Push back to respond better: Regulatory inhibition of the DNA double-strand break response

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 661-672

  Panier, Stephanie ^a,b   Durocher, Daniel ^a,c  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN;

ACETYLATION; CELL CYCLE ARREST; CELL DEATH; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENE REARRANGEMENT; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN STABILITY; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UBIQUITINATION;

ACETYLATION; CHROMATIN; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA DAMAGE; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; PHOSPHORYLATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84886429265     PISSN: 14710072     EISSN: 14710080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrm3659     Document Type: Review

References (119)

1. Jacob, F. & Monod, J. Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 3, 318-356 (1961).
2. Lim, W. A., Lee, C. M. & Tang, C. Design principles of regulatory networks: searching for the molecular algorithms of the cell. Mol. Cell 49, 202-212 (2013).
3. Chowdhury, D. et al. γ-H2AX dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2A facilitates DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell 20, 801-809 (2005).
4. Gudjonsson, T. et al. TRIP12 and UBR5 suppress spreading of chromatin ubiquitylation at damaged chromosomes. Cell 150, 697-709 (2012).
5. Nakada, S., Chen, G. I., Gingras, A. C. & Durocher, D. PP4 is a γH2AX phosphatase required for recovery from the DNA damage checkpoint. EMBO Rep. 9, 1019-1026 (2008).
6. Shao, G. et al. The Rap80-BRCC36 de-ubiquitinating enzyme complex antagonizes RNF8- Ubc13-dependent ubiquitination events at DNA double strand breaks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3166-3171 (2009).
7. Acs, K. et al. The AAA-ATPase VCP/p97 promotes 53BP1 recruitment by removing L3MBTL1 from DNA double-strand breaks. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1345-1350 (2011).
8. Steger, M. et al. Prolyl isomerase PIN1 regulates DNA double-strand break repair by counteracting DNA end resection. Mol. Cell 50, 333-343 (2013).
9. Polo, S. E. & Jackson, S. P. Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications. Genes Dev. 25, 409-433 (2011).
10. Kaidi, A. & Jackson, S. P. KAT5 tyrosine phosphorylation couples chromatin sensing to ATM signalling. Nature 498, 70-74 (2013).
11. Stucki, M. et al. MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 123, 1213-1226 (2005).
12. Murga, M. et al. Global chromatin compaction limits the strength of the DNA damage response. J. Cell Biol. 178, 1101-1108 (2007).
13. Floyd, S. R. et al. The bromodomain protein Brd4 insulates chromatin from DNA damage signalling. Nature 498, 246-250 (2013).
14. Keogh, M. C. et al. A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates γH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Nature 439, 497-501 (2006).
15. Chowdhury, D. et al. A PP4-phosphatase complex dephosphorylates γ-H2AX generated during DNA replication. Mol. Cell 31, 33-46 (2008).
16. Cha, H. et al. Wip1 directly dephosphorylates γ-H2AX and attenuates the DNA damage response. Cancer Res. 70, 4112-4122 (2010).
17. Douglas, P. et al. Protein phosphatase 6 interacts with the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit and dephosphorylates γ-H2AX. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 1368-1381 (2010).
18. Macurek, L. et al. Wip1 phosphatase is associated with chromatin and dephosphorylates γH2AX to promote checkpoint inhibition. Oncogene 29, 2281-2291 (2010).
19. Moon, S. H. et al. Wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 dephosphorylates histone variant γ-H2AX and suppresses DNA double strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 12935-12947 (2010).
20. Xiao, A. et al. WSTF regulates the H2A.X DNA damage response via a novel tyrosine kinase activity. Nature 457, 57-64 (2008).
21. Cook, P. J. et al. Tyrosine dephosphorylation of H2AX modulates apoptosis and survival decisions. Nature 458, 591-596 (2009).
22. Singh, N. et al. Dual recognition of phosphoserine and phosphotyrosine in histone variant H2A.X by DNA damage response protein MCPH1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14381-14386 (2012).
23. Peng, G. et al. BRIT1/MCPH1 links chromatin remodelling to DNA damage response. Nature Cell Biol. 11, 865-872 (2009).
