Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 251-276

  Zhu, Wei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Mixed groups; Native and non native interaction; Peer response

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042788868     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00043-1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allaei, S., & Connor, U. (1990). Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration. The Writing Instructor, 10, 19-28.
2. Berg, C. E. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 215-237.
3. Berlin, J. (1987). Rhetoric and reality: Writing instruction in American colleges, 1900-1985. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
4. Bruffee, K. (1984). Collaborative learning and the "conversation of mankind." College English, 46, 635-652.
5. Bruffee, K. (1993). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Carson, J., & Nelson, G. (1994). Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 17-30.
7. Carson, J., & Nelson, G. (1996). Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 1-19.
8. Chaudron, C. (1983). Evaluating writing: Effects of feedback on revision. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 227 706.
9. Connor, U., & Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 257-276.
10. Coulthard, M. (1985). An introduction to discourse analysis. New York: Longman.
11. Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 81-141.
12. Davis, T. (Ed.). (1998). Open Doors 1997/98: Report on international educational exchange. New York: Institute of International Education.
13. Freedman, S. (1992). Outside-in and inside-out: Peer response groups in two ninth-grade classes. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 71-107.
14. Gere, A., & Abbott, R. (1985). Talking about writing: The language of writing groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 362-385.
15. Graner, M. (1987). Revision workshops: An alternative to peer editing groups. English Journal, 76, 40-45.
16. Hacker, T. (1996). The effects of teacher conferences on peer response discourse. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 23, 112-126.
17. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 255-276.
18. Herrington, A., & Cadman, D. (1991). Peer review and revising in an anthropology course: Lessons for learning. College Composition and Communication, 42, 184-199.
19. Johnson, D. (1992). Approaches to research in second language learning. New York: Longman.
20. Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing talk in peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content. Language Learning, 45, 605-655.
21. Mangelsdorf, K., & Schlumberger, A. (1992). ESL student response stances in a peer review task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 235-254.
22. Mendonca, C., & Johnson, K. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 745-769.
23. Nelson, G., & Carson, J. (1998). ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 113-131.
24. Nelson, G., & Murphy, J. (1992). An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 171-193.
25. Nelson, G., & Murphy, J. (1993). Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? TESOL Quarterly, 27, 135-141.
26. Nystrand, M., & Brandt, D. (1989). Response to writing as a context for learning to write. In C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice and response (pp. 209-230). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
27. Seliger, H., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Sommers, E., & Lawrence, S. (1992). Women's ways of talking in teacher-directed and student-directed peer response groups. Linguistics and Education, 4, 1-36.
29. Spear, K. (1988). Sharing writing. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
30. Stake, R. (1998). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 86-109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
31. Stanley, J. (1992). Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 217-233.
32. Villamil, O., & De Guerrero, M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51-75.
33. Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Wallace, M. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Wordshop Productions. (1991). Beginning writing groups. Tacoma, WA: Wordshop Productions.
37. Zhu, W. (1995). Effects of training for peer response on students' comments and interaction. Written Communication, 12, 492-528.