Genomics and the origin of species

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 176-192

  Seehausen, Ole ^a,b   Butlin, Roger K ^a,b   Keller, Irene ^a,b   Wagner, Catherine E ^a,b   Boughman, Janette W ^a,b   Hohenlohe, Paul A ^a,b   Peichel, Catherine L ^a,b   Saetre, Glenn Peter ^a,b   Bank, Claudia ^c   Brännström, Åke ^d   Brelsford, Alan ^e   Clarkson, Chris S ^f   Eroukhmanoff, Fabrice ^g   Feder, Jeffrey L ^h   Fischer, Martin C ⁱ   Foote, Andrew D ^j,k   Franchini, Paolo ^l   Jiggins, Chris D ^m   Jones, Felicity C ⁿ   Lindholm, Anna K ^o   Lucek, Kay ^a,b   Maan, Martine E ^p   Marques, David A ^a,b   Martin, Simon H ^m   Matthews, Blake ^a   Meier, Joana I ^a,b   Möst, Markus ^a,m   Nachman, Michael W ^q   Nonaka, Etsuko ^d   Rennison, Diana J ^r   Schwarzer, Julia ^a,b,s   Watson, Eric T ^t   Westram, Anja M ^u   Widmer, Alex ⁱ   more..

^a SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^c EPFL   (Switzerland)

^d UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^f LIVERPOOL SCHOOL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^h UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

ⁱ ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^j UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^k UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^l UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^m UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

ⁿ FRIEDRICH MIESCHER LABORATORY OF THE MAX PLANCK SOCIETY   (Germany)

^o UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^p UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^q UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^r UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^s ZOOLOGISCHES FORSCHUNGSMUSEUM ALEXANDER KOENIG   (Germany)

^t UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^u UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BUTTERFLY; DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA; EFFECT SIZE; GENE ISOLATION; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; GENOMICS; NATURAL POPULATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLEIOTROPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE FLOW; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC TRAIT; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HUMAN; MATE CHOICE; SEXUAL SELECTION;

BIODIVERSITY; GENOMICS; MODELS, GENETIC;

EID: 84893015775     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: 14710064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrg3644     Document Type: Review

References (200)

1. Coyne, J. & Orr, H. Speciation (Sinauer Associates, 2004).
2. Nosil, P. Ecological Speciation (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).
3. Price, T. Speciation in Birds (Roberts & Company, 2008).
4. Dobzhansky, T. Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics 21, 113-135 (1936).
5. Muller, H. J. & Pontecorvo, G. Recessive genes causing interspecific sterility and other disharmonies between Drosophila melanogaster and simulans. Genetics 27, 157 (1942).
6. Gavrilets, S. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species (Princeton Univ. Press, 2004).
7. van Doorn, G. S., Edelaar, P. & Weissing, F. J. On the origin of species by natural and sexual selection. Science 326, 1704-1707 (2009).
8. M'Gonigle, L. K., Mazzucco, R., Otto, S. P. & Dieckmann, U. Sexual selection enables long-term coexistence despite ecological equivalence. Nature 484, 506-509 (2012).
9. Gavrilets, S. & Losos, J. B. Adaptive radiation: contrasting theory with data. Science 323, 732-737 (2009).
10. Dieckmann, U., Doebeli, M., Metz, J. A. J. & Tautz, D. (eds) Adaptive Speciation (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004).
11. Coyne, J. A. & Orr, H. A. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51, 295-303 (1997).
12. Nolte, V., Pandey, R. V., Kofler, R. & Schlötterer, C. Genome-wide patterns of natural variation reveal strong selective sweeps and ongoing genomic conflict in Drosophila mauritiana. Genome Res. 23, 99-110 (2013).
13. van der Sluijs, I. et al. Female mating preference functions predict sexual selection against hybrids between sibling species of cichlid fish. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 2871-2877 (2008).
14. Panhuis, T. M., Butlin, R., Zuk, M. & Tregenza, T. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 364-371 (2001).
15. Boughman, J. W. How sensory drive can promote speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 571-577 (2002).
