Sex chromosome linkage of mate preference and color signal maintains assortative mating between interbreeding finch morphs

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1301-1310

  Pryke, Sarah R ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Gouldian finches; Reproductive isolation; Sex chromosomes; Sexual imprinting

Indexed keywords

ASSORTATIVE MATING; CHROMOSOME; DIVERGENCE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FLOW; HERITABILITY; MATE CHOICE; PASSERINE; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COLOR; FINCH; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SEX CHROMOSOME; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; COLOR; FINCHES; LINKAGE (GENETICS); SEX CHROMOSOMES; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; GENETIC LINKAGE;

AVES; ERYTHRURA GOULDIAE; LONCHURA STRIATA DOMESTICA;

EID: 77953733319     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00897.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Albert A Y K, Otto S P. Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism. Science 2005, 310:119-121.
2. Bakker T C M, Pomiankowski A. The genetic basis of female mate preferences. J. Evol. Biol. 1995, 8:129-171.
3. Chalmers N. The development of social relationships. Animal behaviour: genes, development and learning 1983, 114-148. Halliday T RSlater P J B. Pp, , eds, Blackwell Scientific Publications, London
4. Counterman B A, Oritz-Barrientos D, Noor M A F. Using comparative genomic data to test for faster-X evolution. Evolution 2004, 58:656-660.
5. Coyne J A, Orr H A. Speciation 2004, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
6. Dieckmann U, Doebeli M. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 1999, 400:354-357.
7. Dobzhansky T. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 1940, 74:312-321.
8. Dostine P L. Gouldian finch recovery plan 1998, Environment Australia, Canberra
9. Dukas R. Male fruit flies learn to avoid interspecific courtship. Behav. Ecol. 2004, 15:695-698.
10. Ellegren H. Genomic evidence for a large Z-effect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2009, 276:361-366.
11. Evans S M, Fidler M E. The Gouldian finch 2005, Indruss Publications, Queensland
12. Felsenstein J. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals?. Evolution 1981, 35:124-138.
13. Franklin D C, Dostine P L. A note on the frequency and genetics of head colour morphs in the Gouldian finch. Emu 2000, 200:236-239.
14. Galeotti P, Rubolini D, Dunn P O, Fasola M. Colour polymorphism in birds: causes and functions. J. Evol. Biol. 2003, 16:635-646.
15. Gavrilets S. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species 2004, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
16. Gilby A, Pryke S R, Griffith S C. The historical frequency of head colour morphs in the Gouldian finch Erythrura gouldiae. Emu 2009, 109:222-229.
17. Göth A, Hauber M. Ecological approaches to species recognition in birds through studies of model and non-model species. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 2004, 41:823-842.
18. Grant P R, Grant B R. Hybridization, sexual imprinting, and mate choice. Am. Nat. 1997, 149:1-28.
19. Haldane J B S. Sex-ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 1922, 12:101-109.
20. Hauber M E, Sherman P W. Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends Neurosci. 2001, 24:607-614.
21. Hebets E A. Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100:13390-13395.
22. Hurst L D, Randerson J P. An eXceptional chromosome. Trends Genet. 1999, 15:383-385.
23. Irwin D E, Price T. Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. Heredity 1999, 82:347-354.
24. Iyengar V K, Reeve H K, Eisner T. Paternal inheritance of a female moth's mating preference. Nature 2002, 419:830-832.
25. Jennions M D, Petrie M. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 1997, 72:283-327.
26. Kendrick K M, Hinton M R, Atkins K, Haupt M A, Skinner J D. Mothers determine sexual preferences. Nature 1998, 395:229-230.
27. Kirkpatrick M. Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2000, 267:1649-1655.
28. Kirkpatrick M K, Hall D W. Sexual selection and sex linkage. Evolution 2004, 58:683-691.
29. Kirkpatrick M, Ravigne V. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 2002, 159:S22-S35.