24. Wood, J. L., Singh, N., Mer, G. & Chen, J. MCPH1 functions in an H2AX-dependent but MDC1-independent pathway in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 35416-35423 (2007).
25. Krishnan, N. et al. Dephosphorylation of the C-terminal tyrosyl residue of the DNA damage-related histone H2A. X is mediated by the protein phosphatase eyes absent. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 16066-16070 (2009).
26. Galanty, Y., Belotserkovskaya, R., Coates, J. & Jackson, S. P. RNF4, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase, promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev. 26, 1179-1195 (2012).
27. Luo, K., Zhang, H., Wang, L., Yuan, J. & Lou, Z. Sumoylation of MDC1 is important for proper DNA damage response. EMBO J. 31, 3008-30019 (2012).
28. Shi, W. et al. Disassembly of MDC1 foci is controlled by ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 31608-31616 (2008).
29. Vyas, R. et al. RNF4 is required for DNA double-strand break repair in vivo. Cell Death Differ. 20, 490-502 (2013).
30. Yin, Y. et al. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF4 is required for the response of human cells to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 26, 1196-1208 (2012).
31. Perry, J. J. P., Tainer, J. A. & Boddy, M. N. A. SIM-ultaneous role for SUMO and ubiquitin. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 201-208 (2008).
32. Zhang, D., Zaugg, K., Mak, T. W. & Elledge, S. J. A role for the deubiquitinating enzyme USP28 in control of the DNA-damage response. Cell 126, 529-542 (2006).
33. Huen, M. S. Y. et al. RNF8 transduces the DNA-damage signal via histone ubiquitylation and checkpoint protein assembly. Cell 131, 901-914 (2007).
34. Kolas, N. K. et al. Orchestration of the DNA-damage response by the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase. Science 318, 1637-1640 (2007).
35. Mailand, N. et al. RNF8 ubiquitylates histones at DNA double-strand breaks and promotes assembly of repair proteins. Cell 131, 887-900 (2007).
36. Wang, B. & Elledge, S. J. Ubc13/Rnf8 ubiquitin ligases control foci formation of the Rap80/Abraxas/Brca1/ Brcc36 complex in response to DNA damage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 20759-20763 (2007).
37. Doil, C. et al. RNF168 binds and amplifies ubiquitin conjugates on damaged chromosomes to allow accumulation of repair proteins. Cell 136, 435-446 (2009).
38. Panier, S. et al. Tandem protein interaction modules organize the ubiquitin-dependent response to DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell 47, 383-395 (2012).
39. Stewart, G. S. et al. The RIDDLE syndrome protein mediates a ubiquitin-dependent signaling cascade at sites of DNA damage. Cell 136, 420-434 (2009).
40. Panier, S. & Durocher, D. Regulatory ubiquitylation in response to DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair 8, 436-443 (2009).
41. Jackson, S. P. & Durocher, D. Regulation of DNA damage responses by ubiquitin and SUMO. Mol. Cell 49, 795-807 (2013).
42. Huang, J. et al. RAD18 transmits DNA damage signalling to elicit homologous recombination repair. Nature Cell Biol. 11, 592-603 (2009).
43. Shanbhag, N. M., Rafalska-Metcalf, I. U., Balane- Bolivar, C., Janicki, S. M. & Greenberg, R. A. ATM-dependent chromatin changes silence transcription in cis to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 141, 970-981 (2010).
44. Bekker-Jensen, S. et al. HERC2 coordinates ubiquitin-dependent assembly of DNA repair factors on damaged chromosomes. Nature Cell Biol. 12, 80-86 (2009).
45. Danielsen, J. R. et al. DNA damage-inducible SUMOylation of HERC2 promotes RNF8 binding via a novel SUMO-binding zinc finger. J. Cell Biol. 197, 179-187 (2012).
46. Sy, S. M. et al. The ubiquitin specific protease USP34 promotes ubiquitin signaling at DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1093/nar/gkt622 (2013).
47. Nakada, S. et al. Non-canonical inhibition of DNA damage-dependent ubiquitination by OTUB1. Nature 466, 941-946 (2010).
48. Edelmann, M. J. et al. Structural basis and specificity of human otubain 1-mediated deubiquitination. Biochem. J. 418, 379-390 (2009).