16. Maan, M. E. & Seehausen, O. Ecology, sexual selection and speciation. Ecol. Lett. 14, 591-602 (2011).
17. Hendry, A. P., Nosil, P. & Rieseberg, L. H. The speed of ecological speciation. Funct. Ecol. 21, 455-464 (2007).
18. Abbott, R. et al. Hybridization and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 26, 229-246 (2013).
19. Presgraves, D. C. Speciation genetics: search for the missing snowball. Curr. Biol. 20, R1073-R1074 (2010).
20. Presgraves, D. C. The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 175-180 (2010).
21. Rieseberg, L. H. & Blackman, B. K. Speciation genes in plants. Ann. Bot. 106, 439-455 (2010).
22. Rieseberg, L. H. & Burke, J. M. A genic view of species integration-commentary. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 883-886 (2001).
23. Bikard, D. et al. Divergent evolution of duplicate genes leads to genetic incompatibilities within A. thaliana. Science 323, 623-626 (2009).
24. Masly, J. P., Jones, C. D., Noor, M. A. F., Locke, J. & Orr, H. A. Gene transposition as a cause of hybrid sterility in Drosophila. Science 313, 1448-1450 (2006).
25. Ting, C. T. et al. Gene duplication and speciation in Drosophila: evidence from the Odysseus locus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12232-12235 (2004).
26. Matute, D. R., Butler, I. A., Turissini, D. A. & Coyne, J. A. A test of the snowball theory for the rate of evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Science 329, 1518-1521 (2010).
27. Moyle, L. C. & Nakazato, T. Hybrid incompatibility "snowballs" between Solanum species. Science 329, 1521-1523 (2010).
28. Stadler, T., Florez-Rueda, A. M. & Paris, M. Testing for "snowballing" hybrid incompatibilities in Solanum: impact of ancestral polymorphism and divergence estimates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 31-34 (2012).
29. Lynch, M. & Force, A. G. The origin of interspecific genomic incompatibility via gene duplication. Am. Naturalist 156, 590-605 (2000).
30. Schluter, D. Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 323, 737-741 (2009).
31. Nei, M., Maruyama, T. & Wu, C. I. Models of evolution of reproductive isolation. Genetics 103, 557-579 (1983).
32. Ting, C. T., Tsaur, S. C., Wu, M. L. & Wu, C. I. A rapidly evolving homeobox at the site of a hybrid sterility gene. Science 282, 1501-1504 (1998).
33. Crespi, B. & Nosil, P. Conflictual speciation: species formation via genomic conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 48-57 (2013).
34. Frank, S. A. Divergence of meiotic drive-suppression systems as an explanation for sex-biased hybrid sterility and inviability. Evolution 45, 262-267 (1991).
35. Hurst, L. D. & Pomiankowski, A. Causes of sex ratio bias may account for unisexual sterility in hybrids: a new explanation of Haldane's rule and related phenomena. Genetics 128, 841-858 (1991).
36. Cocquet, J. et al. A genetic basis for a postmeiotic X versus Y chromosome intragenomic conflict in the mouse. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002900 (2012).
37. Malik, H. S. in Progress in Molecular and Subcellular Biology (ed. Ugarovic, D.) 33-52 (Springer, 2009).
38. Campbell, P., Good, J. M. & Nachman, M. W. Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation is disrupted in sterile hybrid male house mice. Genetics 193, 819-828 (2013).
39. Rebollo, R., Horard, B., Hubert, B. & Vieira, C. Jumping genes and epigenetics: towards new species. Gene 454, 1-7 (2010).
40. Watson, E. T. & Demuth, J. P. in Speciation: Natural Processes, Genetics and Biodiversity (ed. Michalak, P.) (Nova Science Publishers, 2013).
41. Burton, R. S. & Barreto, F. S. A disproportionate role for mtDNA in Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities? Mol. Ecol. 21, 4942-4957 (2012).
42. Sambatti, J. B. M., Ortiz-Barrientos, D., Baack, E. J. & Rieseberg, L. H. Ecological selection maintains cytonuclear incompatibilities in hybridizing sunflowers. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1082-1091 (2008).
