Developing a framework for responsible innovation

Research Policy

Volumn 42, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1568-1580

  Stilgoe, Jack ^a   Owen, Richard ^a   Macnaghten, Phil ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Emerging technologies; Ethics; Geoengineering; Governance; Responsible innovation

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING; INNOVATION;

EMERGING SCIENCE; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; ETHICS; GENERAL APPLICATIONS; GEOENGINEERING; GOVERNANCE; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84885660070     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (192)

1. B. Adam, and G. Groves Futures tended: care and future-oriented responsibility Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 31 2011 17 27
2. American Meteorological Society Geoengineering the Climate System: A Policy Statement of the American Meteorological Society. Washington, DC 2009 Downloaded from: http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/2009geoengineeringclimate- amsstatement.html (01.02.13)
3. W. Arthur Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events Economic Journal 99 1989 116 131
4. K. Bäckstrand Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness European Environment 16 2006 290 306
5. D. Barben, E. Fisher, C. Selin, and D. Guston Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: foresight, engagement, and integration E. Hackett, M. Lynch, J. Wajcman, The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies third ed. 2008 MIT Press Cambridge, MA 979 1000
6. U. Beck The Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity 1992 Sage London
7. U. Beck Risk society revisited: theory, politics and research programmes B. Adam, U. Beck, J. Van Loon, The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory 2000 Sage London 211 230
8. U. Beck, A. Giddens, and S. Lash Reflexive Modernisation: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order 1994 Polity Cambridge
9. J.D. Bernal The Social Function of Science 1939 Routledge London
10. R. Berne Nanotalk: Conversations with Scientists and Engineers about Ethics, Meaning, and Belief in the Development of Nanotechnology 2006 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ
11. M. Borup, N. Brown, K. Konrad, and H. Van Lente The sociology of expectations in science and technology Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 2006 285 298
12. P. Boyd Ranking geo-engineering schemes Nature Geoscience 1 2008 722 724
13. Bipartisan Policy Centre Task Force on Climate Remediation Research Geoengineering: A National Strategic Plan for Research on the Potential Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Consequences of Climate Remediation Technologies 2011 Bipartisan Policy Centre Washington, DC Downloaded from: http://www.bipartisanpolicy.org/library/report/task-force-climate-remediation- research (01.02.13)
14. W. Brown Inclusive governance practices in nonprofit organizations and implications for practice Nonprofit Management and Leadership 12 2002 369 385
15. N. Brown Hope against hype - accountability in biopasts, presents and futures Science Studies 16 2003 3 21
16. N. Brown, and M. Michael A sociology of expectations: retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 15 2003 3 18
17. N. Brown, B. Rappert, and A. Webster Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective TechnoScience 2000 Ashgate Aldershot, UK
18. L. Busch Standards. Recipes for Reality 2011 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
19. V. Bush Science, the Endless Frontier: A Report to the President 1945 U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC
20. J. Buur, and B. Matthews Participatory innovation International Journal of Innovation Management 12 2008 255 273
21. K. Caldeira, and D. Keith The need for climate engineering research Issues in Science and Technology 27 2010 57 62
22. M. Callon Society in the making: the study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis W. Bijker, T. Hughes, T. Pinch, The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology 1987 MIT Press London 83 103
23. M. Callon, P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy 2009 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
24. H. Chesbrough Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology 2003 Harvard Business School Press Boston, MA
25. J. Chilvers Deliberative and participatory approaches in environmental geography N. Castree, D. Demeritt, D. Liverman, B. Rhoads, The Companion to Environmental Geography 2009 Blackwell London 400 417
26. J. Chilvers Sustainable Participation? Mapping Out and Reflecting on the Field of Public Dialogue in Science and Technology 2010 Sciencewise-ERC Harwell