49. Mattiroli, F. et al. RNF168 ubiquitinates K13-15 on H2A/H2AX to drive DNA damage signaling. Cell 150, 1182-1195 (2012).
50. Juang, Y.-C. et al. OTUB1 co-opts Lys48-linked ubiquitin recognition to suppress E2 enzyme function. Mol. Cell 45, 384-397 (2012).
51. Sato, Y. et al. Molecular basis of K63-linked polyubiquitination inhibition by the interaction between human deubiquitinating enzyme OTUB1 and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBC13. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 25860-25868 (2012).
52. Wiener, R., Zhang, X., Wang, T. & Wolberger, C. The mechanism of OTUB1-mediated inhibition of ubiquitination. Nature 483, 618-622 (2012).
53. Chen, J., Feng, W., Jiang, J., Deng, Y. & Huen, M. S. Y. Ring finger protein RNF169 antagonises the ubiquitin-dependent signaling cascade at sites of DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem.287, 27715-2722 (2012).
54. Poulsen, M., Lukas, C., Lukas, J., Bekker-Jensen, S. & Mailand, N. Human RNF169 is a negative regulator of the ubiquitin-dependent response to DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 197, 189-199 (2012).
55. Cooper, E. M. et al. K63-specific deubiquitination by two JAMM/MPN+ complexes: BRISC-associated Brcc36 and proteasomal Poh1. EMBO J. 28, 621-631 (2009).
56. Cooper, E. M., Boeke, J. D. & Cohen, R. E. Specificity of the BRISC deubiquitinating enzyme is not due to selective binding to Lys63-linked polyubiquitin. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 10344-10352 (2010).
57. Feng, L., Wang, J. & Chen, J. The Lys63-specific deubiquitinating enzyme BRCC36 is regulated by two scaffold proteins localizing in different subcellular compartments. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 30982-30988 (2010).
58. Chen, X. BRCC36 is essential for ionizing radiation-induced BRCA1 phosphorylation and nuclear foci formation. Cancer Res. 66, 5039-5046 (2006).
59. Sobhian, B. et al. RAP80 targets BRCA1 to specific ubiquitin structures at DNA damage sites. Science 316, 1198-1202 (2007).
60. Kim, H., Chen, J. & Yu, X. Ubiquitin-binding protein RAP80 mediates BRCA1-dependent DNA damage response. Science 316, 1202-1205 (2007).
61. Wang, B. et al. Abraxas and RAP80 form a BRCA1 protein complex required for the DNA damage response. Science 316, 1194-1198 (2007).
62. Coleman, K. A. & Greenberg, R. A. The BRCA1- RAP80 complex regulates DNA repair mechanism utilization by restricting end resection. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 13669-13680 (2011).
63. Gatti, M. et al. A novel ubiquitin mark at the N-terminal tail of histone H2As targeted by RNF168 ubiquitin ligase. Cell Cycle 11, 2538-2544 (2012).
64. Komander, D., Clague, M. J. & Urbé, S. Breaking the chains: structure and function of the deubiquitinases. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 550-563 (2009).
65. Blickwedehl, J. et al. Proteasomes and proteasome activator 200 kDa (PA200) accumulate on chromatin in response to ionizing radiation. Radi. Res. 167, 663-674 (2007).
66. Butler, L. R. et al. The proteasomal de-ubiquitinating enzyme POH1 promotes the double-strand DNA break response. EMBO J. 31, 3918-3934 (2012).
67. Mosbech, A., Lukas, C., Bekker-Jensen, S. & Mailand, N. The deubiquitylating enzyme USP44 counteracts the DNA double-strand break response mediated by the RNF8 and RNF168 ubiquitin ligases. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 16579-16587 (2013).
68. Joo, H.-Y. et al. Regulation of cell cycle progression and gene expression by H2A deubiquitination. Nature 449, 1068-1072 (2007).
69. Botuyan, M. V. et al. Structural basis for the methylation state-specific recognition of histone H4-K20 by 53BP1 and Crb2 in DNA repair. Cell 127, 1361-1373 (2006).