43. van Doorn, G. S. & Kirkpatrick, M. Turnover of sex chromosomes induced by sexual conflict. Nature 449, 909-912 (2007).
44. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. Sex differences in fitness and selection for centric fusions between sex-chromosomes and autosomes. Genet. Res. 35, 205-214 (1980).
45. Kitano, J. et al. A role for a neo-sex chromosome in stickleback speciation. Nature 461, 1079-1083 (2009).
46. Parnell, N. F. & Streelman, J. T. Genetic interactions controlling sex and color establish the potential for sexual conflict in Lake Malawi cichlid fishes. Heredity 110, 239-246 (2013).
47. Yeaman, S. & Whitlock, M. C. The genetic architecture of adaptation under migration-selection balance. Evolution 65, 1897-1911 (2011).
48. Silver, L. The peculiar journey of a selfish chromosome: mouse t haplotypes and meiotic drive. Trends Genet. 9, 250-254 (1993).
49. Larracuente, A. M. & Presgraves, D. C. The selfish segregation distorter gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 192, 33-53 (2012).
50. Bull, J. J. Evolution of Sex-determining Mechanisms. (Benjamin/Cumings, 1983).
51. Phadnis, N. & Orr, H. A. A single gene causes both male sterility and segregation distortion in Drosophila hybrids. Science 323, 376-379 (2009).
52. Saether, S. A. et al. Sex chromosome-linked species recognition and evolution of reproductive isolation in flycatchers. Science 318, 95-97 (2007).
53. Lindholm, A. & Breden, F. Sex chromosomes and sexual selection in poeciliid fishes. Am. Naturalist 160, S214-S224 (2002).
54. Reeve, H. K. & Pfennig, D. W. Genetic biases for showy males: are some genetic systems especially conducive to sexual selection? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1089-1094 (2003).
55. Templeton, A. R. Mechanisms of speciation-a population genetic approach. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Systemat. 12, 23-48 (1981).
56. Ayala, F. J. & Tracey, M. L. Genetic differentiation within and between species of Drosophila willistoni group. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 999-1003 (1974).
57. Coyne, J. A. Genetics and speciation. Nature 355, 511-515 (1992).
58. Price, T. D. & Bouvier, M. M. The evolution of F1 postzygotic incompatibilities in birds. Evolution 56, 2083-2089 (2002).
59. Stelkens, R. B., Young, K. A. & Seehausen, O. The accumulation of reproductive incompatibilities in African cichlid fish. Evolution 64, 617-632 (2010).
60. Scopece, G., Musacchio, A., Widmer, A. & Cozzolino, S. Patterns of reproductive isolation in Mediterranean deceptive orchids. Evolution 61, 2623-2642 (2007).
61. Orr, H. A. & Turelli, M. The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 55, 1085-1094 (2001).
62. Strasburg, J. L. & Rieseberg, L. H. Interpreting the estimated timing of migration events between hybridizing species. Mol. Ecol. 20, 2353-2366 (2011).
63. Nosil, P., Funk, D. J. & Ortiz-Barrientos, D. Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence. Mol. Ecol. 18, 375-402 (2009).
64. Strasburg, J. L. et al. What can patterns of differentiation across plant genomes tell us about adaptation and speciation? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 364-373 (2012).
65. Barton, N. Gene flow and speciation. Heredity 50, 213-213 (1983).
66. Wu, C. I. The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 851-865 (2001).
67. Via, S. & West, J. The genetic mosaic suggests a new role for hitchhiking in ecological speciation. Mol. Ecol. 17, 4334-4345 (2008).
68. Feder, J. L., Egan, S. P. & Nosil, P. The genomics of speciation-with-gene-flow. Trends Genet. 28, 342-350 (2012).
69. Nadeau, N. J. et al. Genomic islands of divergence in hybridizing Heliconius butterflies identified by large-scale targeted sequencing. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 343-353 (2012).
70. Andrew, R. L. & Rieseberg, L. H. Divergence is focused on few genomic regions early in speciation: incipient speciation of sunflower ecotypes. Evolution 67, 2468-2482 (2013).
