The perception of workload and task complexity and its influence on students' approaches to learning: A study in higher education

European Journal of Psychology of Education

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 393-415

  Kyndt, Eva ^a   Dochy, Filip ^a   Struyven, Katrien ^a   Cascallar, Eduardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Approaches to learning; Higher Education; Perceived task complexity; Perceived workload

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857059396     PISSN: 02562928     EISSN: 18785174     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10212-010-0053-2     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective, reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centered learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243-260.
3. Biggs, J.B. (1987). Study Process Questionnaire Manual. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
4. Biggs, J. (2001). Enhancing learning: A matter of style or approach? In R. J. Sternberg & L. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 73-102). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ- 2F. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149.
6. Boyatzis, R. E., Stubbs, E. C., & Taylor, S. N. (2002). Learning cognitive and emotional intelligence competences through graduate management education. Academy of Management Journal on Learning and Education, 1(2), 150-162.
7. Braarud, P. (2001). Subjective task complexity and subjective workload: Criterion validity for complex team tasks. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5(3), 261-273.
8. Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 40-52.
9. Campbell, J., Smith, D., Boulton-Lewis, G., Brownlee, J., Burnett, P. C., Carrington, S., et al. (2001). Students' perception of teaching and learning: The influence of students' approaches to learning and teachers' approaching to teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 7(2), 173-187.
10. Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 111-133.
11. Diseth, A., Pallesen, S., Hovland, A., & Larsen, S. (2006). Course experiences, approaches to learning and academic achievement. Education and Training, 48(2-3), 156-169. (Pubitemid 43537085)
12. Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education, 22, 201-204.
13. Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
14. Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Walker, P. (2001). Conceptions, styles, and approaches within higher education: Analytical abstractions and everyday experience. In R. J. Sternberg & L.-F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive, learning and thinking styles (pp. 103-136). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Gijbels, D. (2007). The road to hell: Attempts to enhance students learning approaches. PbPr Conference EARLI, Maastricht, 15 November 2007.
16. Gijbels, D., Van de Watering, G., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2005). The relationship between students' approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(4), 327-341. (Pubitemid 43002790)
17. Gijbels, D., Segers, M., & Struyf, E. (2008). Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students' perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instructional Science, 36(5-6), 431-443.
18. Glouberman, S., & Zimmerman, B. (2002). Complicated and complex systems: What would successful reform of Medicare look like? Discussion Paper, Commission on the Future of health care in Canada. Retrieved on January 04, 2008 from http://www.healthandeverything.org/files/Glouberman-E.pdf
19. Haerem, T., & Rau, D. (2007). The influence of degree of expertise and objective task complexity on perceived task complexity and performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1320-1331.
20. Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229-244.
21. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
22. Hounsell, D. (1984). Learning and essay-writing. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (pp. 103-123). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
23. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternations. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1-55.
24. Hung, W. (2009). The 9-step problem design process for problem-based learning: Application of the 3C3R model. Educational Research Review, 4(2), 118-141.
25. Karangiannopoulou, E., & Christodoulides, P. (2005). The impact of Greek university students' perceptions of their learning environment on approaches to studying and academic outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 329-350. (Pubitemid 44340577)
26. Kember, D. (2004). Interpreting student workload and the factors which shape students' perceptions of their workload. Studies in Higher Education, 29(2), 165-184. (Pubitemid 38421880)
27. Kember, D., & Leung, D. (1998). Influences upon students' perceptions of workload. Educational Psychology, 18(3), 293-307.
28. Kember, D., Charlesworth, M., Dabies, H., MacKay, J., & Stott, V. (1997). Evaluating the effectiveness of educational innovations: Using the study process questionnaire to show that meaningful learning occurs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(2), 141-157. (Pubitemid 127164705)
29. Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., & McNaught, C. (2008). Aworkshop activity to demonstrate that approaches to learning are influenced by the teaching and learning environment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9, 43-56.
30. Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students' perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 27-52.
31. Lonka, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (1996). Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology. Higher Education, 31, 5-24.
32. Mangos, P. M., & Steele-Johnson, D. (2001). The role of subjective task complexity in goal orientation, selfefficacy, and performance relations. Human Performance, 14(2), 169-186.
33. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (pp. 39-58). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
34. Maynard, D. C., & Hakel, M. D. (1997). Effects of objective and subjective task complexity on performance. Human Performance, 10(4), 303-330.
35. Mennin, S. (2007). Small-group problem-based learning as a complex adaptive system. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 303-313.
36. Neilsen, A. C. (2000): Employer satisfaction with graduate skills: Research report. Evaluations and investigation programme. Canberra: DETYA, Higher Education Division. Retrieved on December 10, 2007 on http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/eippubs/eip99-7/eip99-7pdf.pdf.
37. Nijhuis, J., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2005). Influence of redesigning a learning environment on student perceptions and learning strategies. Learning Environments Research, 8, 67-93. (Pubitemid 40630812)
38. Nijhuis, J., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2008). The extent of variability in learning strategies and students' perceptions of the learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 121-134.
39. Perkins, D. N. (1991). What constructivism demands of the learner. Educational Technology, 31(9), 19-21.
40. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education.
41. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
42. Sadlo, G., & Richardson, J. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of the academic environment in students following problem-based and subject based curricula. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(3), 253-274. (Pubitemid 37398782)
43. Salthouse, T. A. (1992). Why do adult age differences increase with task complexity? Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 905-918.
44. Sand-Jecklin, K. (2007). The impact of active/cooperative instruction on beginning nursing student learning strategy preference. Nurse Education Today, 27, 474-480.
45. Schmeck, R. R. (1988). Strategies and styles of learning. An integration of varied perspectives. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 317-347). New York: Plenum Press.
46. Segers, M., Nijhuis, J., & Gijselaers, W. (2006). Redesigning a learning and assessment environment: The influence on students' perceptions of assessment demands and their learning strategies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 223-242. (Pubitemid 44767228)
47. Smith, S. N., & Miller, R. J. (2005). Learning approaches: Examination type, discipline of study, and gender. Educational Psychology, 25(1), 43-53. (Pubitemid 40097487)
48. Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). Task complexity, epistemological beliefs and metacognitive calibration: An exploratory study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 319-338.
49. Stes, A., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2008). Students' study approaches: a study into the validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the R-SPQ-2F. European learning styles information network, 13th annual conference. Gent, 23-25 juni 2008.
50. Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2006). On the dynamics of students' approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16, 279-294. (Pubitemid 44339425)
51. Szafran, R. F. (2001). The effect of academic load on success for new college students: Is lighter better? Research in Higher Education, 42(1), 27-50.
52. Tiwari, A., Chan, S., Wong, E., Wong, D., Chui, C., Wong, A., et al. (2006). The effect of problem-based learning on students' approaches to learning in the context of clinical nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 26, 430-438. (Pubitemid 44201675)
53. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251-266.
54. Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(5), 357-442. (Pubitemid 41167998)
55. Valk, A., & Marandi, T. (2005). How to support deep learning at a university? In: F.E.H. Tay, T.S Chuan, & S.Han-Ming (Eds.), Proceeding of the International Conference on Education 2005. National University of Singapore.
56. Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students approaches to learning: Comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 87-101. (Pubitemid 40106096)
57. Wilson, K. L., Lizzio, A., & Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and appreciation of the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 33-53.
58. Zeegers, P. (2004). Student learning in higher education: A path analysis of academic achievement in science. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(1), 35-56. (Pubitemid 38178404)