Usage-based approaches to language and their applications to second language learning

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Volumn 30, Issue , 2010, Pages 270-291

  Tyler, Andrea ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952894226     PISSN: 02671905     EISSN: 14716356     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1017/S0267190510000140     Document Type: Review

References (125)

1. Achard, M. (2008). Teaching construal: Cognitive pedagogical grammar. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 432-455). New York: Routledge
2. Achard,M., & Niemeier, S. (Eds.). (2004). Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
3. Achugar, M., Schleppegrell, M. J., & Ote'iza, T. (2007). Engaging teachers in language analysis: A functional linguistics approach to reflective literacy. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6, 8-24.
4. In G Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2006). Cognitive linguistic applications in second language or foreign language instruction: Rationale, proposals, and evaluation
5. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 305-355). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
6. Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (Eds.). (2008). Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology. Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter
7. Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Stengers, H. (2007). Presenting figurative idioms with a touch of etymology: More than mere mnemonics? Language Teaching Research, 11, 43-62.
8. Butler, C. S. (1989). Systemic models: Unity, diversity and change. Word, 40, 1-35.
9. Butler, C. S. (2006). Functionalist theories of language. In K. Brown (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (Vol. 4, pp. 696-704). Oxford, UK: Elsevier
10. Bybee, J. (2003). Mechanisms in change in grammaticalization: The role of repetition. In R. Janda & B. Joseph (Eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602-623). Oxford, UK: Blackwell
11. Bybee, J. (2006). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
12. Bybee, J., & Moder, C. (1983). Morphological classes as natural categories. Language, 59, 251-270.
13. Byrnes, H. (2006). A semiotic perspective on culture and foreign language teaching: Implications for collegiate materials development. In V. Galloway & B. Cothran (Eds.), Language and culture out of bounds: Discipline-blurred perspectives on the foreign language classroom (pp. 37-66). Boston, MA: Heinle Thomson
14. Byrnes, H. (2009). Systemic-functional reflections on instructed foreign language acquisition as meaning-making: An introduction. Linguistics and Education, 20, 1-9.
15. Byrnes, H., Maxim, H., & Norris, J. (in press). Realizing advanced FL writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. London: Continuum
16. Cadierno, T. (2008). Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 239-275). New York: Routledge
17. Cameron, L. (2008). A discourse approach to metaphor: Explaining systematic metaphors for literacy processes in a school discourse community. In A. Tyler, Y. Kim, & M. Takada (Eds.), Language in the context of use: Discourse and cognitive approaches to language (pp. 321-338). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
18. Carter, R., Hughes, R., & McCarthy, M. (2000). Exploring language in context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
19. Celce-Murcia, M. (2002). Why it makes sense to teach grammar in context and through discourse. In E. Hinkle & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 119-134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
20. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher's course. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
21. Celce-Murcia, M., & Olshtain, E. (2005). Discourse based approaches: A new framework for second language teaching and learning. In E. Hinkle (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 729-741). New York: Routledge
22. Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: Chicago University Press
23. Chafe, W. (2001). The analysis of discourse flow. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 673-687). Oxford, UK: Blackwell
24. Chafe, W. (2005). The relation of grammar to thought. In C. S. Butler, M. de los ́ Angeles G'omez-Gonz'alez, & S. M. Doval-Su'arez (Eds.), The dynamics of language use: Functional and contrastive perspectives (pp. 55-75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
25. Chafe, W. (2007). Language and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 355-373). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
26. Christie, F. (2006). Literacy teaching and current debates over reading. In R. Whittaker, M. O'Donnell, & A. McCabe (Eds.), Language and literacy: Functional approaches (pp. 45-65). London: Continuum
27. Colombi, M. C. (2009). A systemic functional approach to teaching Spanish for heritage speakers in the United States. Linguistics and Education, 20, 39-49.