71. Stolting, K. N. et al. Genomic scan for single nucleotide polymorphisms reveals patterns of divergence and gene flow between ecologically divergent species. Mol. Ecol. 22, 842-855 (2013).
72. Hohenlohe, P. A. et al. Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags. PLoS Genet. 6, e100086 (2010).
73. Deagle, B. E. et al. Population genomics of parallel phenotypic evolution in stickleback across stream-lake ecological transitions. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 1277-1286 (2012).
74. Jones, F. C. et al. The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 484, 55-61 (2012).
75. Lawniczak, M. K. N. et al. Widespread divergence between incipient Anopheles gambiae species revealed by whole genome sequences. Science 330, 512-514 (2010).
76. Renaut, S. et al. Genomic islands of divergence are not affected by geography of speciation in sunflowers. Nature Commun. 4, 1827 (2013).
77. Keller, I. et al. Population genomic signatures of divergent adaptation, gene flow, and hybrid speciation in the rapid radiation of Lake Victoria cichlid fishes. Mol. Ecol. 22, 2848-2863 (2012).
78. Jones, F. C. et al. A genome-wide SNP genotyping array reveals patterns of global and repeated species-pair divergence in sticklebacks. Curr. Biol. 22, 83-90 (2012).
79. Parchman, T. L. et al. The genomic consequences of adaptive divergence and reproductive isolation between species of manakins. Mol. Ecol. 22, 3304-3317 (2013).
80. Gagnaire, P.-A., Pavey, S. A., Normandeau, E. & Bernatchez, L. The genetic architecture of reproductive isolation during speciation-with-gene-flow in lake whitefish pairs assessed by RAD-sequencing. Evolution 67, 2483-2497 (2013).
81. Michel, A. P. et al. Widespread genomic divergence during sympatric speciation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9724-9729 (2010).
82. Via, S., Conte, G., Mason-Foley, C. & Mills, K. Localizing FST outliers on a QTL map reveals evidence for large genomic regions of reduced gene exchange during speciation-with-gene-flow. Mol. Ecol. 21, 5546-5560 (2012).
83. Roesti, M., Hendry, A. P., Salzburger, W. & Berner, D. Genome divergence during evolutionary diversification as revealed in replicate lake-stream stickleback population pairs. Mol. Ecol. 21, 2852-2862 (2012).
84. Garrigan, D. et al. Genome sequencing reveals complex speciation in the Drosophila simulans clade. Genome Res. 22, 1499-1511 (2012).
85. Neafsey, D. E. et al. SNP genotyping defines complex gene-flow boundaries among African malaria vector mosquitoes. Science 330, 514-517 (2010).
86. Nosil, P. et al. Genomic consequences of multiple speciation processes in a stick insect. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 5058-5065 (2012).
87. Martin, S. H. et al. Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies. Genome Res. 23, 1817-1828 (2013).
88. Noor, M. A. F. & Bennett, S. M. Islands of speciation or mirages in the desert? Examining the role of restricted recombination in maintaining species. Heredity 103, 439-444 (2009).
89. Hahn, M. W., White, B. J., Muir, C. D. & Besansky, N. J. No evidence for biased co-transmission of speciation islands in Anopheles gambiae. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 374-384 (2012).
90. Sousa, V. & Hey, J. Understanding the origin of species with genome-scale data: modelling gene flow. Nature Rev. Genet. 14, 404-414 (2013).
91. Scally, A. et al. Insights into hominid evolution from the gorilla genome sequence. Nature 483, 169-175 (2012).
92. Charlesworth, B., Morgan, M. T. & Charlesworth, D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134, 1289-1303 (1993).
93. Spencer, C. C. A. et al. The influence of recombination on human genetic diversity. PLoS Genet. 2, 1375-1385 (2006).
94. Nachman, M. W. & Payseur, B. A. Recombination rate variation and speciation: theoretical predictions and empirical results from rabbits and mice. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 367, 409-421 (2012).
95. Nei, M. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics (Columbia Univ. Press, 1987).
96. Charlesworth, B. Measures of divergence between populations and the effect of forces that reduce variability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 538-543 (1998).