27. J. Chilvers Reflexive engagement? Actors, learning, and reflexivity in public dialogue on science and technology Science Communication 2012 10.1177/1075547012454598
28. D. Collingridge The Social Control of Technology 1980 Open University Press Milton Keynes, UK
29. B. Cooke, and U. Kothari Participation: The New Tyranny? 2001 Zed Books London and New York
30. R. Cooper Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products Business Horizons 33 1990 44 54
31. A. Corner, K. Parkhill, and N. Pidgeon 'Experiment Earth?' Reflections on a Public Dialogue on Geoengineering. Understanding Risk Working Paper 11-02 2011 School of Psychology, Cardiff University Cardiff
32. D. Cressey Cancelled project spurs debate over geoengineering patents Nature 485 2012 429
33. P. David Path dependence, its critics and the quest for 'historical economics' P. Garrouste, S. Ioannides, Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present 2001 Edward Elgar Publishing Cheltenham, UK
34. P. Davidson, H. Hunt, and C. Burgoyne Atmospheric delivery system. GB 2476518, patent application, published 29th June 2011 2011 Downloaded from: http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=GB&NR=2476518 (01.02.13)
35. R. Doubleday The laboratory revisited: academic science and the responsible governance of nanotechnology NanoEthics 1 2007 167 176
36. H. Douglas The moral responsibilities of scientists (tensions between autonomy and responsibility) American Philosophical Quarterly 40 2003 59 68
37. J. Dryzek Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance 2011 Oxford University Press Oxford
38. EEA (European Environment Agency) Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896-2000 2001 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxemburg
39. EEA (European Environment Agency) Late Lessons from Early Warnings: Science, Precaution, Innovation 2013 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxemburg
40. EPSRC/NERC/LWEC Climate Geoengineering Sandpit 15-19 March 2010 2010 Downloaded from: http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/Calls/2010/ CallForParticipantsGEOENG.pdf (01.02.13)
41. EPSRC/NERC/LWEC Geoengineering Scoping Workshop - Outputs 2009 Downloaded from: http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/Publications/reports/ ReportOfGeoengineeringScopingWorkshop.pdf (01.02.13)
42. European Commission Commission Recommendation of 7 February 2008, on a code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research, Brussels, 07/02/2008 C(2008) 424 final 2008 Downloaded from: http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/nanocode-rec-pe0894c-en.pdf (01.02.13)
43. U. Felt, and B. Wynne Taking European Knowledge Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate. Directorate-General for Research 2007 European Commission Brussels Downloaded from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document-library/ pdf-06/european-knowledge-society-en.pdf (01.02.13)
44. D. Fiorino Environmental risk and democratic process: a critical review Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 14 1989 501 547
45. E. Fisher Ethnographic invention: probing the capacity of laboratory decisions NanoEthics 1 2007 155 165
46. E. Fisher, and A. Rip Responsible innovation: Multi-level dynamics and soft intervention practices R. Owen, J. Bessant, M. Heintz, Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society 2013 Wiley London 165 183
47. E. Fisher, R. Mahajan, and C. Mitcham Midstream modulation of technology: governance from within Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 26 2006 485 496
48. K. Flanagan, E. Uyarra, and M. Laranja Reconceptualising the 'policy mix' for innovation Research Policy 40 2011 702 713
49. M. Fortun Mediated speculations in the genomics futures markets New Genetics and Society 20 2001 139 156
50. M. Fortun For an ethics of promising, or: a few kind words about James Watson New Genetics and Society 24 2005 157 174
51. B. Friedman Value-sensitive design ACM Interactions 3 6 1996 17 23
52. J. Fujimura Constructing do-able' problems in cancer research: articulating alignment Social Studies of Science 17 1987 257 293
53. J. Fujimura Future imaginaries: genome scientists as socio-cultural entrepreneurs A. Goodman, D. Heath, S. Lindee, Genetic Nature/Culture: Anthropology and Science beyond the Two-Culture Divide 2003 University of California Press Berkeley, CA 176 199
54. R. Goodin, and J. Dryzek Deliberative impacts: the macro-political uptake of mini-publics Politics & Society 34 2006 219 244
55. J. Grin, and A. Grunwald Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21st Century Society. Towards a Repertoire for Technology Assessment 2000 Springer Berlin
