Closed MAD2 (C-MAD2) is selectively incorporated into the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC)

Cell Cycle

Volumn 10, Issue 21, 2011, Pages 3740-3750

  Tipton, Aaron R ^a   Tipton, Michael ^a   Yen, Tim ^b   Liu, Song Tao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

^b FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaphase promoting complex cyclosome; Conformer; MAD2; Mitotic checkpoint complex

Indexed keywords

BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; BUB3 PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 20; PROTEIN MAD2;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL ISOLATION; CENTROMERE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HELA CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; MITOSIS; MITOSIS INHIBITION; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 80655140528     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.10.21.17919     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Musacchio A, Salmon ED. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:379-93; PMID:17426725; DOI:10.1038/nrm2163.
2. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature 1998; 396:643-9; PMID:9872311; DOI:10.1038/25292.
3. Weaver BA, Cleveland DW. The aneuploidy paradox in cell growth and tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 2008; 14:431-3; PMID:19061834; DOI:10.1016/j.ccr. 2008.11.011.
4. Musacchio A, Hardwick KG. The spindle checkpoint: structural insights into dynamic signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002; 3:731-41; PMID:12360190; DOI:10.1038/nrm929.
5. Rieder CL, Schultz A, Cole R, Sluder G. Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J Cell Biol 1994; 127:1301-10; PMID:7962091; DOI:10.1083/jcb.127.5.1301.
6. Huang H, Yen TJ. BubR1 is an effector of multiple mitotic kinases that specifies kinetochore: microtubule attachments and checkpoint. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:1164-7; PMID:19282664; DOI:10.4161/cc.8.8.8151.
7. Ciliberto A, Shah JV. A quantitative systems view of the spindle assembly checkpoint. EMBO J 2009; 28:2162-73; PMID:19629044; DOI:10.1038/emboj.2009.186.
8. Luo X, Yu H. Protein metamorphosis: the twostate behavior of Mad2. Structure 2008; 16:1616-25; PMID:19000814; DOI:10.1016/j.str.2008.10.002.
9. Mapelli M, Musacchio A. MAD contortions: conformational dimerization boosts spindle checkpoint signaling. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2007; 17:716-25; PMID:17920260; DOI:10.1016/j.sbi.2007.08.011.
10. Tipton AR, Wang K, Link L, Bellizzi JJ, Huang H, Yen T, et al. BUBR1 and Closed MAD2 (C-MAD2) Interact Directly to Assemble a Functional Mitotic Checkpoint Complex. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:21173-9; PMID:21525009; DOI:10.1074/jbc.M111.238543.
11. Luo X, Tang Z, Rizo J, Yu H. The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Mad1 or Cdc20. Mol Cell 2002; 9:59-71; PMID:11804586; DOI:10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00435-X.
12. Chen RH, Waters JC, Salmon ED, Murray AW. Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMAD2 with unattached kinetochores. Science 1996; 274:242-6; PMID:8824188; DOI:10.1126/science.274.5285.242.
13. Campbell MS, Chan GK, Yen TJ. Mitotic checkpoint proteins HsMAD1 and HsMAD2 are associated with nuclear pore complexes in interphase. J Cell Sci 2001; 114:953-63; PMID:11181178.
14. Kitagawa R. The spindle assembly checkpoint in Caenorhabditis elegans: one who lacks Mad1 becomes mad one. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:338-44; PMID:19177000; DOI:10.4161/cc.8.3.7448.
15. De Antoni A, Pearson CG, Cimini D, Canman JC, Sala V, Nezi L, et al. The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 2005; 15:214-25; PMID:15694304; DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01. 038.
16. Luo X, Tang Z, Xia G, Wassmann K, Matsumoto T, Rizo J, et al. The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein has two distinct natively folded states. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004; 11:338-45; PMID:15024386; DOI:10.1038/nsmb748.
17. Nezi L, Rancati G, De Antoni A, Pasqualato S, Piatti S, Musacchio A. Accumulation of Mad2-Cdc20 complex during spindle checkpoint activation requires binding of open and closed conformers of Mad2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 2006; 174:39-51; PMID:16818718; DOI:10.1083/jcb.200602109.
18. Mapelli M, Massimiliano L, Santaguida S, Musacchio A. The Mad2 conformational dimer: structure and implications for the spindle assembly checkpoint. Cell 2007; 131:730-43; PMID:18022367; DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2007.08. 049.
19. Howell BJ, Hoffman DB, Fang G, Murray AW, Salmon ED. Visualization of Mad2 dynamics at kinetochores, along spindle fibers, and at spindle poles in living cells. J Cell Biol 2000; 150:1233-50; PMID:10995431; DOI:10.1083/jcb.150. 6.1233.
