Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 587-610

  Boumgarden, Peter ^a   Nickerson, Jackson ^b   Zenger, Todd R ^b  

^a HOPE COLLEGE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

ambidexterity; exploration exploitation; organization change; organizational design; vacillation

Indexed keywords

AMBIDEXTERITY; DIFFERENT MECHANISMS; EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION; EXPLORATION-EXPLOITATION; LONG-RUN PERFORMANCE; ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGNS; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; VACILLATION;

PLANNING;

MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84859729836     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: 10970266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.1972     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. Abernathy WJ,. 1978. The Productivity Dilemma: Roadblock to Innovation in the Automobile Industry. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.
2. Alexy K, Park C,. 2000. Hewlett-Packard Company, company report. Prudential Securities, Inc. 21 March.
3. Altherr MR, Haneman N,. 2000. Hewlett-Packard Company, company report. Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation. 15 December.
4. Anderson PA,. 1983. Decision making by objection and the Cuban missile crisis. Administrative Science Quarterly 28: 201-222.
5. Benner MJ, Tushman ML,. 2003. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review 28: 238-256. (Pubitemid 36446326)
6. Bradach J,. 1997. Using the plural form in the management of restaurant chains. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 276-303.
7. Burgelman RA, Meza PE,. 2000. The new HP way. Stanford Graduate School of Business CaseSM-72. Stanford University.
8. Burgelman RA, Meza PE,. 2004a. The new HP in 2004 (A): Leading strategic integration. Stanford Graduate School of Business Case SM-125A. Stanford University.
9. Burgelman RA, Meza PE,. 2004b. The new HP in 2004 (B): Winning in the core business. Stanford Graduate School of Business Case SM-125B. Stanford University.
10. Burns T, Stalker GM,. 1961. The Management of Innovation. Tavistock: London, U.K.
11. BusinessWeek. 1982. Can John Young redesign Hewlett-Packard? 6 December.
12. Casadesus-Masanell R, Spulber DF,. 2000. The fable of Fisher Body. Journal of Law and Economics 43: 67-104.
13. Christensen CM,. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
14. Coase RH,. 2000. The acquisition of Fisher Body by General Motors. Journal of Law and Economics 43: 15-32.
15. Conigliaro L,. 1991. Hewlett-Packard Company, company report. Prudential Securities, Inc. 24 May.
16. Cyert RM, March JG,. 1963. Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Blackwell Business: Cambridge, MA.
17. Doty DH, Glick WH, Huber GP,. 1993. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: a test of two configurational theories. Academy of Management Review 36: 1196-1250.
18. Duncan R,. 1976. The ambidextrous organization: designing dual structures for innovation. In The Management of Organization (Vol. 1), Killman RH, Pondy LR, Sleven D, (eds). North Holland: New York; 167-188.
19. Fang C, Lee J, Schilling MA,. 2010. Balancing exploration and exploitation through structural design: the isolation of subgroups and organizational learning. Organization Science 21 (3): 625-642.
20. Fiorina C,. 2006. Tough Choices: A Memoir. Penguin Group: New York.
21. Freeland RF,. 2000. Creating holdup through vertical integration: Fisher Body revisited. Journal of Law and Economics 43 (1): 33-66.
22. Gersick CJG,. 1991. Revolutionary change theories: a multi-level explanation of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review 16: 30-36.
23. Ghemawat P, Ricart JE,. 1993. The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 14: 59-73.
24. Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J,. 2004. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal 47: 209-226. (Pubitemid 38845937)
25. Gulati R, Puranam P,. 2009. Renewal through reorganization: the value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science 20 (2): 422-440.
26. He ZL, Wong PK,. 2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science 15: 481-494.
27. Hewlett-Packard. 1984. Annual Report. Thompson Research. Available at: (accessed 25 July 2011).
28. Hewlett-Packard. 1992. Annual Report. Thompson Research. Available at: (accessed 25 July 2011).
29. Hewlett-Packard. 1995. Annual Report. Thompson Research. Available at: (accessed 25 July 2011).
30. Hewlett-Packard. 1998. Annual Report. Thompson Research. Available at: (accessed 25 July 2011).
31. Hewlett-Packard. 1999. Annual Report. Thompson Research. Available at: (accessed 25 July 2011).
32. Hewlett-Packard. 2000. Annual Report. Thompson Research. Available at: (accessed 25 July 2011).
33. Hewlett-Packard. 2004. Annual Report. Thompson Research. Available at: (accessed 25 July 2011).
34. Hewlett-Packard. 2005. Annual Report. Thompson Research. Available at: (accessed 25 July 2011).
35. Jones JJ, Jones C, McBride C,. 1997. Modest fourth quarter EPS shortfall; continued growth opportunities in 1998. Salomon Smith Barney. 17 December.
36. Kadushin C, Brimm M,. 1990. Why networking fails: double binds and the limitations of shadow networks. Paper presented at the International Social Network Conference, San Diego, CA.
37. Kannai Y,. 1980. The AELP definition of complementarity and least concave utility functions. Journal of Economic Theory 22: 115-117.
38. King R,. 1984. Hewlett-Packard: challenging the entre- preneurial culture. Harvard Business School Case 9-384-035. Harvard University.
39. Klein B,. 2000. Fisher-General Motors and the nature of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics 42: 105-132.
40. Klein B, Crawford RG, Alchian AA,. 1978. Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. Journal of Law and Economics 21: 297-326.
41. Lambeth J,. 1999. Hewlett-Packard aims to divide and conquer. Computing. 11 March. Available at: (accessed 13 February 2012).
42. Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW,. 1967. Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
