Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future

Academy of Management Perspectives

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 324-338

  O'Reilly Iii, Charles A ^a   Tushman, Michael L ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893375277     PISSN: 15589080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amp.2013.0025     Document Type: Article

References (131)

1. Adler, P., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10, 43-68.
2. Adler, P., Heckscher, C., & Grandy, J. (2013). From clans to collaboration: Collaborative community as the basis of organizational ambidexterity (Working Paper). Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
3. Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage.
4. Alexiev, A. S., Jansen, J., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2010). Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1343-1364.
5. Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1652-1661.
6. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
7. Benner, M. J. (2010). Security analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and internet telephony. Organization Science, 21, 42-62.
8. Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 676-706.
9. Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238-256.
10. Bierly, P. E., & Daly, P. S. (2007). Alternative knowledge strategies, competitive environment, and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practitioners, 31, 493-516.
11. Birkinshaw, J., & Gupta, K. (2013). Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Academy of Management Perspectives (this issue).
12. Boumgarden, P., Nickerson, J., & Zenger, T. R. (2012). Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 587-610.
13. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-based evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1-34.
14. Bryce, D. J., Dyer, J. H., & Furr, N. R. (2007, August). Leaping to new markets: The performance consequences of core strategic change. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia.
15. Bueschgens, T., Bausch, A., & Balkin, D. B. (2010, August). Organizational culture and climate: An integrative review. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Montreal.
16. Burgers, J. H., Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and corporate venturing: The moderating role of formal and informal integration mechanisms. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 206-220.
17. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
18. Burton, M. D., O'Reilly, C. A., & Bidwell, M. (2012, August). Management systems for exploration and exploitation: The micro-foundations of organizational ambidexterity. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Boston.
19. Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20, 781-796.
20. Cao, Q., Simsek, Z., & Zhang, H. (2010). Modeling the joint impact of the CEO and the TMT on organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1272-1296.
21. Carmeli, A., & Halevi, M. Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 207-218.
22. Caspin-Wagner, K., Ellis, S., & Tishler, A. (2012, August). Balancing exploration and exploitation for firm's superior performance: The role of the environment. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Boston.
23. Chandler, A. (1977). The visible hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Chatman, J. A., Caldwell, D. F., O'Reilly, C. A., & Doerr, B. (2013). Organizational culture and performance in high technology firms: The effect of culture content and strength (Working Paper). Berkeley, CA: Haas School of Business.
25. Chen, E. L., & Katila, R. (2008). Rival interpretations of balancing exploration and exploitation: Simultaneous or sequential? In S. Scott (Ed.), Handbook of technology and innovation management (pp. 197- 214). New York: Wiley.
26. Cottrell, T., & Nault, B. R. (2004). Product variety and firm survival in the microcomputer software industry. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1005-1025.
27. Danneels, E. (2011). Trying to become a different type of company: Dynamic capabilities at Smith Corona. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1-31.
28. Danneels, E., Provera, B., & Verona, G. (2013). De-institutionalizing organizational competence: Olivetti's transition from mechanical to electronic technology (Working Paper). Milan: Management Department, Bocconi University.
29. Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy, & D. Slevin (Eds.), The management of organization design: Strategies and implementation (pp. 167-188). New York: North Holland.
30. Ebben, J. J., & Johnson, A. C. (2005). Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1249-1259.
31. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 84-110.
32. Fang, C., Lee, J., & Schilling, M. A. (2010). Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: The isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organization Science, 21, 625-642.
33. Fjeldstad, Ø. D., Snow, C. C., Miles, R. E., & Lettl, C. (2012). The architecture of collaboration. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 734-750.
34. Garaus, C., Mueller, B., Guettel, W., & Konlechner, S. (2012). Balancing, fueling and linking exploration and exploitation: A closer look at the interplay of applied practices in an R&D focused organization (Working Paper). Linz, Austria: Johannes Kepler University.
35. Geerts, A., Blindenbach-Driessen, F., & Gemmel, P. (2010, August). Achieving a balance between exploration and exploitation in service firms: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Montreal.
36. Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209-226.
37. Gilbert, C. (2005). Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 741-763.
38. Gioia, D. A., Patvardhan, S. D., Hamilton, A. L., & Corley, K. G. (2013). Organizational identity formation and change. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 123-192.
39. Goosen, M. C., Bazzazian, N., & Phelps, C. (2012, August). Consistently capricious: The performance effects of simultaneous and sequential ambidexterity. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Boston.
40. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317-371.