20. Shah JV, Botvinick E, Bonday Z, Furnari F, Berns M, Cleveland DW. Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing. Curr Biol 2004; 14:942-52; PMID:15182667; DOI:10.1016/S0960-9822(04)00381-1.
21. Yang M, Li B, Liu CJ, Tomchick DR, Machius M, Rizo J, et al. Insights into mad2 regulation in the spindle checkpoint revealed by the crystal structure of the symmetric mad2 dimer. PLoS Biol 2008; 6:50; PMID:18318601; DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060050.
22. Yu H. Cdc20: a WD40 activator for a cell cycle degradation machine. Mol Cell 2007; 27:3-16; PMID:17612486; DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.009.
23. Peters JM. The anaphase promoting complex/ cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:644-56; PMID:16896351; DOI:10.1038/nrm1988.
24. Zhang Y, Lees E. Identification of an overlapping binding domain on Cdc20 for Mad2 and anaphase-promoting complex: model for spindle checkpoint regulation. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:5190-9; PMID:11438673; DOI:10.1128/MCB.21.15. 5190-9.2001.
25. Chung E, Chen RH. Phosphorylation of Cdc20 is required for its inhibition by the spindle checkpoint. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5:748-53; PMID:12855955; DOI:10.1038/ncb1022.
26. Simonetta M, Manzoni R, Mosca R, Mapelli M, Massimiliano L, Vink M, et al. The influence of catalysis on mad2 activation dynamics. PLoS Biol 2009; 7:10; PMID:19143472; DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000010.
27. Fang G. Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13:755-66; PMID:11907259; DOI:10.1091/mbc.01-09-0437.
28. Fang G, Yu H, Kirschner MW. The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation. Genes Dev 1998; 12:1871-83; PMID:9637688; DOI:10.1101/gad.12.12.1871.
29. Tang Z, Bharadwaj R, Li B, Yu H. Mad2-Independent inhibition of APCCdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. Dev Cell 2001; 1:227-37; PMID:11702782; DOI:10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00019-3.
30. Li Y, Gorbea C, Mahaffey D, Rechsteiner M, Benezra R. MAD2 associates with the cyclosome/anaphasepromoting complex and inhibits its activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:12431-6; PMID:9356466; DOI:10.1073/pnas.94.23.12431.
31. Hardwick KG, Johnston RC, Smith DL, Murray AW. MAD3 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint which interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p and Mad2p. J Cell Biol 2000; 148:871-82; PMID:10704439; DOI:10.1083/jcb.148.5.871.
32. Sudakin V, Chan GK, Yen TJ. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20 and MAD2. J Cell Biol 2001; 154:925-36; PMID:11535616; DOI:10.1083/jcb.200102093.
33. Millband DN, Hardwick KG. Fission yeast Mad3p is required for Mad2p to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex and localizes to kinetochores in a Bub1p-, Bub3p- and Mph1p-dependent manner. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:2728-42; PMID:11909965; DOI:10.1128/MCB.22.8.2728-42.2002.
34. Chen RH. BubR1 is essential for kinetochore localization of other spindle checkpoint proteins and its phosphorylation requires Mad1. J Cell Biol 2002; 158:487-96; PMID:12163471; DOI:10.1083/jcb.200204048.
35. Herzog F, Primorac I, Dube P, Lenart P, Sander B, Mechtler K, et al. Structure of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome interacting with a mitotic checkpoint complex. Science 2009; 323:1477-81; PMID:19286556; DOI:10.1126/science.1163300.
36. Malureanu LA, Jeganathan KB, Hamada M, Wasilewski L, Davenport J, van Deursen JM. BubR1 N terminus acts as a soluble inhibitor of cyclin B degradation by APC/C(Cdc20) in interphase. Dev Cell 2009; 16:118-31; PMID:19154723; DOI:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.11.004.
37. Fraschini R, Beretta A, Sironi L, Musacchio A, Lucchini G, Piatti S. Bub3 interaction with Mad2, Mad3 and Cdc20 is mediated by WD40 repeats and does not require intact kinetochores. EMBO J 2001; 20:6648-59; PMID:11726501; DOI:10.1093/emboj/20.23.6648.
38. Poddar A, Stukenberg PT, Burke DJ. Two complexes of spindle checkpoint proteins containing Cdc20 and Mad2 assemble during mitosis independently of the kinetochore in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 2005; 4:867-78; PMID:15879521; DOI:10.1128/EC.4.5.867-78.2005.
39. Nilsson J, Yekezare M, Minshull J, Pines J. The APC/C maintains the spindle assembly checkpoint by targeting Cdc20 for destruction. Nat Cell Biol 2008; 10:1411-20; PMID:18997788; DOI:10.1038/ncb1799.
40. Kulukian A, Han JS, Cleveland DW. Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubR1 binding. Dev Cell 2009; 16:105-17; PMID:19154722; DOI:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.11.005.
41. Burton JL, Solomon MJ. Mad3p, a pseudosubstrate inhibitor of APCCdc20 in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Genes Dev 2007; 21:655-67; PMID:17369399; DOI:10.1101/gad.1511107.
