Evidence for the Robustness of Protein Complexes to Inter-Species Hybridization

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2012, Pages

  Leducq, Jean Baptiste ^a   Charron, Guillaume ^a   Diss, Guillaume ^a   Gagnon Arsenault, Isabelle ^a   Dubé, Alexandre K ^a   Landry, Christian R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL PROTEIN; NUCLEOPORIN; NUP159 PROTEIN; NUP82 PROTEIN; RNA POLYMERASE II; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES KUDRIAVZEVII; SACCHAROMYCES PARADOXUS; SACCHAROMYCES UVARUM; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

CONSERVED SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; NUCLEAR PORE; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; RNA POLYMERASE II; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES KUDRIAVZEVII;

EID: 84872018955     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003161     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: J. Murray. ix, 1, 502 p.
2. Muller HJ, Pontecorvo G, (1940) Recombinants between Drosophila species the F-1 hybrids of which are sterile. Nature 146: 199-200.
3. Bateson, (1909) Discussion on the Influence of Heredity on Disease, with special Reference to Tuberculosis, Cancer, and Diseases of the Nervous System: Introductory Address. Proc R Soc Med 2: 22-30.
4. Dobzhansky T, (1940) Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. American Naturalist 74: 312-321.
5. Gourbiere S, Mallet J, (2010) Are species real? The shape of the species boundary with exponential failure, reinforcement, and the "missing snowball". Evolution 64: 1-24.
6. Orr HA, Turelli M, (2001) The evolution of postzygotic isolation: Accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 55: 1085-1094.
7. Araripe LO, Montenegro H, Lemos B, Hartl DL, (2010) Fine-scale genetic mapping of a hybrid sterility factor between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana: the varied and elusive functions of "speciation genes". BMC Evol Biol 10: 385.
8. Barbash DA, (2007) Nup96-dependent hybrid lethality occurs in a subset of species from the simulans clade of Drosophila. Genetics 176: 543-552.
9. Brideau NJ, Flores HA, Wang J, Maheshwari S, Wang X, et al. (2006) Two Dobzhansky-Muller genes interact to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. Science 314: 1292-1295.
10. Lee HY, Chou JY, Cheong L, Chang NH, Yang SY, et al. (2008) Incompatibility of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes causes hybrid sterility between two yeast species. Cell 135: 1065-1073.
11. Arabidopsis-Interactome-Mapping-Consortium (2011) Evidence for network evolution in an Arabidopsis interactome map. Science 333: 601-607.
12. Guruharsha KG, Rual JF, Zhai B, Mintseris J, Vaidya P, et al. (2011) A protein complex network of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 147: 690-703.
13. Tarassov K, Messier V, Landry CR, Radinovic S, Serna Molina MM, et al. (2008) An in vivo map of the yeast protein interactome. Science 320: 1465-1470.
14. Choudhary C, Kumar C, Gnad F, Nielsen ML, Rehman M, et al. (2009) Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science 325: 834-840.
15. Collins SR, Miller KM, Maas NL, Roguev A, Fillingham J, et al. (2007) Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446: 806-810.
16. Guo W, Sacher M, Barrowman J, Ferro-Novick S, Novick P, (2000) Protein complexes in transport vesicle targeting. Trends Cell Biol 10: 251-255.
17. Lemmon MA, Schlessinger J, (2010) Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 141: 1117-1134.
18. Lovell SC, Robertson DL, (2010) An integrated view of molecular coevolution in protein-protein interactions. Mol Biol Evol 27: 2567-2575.
19. Pazos F, Valencia A, (2008) Protein co-evolution, co-adaptation and interactions. Embo J 27: 2648-2655.
20. Ramani AK, Marcotte EM, (2003) Exploiting the co-evolution of interacting proteins to discover interaction specificity. J Mol Biol 327: 273-284.
