The Role Of Reinforcement in Speciation: Theory and Data

Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics

Volumn 34, Issue , 2003, Pages 339-364

  Servedio, Maria R ^a   Noor, Mohamed A F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Divergent selection; Incompatibilities; Postmating isolation; Premating isolation; Sympatric speciation

Indexed keywords

DIVERGENCE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

EID: 0842301555     PISSN: 00664162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132412     Document Type: Review

References (122)

1. Albuquerque GS, Tauber CA, Tauber MJ. 1996. Postmating reproductive isolation between Chrysopa quadripunctata and Chrysopa slossonae: Mechanisms and geographic variation. Evolution 50:1598-606
2. Arnold ML, Hodges SA. 1995. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:67-71
3. Balkau BJ, Feldman MW. 1973. Selection for migration modification. Genetics 74:171-74
4. Berlocher SH, Feder JL. 2002. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: Moving beyond controversy? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47:773-815
5. Bigelow RS. 1965. Hybrid zones and reproductive isolation. Evolution 19:449-58
6. Bordenstein SR, Drapeau MD, Werren JH. 2000. Intraspecific variation in sexual isolation in the jewel wasp Nasonia. Evolution 54:567-73
7. Boughman JW. 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411:944-48
8. Buckley PA. 1969. Disruption of species-typical behavior patterns in F1 hybrid Agapornis parrots. Zeit. Tierpsychologie 26:737-47
9. Butlin R. 1987. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2:8-13
10. Cain ML, Andreasen V, Howard D. 1999. Reinforcing selection is effective under a relatively broad set of conditions in a mosaic hybrid zone. Evolution 53:1343-53
11. Carvajal AR, Gandarela MR, Naveira HF. 1996. A three-locus system of interspecific incompatibility underlies male inviability in hybrids between Drosophila buzzatii and D-koepferae. Genetica 98:1-19
12. Connell JH. 1983. On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Am. Nat. 122:661-96
13. Cox RT, Carlton CE. 1991. Evidence of genetic dominance of the 13-year life-cycle in periodical cicadas (Homoptera, Cicadidae, Magicicada Spp). Am. Midl. Nat. 125:63-74
14. Coyne JA. 1992. Genetics of sexual isolation in females of the Drosophila simulans species complex. Genet. Res. Comb. 60:25-31
15. Coyne JA. 1996. Genetics of sexual isolation in male hybrids of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genet. Res. Comb. 68:211-20
16. Coyne JA, Meyers W, Crittenden AP, Sniegowski P. 1993. The fertility effects of pericentric inversions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 134:487-96
17. Coyne JA, Orr HA. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-81
18. Coyne JA, Orr HA. 1997. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51:295-303
19. Coyne JA, Orr HA. 1998. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Ser. B 353:287-305
20. Davies N, Aiello A, Mallet J, Pomiankowski A, Silberglied RE. 1997. Speciation in two neotropical butterflies: extending Haldane's rule. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 264:845-51
21. Dieckmann U, Doebeli M. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354-57
22. Dobzhansky T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
23. Doi M, Matsuda M, Tomaru M, Matsubayashi H, Oguma Y. 2001. A locus for female discrimination behavior causing sexual isolation in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:6714-19
24. Drossel B, McKane A. 2000. Competitive speciation in quantiative genetic models. J. Theor. Biol. 204:467-78
25. Feder JL, Opp SB, Wlazlo B, Reynolds K, Go W, Spisak S. 1994. Host fidelity is an effective premating barrier between sympatric races of the apple magot fly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7990-94
26. Felsenstein J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35:124-38
27. Fisher RA. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford, UK: Clarendon
28. Fishman L, Willis JH. 2001. Evidence for Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities contributing to the sterility of hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus. Evolution 55:1932-42