28. Coventry, K., & Garrod, S. (2004). Saying, seeing and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Essays in cognitive psychology series. New York: Psychology Press
29. Coventry, K., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2008) Spatial language learning and functional geometry. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). London: Routledge
30. Csabi, S. (2004). A cognitive linguistic view of polysemy in English and its implications for teaching. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 233-256). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
31. Dancygier, B. (2008). Personal pronouns, blending, and narrative viewpoint. In A. Tyler, Y. Kim, & M. Takada (Eds.), Language in the context of use: Discourse and cognitive approaches to language (pp. 167-183). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
32. De Knop, S., & De Rycker, T. (Eds.). (2008). Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
33. De Knop, S., Boers, F.,&De Rycker, T. (Eds.). (in press). Applications of cognitive linguistics: Exploring the lexis-grammar continuum in second language pedagogy. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
34. Ellis, N. C. (2002a). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
35. Ellis, N. C. (2002b). Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 297-339.
36. Ellis, N. C. (2008a). Usage-based and form-focused SLA: The implicit and explicit learning of constructions. In A. Tyler, Y. Kim, & M. Takada (Eds.), Language in the context of use: Discourse and cognitive approaches to language (pp. 93-121). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
37. Ellis, N. C. (2008b) Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned attention and the limited L2 end state. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372-406). London: Routledge
38. Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press
39. Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
40. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books
41. Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
42. Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
43. Giv'on, T. (1995). Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
44. Giv'on, T. (2001). Syntax: An introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
45. Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press
46. Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
47. Grady, J. (1997). Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 267-290.
48. Grady, J. (1999). A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. In R. W. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79-100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
49. Grady, J. (2007). Metaphor. In D. Geeraertz & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 188-213). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
50. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold
51. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold
52. Halliday, M. A. K. (2002). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In J. Webster (Ed.), On grammar (pp. 323-351). London: Continuum Press
53. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman
54. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A Language-based Approach To Cognition. London: Cassell
55. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold
56. Hamrick, P., & Attardo, S. (in press). Evaluating applied cognitive linguistics in Italian L2 instruction: Towards a pedagogical cognitive grammar. In S. De Knop, F. Boers, & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Applications of cognitive linguistics: Exploring the lexis-grammar continuum in second language pedagogy. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
57. Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of lexis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
58. Huong, N. T. (2005). Vietnamese learners mastering English articles. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, Netherlands
59. Kemmer, S., & Barlow, M. (2000). Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-basedmodels of language (pp. vii-xxviii). Stanford, CA: CSLI
60. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
61. Lakoff, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image schemas? Cognitive Linguistics,1, 39-74.
62. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
63. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books
64. Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. I. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
65. Langacker, R. W. (1991a). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin, Germany and New York: Mouton de Gruyter
66. Langacker, R.W. (1991b). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. II. Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
67. Langacker, R. W. (2008a). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
68. Langacker, R. W. (2008b). Cognitive grammar as a basis for language instruction. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 66-88). New York: Routledge
69. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). The grammar of choice. In E. Hinkle & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 103-118). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
70. Liamkina, O. A. (2006). The role of explicit meaning-based instruction in foreign language pedagogy: Applications of cognitive linguistics to teaching the German dative case to advanced learners. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66(10), 3627. (UMI No. AAT 3193301).
71. Liamkina, O. A. (2008). Making dative a case for semantic analysis: Differences in use between native and non-native speakers of German. In A. Tyler, Y. Kim, & M. Takada (Eds.), Language in the context of use: Discourse and cognitive approaches to language (pp. 145-166). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
72. Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Children's first language acquisition from a usagebased perspective. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 168-198). New York: Routledge
73. Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Metaphoric competence, second language learning, and communicative language ability. Applied Linguistics, 27, 268-294.
74. Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2004). Input versus transfer?-The role of frequency and similarity in the acquisition of L2 prepositions. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 77-94). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
75. MacArthur, F., & Littlemore, J. (2008). A discovery approach to figurative language learning with the use of corpora. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 159-188). Berlin, Germany:
76. Mouton De Gruyter.Manzanares, J. V., & Rojo Lopez, A. M. (2008). What can language learners tell us about constructions? In S. De Knop & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar (pp. 197-230). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
77. Martin, J. R. (1999). Mentoring semogenesis: "Genre-based" literacy pedagogy. In F. Christie (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp. 123-155). London: Cassell
78. Martin, J. R. (200l). From little things big things grow: Ecogenesis in school geography. In R. Coe, L. Lingard, & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change (pp. 253-271). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
79. Martin, J. R. (2002). Meaning beyond the clause: SFL perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 52-74.
80. Martin, J. R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20, 10-21.
81. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox
82. McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2002). Ten criteria for a spoken grammar. In E. Hinkle & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 51-76). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
83. Mellow, J. D. (2006). The emergence of second language syntax: A case study of the acquisition of relative clauses. Applied Linguistics, 27, 645-670.