21. Harrison JS, Burton RS, (2006) Tracing hybrid incompatibilities to single amino acid substitutions. Mol Biol Evol 23: 559-564.
22. Dujon B, (2006) Yeasts illustrate the molecular mechanisms of eukaryotic genome evolution. Trends Genet 22: 375-387.
23. Scannell DR, Zill OA, Rokas A, Payen C, Dunham MJ, et al. (2011) The Awesome Power of Yeast Evolutionary Genetics: New Genome Sequences and Strain Resources for the Saccharomyces sensu stricto Genus. Genes Genomes Genetics 1: 11-25.
24. Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Chatr-Aryamontri A, Boucher L, Oughtred R, et al. (2011) The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2011 update. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D698-704.
25. Gonzalez SS, Gallo L, Climent MA, Barrio E, Querol A, (2007) Enological characterization of natural hybrids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii. Int J Food Microbiol 116: 11-18.
26. Sniegowski PD, Dombrowski PG, Fingerman E, (2002) Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus coexist in a natural woodland site in North America and display different levels of reproductive isolation from European conspecifics. FEMS Yeast Res 1: 299-306.
27. Greig D, Borts RH, Louis EJ, Travisano M, (2002) Epistasis and hybrid sterility in Saccharomyces. P R Soc B 269: 1167-1171.
28. Xu M, He X, (2011) Genetic incompatibility dampens hybrid fertility more than hybrid viability: yeast as a case study. PLoS ONE 6: e18341 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018341.
29. Michnick SW, Ear PH, Landry C, Malleshaiah MK, Messier V, (2010) A toolkit of protein-fragment complementation assays for studying and dissecting large-scale and dynamic protein-protein interactions in living cells. Methods in Enzymology 470: 335-368.
30. Freschi L, Torres-Quiroz F, Dubé AK, Landry CR, (2012) qPCA: a scalable assay to measure the perturbation of protein-protein interactions in living cells. Molecular BioSystems DOI: 10.1039/C2MB25265A.
31. Neumann N, Lundin D, Poole AM, (2010) Comparative genomic evidence for a complete nuclear pore complex in the last eukaryotic common ancestor. PLoS ONE 5: e13241 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013241.
32. Bapteste E, Charlebois RL, MacLeod D, Brochier C, (2005) The two tempos of nuclear pore complex evolution: highly adapting proteins in an ancient frozen structure. Genome Biol 6: R85.
33. Woychik NA, (1998) Fractions to functions: RNA polymerase II thirty years later. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 63: 311-317.
34. Alber F, Dokudovskaya S, Veenhoff LM, Zhang W, Kipper J, et al. (2007) The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 450: 695-701.
35. Cramer P, Bushnell DA, Fu J, Gnatt AL, Maier-Davis B, et al. (2000) Architecture of RNA polymerase II and implications for the transcription mechanism. Science 288: 640-649.
36. Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Steinmetz LM, Scharfe C, Feldman MW, (2002) Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296: 750-752.
37. Winzeler EA, Shoemaker DD, Astromoff A, Liang H, Anderson K, et al. (1999) Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285: 901-906.
38. Kellis M, Birren BW, Lander ES, (2004) Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428: 617-624.
39. Ear PH, Michnick SW, (2009) A general life-death selection strategy for dissecting protein functions. Nat Methods 6: 813-816.
40. Hittinger CT, Goncalves P, Sampaio JP, Dover J, Johnston M, et al. (2010) Remarkably ancient balanced polymorphisms in a multi-locus gene network. Nature 464: 54-58.
41. Hoelz A, Debler EW, Blobel G, (2011) The structure of the nuclear pore complex. Annu Rev Biochem 80: 613-643.
42. Zamir L, Zaretsky M, Fridman Y, Ner-Gaon H, Rubin E, et al. (2012) Tight coevolution of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-partner interaction networks in fungi leads to interspecies network incompatibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: E406-414.
