Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers

Language Teaching Research

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 321-342

  Hu, Guangwei ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21744443320     PISSN: 13621688     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/1362168805lr169oa     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Allwright, D. 2003: Exploratory Practice: rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research 7: 113-41.
2. Amores, M.J. 1997: A new perspective on peer-editing. Foreign Language Annals 30: 513-23.
3. Baumlin, J.S. and Baumlin, T.E. 1989: Paper grading and the rhetorical stance. In Lawson, B., Ryan, S.S. and Winterowd, W.R., editors, Encountering student texts: interpretive issues in reading student writing, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 171-82.
4. Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. 1987: The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Berg, E.C. 1999: The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 8: 215-41.
6. Campbell, C. 1998: Teaching second-language writing: interacting with text. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
7. Carson, J. and Nelson, G. 1996: Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing 5: 1-19.
8. Caulk, N. 1994: Comparing teacher and student responses to written work. TESOL Quarterly 28: 181-88.
9. Connor, U. and Asenavage, K. 1994: Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: how much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing 3: 257-76.
10. de Guerrero, M.C.M. and Villamil, O.S. 1994: Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal 78: 484-96.
11. DiGiovanni, E. and Nagaswami, G. 2001: Online peer review: an alternative to face-to-face? ELT Journal 55: 263-72.
12. Duchan, J.F. 2004: Frame work in language and literacy: how theory informs practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
13. Harmer, J. 2004: How to teach writing. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
14. Hedgcock, J. and Letkowitz, N. 1992: Collaborative oral/ aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing 1: 255-76.
15. Hu, G. 2002: Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: the case of communicative language teaching in China. Language, Culture and Curriculum 15: 93-105.
16. Jacobs, G.M., Curtis, A., Braine, G. and Huang, S.Y. 1998: Feedback on student writing: taking the middle path. Journal of Second Language Writing 7: 307-17.
17. Leki, I. 1990: Coaching from the margins: issues in written response. In Kroll, B., editor, Second language writing: research insights for the classroom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57-68.
18. Liu, J. and Sadler, R.W. 2003: The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 193-227.
19. Lockhart, C. and Ng, P. 1995: Analyzing talk in peer response groups: stances, functions, and content. Language Learning 45: 605-55.
20. Mangelsdorf, K. and Schlumberger, A. 1992: ESL student response stances in a peer-review task. Journal of Second Language Writing 1: 235-54.
21. McGroarty, M.E. and Zhu, W. 1997: Triangulation in classroom research: a study of peer revision. Language Learning 47: 1-43.
22. Mendonça, C.O. and Johnson, K.E. 1994: Peer review negotiations: revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly 28: 745-69.
23. Mittan, R. 1989: The peer review process: harnessing students' communicative power. In Johnson, D.H. and Roen, D.H., editors, Richness in writing: empowering ESL students, New York: Longman, 207-19.
24. Nelson, G.L. and Carson, J.G. 1998: ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing 7: 113-31.
25. Nelson, G.L. and Murphy, J.M. 1992: An L2 writing group: task and social dimensions. Journal of Second Language Writing 1: 171-93.
26. Nelson, G. L. 1993: Peer response groups: do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? TESOL Quarterly 27: 135-42.
27. Pauius, T.M. 1999: The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 8: 265-89.
28. Perpignan, H. 2003: Exploring the written feedback dialogue: a research, learning and teaching practice. Language Teaching Research 7: 259-78.
29. Reid, J. 1994: Responding to ESL students' texts: the myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly 28: 273-92.
30. Silva, T. and Brice, C. 2004: Research in teaching writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24: 70-106.
31. Stanley, J. 1992: Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing 1: 217-33.
32. Susser, B. 1994: Process approaches in ESL/EFL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing 3: 31-47.
33. Tsui, A.B.M. and Ng, M. 2000: Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing 9: 147-70.
34. Tuzi, F. 2004: The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition 21: 217-35.
35. Villamil, O.S. and de Guerrero, M.C.M. 1996: Peer revision in the L2 classroom: social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing 5: 51-75.
36. Villamil, O.S. 1998: Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing. Applied Linguistics 19: 491-514.
37. Zamel, V. 1983: The composing processes of advanced ESL students: six case studies. TESOL Quarterly 16: 165-87.
38. Zamel, V. 1987: Recent research on writing pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly 21: 697-715.
39. Zhang, S. 1999: Thoughts on some recent evidence concerning the affective advantage of peer feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 8: 321-26.
40. Zhu, W. 2001: Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 251-76.