97. Renaut, S., Owens, G. L. & Rieseberg, L. H. Shared selective pressure and local genomic landscape lead to repeatable patterns of genomic divergence in sunflowers. Mol. Ecol. 23, 311-324 (2014).
98. Ellegren, H. et al. The genomic landscape of species divergence in Ficedula flycatchers. Nature 491, 756-760 (2012).
99. Heliconius Genome Consortium. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487, 94-98 (2012).
100. Janousek, V. et al. Genome-wide architecture of reproductive isolation in a naturally occurring hybrid zone between Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus. Mol. Ecol. 21, 3032-3047 (2012).
101. Elmer, K. R. & Meyer, A. Adaptation in the age of ecological genomics: insights from parallelism and convergence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 298-306 (2011).
102. Nosil, P., Egan, S. P. & Funk, D. J. Heterogeneous genomic differentiation between walking-stick ecotypes: "isolation by adaptation" and multiple roles for divergent selection. Evolution 62, 316-336 (2008).
103. Campbell, D. & Bernatchez, L. Generic scan using AFLP markers as a means to assess the role of directional selection in the divergence of sympatric whitefish ecotypes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 945-956 (2004).
104. Excoffier, L., Hofer, T. & Foll, M. Detecting loci under selection in a hierarchically structured population. Heredity 103, 285-298 (2009).
105. Gagnaire, P.-A., Normandeau, E., Pavey, S. A. & Bernatchez, L. Mapping phenotypic, expression and transmission ratio distortion QTL using RAD markers in the Lake Whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis). Mol. Ecol. 22, 3036-3048 (2013).
106. Nosil, P., Parchman, T. L., Feder, J. L. & Gompert, Z. Do highly divergent loci reside in genomic regions affecting reproductive isolation? A test using next-generation sequence data in Timema stick insects. BMC Evol. Biol. 12, 164 (2012).
107. Lindtke, D., González-Martínez, S. C., Macaya-Sanz, D. & Lexer, C. Admixture mapping of quantitative traits in Populus hybrid zones: power and limitations. Heredity 111, 474-485 (2013).
108. Malek, T. B., Boughman, J. W., Dworkin, I. & Peichel, C. L. Admixture mapping of male nuptial colour and body shape in a recently formed hybrid population of threespine stickleback. Mol. Ecol. 21, 5265-5279 (2012).
109. Schluter, D. & Conte, G. L. Genetics and ecological speciation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9955-9962 (2009).
110. Seehausen, O. et al. Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature 455, 620-626 (2008).
111. Feder, J. L. et al. Allopatric genetic origins for sympatric host-plant shifts and race formation in Rhagoletis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 10314-10319 (2003).
112. Nadeau, N. J. et al. Genome-wide patterns of divergence and gene flow across a butterfly radiation. Mol. Ecol. 22, 814-826 (2013).
113. Seehausen, O. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 198-207 (2004).
114. Smadja, C. M. & Butlin, R. K. A framework for comparing processes of speciation in the presence of gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 20, 5123-5140 (2011).
115. Bierne, N., Welch, J., Loire, E., Bonhomme, F. & David, P. The coupling hypothesis: why genome scans may fail to map local adaptation genes. Mol. Ecol. 20, 2044-2072 (2011).
116. Hermann, K. et al. Tight genetic linkage of prezygotic barrier loci creates a multifunctional speciation island in Petunia. Curr. Biol. 23, 873-877 (2013).
117. Bank, C., Burger, R. & Hermisson, J. The limits to parapatric speciation: Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities in a continent-island model. Genetics 191, 845-863 (2012).
118. Wright, K. M., Lloyd, D., Lowry, D. B., Macnair, M. R. & Willis, J. H. Indirect evolution of hybrid lethality due to linkage with selected locus in Mimulus guttatus. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001497 (2013).
119. Barton, N. H. Multilocus clines. Evolution 37, 454-471 (1983).
120. Barton, N. H. & de Cara, M. A. The evolution of strong reproductive isolation. Evolution 63, 1171-1190 (2009).
121. Nosil, P., Harmon, L. J. & Seehausen, O. Ecological explanations for (incomplete) speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 145-156 (2009).
