Explaining Hong Kong Students' Response to Process Writing: An Exploration of Causes and Outcomes

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 227-252

  Pennington, Martha C ^a   Brock, Mark N ^b   Yue, Francis ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345949101     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90003-X     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Balla, J., & Pennington, M.C. (1995). Bilingualism in microcosm: The evolution of occupation-related discourse communities in Hong Kong tertiary education. Perspectives, 7 (1), 57-86. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, Working Papers of the Department of English.
2. Barnes, D., & Shemilt, D. (1974). Transmission and interpretation. Education Review, 26, 213-228.
3. Brock, M.N. (1992). Made in Hong Kong: An imperialist rhetoric and the teaching of composition. In M.N. Brock & L. Walters (Eds.), Teaching composition around the Pacific Rim: Politics and pedagogy (pp. 28-34). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
4. Brock, M.N. (1994). Reflections on change: Implementing the process approach in Hong Kong. RELC Journal, 25 (2), 51-70.
5. Brock, M.N. (1995). Resistance and change: Hong Kong students and the process approach. Perspectives, 7 (2), 53-69. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, Working Papers of the Department of English. Paper also presented at the Annual TESOL Conference (March, 1995). Long Beach, CA.
6. Brock, M.N. (1995). Resistance and change: Hong Kong students and the process approach. Perspectives, 7 (2), 53-69. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, Working Papers of the Department of English. Paper also presented at the Annual TESOL Conference (March, 1995). Long Beach, CA.
7. Centra, J.A., & Potter, D.A. (1980). School and teacher effects: An interrelational model. Review of Educational Research. 50, 273-291.
8. Edge, J. (1996). Cross-cultural paradoxes in a profession of values. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 9-30.
9. Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Grimmett, P.P., & Crehan, E.P. (1992). The nature of collegiality in teacher development: The case of clinical supervision. In M. Fullan & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change (pp. 56-85). London: Palmer Press.
11. Havelock, R. (1982). The change agent's guide to innovation in education, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
12. Johnson, R.K. (1991). Teaching and learning in the English stream in secondary schools: Implications of ECR4. Institute of Language in Education Journal, 8, 10-24.
13. Morris, P. (1985). Teachers' perceptions of the barriers to the implementation of a pedagogic innovation: A South East Asian case study. International Review of Education, 31, 3-18.
14. Nicholls, A. (1983). Managing educational innovations. London: Allen & Unwin.
15. Pennington, M.C. (1992). Implementing process writing in Hong Kong secondary schools: Towards a context-sensitive model of educational innovation. Earmarked Research Grant Project No. CPHK 195/92H. Hong Kong University and Polytechnic Grants Council.
16. Pennington, M.C. (1995a). Eight case studies of classroom discourse in the Hong Kong secondary English class. Research Report No. 42. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, Department of English.
17. Pennington, M.C. (1995b). Modelling educational outcomes: Relating input to output in teacher change. Research Monograph No. 5. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, Department of English.
18. Pennington, M.C, (1995c). Pattern and variation in use of two languages in the Hong Kong secondary English class. RELC Journal, 26 (2), 80-105.
19. Pennington, M.C. (1995d, March 15). Sensitizing bilingual teachers to the use of two languages in the English class. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Teacher Education in Second Language Teaching, City University of Hong Kong.
20. Pennington, M.C. (1995e.). The teacher change the cycle. TESOL Quarterly, 29 (4), 705-731.
21. Pennington, M.C., & Balla, J. (in press). Our future English teachers: Language use among graduate and undergraduate TESL students in Hong Kong. In M.C. Pennington (ED.), Language in Hong Kong at century's end, Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.
22. Pennington, M.C., & Cheung, M. (1995). Factors shaping the introduction of process writing in Hong Kong secondary schools. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 8 (1), 1-20.
23. Pennington, M.C., Costa, V., So, S., Li, J.W.S., Hirose, K., & Niedzielski, K. (1995, March). A cross-country comparison of beliefs and practices of English composition teachers in the Asia-Pacific region. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Teacher Education in Second Language Teaching, City University of Hong Kong.
24. Pennington, M.C., & Yue, F. (1994). English and Chinese in Hong Kong: Pre-1997 language attitudes. World Englishes, 13, 1-21.
25. Pierson, H.D. (1987). Language attitudes and language proficiency. In R., Lord, & H.N.L. Cheng (Eds.), Language education in Hong Kong (pp. 51-82). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
26. Pierson, H.D. (in press). Societal accommodation to English and Putonghua in Cantonese-speaking Hong Kong. In M.C. Pennington (Ed.), Language in Hong Kong at century's end. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.
27. Pierson, H.D., Fu, G.S., & Lee, S.Y. (1980). An analysis of the relationship between language attitudes and English attainment of secondary school students in Hong Kong. Language Learning, 30, 289-316.
28. Richards, S. (1993). Motivation in second language learning: A Hong Kong persepctive. Research Report No. 32. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, Department of English.
29. Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.), New York: Free Press.
30. Shi, L., & Cumming, A. (1995). Teachers' conceptions of second language writing instruction: Five case studies. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 87-111.
31. Sikes, P.J. (1992). Imposed change and the experienced teacher. In M. Fullan & A. Hargreaves, Teacher development and educational change (pp. 36-55). London: Falmer Press.