41. Han, M., & Celly, N. (2008). Strategic ambidexterity and performance in international new ventures. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 25, 335- 349.
42. Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 716-749.
43. Harreld, J. B., O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2007). Dynamic capabilities at IBM: Driving strategy into action. California Management Review, 49, 21-43.
44. He, Z., & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481-494.
45. Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., Teece, D. J., & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
46. Hensmans, M., & Johnson, G. (2007, August). Can history be a dynamic capability? Traditions of imprinted dynamic capabilities of transformation. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia.
47. Hill, S. A., & Birkinshaw, J. (2012). Ambidexterity and survival in corporate venture units. Journal of Management.
48. Holmqvist, M. (2004). Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organization Science, 15, 70-81.
49. House, C. H., & Price, R. L. (2009). The HP phenomenon: Innovation and business transformation. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
50. Jansen, J. J. P., Andriopoulous, C., & Tushman, M. (2013). Organizing for ambidexterity: Founding, developing and revitalizing dynamic capabilities over time (Working Paper). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus University.
51. Jansen, J. J. P., George, G., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 982-1007.
52. Jansen, J. J. P., Tempelaar, M. P., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20, 797-811.
53. Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation and performance effects: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52, 1661-1674.
54. Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 999-1015.
55. Jansen, J. J. P., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 5-18.
56. Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives (this issue).
57. Kang, S.-C., & Snell, S. A. (2009). Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: A framework for human resource management. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 65-92.
58. Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1183-1194.
59. Kauppila, O. P. (2010). Creating ambidexterity by integrating and balancing separate interorganizational partnerships. Strategic Organization, 8, 283-312.
60. Khazanchi, S., Lewis, M. W., & Boyer, K. K. (2007). Innovation- supportive culture: The impact of organizational values on process innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 871-884.
61. Lai, H. C., & Weng, C. S. (2010, August). How to manage organizational ambidexterity in the phase of technological discontinuity? Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Montreal.
62. Lakhani, K., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Tushman, M. (2013). Open innovation and organizational boundaries: Task decomposition, knowledge distribution, and the locus of innovation. In A. Grandori (Ed.), Handbook of economic organization: Integrating economic and organizational theory (pp. 355-382). Northampton, MA: Elgar.
63. Laplume, A. O., & Dass, P. (2012, August). Exploration and exploitation for various stages of firm growth through diversification. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Boston.
64. Lavie, D., Kang, J., & Rosenkopf, L. (2011). Balance within and across domains: The performance implications of exploration and exploitation in alliances. Organization Science, 22, 1517-1538.
65. Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006). Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 797-818.
66. Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 109-155.
67. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 1-47.
68. Lee, J., Lee, J., & Lee, H. (2003). Exploration and exploitation in the presence of network externalities. Management Science, 49, 553-570.
69. Lovas, B., & Ghoshal, S. (2000). Strategy as guided evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 875-896.
70. Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium- sized firms: The pivotal role of TMT behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32, 1-27.
71. March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
72. Markides, C. (2013). Business model innovation: What can the ambidexterity literature teach us? Academy of Management Perspectives (this issue).
73. Markides, C., & Charitou, C. (2004). Competing with dual business models: A contingency approach. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 22-36.
74. Martin, J. A., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2010). Rewiring: Crossbusiness- unit collaborations in multibusiness organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 285- 301.
75. Masini, A., Zollo, M., & van Wassenhove, L. (2004). Understanding exploration and exploitation in changing operating routines: The influence of industry and organizational traits (Working Paper No. OTM 04- 022). London: London Business School.
76. McGrath, R. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 118-131.
77. Mitchell, W., & Singh, K. (1993). Death to the lethargic: Effects of expansion into new technical subfields on performance in a firm's base business. Organization Science, 4, 152-180.
78. Nemanich, L., & Vera, D. (2009). Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 19-33.
79. Nickerson, J., & Zenger, T. (2002). Being efficiently fickle: A dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organization Science, 13, 547-566.
80. Nobeoka, K., & Cusumano, M. A. (1998). Multiproduct strategy and sales growth: The benefits of rapid design transfer in new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 169-186.
81. Nosella, A., Cantarello, S., & Filippini, R. (2012). The intellectual structure of organizational ambidexterity: A bibliometric investigation into the state of the art. Strategic Organization, 10, 450-465.
82. O'Reilly, C. A., Harreld, J. B., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: IBM and emerging business opportunities. California Management Review, 51, 1-25.
83. O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 74-83.
84. O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206.
85. O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53, 1-18.