30. Kondrashov A S, Kondrashov F A. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 1999, 400:351-354.
31. Laland K. On the evolutionary consequences of sexual imprinting. Evolution 2004, 48:477-489.
32. Lemmon A R, Kirkpatrick M. Reinforcement and the genetics of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 2006, 173:1145-1155.
33. Noor M A F, Grams K L, Bertucci L A, Reiland J. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98:12084-12088.
34. Ortiz-Barrientos D, Noor M A F. Evidence for a one-allele assortative mating locus. Science 2005, 310:1467.
35. Prowell D P. Sex linkage and speciation in Lepidoptera. Endless forms: species and speciation 1998, 309-319. Howard D JBerlocher S H. Pp, , eds, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K
36. Pryke S R, Griffith S C. The relative role of male versus female mate choice in maintaining assortative pairing among discrete colour morphs. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:1512-1521.
37. Pryke S R, Griffith S C. Genetic incompatibility drives sex allocation and maternal investment in a polymorphic finch. Science 2009a, 323:1605-1607.
38. Pryke S R, Griffith S C. Postzygotic genetic incompatibility between sympatric color morphs. Evolution 2009b, 63:793-798.
39. Pryke S R, Griffith S C. Socially mediated trade-offs between aggression and parental effort in competing color morphs. Am. Nat. 2009c, 174:455-464.
40. Pryke S R, Astheimer L B, Buttemer W A, Griffith S C. Frequency-dependent physiological tradeoffs between competing colour morphs. Biol. Lett. 2007, 3:494-497.
41. Qvarnström A, Bailey R I. Speciation through evolution of sex-linked genes. Heredity 2009, 102:4-15.
42. Reeve H K, Pfennig D W. Genetic biases for showy males: are some genetic systems especially conducive to sexual selection?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100:1089-1094.
43. Reinhold K. Sex linkage among genes controlling sexually selected traits. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1998, 44:1-7.
44. Ritchie M G, Phillips S D F. The genetics of sexual isolation. Endless forms: species and speciation 1998, 291-308. Howard D J, Berlocher S H. Pp, , eds, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K
45. Sætre G P, Moum T, Bures S, Král M, Adamjan M, Moreno J. A sexually-selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 1997, 387:589-592.
46. Sætre G P, Borge T, Lindroos K, Haavie J, Sheldon B C, Primmer C R, Syvanen A C. Sex chromosome evolution and speciation in Ficedula flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2003, 270:53-59.
47. Sæther S A, Sætre G P, Borge T, Wiley C, Svedin N, Andersson G, Veen T, Haavie J, Servedio M R, Bures S. Sex chromosome-linked species recognition and evolution of reproductive isolation in flycatchers. Science 2007, 318:95-97.
48. Servedio M R. Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating. Evolution 2000, 54:21-29.
49. Servedio M R, Noor M A F. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data meet. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2003, 34:339-364.
50. Servedio M R, Sætre G-P. Speciation as a positive feedback loop between postzygotic and prezygotic barriers to gene flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2003, 270:1473-1479.
51. Servedio M R, Sætre G-P, Sæther S A. Reinforcement and learning. Evol. Ecol. 2009, 23:109-123.
52. Slagsvold T, Hansen B T, Johannessen L E, Lifjeld J T. Mate choice and imprinting in birds studied by cross-fostering in the wild. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 269:1449-1455.
53. Southern H N. Polymorphism in Poephila gouldiae. J. Genet. 1945, 47:51-157.
54. ten Cate C, Vos D R. Sexual imprinting and evolutionary processes in birds: a reassessment. Adv. Study Behav. 1999, 28:1-31.
55. Trickett A J, Butlin R K. Recombination suppressors and the evolution of new species. Heredity 1994, 73:339-345.
56. Veen T, Borge T, Griffith S C, Sætre G-P, Bures S, Gustafsson L, Sheldon B C. Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers. Nature 2001, 411:45-50.
57. Verzijden M N, ten Cate C. Early learning influences species assortative mating preferences in Lake Victoria cichlid fish. Biol. Lett. 2007, 22:134-136.