70. Fradet-Turcotte, A. et al. 53BP1 is a reader of the DNA-damage-induced H2A Lys 15 ubiquitin mark. Nature 499, 50-54 (2013).
71. Zgheib, O., Pataky, K., Brugger, J. & Halazonetis, T. D. An oligomerized 53BP1 Tudor domain suffices for recognition of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 1050-1058 (2009).
72. Mallette, F. A. et al. RNF8- and RNF168-dependent degradation of KDM4A/JMJD2A triggers 53BP1 recruitment to DNA damage sites. EMBO J. 31, 1865-1878 (2012).
73. Vaz, B., Halder, S. & Ramadan, K. Role of p97/VCP (Cdc48) in genome stability. Front. Genet. 4, 60 (2013).
74. Meerang, M. et al. The ubiquitin-selective segregase VCP/p97 orchestrates the response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature Cell Biol. 13, 1376-1382 (2011).
75. Hsiao, K. Y. & Mizzen, C. A. Histone H4 deacetylation facilitates 53BP1 DNA damage signaling and double-strand break repair. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 157-165 (2013).
76. Tang, J. et al. Acetylation limits 53BP1 association with damaged chromatin to promote homologous recombination. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 317-325 (2013).
77. Sfeir, A. & de Lange, T. Removal of shelterin reveals the telomere end-protection problem. Science 336, 593-597 (2012).
78. de Lange, T. How shelterin solves the telomere end-protection problem. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 75, 167-177 (2010).
79. d'Adda di Fagagna, F. et al. A DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescence. Nature 426, 194-198 (2003).
80. Denchi, E. L. & de Lange, T. Protection of telomeres through independent control of ATM and ATR by TRF2 and POT1. Nature 448, 1068-1071 (2007).
81. Takai, H., Smogorzewska, A. & de Lange, T. DNA damage foci at dysfunctional telomeres. Curr. Biol. 13, 1549-1556 (2003).
82. van Steensel, B., Smogorzewska, A. & de Lange, T. TRF2 protects human telomeres from end-to-end fusions. Cell 92, 401-413 (1998).
83. Okamoto, K. et al. A two-step mechanism for TRF2-mediated chromosome-end protection. Nature 494, 502-505 (2013).
84. Karlseder, J. et al. The telomeric protein TRF2 binds the ATM kinase and can inhibit the ATM-dependent DNA damage response. PLoS Biol. 2, E240 (2004).
85. Giunta, S., Belotserkovskaya, R. & Jackson, S. P. DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 190, 197-207 (2010).
86. van Vugt, M. A. et al. A mitotic phosphorylation feedback network connects Cdk1, Plk1, 53BP1, and Chk2 to inactivate the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000287 (2010).
87. Zhang, W., Peng, G., Lin, S. Y. & Zhang, P. DNA damage response is suppressed by the high cyclin-dependent kinase 1 activity in mitotic mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 35899-35905 (2011).
88. Lilley, C. E., Chaurushiya, M. S., Boutell, C., Everett, R. D. & Weitzman, M. D. The intrinsic antiviral defense to incoming HSV-1 genomes includes specific DNA repair proteins and is counteracted by the viral protein ICP0. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002084 (2011).
89. Lilley, C. E. et al. A viral E3 ligase targets RNF8 and RNF168 to control histone ubiquitination and DNA damage responses. EMBO J. 29, 943-955 (2010).
90. Chaurushiya, M. S. et al. Viral E3 ubiquitin ligase-mediated degradation of a cellular E3: viral mimicry of a cellular phosphorylation mark targets the RNF8 FHA domain. Mol. Cell 46, 79-90 (2012).
91. Boutell, C. et al. A viral ubiquitin ligase has substrate preferential SUMO targeted ubiquitin ligase activity that counteracts intrinsic antiviral defence. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002245 (2011).
92. Weitzman, M. D., Lilley, C. E. & Chaurushiya, M. S. Changing the ubiquitin landscape during viral manipulation of the DNA damage response. FEBS Lett. 585, 2897-2906 (2011).
93. Symington, L. S. & Gautier, J. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 247-271 (2011).
94. Chapman, J. R., Taylor, M. R. G. & Boulton, S. J. Playing the end game: DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Mol. Cell 47, 497-510 (2012).
