Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1183-1194

  Katila, Riitta ^a   Ahuja, Gautam ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036961401     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3069433     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ahuja, G. 2000a. The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(special issue): 317-343.
2. Ahuja, G. 2000b. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 425-455.
3. Ahuja, G.,&Katila, R. 2001. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 197-220.
4. Argote, L. 1999. Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
5. Argyris, C.,&Schön, D. 1978. Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Arundel, A.,&Kabla, I. 1998. What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms. Research Policy, 27: 127-141.
7. Banbury, C.,&Mitchell, W. 1995. The effect of introducing important incremental innovations on market share and business survival. Strategic Management Journal, 16(special issue): 161-182.
8. Blundell, R., Griffith, R.,&Van Reenen, J. 1995. Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Economic Journal, 105: 333-344.
9. Bruderer, E.,&Singh, J. 1996. Organizational evolution, learning, and selection: A genetic-algorithm-based model. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1322-1349.
10. Chaney, P.,&Devinney, T. 1992. New product innovations and stock price performance. Journal of Business Finance&Accounting, 19: 677-695.
11. Chatterjee, S.,&Blocher, J. 1992. Measurement of firm diversification: Is it robust? Academy of Management Journal, 35: 874-888.
12. Clark, K., Chew, B.,&Fujimoto, T. 1987. Product development in the world auto industry. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, special issue on micro-economics (3): 729-771.
13. Cockburn, I.,&Griliches, Z. 1987. Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market's valuation of R&D and patents. Working paper no. 2465, NBER, Cambridge, MA.
14. Cohen, W. 1995. Empirical studies of innovative activity. In P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change: 182-264. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
15. Cohen, W.,&Levinthal, D. 1994. A fortune favors the prepared firm. Management Science, 40: 227-251.
16. Coombs, R., Narandren, P.,&Richards, A. 1996. A literature-based innovation output indicator. Research Policy, 25: 403-413.
17. Cronbach, L. 1987. Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102: 414-417.
18. Cyert, R.,&March, J. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19. Dahlin, K. 1993. Diffusion and industrial dynamics in the robot industry. International Journal of Technology Management, 8(3-5): 259-281.
20. Dosi, G. 1988. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26: 1120-1171.
21. Dougherty, D.,&Hardy, C. 1996. Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1120-1153.
22. Eisenhardt, K. M.,&Tabrizi, B. N. 1995. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 84-110.
23. Fleming, L.,&Sorenson, O. 2001. Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 30: 1019-1039.
24. Grant, R. 1996. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7: 375-387.
25. Grupp, H., Schwitalla, B., Schmoch, U.,&Granberg, A. 1990. Developing industrial robot technology in Sweden, West Germany, Japan, and the U.S.A. In J. Sigurdson (Ed.), Measuring the dynamics of technological change: 106-129. London: Pinter Publishers.
26. Hayes, R.,&Wheelwright, S. (Eds.) 1984. Restoring our competitive edge: Competing through manufacturing. New York: Wiley.
27. Heckman, J.,&Borjas, G. 1980. Does unemployment cause future unemployment? Economica, 47: 247-283.
28. Heiner, R. 1986. Uncertainty, signal-detection experiments, and modeling behavior. In R. Langlois (Ed.), Economics as a process: Essays in the new institutional economics: 59-115. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29. Helfat, C. 1994. Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Science, 40: 1720-1747.
30. Henderson, R.,&Clark, K. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9-30.
31. Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R., Johnson, R.,&Moesel, D. 1996. The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1084-1119.
32. Hoskisson, R.,&Hitt, M. 1988. Strategic control systems and relative R&D investment in large multi-product firms. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 605-621.
33. Huber, G. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and a review of the literatures. Organization Science, 2: 88-115.
34. International Federation of Robotics. 1999. World robotics. Geneva: International Federation of Robotics.
35. Jaikumar, R.,&Bohn, R. 1992. A dynamic approach to operations management: An alternative to static optimization. International Journal of Production Economics, 27: 265-282.
36. Katila, R. 2000. Innovation search determinants of new product introductions and their radicality: The case of industrial robotics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
37. Katila, R. 2002. New product search over time: Past ideas in their prime? Academy of Management Journal, 45: 995-1010.
38. Levinthal, D.,&March, J. 1981. A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2: 307-333.
39. Levinthal, D.,&March, J. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95-113.
40. Liang, K.-Y.,&Zeger, S.L. 1986. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73: 13-22.
41. Mansfield,E. 1968. The economics of technological change, New York: Norton.
42. Mansfield,E. 1988. The speed and cost of industrial innovation in Japan and the United States; External vs. internal technology. Management Science, 34: 1157-1168.
43. March, J. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71-87.
44. Martin, X.,&Mitchell, W. 1998. The influence of local search and performance heuristics on new design introduction in a new product market. Research Policy, 26: 753-771.
45. McCullagh, P.,&Nelder, J. 1989. Generalized linear models. New York: Chapman&Hall.
46. Miner, A., Bassoff, P.,&Moorman, C. 2001. Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 304-337.
47. Nelson, R. 1993. (Ed.). National innovation systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Nelson, R.,&Winter, S. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Rosenkopf, L.,&Nerkar, A. 2001. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disc industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 287-306.
50. Saviotti, P.,&Metcalfe, J. 1984. A theoretical approach to the construction of technological output indicators. Research Policy, 13: 141-151.
51. Schoonhoven, C., Eisenhardt, K.,&Lyman, K. 1990. Speeding products to market: Waiting time to first product introduction in new firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 177-207.
52. Schumpeter, J. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Shane, S. 1992. Why do some societies invent more than others? Journal of Business Venturing, 7: 29-46.
54. Steensma, K.,&Corley, K. 2000. On the performance of technology-sourcing partnerships: The interaction between partner interdependence and technology attributes. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 1045-1067.
55. Stuart, T. E.,&Podolny, J. M. 1996. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17(special issue): 21-38.
56. Teece, D. J. 1987. Capturing value from technological innovation: Integration, strategic partnering, and licensing decisions. In B. Guile&H. Brooks (Eds.), Technology and global industry: 65-95. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
57. Thompson, J. 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
58. von Hippel, E.,&Tyre, M. 1995. How learning by doing is done: Problem identification in novel process equipment. Research Policy, 24: 1-12.
59. Walker, R. 1995. Patents as scientific and technical literature. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
60. Winter, S. 1984. Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5: 287-320.