Systematic pathway analysis using high-resolution fitness profiling of combinatorial gene deletions

Nature Genetics

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 199-206

  Onge, Robert P St ^a   Mani, Ramamurthy ^b   Oh, Julia ^a   Proctor, Michael ^a   Fung, Eula ^a   Davis, Ronald W ^a   Nislow, Corey ^c   Roth, Frederick P ^b,d   Giaever, Guri ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology Department   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; MESYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; MPH1 HELICASE; PROTEIN; SGS1 HELICASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; DNA DAMAGE; GENE; GENE DELETION; GENE INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

DEAD-BOX RNA HELICASES; DNA REPAIR; GENE DELETION; GENES, FUNGAL; METHYL METHANESULFONATE; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; RECQ HELICASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 33846604202     PISSN: 10614036     EISSN: 15461718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ng1948     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Phillips, P.C. The language of gene interaction. Genetics 149, 1167-1171 (1998).
2. Phillips, P.C., Otto, S.P. & Whitlock, M.C. Beyond the Average: the Evolutionary Importance of Gene Interactions and Variability of Epistatic Effects in Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process 20-38 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2000).
3. Kondrashov, A.S. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature 336, 435-440 (1988).
4. Szafraniec, K., Wloch, D.M., Sliwa, P., Borts, R.H. & Korona, R. Small fitness effects and weak genetic interactions between deleterious mutations in heterozygous loci of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genet. Res. 82, 19-31 (2003).
5. Elena, S.F. & Lenski, R.E. Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria. Nature 390, 395-398 (1997).
6. Maisnier-Patin, S. et al. Genomic buffering mitigates the effects of deleterious mutations in bacteria. Nat. Genet. 37, 1376-1379 (2005).
7. Hartman, J.L., IV, Garvik, B. & Hartwell, L. Principles for the buffering of genetic variation. Science 291, 1001-1004 (2001).
8. Davierwala, A.P. et al. The synthetic genetic interaction spectrum of essential genes. Nat. Genet. 37, 1147-1152 (2005).
9. Kelley, R. & Ideker, T. Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 561-566 (2005).
10. Ooi, S.L. et al. Global synthetic-lethality analysis and yeast functional profiling. Trends Genet. 22, 56-63 (2006).
11. Ooi, S.L., Shoemaker, D.D. & Boeke, J.D. DNA helicase gene interaction network defined using synthetic lethality analyzed by microarray. Nat. Genet. 35, 277-286 (2003).
12. Pan, X. et al. A DNA Integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 124, 1069-1081 (2006).
13. Schuldiner, M. et al. Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell 123, 507-519 (2005).
14. Tong, A.H. et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294, 2364-2368 (2001).
15. Tong, A.H. et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303, 808-813 (2004).
16. Wong, S.L., Zhang, L.V. & Roth, F.P. Discovering functional relationships: biochemistry versus genetics. Trends Genet. 21, 424-427 (2005).
17. Wong, S.L. et al. Combining biological networks to predict genetic interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15682-15687 (2004).
18. Drees, B.L. et al. Derivation of genetic interaction networks from quantitative phenotype data. Genome Biol. 6, R38 (2005).
19. Segre, D., Deluna, A., Church, G.M. & Kishony, R. Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nat. Genet. 37, 77-83 (2005).
20. Collins, S.R., Schuldiner, M., Krogan, N.J. & Weissman, J.S. A strategy for extracting and analyzing large-scale quantitative epistatic interaction data. Genome Biol. 7, R63 (2006).
21. Lee, W. et al. Genome-wide requirements for resistance to functionally distinct DNA-damaging agents. PLoS Genet. 1, e24 (2005).
22. Giaever, G. et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418, 387-391 (2002).
23. Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25-29 (2000).