86. Phene, A., Tallman, S., & Almeida, P. (2012). When do acquisitions facilitate technological exploration and exploitation? Journal of Management, 38, 753-783.
87. Piao, M. (2010). Thriving in the new: Implication of exploration on organizational longevity. Journal of Management, 36, 1529-1554.
88. Puranam, P., Singh, H., & Zollo, M. (2006). Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 263-280.
89. Raisch, S. (2008). Balanced structures: Designing organizations for profitable growth. Long Range Planning, 41, 483-508.
90. Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34, 375-409.
91. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20, 685-695.
92. Ramachandran, I., & Lengnick-Hall, C. A. (2010, August). Multidimensional and dynamic ambidexterity configurations: Rethinking the question of balance. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Montreal.
93. Rosenbloom, R. S. (2000). Leadership, capabilities, and technological change: The transformation of NCR in the electronic era. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1083-1103.
94. Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 287-306.
95. Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20, 759- 780.
96. Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 201-221.
97. Sarkees, M., & Hulland, J. (2009). Innovation and efficiency: Is it possible to have it all? Business Horizons, 52, 45-55.
98. Schultz, M., & Hernes, T. (2013). A temporal perspective on organizational identity. Organization Science, 24, 1-21.
99. Schulze, P., Heinemann, F., & Abedin, A. (2008, August). Balancing exploitation and exploration: Organizational antecedents and performance effects of ambidexterity. Best Paper, Proceedings of the Academy of Management, Anaheim.
100. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
101. Sidhu, J., Volberda, H., & Commandeur, H. (2004). Exploring exploration orientation and its determinants: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 913-932.
102. Siggelkow, N., & Levinthal, D. A. (2003). Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science, 14, 650-669.
103. Siggelkow, N., & Rivkin, J. (2005). Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organization Science, 16, 101-122.
104. Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 864-894.
105. Sine, W. D., Mitsuhashi, H., & Kirsch, D. A. (2006). Revisiting Burns and Stalker: Formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 121-132.
106. Smith, W., Binns, A., & Tushman, M. (2010). Complex business models: Managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 43, 448-461.
107. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381-403.
108. Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16, 522-536.
109. Sull, D. N. (1999). The dynamics of standing still: Fire stone Tire and Rubber and the radial revolution. Business History Review, 73, 430-464.
110. Taylor, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2009). Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management and ambidexterity. Organization Science, 20, 718-739.
111. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.
112. Tempelaar, M. P., & Van De Vrande, V. (2012, August). Dynamism, munificence, internal and external exploration- exploitation and their performance effects. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Boston.
113. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social sciences bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
114. Tripsas, M. (1997). Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from the typesetter industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, 341-377.
115. Tripsas, M. (2013). Exploring the interaction between organizational identity and organizational design in technological transitions (Working Paper). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
116. Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1147-1161.
117. Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 317-332.
118. Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996). The ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 1-23.
119. Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (2002). Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
120. Tushman, M. L., O'Reilly, C. A., & Harreld, J. B. (2013). Leading strategic renewal: Proactive punctuated change through innovation streams and disciplined learning. Paper presented at the Harvard Business School, May 9.
121. Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 171-222.
122. Tushman, M. L., Smith, W. K., Wood, R., Westerman, G., & O'Reilly, C. A. (2010). Organizational designs and innovation streams. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 1331-1366.
123. Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zhara, S. A. (2008). Exploration, exploitation and firm performance: An analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 221-231.
124. Van Looy, B., Martens, T., & Debackere, K. (2005). Organizing for continuous innovation: On the sustainability of ambidextrous organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 208-221.
125. Venkatraman, N., Lee, C.-H., & Iyer, B. (2006, August). Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: A longitudinal test in the software sector. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Honolulu.
126. Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
127. Wang, H., & Li, J. (2008). Untangling the effects of overexploration and overexploitation on organizational performance: The moderating role of organizational dynamism. Journal of Management, 34, 925-951.
128. Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial organization: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
129. Yang, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2007, August). Ambidexterity in product innovation management: The direct and contingent effects on firm performance. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Philadelphia.
130. Yu, G. J., & Khessina, O. (2012, August). The role of exploration in firm survival in the worldwide optical library market, 1990-1998. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Boston.
131. Zhiang, L., Yang, H., & Demirkan, I. (2007). The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: Empirical investigation and computational theorizing. Management Science, 53, 1645-1658.