29. Fishman L, Wyatt R. 1999. Pollinator-mediated competition, reproductive character displacement, and the evolution of selfing in Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 53:1723-33
30. Gerhardt HC. 1994. Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim. Behav. 47:959-69
31. Gil D, Gahr M. 2002. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:133-41
32. Grafen A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theor. Biol. 144:517-46
33. Grant BR, Grant PR. 1998. Hybridization and speciation in Darwin's finches: the role of sexual imprinting on a culturally transmitted trait. See Howard & Berlocher 1998, pp. 404-22
34. Grant PR. 1986. Ecology and Evolution of Darwin's Finches. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. 458 pp.
35. Grant PR, Grant BR. 1997a. Genetics and the origin of bird species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7768-75
36. Grant PR, Grant BR. 1997b. Hybridization, sexual imprinting, and mate choice. Am. Nat. 149:1-28
37. Hatfield T, Schluter D. 1999. Ecological speciation in sticklebacks: Environment-dependent hybrid fitness. Evolution 53: 866-73
38. Helbig AJ, Salomon M, Bensch S, Seibold I. 2001. Male-biased gene flow across an avian hybrid zone: evidence from mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA. J. Evol. Biol. 14:277-87
39. Higashi M, Takimoto G, Yamamura N. 1999. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Nature 402:523-26
40. Hobel G, Gerhardt HC. 2003. Reproductive character displacement in the acoustic system of green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea). Evolution. 57:894-904
41. Holynska M. 2000. Is the spinule pattern on the leg 4 coxopodite a tactile signal in the specific mate recognition system of Mesocyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopidae)? Hydrobiologia 417:11-24
42. Howard DJ. 1993. Reinforcement: Origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process, ed. RG Harrison, pp. 46-69. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
43. Howard DJ. 1999. Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:109-32
44. Howard DJ, Berlocher SH. 1998. Endless Forms, Species and Speciation. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
45. Irwin DE, Price T. 1999. Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. Heredity 82:347-54
46. Iyengar VK, Reeve HK, Eisner T. 2002. Paternal inheritance of a females moth's mating preference. Nature 419:830-832
47. Jiggins CD, Naisbit RE, Coe RL, Mallet J. 2001. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411:302-5
48. Kawata M, Yoshimura J. 2000. Speciation by sexual selection in hybridizing populations without viability selection. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2:897-909
49. Kawecki TJ. 1996. Sympatric speciation driven by beneficial mutations. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 263:1515-20
50. Kawecki TJ. 1997. Sympatric speciation via habitat specialization driven by deleterious mutations. Evolution 51:1751-63
51. Kelly JK, Noor MAF. 1996. Speciation by reinforcement: A model derived from studies of Drosophila. Genetics 143:1485-97
52. King M. 1993. Species Evolution: The Role of Chromosome Change. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
53. Kirkpatrick M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1-12
54. Kirkpatrick M. 2000. Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 267:1649-55
55. Kirkpatrick M. 2001. Reinforcement during ecological speciation. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 268:1259-63
56. Kirkpatrick M, Barton NH. 1997. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:1282-86
57. Kirkpatrick M, Ravigné V. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159:S22-S35
58. Kirkpatrick M, Servedio MR. 1999. The reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. Genetics 151:865-84
59. Kondrashov AS. 1983. Multilocus model of sympatric speciation I. One character. Theor. Popul. Biol. 24:121-35
60. Kondrashov AS, Kondrashov FA. 1999. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400:351-54
61. Kondrashov AS, Shpak M. 1998. On the origin of species by means of assortative mating. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 265:2273-78
62. Lambrechts M, Dhondt AA. 1988. The anti-exhaustion hypothesis - a new hypothesis to explain song performance and song switching in the great tit. Anim. Behav. 36:327-34
