Sympatric speciation: Models and empirical evidence

Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics

Volumn 38, Issue , 2007, Pages 459-487

  Bolnick, Daniel I ^a   Fitzpatrick, Benjamin M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Disruptive selection; Reinforcement reproductive isolation

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHY; EVOLUTION; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; MATING BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY;

EID: 37749020514     PISSN: 1543592X     EISSN: 15452069     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095804     Document Type: Review

References (152)

1. Ackermann M, Doebeli M. 2004. Evolution of niche width and adaptive diversification. Evolution 58:2599-612
2. Aeschlimann PB, Haberli MA, Reusch TBH, Boehm T, Milinski M. 2003. Female sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus use self-reference to optimize MHC allele number during mate selection. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54:19-26
3. Agapow PM, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Crandall KA, Gittleman JL, Mace GM, et al. 2004. The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. Q. Rev. Biol. 79:161-79
4. Alatalo RV, Carlson A, Lundberg A. 1988. The search cost in mate choice of the pied flycatcher. Anim. Behav. 36:289-91
5. Arnegard ME, Kondrashov AS. 2004. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection alone is unlikely. Evolution 58:222-37
6. Avise JC, Walker D, Johns GC. 1998. Speciation durations and Pleistocene effects on vertebrate phylogeography. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 265:1707-12
7. Baack EJ. 2004. Cytotype segregation on regional and microgeographic scales in snow buttercups (Ranunculus adoneus: Ranunculaceae). Am. J. Bot. 91:1783-88
8. Balkau B, Feldman MW. 1973. Selection for migration modification. Genetics 74:171-74
9. Barluenga M, Stoelting KN, Salzburger W, Muschick M, Meyer A. 2006a. Evolutionary biology - Evidence for sympatric speciation? Reply. Nature 444:E13
10. Barluenga M, Stoelting KN, Salzburger W, Muschick M, Meyer A. 2006b. Sympatric speciation in Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fish. Nature 439:719-23
11. Barraclough TG, Vogler AP. 2000. Detecting the geographical pattern of speciation from species-level phylogenies. Am. Nat. 155:419-34
12. Barron AB. 2001. The life and death of Hopkins' host-selection principle. J. Insect Behav. 14:725-37
13. Barton NH, Polechova J. 2005. The limitations of adaptive dynamics as a model of evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1186-90
14. Benkman CW. 1996. Are the ratios of bill crossing morphs in crossbills the result of frequency-dependent selection? Evol. Biol. 10:119-26
15. Berlocher SH. 1998. Can sympatric speciation be proven from biogeographic and phylogenetic evidence? In Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, ed. DJ Howard, SH Berlocher, pp. 99-113. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
16. Berlocher SH. 1999. Host race or species? Allozyme characterization of the 'flowering dogwood fly', a member of the Rhagoletis pomonella complex. Heredity 83:652-62
17. Berlocher SH, Feder JL. 2002. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47:773-815
18. Berrebi P, Valiushok D. 1998. Genetic divergence among morphotypes of Lake Tana (Ethiopia) barbs. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 64:369-84
19. Boake CRB. 1991. Coevolution of senders and receivers of sexual signals-genetic coupling and genetic correlations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6:225-27
20. Bolnick DI. 2001. Intraspecific competition favours niche width expansion in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 410:463-66
21. Bolnick DI. 2004a. Waiting for sympatric speciation. Evolution 87:895-99
22. Bolnick DI. 2004b. Can intraspecific competition drive disruptive selection? An experimental test in natural populations of sticklebacks. Evolution 87:608-18
23. Bolnick DI, Doebeli M. 2003. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution 57:2433-49
24. Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Fordyce JA, Yang LH, Davis JM, et al. 2003. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am. Nat. 161:1-28
25. Bürger R. 2005. A multilocus analysis of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection on a quantitative trait. J. Math. Biol. 50:355-96
26. Bürger R, Schneider KA, Willensdorfer M. 2006. The conditions for speciation through intraspecific competition. Evolution 60:2185-206
27. Butlin R. 1993. The variability of mating signals and preferences in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera, Delphacidae). J. Insect Behav. 6:125-40
28. Byers JA, Byers AA, Dunn SJ. 2006. A dry summer diminishes mate search effort by pronghorn females: Evidence for a significant cost of mate search. Ethology 112:74-80