24. Ye, P., Peyser, B.D., Spencer, F.A. & Bader, J.S. Commensurate distances and similar motifs in genetic congruence and protein interaction networks in yeast. BMC Bioinformatics 6, 270 (2005).
25. Kaliraman, V., Mullen, J.R., Fricke, W.M., Bastin-Shanower, S.A. & Brill, S.J. Functional overlap between Sgs1-Top3 and the Mms4-Mus81 endonuclease. Genes Dev. 15, 2730-2740 (2001).
26. Shor, E., Weinstein, J. & Rothstein, R. A genetic screen for top3 suppressors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies SHU1, SHU2, PSY3 and CSM2: four genes involved in error-free DNA repair. Genetics 169, 1275-1289 (2005).
27. Friedl, A.A., Liefshitz, B., Steinlauf, R. & Kupiec, M. Deletion of the SRS2 gene suppresses elevated recombination and DNA damage sensitivity in rad5 and rad18 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 486, 137-146 (2001).
28. Ulrich, H.D. & Jentsch, S. Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in DNA repair. EMBO J. 19, 3388-3397 (2000).
29. Huang, M.E., Rio, A.G., Nicolas, A. & Kolodner, R.D. A genomewide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for genes that suppress the accumulation of mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 11529-11534 (2003).
30. Punnett, R.C. Mendelism (Macmillan, New York, 1913).
31. Jana, S. Simulation of quantitative characters from qualitatively acting genes. I. Nonallelic gene interactions involving two or three loci. Theor. Appl. Genet. 42, 119-124 (1972).
32. Ito, T. et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4569-4574 (2001).
33. Sung, P. Yeast Rad55 and Rad57 proteins form a heterodimer that functions with replication protein A to promote DNA strand exchange by Rad51 recombinase. Genes Dev. 11, 1111-1121 (1997).
34. Avery, L. & Wasserman, S. Ordering gene function: the interpretation of epistasis in regulatory hierarchies. Trends Genet. 8, 312-316 (1992).
35. Krogh, B.O. & Symington, L.S. Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38, 233-271 (2004).
36. Lisby, M., Barlow, J.H., Burgess, R.C. & Rothstein, R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118, 699-713 (2004).
37. Ellis, N.A. et al. The Bloom's syndrome gene product is homologous to RecQ helicases. Cell 83, 655-666 (1995).
38. Fabre, F., Chan, A., Heyer, W.D. & Gangloff, S. Alternate pathways involving Sgs1/Top3, Mus81/ Mms4, and Srs2 prevent formation of toxic recombination intermediates from single-stranded gaps created by DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16887-16892 (2002).
39. Liberi, G. et al. Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. Genes Dev. 19, 339-350 (2005).
40. Prakash, R. et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae MPH1 gene, required for homologous recombination-mediated mutation avoidance, encodes a 3′ to 5′ DNA helicase. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 7854-7860 (2005).
41. Schurer, K.A., Rudolph, C., Ulrich, H.D. & Kramer, W. Yeast MPH1 gene functions in an error-free DNA damage bypass pathway that requires genes from Homologous recombination, but not from postreplicative repair. Genetics 166, 1673-1686 (2004).
42. Meetei, A.R. et al. A human ortholog of archaeal DNA repair protein Hef is defective in Fanconi anemia complementation group M. Nat. Genet. 37, 958-963 (2005).
43. Bai, Y. & Symington, L.S.A. Rad52 homolog is required for RAD51-independent mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 10, 2025-2037 (1996).
44. Klein, H.L. Mutations in recombinational repair and in checkpoint control genes suppress the lethal combination of srs2Δ with other DNA repair genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 157, 557-565 (2001).
45. McEachern, M.J. & Haber, J.E. Break-induced replication and recombinational telomere elongation in yeast. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75, 111-135 (2006).
46. Winzeler, E.A. et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285, 901-906 (1999).
47. Guthrie, C. & Fink, G.R. (eds.) Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology (Academic Press, New York, 1991).
48. Rose, M.D., Winston, F. & Heiter, P. Methods in Yeast Genetics: a Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA, 1990).
49. Erdeniz, N., Mortensen, U.H. & Rothstein, R. Cloning-free PCR-based allele replacement methods. Genome Res. 7, 1174-1183 (1997).