSS. 2000. SyStat. Chicago: SPSS.
57. Stebbins GL, Matzke EB, Epling C. 1947. Hybridization in a population of Quercus marilandica and Q. ilicifolia. Evolution 1: 79-88.
58. Steinhoff S. 1993. Results of species hybridization with Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Annales des Sciences Forestières 50: 137s-143s.
59. n-microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea. Plant Molecular Biology, 33: 1093-1096.
60. Streiff R, Labbé T, Bacilieri R, Steinkellner H, Glössl J, Kremer A. 1998. Within-population genetic structure in Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. assessed with isozymes and microsatellites. Molecular Ecology 7: 317-328.
61. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Lexer C, Steinkellner H, Glössl J, Kremer A. 1999. Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Molecular Ecology 8: 831-842.
62. Tovar-Sánchez E, Oyama K. 2004. Natural hybridization and hybrid zones between Quercus crassifolia and Quercus crassipes (Fagaceae) in Mexico: morphological and molecular evidence. American Journal of Botany 91: 1352-1363.
63. Vähä J-P, Primmer CR. 2006. Efficiency of model-based Bayesian methods for detecting hybrid individuals under different hybridization scenarios and with different numbers of loci. Molecular Ecology 15: 63-72.
64. Valbuena-Carabaña M, Gonzalez-Martinez SC, Sork VL, Collada C, Soto A, Goicoechea PG, Gil L. 2005. Gene flow and hybridisation in a mixed oak forest (Quercus pyrenaica Willd. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) in central Spain. Heredity 95: 457-465.
65. Waser PM, Strobeck C. 1998. Genetic signatures of interpopulation dispersal. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 43-44.
66. Whittemore AT, Schaal BA. 1991. Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 88: 2540-2544.
67. Williams JH, Boecklen WJ, Howard DJ. 2001. Reproductive processes in two oak (Quercus) contact zones with different levels of hybridization. Heredity 87: 680-690.