29. Chesser RT, Zink RM. 1994. Modes of speciation in birds: a test of Lynch's method. Evolution 48:490-97
30. Claridge MF, Dawah HA, Wilson MR. 1997. Species: the Units of Biodiversity. London: Chapman & Hall. 460 pp.
31. Coyne JA, Orr HA. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. 545 pp.
32. Coyne TA, Price T. 2000. Little evidence for sympatric speciation in island birds. Evolution 54:2166-71
33. Demeeus T, Michalakis Y, Renaud F, Olivieri I. 1993. Polymorphism in heterogeneous environments, evolution of habitat selection and sympatric speciation-hard and soft selection models. Evol. Ecol. 7:175-98
34. de Vries H. 1901-1903. De Mutationstheorie, Vols. I, II. Leipzig: Verlag von Veit
35. Dieckmann U, Doebeli M. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354-57
36. Dieckmann U, Doebeli M, Metz JAJ, Tautz D, eds. 2004. Adaptive Speciation. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press. 476 pp.
37. Dimmick WW, Edds DR. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of the endemic Schizoathicine (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) fishes of Lake Rara, Nepal. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 30:919-29
38. Doebeli M. 2005. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1587-600
39. Drés M, Mallet J. 2002. Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 357:471-92
40. Feder JL, Berlocher SH, Roethele JB, Dambroski H, Smith JJ, et al. 2003. Allopatric genetic origins for sympatric host-plant shifts and race formation in Rhagoletis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:10314-19
41. Feder JL, Filchak KE. 1999. It's about time: the evidence for host plant-mediated selection in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella, and its implications for fitness trade-offs in phytophagous insects. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 91:211-25
42. Felsenstein J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35:124-38
43. Fitzpatrick BM, Turelli M. 2006. The geography of mammalian speciation: Mixed signals from phylogenies and range maps. Evolution 60:601-15
44. Forsgren E. 1992. Predation risk affects mate choice in a Gobiid fish. Am. Nat. 140:1041-49
45. Fry JD. 2003. Multilocus models of sympatric speciation: Bush vs Rice vs Felsenstein. Evolution 57:1735-46
46. Futuyma DJ, Mayer GC. 1980. Non-allopatric speciation in animals. Syst. Zool. 29:254-71
47. Gavrilets S. 2003. Models of speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 57:2197-215
48. Gavrilets S. 2004. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. 476 pp.
49. Gavrilets S. 2005. "Adaptive speciation" - it is not that easy: a reply to Doebeli et al. Evolution 59:696-99
50. Gavrilets S. 2006. The Maynard Smith model of sympatric speciation. J. Theor. Biol. 239:172-82
51. Gavrilets S, Waxman D. 2002. Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:10533-38
52. Gibson RM, Bachman GC. 1992. The costs of female choice in a lekking bird. Behav. Ecol. 3:300-9
53. Gislason D, Ferguson MM, Skulason S, Snorrason SS. 1999. Rapid and coupled phenotypic and genetic divergence in Icelandic arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56:2229-34
54. Godin JGJ, Briggs SE. 1996. Female mate choice under predation risk in the guppy. Anim. Behav. 51:117-30
55. Gompert Z, Fordyce JA, Forister ML, Shapiro AM, Nice CC. 2006. Homoploid hybrid speciation in an extreme environment. Science 314:1923-25
56. Gottlieb LD. 1979. The origin of phenotype in a recently evolved species. In Topics in Plant Population Biology, ed. OT Solbrig, S Jain, GD Johnson, PH Raven, pp. 264-86. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
57. Grant PR, Grant BR. 1997. Hybridization, sexual imprinting, and mate choice. Am. Nat. 149:1-28
58. Hager BJ, Teale SA. 1996. The genetic control of pheromone production and response in the pine engraver beetle Ips pini. Heredity 77:100-7
59. Hedrick AV, Dill LM. 1993. Mate choice by female crickes is influenced by predation risk. Anim. Behav. 46:193-96
60. Higashi M, Takimoto G, Yamamura N. 1999. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Nature 402:523-26
61. Hori M. 1993. Frequency-dependent natural selection in the handedness of scale-eating cichlid fish. Science 270:216-19
62. Irwin DE, Price T. 1999. Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. Heredity 82:347-54
63. Jennions MD, Petrie M. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: A review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 72:283-327