95. Lieber, M. R. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 181-211 (2010).
96. Zimmermann, M., Lottersberger, F., Buonomo, S. B., Sfeir, A. & de Lange, T. 53BP1 regulates DSB repair using Rif1 to control 5′ end resection. Science 339, 700-704 (2013).
97. Feng, L., Fong, K.-W., Wang, J., Wang, W. & Chen, J. RIF1 counteracts BRCA1-mediated end resection during DNA repair. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 11135-11143 (2013).
98. Escribano-Diaz, C. et al. A cell cycle-dependent regulatory circuit composed of 53BP1-RIF1 and BRCA1-CtIP controls DNA repair pathway choice. Mol. Cell 49, 872-883 (2013).
99. Di Virgilio, M. et al. Rif1 prevents resection of DNA breaks and promotes immunoglobulin class switching. Science 339, 711-715 (2013).
100. Chapman, J. R. et al. RIF1 is essential for 53BP1-dependent nonhomologous end joining and suppression of DNA double-strand break resection. Mol. Cell 49, 858-871 (2013).
101. Callen, E. et al. 53BP1 mediates productive and mutagenic DNA repair through distinct phosphoprotein interactions. Cell 153, 1266-1280 (2013).
102. Langerak, P., Mejia-Ramirez, E., Limbo, O. & Russell, P. Release of Ku and MRN from DNA ends by Mre11 nuclease activity and Ctp1 is required for homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002271 (2011).
103. Kaidi, A., Weinert, B. T., Choudhary, C. & Jackson, S. P. Human SIRT6 promotes DNA end resection through CtIP deacetylation. Science 329, 1348-1353 (2010).
104. Dou, H., Huang, C., Singh, M., Carpenter, P. B. & Yeh, E. T. Regulation of DNA repair through deSUMOylation and SUMOylation of replication protein A complex. Mol. Cell 39, 333-345 (2010).
105. Antony, E. et al. Srs2 disassembles Rad51 filaments by a protein-protein interaction triggering ATP turnover and dissociation of Rad51 from DNA. Mol. Cell 35, 105-115 (2009).
106. Krejci, L. et al. DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 423, 305-309 (2003).
107. Veaute, X. et al. The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nature 423, 309-312 (2003).
108. Moldovan, G.-L. et al. Inhibition of homologous recombination by the PCNA-interacting protein PARI. Mol. Cell 45, 75-86 (2012).
109. Roy, R., Chun, J. & Powell, S. N. BRCA1 and BRCA2: different roles in a common pathway of genome protection. Nature Rev. Cancer 12, 68-78 (2012).
110. Esashi, F. et al. CDK-dependent phosphorylation of BRCA2 as a regulatory mechanism for recombinational repair. Nature 434, 598-604 (2005).
111. Kasparek, T. R. & Humphrey, T. C. DNA double-strand break repair pathways, chromosomal rearrangements and cancer. Seminars Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 886-897 (2011).
112. Silverman, J., Takai, H., Buonomo, S. B. C., Eisenhaber, F. & de Lange, T. Human Rif1, ortholog of a yeast telomeric protein, is regulated by ATM and 53BP1 and functions in the S-phase checkpoint. Genes Dev. 18, 2108-2119 (2004).
113. Xu, D. et al. Rif1 provides a new DNA-binding interface for the Bloom syndrome complex to maintain normal replication. EMBO J. 29, 3140-3155 (2010).
114. Kim, J. M. et al. Inactivation of murine Usp1 results in genomic instability and a Fanconi anemia phenotype. Dev. Cell 16, 314-320 (2009).
115. Harreman, M. et al. Distinct ubiquitin ligases act sequentially for RNA polymerase II polyubiquitylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20705-20710 (2009).
116. Kruse, J.-P. & Gu, W. Modes of p53 regulation. Cell 137, 609-622 (2009).
117. Purvis, J. E. et al. p53 dynamics control cell fate. Science 336, 1440-1444 (2012).
118. Altmeyer, M. & Lukas, J. Guarding against collateral damage during chromatin transactions. Cell 153, 1431-1434 (2013).
119. Heyer, W.-D., Ehmsen, K. T. & Liu, J. Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 44, 113-139 (2010).