Conflictual speciation: Species formation via genomic conflict

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 48-57

  Crespi, Bernard ^a   Nosil, Patrik ^b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Genomic conflict; Intragenomic conflict; Post zygotic isolation; Reproductive isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; GENOMICS; NATURAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENOME; GENOME IMPRINTING; HUMAN; PLANT; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; TRANSPOSON;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DNA TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENOME; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; HUMANS; PLANTS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84871680520     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.015     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Schluter D. Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 2009, 323:737-741.
2. Nosil P. Ecological Speciation 2012, Oxford University Press.
3. Nosil P., Flaxman S.M. Conditions for mutation-order speciation. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2011, 278:399-407.
4. McClintock B. Modified gene expressions induced by transposable elements. Mobilization and Reassembly of Genetic Information 1980, 11-19. Academic Press. W.A. Scott (Ed.).
5. Cosmides L.M., Tooby J. Cytoplasmic inheritance and intragenomic conflict. J. Theor. Biol. 1981, 89:83-129.
6. Rice W.R. Intergenomic conflict, interlocus antagonistic coevolution, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Endless Forms: Species and Speciation 1998, 261-270. Oxford University Press. D.J. Howard, S.H. Berlocher (Eds.).
7. McDermott S.R., Noor M.A.F. The role of meiotic drive in hybrid male sterility. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2010, 365:1265-1272.
8. Presgraves D.C. The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:175-180.
9. Johnson N.A. Hybrid incompatibility genes: remnants of a genomic battlefield?. Trends Genet. 2010, 26:317-325.
10. Rieseberg L.H., Blackman B.K. Speciation genes in plants. Ann. Bot. 2010, 106:439-455.
11. Burt A., Trivers R. Genes in Conflict: The Biology of Selfish Genetic Elements 2006, Harvard University Press.
12. Agrawal A.A., et al. Ecological divergence and the evolution of intrinsic postmating isolation with gene flow. Int. J. Ecol. 2011, 2011:1-15.
13. Price T.A.R., Wedell N. Selfish genetic elements and sexual selection: their impact on male fertility. Genetica 2008, 132:295-307.
14. Carroll L.S., et al. Fitness effects of a selfish gene (the Mus T complex) are revealed in an ecological context. Evolution 2004, 58:1318-1328.
15. Vala F., et al. Wolbachia affects oviposition and mating behaviour of its spider mite host. J. Evol. Biol. 2004, 17:692-700.
16. Miller W.J., et al. Infectious speciation revisited: impact of symbiont-depletion on female fitness and mating behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6:e1001214.
17. Chafee M.E., et al. Decoupling of host-symbiont-phage coadaptations following transfer between insect species. Genetics 2011, 187:203-215.
18. Koukou K., et al. Influence of antibiotic treatment and Wolbachia curing on sexual isolation among Drosophila melanogaster cage populations. Evolution 2006, 60:87-96.
19. Rieseberg L.H., Willis J.H. Plant speciation. Science 2007, 317:910-914.
20. Price T.D. Speciation in Birds 2007, Roberts and Company.
21. Macholan M., et al. Genetic conflict outweighs heterogametic incompatibility in the mouse hybrid zone?. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8:271.
22. Nachman M.W., Payseur B.A. Recombination rate variation and speciation: theoretical predictions and empirical results from rabbits and mice. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2012, 367:409-421.
23. Carneiro M., et al. Speciation in the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): islands of differentiation on the X chromosome and autosomes. Evolution 2010, 64:3443-3460.
24. Fishman L., Saunders A. Centromere-associated female meiotic drive entails male fitness costs in monkeyflowers. Science 2008, 322:1559-1562.
25. Scopece G., et al. Polymorphism of postmating reproductive isolation within plant species. Taxon 2010, 59:1367-1374.
26. Dyer K.A. Local selection underlies the geographic distribution of sex-ratio drive in Drosophila neotestacea. Evolution 2012, 66:973-984.
27. Haig D. Gestational drive and the green-bearded placenta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93:6547-6551.
28. Rice W.R., et al. Sexually antagonistic "zygotic drive" of the sex chromosomes. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4:e1000313.
29. Fedyk S., Chetnicki W. Preferential segregation of metacentric chromosomes in simple Robertsonian heterozygotes of Sorex araneus. Heredity 2007, 99:545-552.
30. Ropiquet A., et al. Chromosome evolution in the subtribe Bovina (Mammalia, Bovidae): the karyotype of the Cambodian banteng (Bos javanicus birmanicus) suggests that Robertsonian translocations are related to interspecific hybridization. Chromosome Res. 2008, 16:1107-1118.
31. Brown J.D., O'Neill R.J. Chromosomes, conflict, and epigenetics: chromosomal speciation revisited. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, Vol 11 2010, 291-316. A. Chakravarti, E. Green (Eds.).