64. Johannesson K, Rolan-Alvarez E, Ekendahl A. 1995. Incipient reproductive isolation between two sympatric morphs of the intertidal snail Littorina saxatilis. Evolution 49:1180-90
65. Johansson J, Ripa J. 2006. Will sympatric speciation fail due to stochastic competitive exclusion? Am. Nat. 168:572-78
66. Jordal BH, Emerson BC, Hewitt GM. 2006. Apparent 'sympatric' speciation in ecologically similar herbivorous beetles facilitated by multiple colonizations of an island. Mol. Ecol. 15:2935-47
67. Jordan DS. 1905. The origin of species through isolation. Science 22:545-62
68. Katakura H, Shioi M, Kira Y. 1989. Reproductive isolation by host specificity in a pair of phytophagous ladybird beetles. Evolution 43:1045-53
69. Kingsolver JG, Hoekstra HE, Hoekstra JM, Berrigan D, Vignieri SN, et al. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157:245-61
70. Kirkpatrick M, Nuismer SL. 2004. Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 271:687-93
71. Kirkpatrick M, Ravigne V. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: Models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159:S22-35
72. Klemetsen A, Elliott JM, Knudsen R, Sorensen P. 2002. Evidence for genetic differences in the offspring of two sympatric morphs of Arctic charr. J. Fish Biol. 60:933-50
73. Kronforst MR, Young LG, Kapan DD, McNeely C, O'Neill RJ, Gilbert LE. 2006. Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:6575-80
74. Lande R, Seehausen O, van Arphen JJM. 2001. Mechanisms of rapid sympatric speciation by sex reversal and sexual selection in cichlid fish. Genetica 112:435-43
75. Landolt PJ, Phillips TW. 1997. Host plant influences on sex pheromone behavior of phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42:371-91
76. Levene H. 1953. Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Am. Nat. 87:331-33
77. Linn C, Feder JL, Nojima S, Dambroski HR, Berlocher SH, Roelofs W. 2003. Fruit odor discrimination and sympatric host race formation in Rhagoletis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:11490-93
78. Losos JB, Glor RE. 2003. Phylogenetic comparative methods and the geography of speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:220-27
79. Lynch JD. 1989. The gauge of speciation: on the frequencies of modes of speciation. In Speciation and its Consequences, ed. D Otte, JA Endler, pp. 527-53. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
80. Marcillac F, Grosjean Y, Ferveur JF. 2005. A single mutation alters production and discrimination of Drosophila sex pheromones. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. 5272:303-9
81. Matessi C, Gimelfarb A, Gavrilets S. 2001. Long-term buildup of reproductive isolation promoted by disruptive selection: how far does it go? Selection 2:41-64
82. Mavarez J, Salazar CA, Bermingham E, Salcedo C, Jiggins CD, Linares M. 2006. Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies. Nature 441:868-71
83. Maynard Smith J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100:637-50
84. Mayr E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. 382 pp.
85. Mayr E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap. 811 pp.
86. McKaye KR. 1986. Mate choice and size assortative pairing by the cichlid fishes of Lake Jiloa, Nicaragua. J. Fish Biol. 29:135-50
87. McLaughlin RL, Ferguson MM, Noakes DLG. 1999. Adaptive peaks and alternative foraging tactics in brook charr: evidence of short-term divergent selection for sitting-and-waiting and actively searching. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45:386-95
88. Milinski M, Bakker TCM. 1992. Costs influence sequential mate choice in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 250:229-33
89. Munday PL, van Herwerden L, Dudgeon CL. 2004. Evidence for sympatric speciation by host shift in the sea. Curr. Biol. 14:1498-504
90. Near TJ, Bolnick DI, Wainwright PC. 2005. Fossil calibrations and molecular divergence time estimates in centrarchid fishes (Teleostei: Centrarchidae). Evolution 59:1768-82
91. Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP, Kirkpatrick M. 2006. Migration and the genetic covariance between habitat preference and performance. Am. Nat. 167:E66-78
92. Ortiz-Barrientos D, Noor MAF. 2005. Evidence for a one-allele assortative mating locus. Science 310:1467
93. Otto SP, Whitton J. 2000. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34:401-37
94. Palokangas P, Alatalo RV, Korpimaki E. 1992. Female choice in the kestrel under different availability of mating options. Anim. Behav. 43:659-65
