Students' perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry

Assessing Writing

Volumn 19, Issue , 2014, Pages 80-96

  Wang, Weiqiang ^a  

^a GUANGDONG UNIVERSITY OF FOREIGN STUDIES   (China)

Author keywords

Draft revision; EFL writing; Peer feedback; Rubric; Students' perceptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891630861     PISSN: 10752935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Andrade H.G. Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership 2000, 57(5):13-18.
2. Andrade H., Du Y. Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2007, 32(2):159-181.
3. Badger R., White G. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal 2000, 54(2):153-160.
4. Berg E.C. The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 1999, 8(3):215-241.
5. Brown A. Self-assessment of writing in independent language learning programs: The value of annotated samples. Assessing Writing 2005, 10(3):174-191.
6. Bryant D., Carless D. Peer assessment in a test-dominated setting: Empowering, boring or facilitating examination preparation?. Educational Research for Policy and Practice 2010, 9(1):3-15.
7. Carless D. From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings 2011, Routledge, London.
8. Carson J.G., Nelson G.L. Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing 1996, 5(1):1-19.
9. Caulk N. Comparing teacher and student responses to written work. TESOL Quarterly 1994, 28(1):181-188.
10. Cho K., Schunn C.D., Charney D. Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication 2006, 23(3):260-294.
11. Cho K., MacArthur C. Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction 2010, 98(4):891-901.
12. Connor U., Asenavage K. Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision?. Journal of Second Language Writing 1994, 3(3):257-276.
13. Fei H. Students perceptions of peer response activity in English writing instruction. Teaching English in China 2006, 29(04):48-52.
14. Guerrero M.C.M.D., Villamil O.S. Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal 1994, 78(4):484-496.
15. Hamp-Lyons L. Scoring procedures for ESL contexts. Assessing second language writing in academic contexts 1991, 241-276. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ. L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.).
16. Hanrahan S.J., Isaacs G. Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students' views. Higher Education Research & Development 2001, 20(1):53-70.
17. He L., Shi L. Topical knowledge and ESL writing. Language Testing 2012, 29(3):443-464.
18. Hu G. Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research 2005, 9(3):321-342.
19. Jacobs G.M., Curtis A., Braine G., Huang S. Feedback on student writing: Taking the middle path. Journal of Second Language Writing 1998, 7(3):307-317.
20. Jacobs H., Zinkgraf S., Wormuth D., Hartfiel V., Hughey J. Testing ESL composition: A practical approach 1981, Newbury House, Rowley, MA.
21. Kondo-Brown K. A FACETS analysis of rater bias in measuring Japanese second language writing performance. Language Testing 2002, 19(1):3-31.
22. Liu J., Hansen J.G. Peer response in second language writing classrooms 2002, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
23. Liu J., Sadler R.W. The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2003, 85(3):550-551.
24. Mangelsdorf K. Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom. ELT Journal 1992, 46(3):274-284.
25. Mangelsdorf K., Schlumberger A. ESL student response stances in a peer-review task. Journal of Second Language Writing 1992, 1(3):235-254.
26. Matsuno S. Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms. Language Testing 2009, 26(1):75-100.
27. Mawlawi Diab N. Effects of peer- versus self-editing on students' revision of language errors in revised drafts. System 2010, 38(1):85-95.
28. Mawlawi Diab N. Assessing the relationship between different types of student feedback and the quality of revised writing. Assessing Writing 2011, 16(4):274-292.
29. McGroarty M.E., Zhu W. Triangulation in classroom research: A study of peer revision. Language Learning 1997, 47(1):1-43.
30. Mendonca C.O., Johnson K.E. Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly 1994, 28(4):745-769.
31. Merriam S.B. Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education 1998, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
32. Min H. Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System 2005, 33(2):293-308.
33. Min H. The effects of trained peer review on EFL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 2006, 15(2):118-141.
34. Nelson G.L., Carson J.G. ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing 1998, 7(2):113-131.
35. Paulus T.M. The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 1999, 8(3):265-289.
36. Pennington M.C., Brock M.N., Yue F. Explaining Hong Kong students' response to process writing: An exploration of causes and outcomes. Journal of Second Language Writing 1996, 5(3):227-252.
37. Rahimi M. Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students' feedback and writing. Language Teaching Research 2013, 17(1):67-89.
38. Rao Z. Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. ELT Journal 2007, 61(2):100-106.
39. Reddy Y.M., Andrade H. A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2010, 35(4):435-448.
40. Rollinson P. Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal 2005, 59(1):23-30.
41. Saito H., Fujita T. Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research 2004, 8(1):31-54.
42. Sengupta S. Peer evaluation: 'I am not the teacher'. ELT Journal 1998, 52(1):19-28.
43. Shih-hsien Y. Exploring the effectiveness of using peer evaluation and teacher feedback in college students' writing. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 2011, 20(1):144-150.
44. Stanley J. Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing 1992, 1(3):217-233.
45. Suzuki M. Japanese learners' self revisions and peer revisions of their written compositions in English. TESOL Quarterly 2008, 42(2):209-233.
46. Tedick D.J. ESL writing assessment: Subject-matter knowledge and its impact on performance. English for Specific Purposes 1990, 9(2):123-143.
47. Torrance H. Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 2007, 14(3):281-294.
48. Tsui A.B.M., Ng M. Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?. Journal of Second Language Writing 2000, 9(2):147-170.
49. Villamil O.S., de Guerrero M.C.M. Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing 1996, 5(1):51-75.
50. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes 1978, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
51. Weigle S.C. Assessing writing 2002, Cambridge University Press, New York.
52. Yang M., Badger R., Yu Z. A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing 2006, 8(3):265-289.
53. Zhang S. Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing 1995, 4(3):209-222.
54. Zhang S. Thoughts on some recent evidence concerning the affective advantage of peer feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 1999, 8(3):321-326.
55. Zhao H. Investigating learners' use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing 2010, 15(1):3-17.
56. Zhu W. Effects of training for peer response on students' comments and interaction. Written Communication 1995, 12(4):492-528.
57. Zhu W. Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing 2001, 10(4):251-276.