63. Lamnissou K, Loukas M, Zouros E. 1996. Incompatibilities between Y chromosome and autosomes are responsible for male hybrid sterility in crosses between Drosophila virilis and Drosophila texana. Heredity 26:603-9
64. Lande R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:3721-25
65. Levitan DR. 2002. The relationship between conspecific fertilization success and reproductive isolation among three congeneric sea urchins. Evolution 56:1599-609
66. Liou LW, Price TD. 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 48:1451-59
67. Lloyd M, Kritsky G, Simon C. 1983. A simple mendelian model for 13-year and 17-year life-cycles of periodical cicadas, with historical evidence of hybridization between them. Evolution 37:1162-80
68. Lofstedt C, Hansson BS, Roelofs W, Bengtsson BO. 1989. No linkage between genes-controlling female pheromone production and male pheromone response in the european corn-borer, Ostrinia-nubilalis Hubner (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). Genetics 123:553-56
69. Loftus-Hills JJ, Littlejohn ML. 1992. Reinforcement and reproductive character displacement in Gastrophryne carolinensis and G. olivacea (Anura: Microhylidae): A reexamination. Evolution 46:896-906
70. Lorenz KZ. 1952. King Solomon's Ring. New York: Crowell
71. Lynch A, Baker AJ. 1994. A population mimetics approach to cultural evolution in chaffinch song: differentiation among populations. Evolution 48:351-59
72. Mallet J. 1995. A species definition for the Modern Sythesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:294-99
73. Mallet J. 1999. Causes and consequences of lack of coevolution in Mullerian mimicry. Evol. Ecol. 13:777-806
74. Markow TA. 1997. Assortative fertilization in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7756-60
75. McPhail JD. 1984. Ecology and evolution of sympatric sticklebacks (Gasterosteus) - morphological and genetic-evidence for a species pair in Enos Lake, British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. Rev. Can. Zool. 62:1402-8
76. McPhail JD. 1992. Ecology and evolution of sympatric sticklebacks (Gasterosteus) - evidence for a species-pair in Paxton Lake, Texada Island, British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. Rev. Can. Zool. 70:361-69
77. Michalak P, Grzesik J, Rafinski J. 1997. Tests for sexual incompatibility between two newt species, Triturus vulgaris and Triturus montandioni: No-choice mating design. Evolution 51:2045-50
78. Moore JA. 1957. An embryologist's view of the species concept. In The Species Problem, ed. E Mayr, pp. 325-38. Washington, D.C.: Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci.
79. Muller HJ. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6:71-125
80. Mundinger PC. 1982. Microgeographic and macrogeographic variation in acquired vocalizations in birds. In Acoustic Communication in Birds, ed. DE Kroodsma, EH Miller, 2:147-208. New York: Academic
81. Nagel L, Schluter D. 1998. Body size, natural selection, and speciation in sticklebacks. Evolution 52:209-18
82. Naisbit RE, Jiggins CD, Mallet J. 2001. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 268:1849-54
83. Navarro A, Barton NH. 2003. Accumulating postzygotic isolation genes in parapatry: a new twist on chromosomal speciation. Evolution 57:447-59
84. Noor MAF. 1995. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375:674-75
85. Noor MAF. 1997a. Genetics of sexual isolation and courtship dysfunction in male hybrids of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Evolution 51:809-15
86. Noor MAF. 1997b. How often does sympatry affect sexual isolation in Drosophila? Am. Nat. 149:1156-63
87. Noor MAF. 1999. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83:503-8
88. Noor MAF, Grams KL, Bertucci LA, Almendarez Y, Reiland J, Smith KR. 2001a. The genetics of reproductive isolation and the potential for gene exchange between Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis via backcross hybrid males. Evolution 55:512-21
89. Noor MAF, Grams KL, Bertucci LA, Reiland J. 2001b. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:12084-88
90. Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP. 2003. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. In press