95. Palstra AP, de Graaf M, Sibbing FA. 2004. Riverine spawning and reproductive segregation in a lacustrine cyprinid species flock, facilitated by homing? Anim. Biol. 54:393-415
96. Palumbi SR. 1999. All males are not created equal: Fertility differences depend on gamete recognition polymorphisms in sea urchins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:12632-37
97. Pfennig DW, Rice AM, Martin RA. 2007. Field and experimental evidence for competition's role in phenotypic divergence. Evolution 61:257-71
98. Podos J. 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature 409:185-88
99. Polechova J, Barton NH. 2005. Speciation through competition: a critical review. Evolution 59:1194-210
100. Pratt GF. 1994. Evolution of Euphilotes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) by seasonal and host shifts. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 51:387-416
101. Prowell DP, McMichael M, Silvain JF. 2004. Multilocus genetic analysis of host use, introgression, and speciation in host strains of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97:1034-44
102. Rainey PB, Travisano M. 1998. Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature 394:69-72
103. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29:467-501
104. Reid ML, Stamps JA. 1997. Female mate choice tactics in a resource-based mating system: Field tests of alternative models. Am. Nat. 150:98-121
105. Reynolds RG, Fitzpatrick BM. 2007. Assortative mating in poison-dart frogs based on an ecologically important trait. Evolution. 61(9):2253-59
106. Rice WR, Hostert EE. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: What have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47:1637-53
107. Rice WR, Salt GW. 1990. The evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character under sympatric conditions: experimental evidence. Evolution 44:1140-52
108. Rieseberg LH, Van Fossen C, Desrochers AM. 1995. Hybrid speciation accompanied by genomic reorganization in wild sunflowers. Nature 375:313-16
109. Robinson BW, Wilson DS. 1996. Trade-offs of ecological specialization: An intraspecific comparison of pumpkinseed sunfish phenotypes. Ecology 77:170-78
110. Roughgarden J. 1972. Evolution of niche width. Am. Nat. 106:683-718
111. Savolainen V, Anstett M-C, Lexer C, Hutton I, Clarkson JJ, et al. 2006. Sympatric speciation in palms on an oceanic island. Nature 441:210-13
112. Schliewen U, Rassmann K, Markmann M, Markert J, Kocher T, Tautz D. 2001. Genetic and ecological divergence of a monophyletic cichlid species pair under fully sympatric conditions in Lake Ejagham, Cameroon. Mol. Ecol. 10:1471-88
113. Schliewen UK, Klee B. 2004. Reticulate sympatric speciation in Cameroonian crater lake cichlids. Front. Zool. 1:1-12
114. Schliewen UK, Kocher TD, McKaye KR, Seehausen O, Tautz D. 2006. Evolutionary biology - Evidence for sympatric speciation? Nature 444:E12-13
115. Schliewen UK, Tautz D, Paabo S. 1994. Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of crater lake cichlids. Nature 368:629-32
116. Schluter D. 1994. Experimental evidence that competition promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Science 266:798-801
117. Schneider KA, Bürger R. 2006. Does competitive divergence occur if assortative mating is costly? J. Evol. Biol. 19:570-88
118. Schwarz D, Matta BM, Shakir-Botteri NL, McPheron BA. 2005. Host shift to an invasive plant triggers rapid animal hybrid speciation. Nature 436:546-49
119. Seehausen O. 1997. Distribution of and reproductive isolation among color morphs of a rock-dwelling Lake Victoria cichlid (Haplochromis nyererei). Ecol. Freshw. Fish 6:59-66
120. Seger J. 1985. Intraspecific resource competition as a cause of sympatric speciation. In Evolution: Essays in Honor of John Maynard Smith, ed. PJ Greenwood, PH Harvey, M Slatkin, pp. 43-53. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
121. Servedio MR, Noor MAF. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: Theory and data. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:339-64
122. Sezer M, Budin RK. 1998. The genetic basis of host plant adaptation in the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens). Heredity 80:499-508
123. Skulason S, Snorrason SS, Noakes DLG, Ferguson MM, Malmquist HJ. 1989. Segregation in spawning and early life-history among polymorphic arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus in Thingvallavatn, Iceland. J. Fish Biol. 35:225-32