43. Fernandez-Martinez J, Phillips J, Sekedat MD, Diaz-Avalos R, Velazquez-Muriel J, et al. (2012) Structure-function mapping of a heptameric module in the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 196: 419-434.
44. Emtage JL, Bucci M, Watkins JL, Wente SR, (1997) Defining the essential functional regions of the nucleoporin Nup145p. J Cell Sci 110 (Pt 7) (): 911-925.
45. Teixeira MT, Fabre E, Dujon B, (1999) Self-catalyzed cleavage of the yeast nucleoporin Nup145p precursor. J Biol Chem 274: 32439-32444.
46. Ficarro SB, McCleland ML, Stukenberg PT, Burke DJ, Ross MM, et al. (2002) Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Biotechnol 20: 301-305.
47. Smolka MB, Albuquerque CP, Chen SH, Zhou H, (2007) Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 10364-10369.
48. Malmstrom L, Riffle M, Strauss CE, Chivian D, Davis TN, et al. (2007) Superfamily assignments for the yeast proteome through integration of structure prediction with the gene ontology. PLoS Biol 5: e76 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050076.
49. Rout MP, Aitchison JD, Suprapto A, Hjertaas K, Zhao Y, et al. (2000) The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J Cell Biol 148: 635-651.
50. Levy ED, (2010) A simple definition of structural regions in proteins and its use in analyzing interface evolution. J Mol Biol 403: 660-670.
51. Melcak I, Hoelz A, Blobel G, (2007) Structure of Nup58/45 suggests flexible nuclear pore diameter by intermolecular sliding. Science 315: 1729-1732.
52. Boehmer T, Jeudy S, Berke IC, Schwartz TU, (2008) Structural and functional studies of Nup107/Nup133 interaction and its implications for the architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Mol Cell 30: 721-731.
53. Yoshida K, Seo HS, Debler EW, Blobel G, Hoelz A, (2011) Structural and functional analysis of an essential nucleoporin heterotrimer on the cytoplasmic face of the nuclear pore complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 16571-16576.
54. Qian W, He X, Chan E, Xu H, Zhang J, (2011) Measuring the evolutionary rate of protein-protein interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 8725-8730.
55. Presgraves DC, Balagopalan L, Abmayr SM, Orr HA, (2003) Adaptive evolution drives divergence of a hybrid inviability gene between two species of Drosophila. Nature 423: 715-719.
56. Presgraves DC, Stephan W, (2007) Pervasive adaptive evolution among interactors of the Drosophila hybrid inviability gene, Nup96. Mol Biol Evol 24: 306-314.
57. Greig D, (2007) A screen for recessive speciation genes expressed in the gametes of F1 hybrid yeast. PLoS Genet 3: e21 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030021.
58. Kao KC, Schwartz K, Sherlock G, (2010) A genome-wide analysis reveals no nuclear dobzhansky-muller pairs of determinants of speciation between S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus, but suggests more complex incompatibilities. PLoS Genet 6: e1001038 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038.
59. Heck JA, Argueso JL, Gemici Z, Reeves RG, Bernard A, et al. (2006) Negative epistasis between natural variants of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MLH1 and PMS1 genes results in a defect in mismatch repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 3256-3261.
60. Liti G, Haricharan S, Cubillos FA, Tierney AL, Sharp S, et al. (2009) Segregating YKU80 and TLC1 alleles underlying natural variation in telomere properties in wild yeast. PLoS Genet 5: e1000659 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000659.
61. Arroyo-Lopez FN, Orlic S, Querol A, Barrio E, (2009) Effects of temperature, pH and sugar concentration on the growth parameters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. kudriavzevii and their interspecific hybrid. Int J Food Microbiol 131: 120-127.
62. Hittinger CT, Rokas A, Carroll SB, (2004) Parallel inactivation of multiple GAL pathway genes and ecological diversification in yeasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 14144-14149.
63. Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF, Jones DT, (2004) Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J Mol Biol 337: 635-645.