The acquisition of second language writing

The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 319-334

  Polio, Charlene ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893820384     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203808184     Document Type: Chapter

References (112)

1. Adams, R. and Ross-Feldman, L. (2008). Does writing influence learner attention to form? The speaking-writing connection in second language and academic literacy development. In D. Belcher and A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral/literate connection: Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interaction (pp. 210—225). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2. Alamargot, D. and Chanquoy, L. (2001). General introduction: A definition of writing and a presentation of the main models. In D. Alamargot and L. Chanquoy (Eds.), Through models of writing (pp. 1—32). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Aljaafreh, A. and Lantolf, J. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78, 465—83.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1997). Anotherpiece ofthe puzzle: The emergence of present perfect. Language Learning, 51, 215-264.
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Oxford: Blackwell.
6. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2007). One functional approach to second language acquisition: The concept-oriented approach. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction(pp. 57-76). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Belcher, D. and Hirvela, A. (Eds.) (2008). The oral/literate connection: Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8. Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9. Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., and Helt, M. (2002). Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 9-48.
10. Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69-124.
11. Bitchener, J., Young, S., and Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205.
12. Blake, C. (2009). Potential of text-based internet chats for improving oral fluency in a second language. Modern Language Journal, 93, 227-240.
13. Brooks, L. and Swain, M. (2009). Languaging in collaborative writing: Creation of and response to expertise. In A. Mackey and C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 58-89). New York: Routledge.
14. Byrnes, H. and Sinicrope, C. (2008). Advancedness and the development of relativization in L2 German: A curriculum-based longitudinal study. In L. Ortega and H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 109-138). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Ceyala, M. L. and Navés, T. (2009). Age-related differences and associated factors in foreign language writing: Implications for L2 writing theory and school curricula. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 130-155). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
16. Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.
17. Chandler, J. (2004) A response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 345-348.
18. Cleland, A. and Pickering, M. (2006). Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations?. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 185-198.
19. Cohen, A. and Brooks-Carson, A. (2001). Research on direct versus translated writing: Students’ strategies and their results. Modern Language Journal, 85, 169-188.
20. Cumming, A. (1990). Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482-511.
21. Cumming, A. (2002). Assessing L2 writing: Alternative constructs and ethical dilemmas. Assessing Writing, 8, 73-83.
22. Ellis, N. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305-352.
23. Ellis, N. (2007). The associative-cognitivist CREED. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 77-96). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style in the use ofthe past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12-20.
25. Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51 (Supplement 1), 1-46.
26. Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakima, M., and Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353—371.
27. Ellis, R. and Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 59—84.
28. Ferris, D. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
29. Ferris, D. and Hedgcock, J. (2005). Teaching ESL composition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Ferris, D. and Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161—184.
31. Flower, L. and Hayes, J. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 310, 21—32.
32. Flowerdew, J. (2001).Attitudes of journal editors to non-native speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 121-150.
33. Flowerdew, J. and Li, Y. (2009). English or Chinese? The trade-off between local and international publication among Chinese academic in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 1-16.
34. Foster, P. and Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299-324.
35. Friedlander, A. (1990). Composing in English: Effects of a first language on writing in English as Second Language. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insight for the classroom (pp. 109-125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Gass, S. M. and Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19, 3- 17.
37. Gass, S. and Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 175-199). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Guenette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 40-53.
39. Gutiérrez, X. (2008). What does metalinguistic activity in L2 learners’ interaction during a collaborative writing task look like? Modern Language Journal, 92, 519-537.
40. Harklau, L. (2002). The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 329-350.
41. Hatch, E. (1978). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 401-435). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
42. Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. Levy and S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Hayes, J. R. and Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Hinkel, E. (2002). Second language writers’ text. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Kawauchi, C. (2005). The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of learners with low and high intermediate L2 proficiency. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 143-164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
47. Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In M. C. Levy and S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57-71). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Kellogg, R. T. (2001). Competition for working memory among writing processes. American Journal of Psychology, 114, 175-192.
49. Kim, Y. (2008). The effects of integrated language-based instruction in elementary ESL learning. Modern Language Journal, 92, 431-451.
50. Kobayashi, H. and Rinnert, C. (1992). Effects of first language on second language writing: Translation vs. direct composition. Language Learning, 42, 183-215.
51. Kuiken, F. and Vedder, I. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 48-60.
52. Lally, C. (2000). First language influences in second language composition: The effect of pre-writing. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 428-432.
53. Lantolf, J. and Thorne, S. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 197-220).Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 285—312.
55. Leki, I., Cumming, A., and Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
56. Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
57. Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition: Annals of the New York academy of science, 379, 259—278.