32. de Villena F.P.M., Sapienza C. Female meiosis drives karyotypic evolution in mammals. Genetics 2001, 159:1179-1189.
33. Malik H.S., Henikoff S. Major evolutionary transitions in centromere complexity. Cell 2009, 138:1067-1082.
34. van Doorn G.S., Kirkpatrick M. Turnover of sex chromosomes induced by sexual conflict. Nature 2007, 449:909-912.
35. Yoshida K., Kitano J. The contribution of female meiotic drive to the evolution of neo-sex chromosomes. Evolution 2012, 66:3198-3208. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01681.x.
36. Úbeda F., Wilkins J.F. The red queen theory of recombination hotspots. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24:541-553.
37. Segurel L., et al. The case of the fickle fingers: how the PRDM9 zinc finger protein specifies meiotic recombination hotspots in humans. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1001211.
38. Rebollo R., et al. Jumping genes and epigenetics: towards new species. Gene 2010, 454:1-7.
39. Jurka J., et al. Families of transposable elements, population structure and the origin of species. Biol. Direct 2011, 6:44.
40. Bohne A., et al. Transposable elements as drivers of genomic and biological diversity in vertebrates. Chromosome Res. 2008, 16:203-215.
41. Zeh D.W., et al. Transposable elements and an epigenetic basis for punctuated equilibria. Bioessays 2009, 31:715-726.
42. Brennecke J., et al. An epigenetic role for maternally inherited piRNAs in transposon silencing. Science 2008, 322:1387-1392.
43. Khurana J.S., et al. Adaptation to P element transposon invasion in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 2011, 147:1551-1563.
44. Martienssen R.A. Heterochromatin, small RNA and post-fertilization dysgenesis in allopolyploid and interploid hybrids of Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2010, 186:46-53.
45. Erilova A., et al. Imprinting of the Polycomb group gene MEDEA serves as a ploidy sensor in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000663.
46. Ishikawa R., Kinoshita T. Epigenetic programming: the challenge to species hybridization. Mol. Plant 2009, 2:589-599.
47. Kohler C., Kradolfer D. Epigenetic mechanisms in the endosperm and their consequences for the evolution of flowering plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1809:438-443.
48. Ishikawa R., et al. Rice interspecies hybrids show precocious or delayed developmental transitions in the endosperm without change to the rate of syncytial nuclear division. Plant J. 2011, 65:798-806.
49. Lu J., et al. Maternal siRNAs as regulators of parental genome imbalance and gene expression in endosperm of Arabidopsis seeds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:5529-5534.
50. Greiner S., et al. The role of plastids in plant speciation. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20:671-691.
51. Werren J.H. Selfish genetic elements, genetic conflict, and evolutionary innovation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:10863-10870.
52. Fishman L., Willis J.H. A cytonuclear incompatibility causes anther sterility in Mimulus hybrids. Evolution 2006, 60:1372-1381.
53. Frank S.A., Barr C.M. Programmed cell death and hybrid incompatibility. J. Hered. 2003, 94:181-183.
54. Chou J.Y., Leu J.Y. Speciation through cytonuclear incompatibility: insights from yeast and implications for higher eukaryotes. Bioessays 2010, 32:401-411.
55. Brucker R.M., Bordenstein S.R. Speciation by symbiosis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:443-451.
56. Frank S.A., Crespi B.J. Pathology from evolutionary conflict, with a theory of X chromosome versus autosome conflict over sexually antagonistic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:10886-10893.
57. Chase K., et al. Interaction between the X chromosome and an autosome regulates size sexual dimorphism in Portuguese Water Dogs. Genome Res. 2005, 15:1820-1824.
58. Crespi B.J. Turner syndrome and the evolution of human sexual dimorphsm. Evol. Appl. 2008, 1:449-461.
59. Good J.M., et al. Widespread over-expression of the X chromosome in sterile F-1 hybrid mice. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001148.
60. White M.A., et al. Genetic dissection of a key reproductive barrier between nascent species of house mice. Genetics 2011, 189:289-304.
61. Mishra P.K., Singh B.N. Genetic interactions underlying hybrid male sterility in the Drosophila bipectinata species complex. Genes Genet. Syst. 2006, 81:193-200.
62. Sackton T.B., et al. Interspecific Y chromosome introgressions disrupt testis-specific gene expression and male reproductive phenotypes in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:17046-17051.
63. Sweigart A.L. The genetics of postmating, prezygotic reproductive isolation between Drosophila virilis and D. americana. Genetics 2010, 184:401-410.
64. Sweigart A.L. Simple Y-autosomal incompatibilities cause hybrid male sterility in reciprocal crosses between Drosophila virilis and D. americana. Genetics 2010, 184:779-787.