91. Orr HA. 1987. Genetics of male and female sterility in hybrids of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics 116:555-63
92. Orr HA. 1995. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139:1805-13
93. Orr HA, Irving S. 2001. Complex epistasis and the genetic basis of hybrid sterility in the Drosophila pseudoobscura Bogota-USA hybridization. Genetics 158:1089-100
94. Ortíz-Barrientos D, Reiland J, Hey J, Noor MAF. 2002. Recombination and the divergence of hybridizing species. Genetica 116:167-78
95. Palopoli MF, Wu C-I. 1994. Genetics of hybrid male sterility between Drosophila sibling species: a complex web of epistasis is revealed in interspecific studies. Genetics 138:329-41
96. Pantazidis AC, Galanopoulos VK, Zouros E. 1993. An autosomal factor from Drosophila arizonae restores spermatogenesis in Drosophila mojavensis males carrying the D. arizonae Y chromosome. Genetics 134:309-18
97. Pashley DP, Martin JA. 1987. Reproductive incompatibility between host strains of the fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 80:731-33
98. Payne RJH, Krakauer DC. 1997. Sexual selection, space, and speciation. Evolution 51:1-9
99. Pfennig KS, Simovich MA. 2002. Differential selection to avoid hybridization in two toad species. Evolution 56:1840-48
100. Podos J. 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature 409:185-88
101. Presgraves DC. 2002. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in Lepidoptera. Evolution 56:1168-83
102. Price TD. 2003. Causes of post-mating reproductive isolation in birds. Acta Zoologica Sinica. In press
103. Price TD, Bouvier MM. 2002. The evolution of F1 postzygotic incompatibilities in birds. Evolution 56:2083-89
104. Prowell DP. 1998. Sex linkage and speciation in Lepidoptera. See Howard & Berlocher 1998, pp. 309-19
105. Rawson PD, Burton RS. 2002. Functional coadaptation between cytochrome c and cytochrome c oxidase within allopatric populations of a marine copepod. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:12955-58
106. Rice WR. 1987. Speciation via habitat specialization: the evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character. Evol. Ecol. 1:301-14
107. Rundle HD. 2002. A test of ecologically dependent postmating isolation between sympatric sticklebacks. Evolution 56:322-29
108. Rundle HD, Schluter D. 1998. Reinforcement of stickleback mating preferences: Sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 52:200-8
109. Rundle HD, Whitlock MC. 2001. A genetic interpretation of ecologically dependent isolation. Evolution 55:198-201
110. Sætre GP, Borge T, Lindroos K, Haavie J, Sheldon BC, et al. 2003. Sex chromosome evolution and speciationin Ficedula flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 270:53-59
111. Sætre GP, Krai M, Bures S, Ims RA. 1999. Dynamics of a clinal hybrid zone and a comparison with island hybrid zones of flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca and F-albicollis). J. Zool. 247:53-64
112. Sætre G-P, Moum T, Bures S, Kral M, Adamjan M, Moreno J. 1997. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387:589-92
113. Sanderson N. 1989. Can gene flow prevent reinforcement? Evolution 43:1223-35
114. Sasa MM, Chippindale PT, Johnson NA. 1998. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in frogs. Evolution 52:1811-20
115. Schilthuizen M, Lombaerts M. 1995. Life on the edge - a hybrid zone in Albinaria-hippolyti (Gastropoda, Clausiliidae) from Crete. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 54:111-38
116. Schluter D. 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:372-80
117. Schoener TW. 1983. Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am. Nat. 122:240-85
118. Servedio MR, Kirkpatrick M. 1997. The effects of gene flow on reinforcement. Evolution 51:1764-72
119. Servedio MR, Saetre GP. 2003. Speciation as a positive feedback loop between post- and prezygotic barriers to gene flow. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. In press
120. Slabbekoorn H, Smith TB. 2002. Bird song, ecology and speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 357:493-503
121. Sota T, Kubota K. 1998. Genital lock-and-key as a selective agent against hybridization. Evolution 52:1507-13
122. Sperling FAH. 1994. Sex-linked genes and species-differences in Lepidoptera. Can. Entomol. 126:807-18