122. Doebeli, M. & Dieckmann, U. Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature 421, 259-264 (2003).
123. Butlin, R. K. & Ritchie, M. G. Pulling together or pulling apart: hybridization in theory and practice. J. Evol. Biol. 26, 294-298 (2013).
124. Servedio, M. R. & Noor, M. A. F. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Systemat. 34, 339-364 (2003).
125. Qvarnström, A. & Bailey, R. I. Speciation through evolution of sex-linked genes. Heredity 102, 4-15 (2009).
126. Pryke, S. R. & Griffith, S. C. Postzygotic genetic incompatibility between sympatric color morphs. Evolution 63, 793-798 (2009).
127. Pryke, S. R. Sex chromosome linkage of mate preference and color signal maintains assortative mating between interbreeding finch morphs. Evolution 64, 1301-1310 (2010).
128. Kirkpatrick, M. & Barton, N. Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics 173, 419-434 (2006).
129. Felsenstein, J. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals. Evolution 35, 124-138 (1981).
130. Hopkins, R. & Rausher, M. D. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower color allele drives reinforcement. Science 335, 1090-1092 (2012).
131. Hopkins, R. & Rausher, M. D. Identification of two genes causing reinforcement in the Texas wildflower Phlox drummondii. Nature 469, 411-414 (2011).
132. Servedio, M. R., Van Doorn, G. S., Kopp, M., Frame, A. M. & Nosil, P. Magic traits in speciation: 'magic' but not rare? Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 389-397 (2011).
133. Lowry, D. B. & Willis, J. H. A widespread chromosomal inversion polymorphism contributes to a major life-history transition, local adaptation, and reproductive isolation. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000500 (2010).
134. Joron, M. et al. Chromosomal rearrangements maintain a polymorphic supergene controlling butterfly mimicry. Nature 477, 203-206 (2011).
135. Noor, M. A. F., Grams, K. L., Bertucci, L. A. & Reiland, J. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12084-12088 (2001).
136. Shaw, K. L. & Lesnick, S. C. Genomic linkage of male song and female acoustic preference QTL underlying a rapid species radiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9737-9742 (2009).
137. Merrill, R. M., Van Schooten, B., Scott, J. A. & Jiggins, C. D. Pervasive genetic associations between traits causing reproductive isolation in Heliconius butterflies. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 511-518 (2011).
138. Saetre, G. P. & Saether, S. A. Ecology and genetics of speciation in Ficedula flycatchers. Mol. Ecol. 19, 1091-1106 (2010).
139. Bimova, B. V. et al. Reinforcement selection acting on the European house mouse hybrid zone. Mol. Ecol. 20, 2403-2424 (2011).
140. Teeter, K. C. et al. The variable genomic architecture of isolation between hybridizing species of house mice. Evolution 64, 472-485 (2010).
141. Nielsen, R., Korneliussen, T., Albrechtsen, A., Li, Y. & Wang, J. SNP calling, genotype calling, and sample allele frequency estimation from new-generation sequencing data. PLoS ONE 7, e37558 (2012).
142. Orr, H. A. The genetics of species differences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 343-350 (2001).
143. Haller, B. C., De Leon, L. F., Rolshausen, G., Gotanda, K. M. & Hendry, A. P. Magic traits: distinguishing the important from the trivial. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 4-5 (2012).
144. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon Press, 1930).
145. Orr, H. A. The population genetics of adaptation: The distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52, 935-949 (1998).
146. Orr, H. A. The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nature Rev. Genet. 6, 119-127 (2005).
147. Rockman, M. V. The QTN program and the alleles that matter for evolution: all that's gold does not glitter. Evolution 66, 1-17 (2012).
148. Gordo, I. & Campos, P. R. Evolution of clonal populations approaching a fitness peak. Biol. Lett. 9, 20120239 (2013).
149. Guillaume, F. & Whitlock, M. C. Effects of migration on the genetic covariance matrix. Evolution 61, 2398-2409 (2007).