65. Turelli M., Moyle L.C. Asymmetric postmating isolation: Darwin's corollary to Haldane's rule. Genetics 2007, 176:1059-1088.
66. Meiklejohn C.D., Tao Y. Genetic conflict and sex chromosome evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25:215-223.
67. Hahn M.W., et al. No evidence for biased co-transmission of speciation islands in Anopheles gambiae. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2012, 367:374-384.
68. Rieseberg L.H. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:351-358.
69. Noor M.A.F., et al. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:12084-12088.
70. Gavrilets S. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species 2004, Princeton University Press.
71. Rundle H.D., Nosil P. Ecological speciation. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:336-352.
72. Henikoff S., et al. The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 2001, 293:1098-1102.
73. Brandvain Y., Haig D. Divergent mating systems and parental conflict as a barrier to hybridization in flowering plants. Am. Nat. 2005, 166:330-338.
74. Leimu R., Fischer M. A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e4010.
75. Hereford J. A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. Am. Nat. 2009, 173:579-588.
76. Adams C.S. Intraparental gamete competition provides a selective advantage for the development of hybrid sterility via meiotic drive. Evolution 2005, 59:1229-1236.
77. Telschow A., et al. Wolbachia-induced unidirectional cytoplasmic incompatibility and speciation: mainland-island model. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e701.
78. Duesberg P., et al. Is carcinogenesis a form of speciation?. Cell Cycle 2011, 10:2100-2114.
79. Sanei M., et al. Loss of centromeric histone H3 (CENH3) from centromeres precedes uniparental chromosome elimination in interspecific barley hybrids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:E498-E505.
80. Matsubara K., et al. Relationship between transmission ratio distortion and genetic divergence in intraspecific rice crosses. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2011, 286:307-319.
81. Jones N., Pasakinskiene I. Genome conflict in the gramineae. New Phytol. 2005, 165:391-409.
82. Tao Y., et al. A sex-ratio meiotic drive system in Drosophila simulans. II: An X-linked distorter. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:2576-2588.
83. Phadnis N., Orr H.A. A single gene causes both male sterility and segregation distortion in Drosophila hybrids. Science 2009, 323:376-379.
84. Ferree P.M., Barbash D.A. Species-specific heterochromatin prevents mitotic chromosome segregation to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000234.
85. Tang S.W., Presgraves D.C. Evolution of the Drosophila nuclear pore complex results in multiple hybrid incompatibilities. Science 2009, 323:779-782.
86. Bayes J.J., Malik H.S. Altered heterochromatin binding by a hybrid sterility protein in Drosophila sibling species. Science 2009, 326:1538-1541.
87. Brideau N.J., et al. Two Dobzhansky-Muller genes interact to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. Science 2006, 314:1292-1295.
88. Hui L., et al. The mouse t complex gene Tsga2, encoding polypeptides located in the sperm tail and anterior acrosome, maps to a locus associated with sperm motility and sperm-egg interaction abnormalities. Biol. Reprod. 2006, 74:633-643.
89. Dilkes B.P., et al. The maternally expressed WRKY transcription factor TTG2 controls lethality in interploidy crosses of Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:2707-2720.
90. Walia H., et al. Dosage-dependent deregulation of an AGAMOUS-LIKE gene cluster contributes to interspecific incompatibility. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1128-1132.
91. Shi W., et al. Widespread disruption of genomic imprinting in adult interspecies mouse (Mus) hybrids. Genesis 2005, 43:100-108.
92. Vrana P.B. Genomic imprinting as a mechanism of reproductive isolation in mammals. J. Mammal. 2007, 88:5-23.
93. Josefsson C., et al. Parent-dependent loss of gene silencing during interspecies hybridization. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:1322-1328.
94. Ungerer M.C., et al. Genome expansion in three hybrid sunflower species is associated with retrotransposon proliferation. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:R872-R873.
95. Shan X.H., et al. Mobilization of the active MITE transposons mPing and Pong in rice by introgression from wild rice (Zizania latifolia Griseb.). Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005, 22:976-990.
96. Metcalfe C.J., et al. Genomic instability within centromeres of interspecific marsupial hybrids. Genetics 2007, 177:2507-2517.
97. Brown J.D., et al. Retroelement demethylation associated with abnormal placentation in Mus musculus x Mus caroli hybrids. Biol. Reprod. 2012, 86:88.
98. Barr C.M., Fishman L. Cytoplasmic male sterility in Mimulus hybrids has pleiotropic effects on corolla and pistil traits. Heredity 2011, 106:886-893.
99. Sambatti J.B.M., et al. Ecological selection maintains cytonuclear incompatibilities in hybridizing sunflowers. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:1082-1091.
100. Ringo J., et al. Bacteria-induced sexual isolation in Drosophila. Fly 2011, 5:310-315.