84. Moder, C. L. (2004). Ice box moms and hockey dads: Context and the mapping of N-N metaphorical expressions. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture and mind (109-121). Stanford, CA: CSLI
85. Moder, C. L. (2008). It's like making a soup: Metaphors and similes in spoken news discourse. In A. Tyler, Y. Kim, & M. Takada (Eds.), Language in the context of use: Discourse and cognitive approaches to language (pp. 301-320). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
86. Newman, J. (1996). Give: A cognitive linguistic study. New York: Mouton de Gruyter
87. Niemeier, S. (2008). The notion of boundedness/unboundedness in the foreign language classroom. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 309-327). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
88. Panther, K., & Thornburg, L. (2001). A conceptual analysis of English -er nominals. In M. Putz, S. Niemeier, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy (pp. 149-200). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
89. Putz, M., Niemeier, S., & Dirven, R. (Eds.). (2001). Applied cognitive linguistics I: Theory and language acquisition. Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter
90. Putz, M., Niemeier, S., & Dirven, R. (Eds.). (2001). Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy. Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter
91. Reddy, M. (1993). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 164-201). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
92. Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge
93. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 382-439.
94. Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (2003). Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds: A cognitive approach. Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter
95. Sanders, T., & Spooren, W. (2005). Discourse and text structure. In D. Geeraertz & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 916-937). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
96. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
97. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2008). Grammar, the sentence, and traditions of linguistic analysis. In Charles Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 549-564). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
98. Schleppegrell, M. J., Greer, S., & Taylor, S. (2008). Literacy in history: Language and meaning. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31, 174-187.
99. Schmid, H. (2007). Entrenchment, salience and basic levels. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 117-138). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
100. Slobin, D. I. (1996a). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195-220). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press
101. Slobin,D. I. (1996b). From "thought and language" to "thinking for speaking." In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity. Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language, No. 17 (pp. 70-96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
102. Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought (pp. 157-191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
103. Slobin, D. I. (2009). Relations between paths of motion and paths of vision: A crosslinguistic and developmental exploration. In V. M. Gathercole (Ed.), Routes to language: Studies in honor of Melissa Bowerman (pp. 197-221). New York: Psychology Press
104. Strauss, S., Lee, J., & Ahn, K. (2006). Applying conceptual grammar to advanced-level language teaching: The case of two completive constructions in Korean. Modern Language Journal, 90, 185-209.
105. Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
106. Talmy, L. (2000a). Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol. I. Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
107. Talmy, L. (2000b). Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol. II. Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
108. Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
109. Taylor, J. R. (2003). Linguistic categorization. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
110. Taylor, J. R. (2004). Cognitive grammar. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
111. Tomasello,M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
112. Tomasello, M., & Brooks, P. (1998). Young children's earliest transitive and intransitive constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 379-395.
113. Tomlin, R. (1994). Functional grammar, pedagogical grammars, and communicative language teaching. In T. Odlin (Ed.) Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 140-178). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
114. Tomlin, R. (1997). Mapping conceptual representations into linguistic representations: The role of attention in grammar. In J. Nuyts & E. Pederson (Eds.), Language and conceptualization (pp. 162-189). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
115. Tyler, A. (2008a). Cognitive linguistics and second language instruction. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 456-488). London: Routledge
116. Tyler, A. (2008b). Applied cognitive linguistics: Putting linguistics back into second language learning. In M. Putz (Ed.), Cognitive approaches to second/foreign language processing: Theory and pedagogy (pp. 904-923). Essen, Germany: LAUD.
117. Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2001). The relation between experience, conceptual structure and meaning: Non-temporal uses of tense and language teaching. In M. Putz, R. Dirven, & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics I: Theory and language acquisition (pp. 63-105). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
118. Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
119. Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2004). Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar: The case of over. In M. Achard & S. Neimeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 257-280). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
120. Tyler, A., Kim, Y., & Takada, M. (Eds.). (2008). Language in the context of use: Discourse and cognitive approaches to language. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter
121. Verspoor,M., & Lowie,W. (2003).Making sense of polysemous words. Language Learning, 53, 547-586.
122. Verspoor, M., & Tyler, A. (2009). The role of cognitive linguistics in second language research. In W. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 160-177). Oxford, UK: Emerald
123. von Stutterheim, C. (2003). Linguistic structures and information organisation: The case of very advanced learners. In S. Foster-Cohen (Ed.), EUROSLA Yearbook 3 (pp. 183-206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
124. Walker, C. (2008). Factors which influence the process of collocation. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 291-308) Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter
125. Zyzik, E. (2009). The role of input revisited: Nativist and usage-based models. L2 Journal, 1, 42-61.