150. Bomblies, K. & Weigel, D. Arabidopsis and relatives as models for the study of genetic and genomic incompatibilities. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 1815-1823 (2010).
151. Leary, G. P. et al. Single mutation to a sx pheromone receptor provides adaptive specificity between closely related moth species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14081-14086 (2012).
152. Bradshaw, H. D. & Schemske, D. W. Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkey flowers. Nature 426, 176-178 (2003).
153. Feder, J. L. et al. Host fidelity is an effective premating barrier between sympatric races of the apple maggot fly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7990-7994 (1994).
154. Klahre, U. et al. Pollinator choice in Petunia depends on two major genetic loci for floral scent production. Curr. Biol. 21, 730-739 (2011).
155. Dambroski, H. R. et al. The genetic basis for fruit odor discrimination in Rhagoletis flies and its significance for sympatric host shifts. Evolution 59, 1953-1964 (2005).
156. Haesler, M. P. & Seehausen, O. Inheritance of female mating preference in a sympatric sibling species pair of Lake Victoria cichlids: implications for speciation. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 237-245 (2005).
157. Fan, P. et al. Genetic and neural mechanisms that inhibit Drosophila from mating with other species. Cell 154, 89-102 (2013).
158. Ballerini, E. S. et al. QTL mapping reveals the genetic architecture of loci affecting pre-and post-zygotic isolating barriers in Louisiana Iris. BMC Plant Biol. 12, 91 (2012).
159. Reed, R. D. et al. optix drives the repeated convergent evolution of butterfly wing pattern mimicry. Science 333, 1137-1141 (2011).
160. Barrett, R. D. H., Rogers, S. M. & Schluter, D. Environment specific pleiotropy facilitates divergence at the Ectodysplasin locus in threespine stickleback. Evolution 63, 2831-2837 (2009).
161. Arnold, S. J., Burger, R., Hohenlohe, P. A., Ajie, B. C. & Jones, A. G. Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix. Evolution 62, 2451-2461 (2008).
162. Lande, R. Quantitative genetic-analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain-body size allometry. Evolution 33, 402-416 (1979).
163. Schluter, D. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50, 1766-1774 (1996).
164. Roff, D. The evolution of the G matrix: selection or drift? Heredity 84, 135-142 (2000).
165. Martin, G., Chapuis, E. & Goudet, J. Multivariate Qst-Fst comparisons: a neutrality test for the evolution of the G matrix in structured populations. Genetics 180, 2135-2149 (2008).
166. Hansen, T. F. & Houle, D. Measuring and comparing evolvability and constraint in multivariate characters. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 1201-1219 (2008).
167. Chenoweth, S. F., Rundle, H. D. & Blows, M. W. The contribution of selection and genetic constraints to phenotypic divergence. Am. Naturalist 175, 186-196 (2010).
168. Roff, D. A. & Fairbairn, D. J. A test of the hypothesis that correlational selection generates genetic correlations. Evolution 66, 2953-2960 (2012).
169. Jones, A. G., Arnold, S. J. & Bürger, R. Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift. Evolution 57, 1747-1760 (2003).
170. Agrawal, A. F., Brodie, E. D. & Rieseberg, L. H. Possible consequences of genes of major effect: transient changes in the G-matrix. Genetica 112, 33-43 (2001).
171. Jones, A. G., Arnold, S. J., Bürger, R., Hohenlohe, P. A. & Uyeda, J. C. The effects of stochastic and episodic movement of the optimum on the evolution of the G-matrix and the response of the trait mean to selection. J. Evol. Biol. 25, 2210-2231 (2012).
172. Yang, J. et al. Genome partitioning of genetic variation for complex traits using common SNPs. Nature Genet. 43, 519-525 (2011).
173. Kopp, A. Metamodels and phylogenetic replication: a systematic approach to the evolution of developmental pathways. Evolution 63, 2771-2789 (2009).
174. Eroukhmanoff, F. & Svensson, E. I. Evolution and stability of the G-matrix during the colonization of a novel environment. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 1363-1373 (2011).