42. Davenport J, Harris LD, Goorha R. Spindle checkpoint function requires Mad2-dependent Cdc20 binding to the Mad3 homology domain of BubR1. Exp Cell Res 2006; 312:1831-42; PMID:16600213; DOI:10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.02.018.
43. Braunstein I, Miniowitz S, Moshe Y, Hershko A. Inhibitory factors associated with anaphase-promoting complex/cylosome in mitotic checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:4870-5; PMID:17360335; DOI:10.1073/pnas.0700523104.
44. Chan GK, Jablonski SA, Sudakin V, Hittle JC, Yen TJ. Human BUBR1 is a mitotic checkpoint kinase that monitors CENP-E functions at kinetochores and binds the cyclosome/APC. J Cell Biol 1999; 146:941-54; PMID:10477750; DOI:10.1083/jcb.146.5.941.
45. Cdc. A mammalian homolog of CDC20/Fizzy/slp1. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:28501-11; PMID:9353311; DOI:10.1074/jbc.272.45.28501.
46. Sironi L, Melixetian M, Faretta M, Prosperini E, Helin K, Musacchio A. Mad2 binding to Mad1 and Cdc20, rather than oligomerization, is required for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J 2001; 20:6371-82; PMID:11707408; DOI:10.1093/emboj/20.22.6371.
47. Rape M, Kirschner MW. Autonomous regulation of the anaphase-promoting complex couples mitosis to S-phase entry. Nature 2004; 432:588-95; PMID:15558010; DOI:10.1038/nature03023.
48. Xia G, Luo X, Habu T, Rizo J, Matsumoto T, Yu H. Conformation-specific binding of p31(comet) antagonizes the function of Mad2 in the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J 2004; 23:3133-43; PMID:15257285; DOI:10.1038/sj.emboj. 7600322.
49. comet. EMBO J 2006; 25:1273-84; PMID:16525508; DOI:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601033.
50. comet blocks Mad2 activation through structural mimicry. Cell 2007; 131:744-55; PMID:18022368; DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.048.
51. Summers MK, Pan B, Mukhyala K, Jackson PK. The unique N terminus of the UbcH10 E2 enzyme controls the threshold for APC activation and enhances checkpoint regulation of the APC. Mol Cell 2008; 31:544-56; PMID:18722180; DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.014.
52. comet promotes disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex in an ATP-dependent process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108:3187-92; PMID:21300909; DOI:10.1073/pnas.1100023108.
53. Meraldi P, Draviam VM, Sorger PK. Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev Cell 2004; 7:45-60; PMID:15239953; DOI:10.1016/j.devcel.2004.06.006.
54. Hernando E, Nahle Z, Juan G, Diaz-Rodriguez E, Alaminos M, Hemann M, et al. Rb inactivation promotes genomic instability by uncoupling cell cycle progression from mitotic control. Nature 2004; 430:797-802; PMID:15306814; DOI:10.1038/nature02820.
55. Reimann JD, Freed E, Hsu JY, Kramer ER, Peters JM, Jackson PK. Emi1 is a mitotic regulator that interacts with Cdc20 and inhibits the anaphase promoting complex. Cell 2001; 105:645-55; PMID:11389834; DOI:10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00361- 0.
56. CDC/hCDC20 is associated with BUBR1 and may be a downstream target of the spindle checkpoint kinase. Oncogene 2000; 19:4557-62; PMID:11030144; DOI:10.1038/sj.onc.1203803.
57. CDC mediates association of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex, and is involved in regulating anaphase onset and late mitotic events. J Cell Biol 1998; 141:1393-406; PMID:9628895; DOI:10.1083/jcb.141.6.1393.
58. Visconti R, Palazzo L, Grieco D. Requirement for proteolysis in spindle assembly checkpoint silencing. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:564-9.
59. Elowe S, Dulla K, Uldschmid A, Li X, Dou Z, Nigg EA. Uncoupling of the spindle-checkpoint and chromosome-congression functions of BubR1. J Cell Sci 2010; 123:84-94; PMID:20016069; DOI:10.1242/jcs.056507.
60. Sczaniecka M, Feoktistova A, May KM, Chen JS, Blyth J, Gould KL, et al. The spindle checkpoint functions of Mad3 and Mad2 depend on a Mad3 KEN box-mediated interaction with Cdc20-anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C). J Biol Chem 2008; 283:23039-47; PMID:18556659; DOI:10.1074/jbc.M803594200.
61. Tiwari RK, Kusari J, Sen GC. Functional equivalents of interferon-mediated signals needed for induction of an mRNA can be generated by double-stranded RNA and growth factors. EMBO J 1987; 6:3373-8; PMID:2828026.
62. Durocher Y, Perret S, Kamen A. High-level and high-throughput recombinant protein production by transient transfection of suspension-growing human 293-EBNA1 cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30:9; PMID:11788735; DOI:10.1093/nar/30.2.e9.
63. Liu ST, Rattner JB, Jablonski SA, Yen TJ. Mapping the assembly pathways that specify formation of the trilaminar kinetochore plates in human cells. J Cell Biol 2006; 175:41-53; PMID:17030981; DOI:10.1083/jcb.200606020.