124. Slagsvold T, Dale S. 1991. Mate choice models - can cost of searching and cost of courtship explain mating patterns of female pied flycatchers. Ornis Scan. 22:319-26
125. Slagsvold T, Dale S. 1994. Why do female pied flycatchers mate with already mated males - deception or restricted mate sampling? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34:239-50
126. Slatkin M. 1979. Frequency- and density-dependent selection on a quantitative character. Genetics 93:755-71
127. Smith DC. 1988. Heritable divergence of Rhagoletis pomonella host races by seasonal asynchrony. Nature 336:66-67
128. Smith TB. 1990. Resource use by bill morphs of an African finch: evidence for intraspecific competition. Ecology 71:1246-57
129. Smith TB. 1993. Disruptive selection and the genetic basis of bill size polymorphism in the African finch Pyrenestes. Nature 363:618-20
130. Smith TB, Skulason S. 1996. Evolutionary significance of resource polymorphisms in fishes, amphibians, and birds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:111-33
131. Sorenson MD, Sefc KM, Payne RB. 2003. Speciation by host switch in brood parasitic indigobirds. Nature 424:928-31
132. Stennett MD, Etges WJ. 1997. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. III. Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation is determined by use of different host plants in Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:2803-24
133. Stuessy TF, Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Keil DJ. 2004. Diploid and polyploid cytotype distribution in Melampodium cinereum and M-leucanthum (Asteraceae, Heliantheae). Am. J. Bot. 91:889-98
134. Swanson BO, Gibb AC, Marks JC, Hendrickson DA. 2003. Trophic polymorphism and behavioral differences decrease intraspecific competition in a cichlid, Herichthys minckleyi. Ecology 84:1441-46
135. Taylor EB, Bentzen P. 1993. Evidence for multiple origins and sympatric divergence of trophic ecotypes of smelt (Osmerus) in northeastern North America. Evolution 47:813-32
136. Taylor EB, McPhail JD. 2000. Historical contingency and ecological determinism interact to prime speciation in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 267:2375-84
137. ThodayJM, Gibson JB. 1962. Isolation by disruptive selection. Nature 193:1164-66
138. Turner GF, Burrows MT. 1995. A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 260:287-92
139. Udovic D. 1980. Frequency-dependent selection, disruptive selection, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Am. Nat. 116:621-41
140. van Doom GS, Dieckmann U, Weissing FJ. 2004. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection: a critical reevaluation. Am. Nat. 163:709-25
141. vanEmden HF, Sponagl B, Baker T, Ganguly S, Douloumpaka S. 1996. Hopkins 'host selection principle', another nail in its coffin. Physiol. Entomol. 21:325-28
142. Verzijden MN, Lachlan RF, Servedio MR. 2005. Female mate-choice behavior and sympatric speciation. Evolution 59:2097-108
143. Ward AJW, Hart PJB, Krause J. 2004. The effects of habitat- and diet-based cues on association preferences in three-spined sticklebacks. Behav. Ecol. 15:925-29
144. Waxman D, Gavrilets S. 2005a. 20 questions on adaptive dynamics: a target review. J Evol. Biol. 18:1139-54
145. Waxman D, Gavrilets S. 2005b. Issues of terminology, gradient dynamics and the ease of sympatric speciation in Adaptive Dynamics. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1214-19
146. Weiblen GD, Bush GL. 2002. Speciation in fig pollinators and parasites. Mol. Ecol. 11:1573-78
147. Werner TK, Sherry TW. 1987. Behavioral feeding specialization in Pinaroloxias inornata, the "Darwin's Finch" of Cocos Island, Costa Rica. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:5506-10
148. Wikelski M, Carbone C, Bednekoff PA, Choudhury S, Tebbich S. 2001. Why is female choice not unanimous? Insights from costly mate sampling in marine iguanas. Ethology 107:623-38
149. Wilson AJ, Gislason D, Skulason S, Snorrason SS, Adams CE, et al. 2004. Population genetic structure of Arctic Charr, Salvelinus alpinus from northwest Europe on large and small spatial scales. Mol. Ecol. 13:1129-42
150. Wilson DS, Turelli M. 1986. Stable underdominance and the evolutionary invasion of empty niches. Am. Nat. 127:835-50
151. Wood CC, Foote CJ. 1996. Evidence for sympatric genetic divergence of anadromous and nonanadromous morphs of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Evolution 50:1265-79
152. Wood TK, Keese M. 1990. Host-plant-induced assortative mating in Echenopa tree-hoppers. Evolution 44:619-28