43. Lee TW, Mitchell TR, Sablynski CJ,. 1999. Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology. Journal of Vocational Behavior 55: 161-187.
44. Levinthal DA, March JG,. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 14: 95-112.
45. Lubatkin MH, Simsek Z, Ling Y, Veiga JF,. 2006. Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management 32: 646-672. (Pubitemid 44349935)
46. March JG,. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2: 71-87.
47. Martens T, Debackere K, Van Looy B,. 2005. Organizing for continuous innovation: on the sustainability of the ambidextrous organization. Creativity and Innovation Management 14: 208-221. (Pubitemid 41288122)
48. McCullough A,. 2005. Hewlett-Packard, laying down the new law. Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation. 13 December.
49. Milgrom P, Qian Y, Roberts J,. 1991. Complementarities, momentum, and the evolution of modern manufacturing. American Economics Review 81: 84-88.
50. Milgrom P, Roberts J,. 1990. Tie economics of modern manufacturing: technology, strategy, and organization. American Economic Review 80: 511-528.
51. Miller D, Friesen PH,. 1980. Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal 23: 591-614.
52. Mintzberg H,. 1978. Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science 24: 934-948.
53. Mintzberg H,. 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
54. Muratore CL,. 1984. Hewlett-Packard Company, company report. Prudential-Bache Securities. 20 September.
55. Neff AJ, Wu S, Bean WB,. 1999. Hewlett-Packard, the metamorphosis continues. Bear Stearns. 25 May.
56. Nickerson JA, Zenger TR,. 2002. Being efficiently fickle: a dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organization Science 13: 547-566.
57. O'Reilly CA, Tushman ML,. 1997. Winning Through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
58. O'Reilly CA, Tushman ML,. 2004. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review 82: 74-81.
59. O'Reilly CA, Tushman ML,. 2008. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior 28: 185-206.
60. Pinnfield LT,. 1986. A field examination of perspectives on organizational decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 365-388.
61. Probst G, Raisch S,. 2005. Organizational crisis: the logic of failure. Academy of Management Executive 19: 90-105. (Pubitemid 40317707)
62. Raisch S, Birkinshaw J,. 2008. Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management 34 (3): 375-409.
63. Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, Tushman ML,. 2009. Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science 20 (4): 685-695.
64. Rueppel PC, Carboy ME, Raber E,. 1999. Hewlett-Packard Company, company report. Deutsche Bank. 24 August.
65. Scott WR,. 1981. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
66. Semple R, Kelleher C,. 2006. Hewlett-Packard, more gas in the tank? Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation. 8 November.
67. Shrader CB, Lincoln JR, Hoffman AN,. 1989. The network structures of organizations: effects of task contingencies and distributional form. Human Relations 42: 43-67.
68. Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA,. 2003. Temporarily divide to conquer: centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science 14: 650-669.
69. Simon HA,. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99-118.
70. Smith WK, Tushman ML,. 2005. Managing strategic contradictions: a top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science 16: 522-536. (Pubitemid 41677005)
71. Stevenson W,. 1990. Formal structure and networks of interaction with organizations. Social Science Research 19: 113-131.
72. Taylor A, Helfat CE,. 2009. Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity. Organization Science 20 (4): 718-739.
73. Thompson JD,. 1967. Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill: New York.
74. Tushman M, Smith WK, Wood RC, Westerman G, O'Reilly C,. 2010. Organizational designs and innovation streams. Industrial and Corporate Change 19: 1331-1336.
75. Tushman ML, Roberts MJ, Kiron D,. 2001a. USA Today: Pursuing the Network Strategy (A), 9-402-010, Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
76. Tushman ML, Roberts MJ, Kiron D,. 2001b. USA Today: Pursuing the Network Strategy (B), 9-402-010, Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
77. Tushman ML, Romanelli E,. 1985. Organizational evolution: a metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior 7: 171-222.
78. USA Today. 2005. USA Today merging print, online newsrooms. 12 December. Available at: (accessed 13 February 2012).
79. Vijayan J,. 1998. HP reorgs to clarify message. Computerworld. 26 October. Available at: (accessed 13 February 2012).
80. Wang SF,. 1991a. Hewlett-Packard Company, company report. Smith Barney, Harris Upham and Co. 7 March.
81. Wang SF,. 1991b. Hewlett-Packard Company, company report. Smith Barney, Harris Upham and Co. 3 June.
82. Wang SF,. 1995. Hewlett-Packard Company, company report. Smith Barney. 19 January.
83. Weick KE,. 1976. Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 21: 1-19.
84. Williamson OE,. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press: New York.
85. Williamson OE,. 1991. Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 269-296.
86. Yoder SK,. 1991. A 1990 reorganization at Hewlett-Packard already is paying off. Wall Street Journal. 22 July.
87. Young D,. 1999. Hewlett-Packard research note. Paine Webber. 1 December.
88. Zillmer L, Zenger TR,. 2002a. Hewlett-Packard (A): The search for an efficient organizational culture. Olin School of Business, Washington University in St Louis.
89. Zillmer L, Zenger TR,. 2002b. Hewlett-Packard (B): The search for an efficient organizational culture. Olin School of Business, Washington University in St Louis.
90. Zillmer L, Zenger TR,. 2002c. Hewlett-Packard (C): The search for an efficient organizational culture. Olin School of Business, Washington University in St Louis.
91. Zillmer L, Zenger TR,. 2002d. Hewlett-Packard (D): A new captain. Olin School of Business, Washington University in St Louis.