58. Long, M. H. (1983). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non—native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177—193.
59. Mackey, A. and Polio, C. (2009). Introduction. In Mackey, A. and Polio, C. (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 1—10). New York: Routledge.
60. Manchón, R. M. (2011). The language learning potential of writing in foreign language contexts: Lessons from research. In M. Reichelt and T. Cimasko (Eds.), Foreign language writing: Research insights (pp. 44—64). West Lafayette: Parlour Press.
61. Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83—108.
62. Miller, K., Lindgren, E., and Sullivan, K. (2008). The psycholinguistic dimension in second language writing: Opportunities for research and pedagogy using computer key stroke logging. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 433—454.
63. Mitchell, R. and Myles, F. (1998). Second language learning theories. London: Arnold.
64. Mochizuki, N. and Ortega, L. (2008). Balancing communication and grammar in beginning-level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research, 12, 11—37.
65. Nassaji, H. and Cumming, A. (2000). What’s in a ZPD? A case study of a young ESL student and teacher interacting through dialog journals. Language Teaching Research, 4, 95—121.
66. National Council of Teachers of English (2005). The impact of the SAT and ACT timed writing tests. http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Positions/SAT-ACT-tf-report.pdf
67. Norris, J. M. and Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417—528.
68. Norris, J. M. and Ortega, L. (2003). Defining and measuring L2 acquisition. In C. Doughty and M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 717—761). New York: Blackwell.
69. Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109-148.
70. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
71. Pienemann, M. (2005). Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
72. Pienemann, M. (2007). Processability theory. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 137-154). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
73. Pienemann, M. and Johnston, M. (1987). Factors influencing the development of language proficiency. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Applying second language acquisition research (pp. 45-141). Adelaide, Australia: National Curriculum Resource Centre, AMEP.
74. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: William Morrow.
75. Polio, C. (1997). Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language Learning, 47, 101 -143.
76. Polio, C. (2001). Research methodology in second language writing research: The case of text-based studies. In T. Silva and P. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 91-116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
77. Polio, C. (2003). An overview of approaches to second language writing research. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the Dynamics of Second Language Writing (pp. 35-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Qi, D. and Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277-303.
79. Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing. Studies in componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 1-32.
80. Russell, J. and Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. M. Norris and L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
81. Sachs, R. and Polio, C. (2007). Learners’ uses of two types of written feedback on an L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(1), pp. 67-100.
82. Sangarun, J. (2005). The effects of focusing on meaning and form in strategic planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in asecond language (pp. 111-141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
83. Sasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 259-292.
84. Sasaki, M. (2004).Building an empirically-based model of EFL learners’ writing processes. In S. Ransdell and M. -L. Barbier (Eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 49-80). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.
85. Sasaki, M. (2007). Effects of study-abroad experiences on EFL writers: A multiple data analysis. Modern Language Journal, 91, 602-620.
86. Schoonen, R., Snellings, P., Stevenson, M., andVan Gelderen, A. (2009). Towardsablueprint of the foreing language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 77-101). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
87. Serrano, R. and Howard, E. R. (2007). Second language writing development in English and in Spanish in a two-way immersion programme. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(2), 152-170.
88. Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283.
89. Stapa, S. and Magid, A. (2009). The use of first language in developing ideas in second language writing. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 41-47.
90. Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153-173.
91. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (p. 64-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-483). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
93. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
94. Tarone, E. and Bigelow, M. (2005). Impact of literacy on oral language processing: Implications for second language acquisition research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 77-97.
95. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
96. Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337-343.
97. Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 255-272.
98. Tyler, A. (2011) Usage-based approaches to language and their applications to second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 270-291.
99. VanPatten, B. and Williams, J. (2007). Introduction: The nature of theories. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams, (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
100. Wang, W. and Wen, Q. (2002). L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 225-246.
101. Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
102. Weissberg, R. (2000). Developmental relationships in the acquisition of English syntax: Writing vs. speech. Learning and Instruction, 10, 37-53.
103. Wendel, J. (1997). Planning and second language narrative production. Unpublished PhD thesis. Temple University, Japan.
104. White, L. (2007). Linguistic theory, Universal grammar, and second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 37-56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
105. Wigglesworth, G. (1997). An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing, 14, 85-106.
106. Williams, J. (2008). The speaking-writing connection in second language and academic literacy development. In D. Belcher and A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral/literate connection: Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interaction (pp. 10-25). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
107. Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., and Kim, H. Y. (1998). Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity. (Technical Report #17). Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
108. Wong, W. (2001). Modality and attention to meaning and form in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 345-368. Charlene Polio
109. Xu, C. (2009). Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Ellis et al., (2008) and Bitchener (2008). Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 270—275.
110. Yuan, F. and Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1—27.
111. Zhang, S. (1987). Cognitive complexity and written production in English as a second language. Language Learning, 37, 469—481.
112. Zimmermann, R. (2000). L2 writing subprocesses. A model of formulating and empirical findings. Learning and Instruction, 10, 73—99.