175. Nolte, A. W. & Tautz, D. Understanding the onset of hybrid speciation. Trends Genet. 26, 54-58 (2010).
176. Selz, O. M., Lucek, K., Young, K. A. & Seehausen, O. Relaxed trait covariance in interspecific cichlid hybrids predicts morphological diversity in adaptive radiations. J. Evol. Biol. 27, 11-24 (2014).
177. Macaya-Sanz, D. et al. Genetic analysis of post-mating reproductive barriers in hybridizing European Populus species. Heredity 107, 478-486 (2011).
178. Seehausen, O. Conditions when hybridization might predispose populations for adaptive radiation. J. Evol. Biol. 26, 279-281 (2013).
179. Bolnick, D. I. & Fitzpatrick, B. M. Sympatric speciation: models and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Systemat. 38, 459-487 (2007).
180. Papadopulos, A. S. T. et al. A comparative analysis of the mechanisms underlying speciation on Lord Howe Island. J. Evol. Biol. 26, 733-745 (2013).
181. Stern, D. L. & Orgogozo, V. The loci of evolution: how predictable is genetic evolution? Evolution 62, 2155-2177 (2008).
182. Hoekstra, H. E. & Coyne, J. A. The locus of evolution: evo devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 61, 995-1016 (2007).
183. Eriksson, A. & Manica, A. Effect of ancient population structure on the degree of polymorphism shared between modern human populations and ancient hominins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 13956-13960 (2012).
184. Bazin, E., Dawson, K. J. & Beaumont, M. A. Likelihood-free inference of population structure and local adaptation in a Bayesian hierarchical model. Genetics 185, 587-602 (2010).
185. Lawson, D. J., Hellenthal, G., Myers, S. & Falush, D. Inference of population structure using dense haplotype data. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002453 (2012).
186. Slate, J. Quantitative trait locus mapping in natural populations: progress, caveats and future directions. Mol. Ecol. 14, 363-379 (2005).
187. Buerkle, C. A. & Lexer, C. Admixture as the basis for genetic mapping. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 686-694 (2008).
188. Gompert, Z. & Buerkle, C. A. Bayesian estimation of genomic clines. Mol. Ecol. 20, 2111-2127 (2011).
189. Trier, C. N., Hermansen, J. S., Sætre, G. P. & Bailey, R. I. Evidence for mito-nuclear and sex-linked incompatibilities between the hybrid Italian sparrow and its parent species. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004075 (2014).
190. Barrett, R. D. H., Rogers, S. M. & Schluter, D. Natural selection on a major armor gene in threespine stickleback. Science 322, 255-257 (2008).
191. Cookson, W., Liang, L., Abecasis, G., Moffatt, M. & Lathrop, M. Mapping complex disease traits with global gene expression. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 184-194 (2009).
192. Orr, H. A. The population-genetics of speciation-the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139, 1805-1813 (1995).
193. Vonlanthen, P. et al. Eutrophication causes speciation reversal in whitefish adaptive radiations. Nature 482, 357-362 (2012).
194. Rosenblum, E. B. et al. Goldilocks meets Santa Rosalia: an ephemeral speciation model explains patterns of diversification across time scales. Evol. Biol. 39, 255-261 (2012).
195. Butlin, R. K., Bridle, J. R. & Schluter, D. Speciation and Patterns of Diversity (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).
196. Sanderson, M. J. & Donoghue, M. J. Reconstructing shifts in diversification rates on phylogenetic trees. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 15-20 (1996).
197. Seehausen, O., van Alphen, J. J. M. & Witte, F. Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277, 1808-1811 (1997).
198. Taylor, E. et al. Speciation in reverse: morphological and genetic evidence of the collapse of a three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) species pair. Mol. Ecol. 15, 343-355 (2006).
199. Seehausen, O., Takimoto, G., Roy, D. & Jokela, J. Speciation reversal and biodiversity dynamics with hybridization in changing environments. Mol. Ecol. 17, 30-44 (2008).
200. Etges, W. J., de Oliveira, C. C., Noor, M. A. F. & Ritchie, M. G. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. III. Life-history divergence in allopatry and reproductive isolation. Evolution 64, 3549-3569 (2010).