56. A. Grinbaum, and C. Groves What is "responsible" about responsible innovation? Understanding the ethical issues R. Owen, J. Bessant, M. Heintz, Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society 2013 Wiley London 119 142
57. C. Groves Technological futures and non-reciprocal responsibility International Journal of the Humanities 4 2006 57 61
58. R. Grove-White, P. Macnaghten, S. Mayer, and B. Wynne Uncertain World: Genetically Modified Organisms, Food and Public Attitudes in Britain 1997 Centre for the Study of Environmental Change Lancaster, UK
59. R. Grove-White, P. Macnaghten, and B. Wynne Wising Up: The Public and New Technologies 2000 Centre for the Study of Environmental Change Lancaster, UK
60. D. Guston Toward Centres for Responsible Innovation in the Commercialized University. Public Science in a Liberal Democracy: The Challenge to Science and Democracy 2006 University of Toronto Press Toronto
61. D. Guston The pumpkin or the tiger? Michael Polanyi, Frederick Soddy, and anticipating emerging technologies Minerva 50 2012 363 379
62. D. Guston, and D. Sarewitz Real-time technology assessment Technology in Society 24 2002 93 109
63. I. Hacking Culpable ignorance of interference effects D. MacLean, Values at Risk 1986 Rowman and Allanheld Totowa, NJ 136 154
64. M. Hajer Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void Policy Sciences 36 2003 175 195
65. M. Hajer Authoritative Governance: Policy Making in the Age of Mediatization 2009 Oxford University Press Oxford
66. M. Hajer, and H. Wagenaar Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society 2003 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
67. C. Hamilton Earthmasters: The Dawn of the Age of Climate Engineering 2013 Yale University Press London
68. A. Hedgecoe Bioethics and the reinforcement of socio-technical expectations Social Studies of Science 40 2010 163 186
69. A. Hedgecoe, and P. Martin The drugs don't work: expectations and the shaping of pharmacogenetics Social Studies of Science 33 2003 327 364
70. T. Hellström Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation Technology in Society 25 2003 369 384
71. K. Henwood, and N. Pidgeon What is the Relationship between Identity and Technological, Economic, Demographic, Environmental and Political Change Viewed through a Risk Lens? 2013 Government Office for Science London Downloaded from: http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/foresight/docs/identity/13-519-identity-and-change- through-a%20risk-lens.pdf (01.02.13)
72. L. Hessels, H. van Lente, and R. Smits In search of relevance: the changing contract between science and society Science and Public Policy 36 2009 387 401
73. S. Hilgartner Intellectual property and the politics of emerging technology: inventors, citizens, and powers to shape the future Chicago-Kent Law Review 84 2009 197 224
74. HM Treasury/DTI/DfES Science and Innovation Investment Framework 2004 HM Treasury London
75. H. Hoffmann-Riem, and B. Wynne In risk assessment, one has to admit ignorance Nature 416 2002 123
76. Hands Off Mother Earth (HOME) SPICE Opposition Letter 2011 Downloaded from: http://www.handsoffmotherearth.org/hose-experiment/spice-opposition-letter (01.02.13)
77. T. Horlick-Jones, J. Walls, G. Rowe, N. Pidgeon, W. Poortinga, G. Murdock, and T. O'Riordan The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Engagement 2007 Routledge London
78. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, Third Report: Science and Society 2000 HMSO London
79. C. Illies, and A. Meijers Artefacts without agency The Monist 92 2009 420 440
80. Ipsos-MORI Experiment Earth: Report on a Public Dialogue on Geoengineering 2010 Natural Environment Research Council Swindon Downloaded from: www.nerc.ac.uk/about/consult/geoengineering-dialogue-final-report.pdf (01.02.13)
81. A. Irwin The politics of talk: coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance Social Studies of Science 36 2006 299 330
82. A. Irwin, T. Jensen, and K. Jones The good, the bad and the perfect: criticizing engagement practice Social Studies of Science 43 2013 118 135
83. S. Jasanoff Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science Minerva 41 2003 223 244
84. H. Jonas The Imperative of Responsibility 1984 University of Chicago Press Chicago
85. D. Kaiser, and J. Moreno Dual-use research: self-censorship is not enough Nature 492 2012 345 347
86. R. Karinen, and D. Guston Toward anticipatory governance: the experience with nanotechnology. Governing future technologies Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 27 2010 217 232
87. M. Kearnes, and A. Rip The emerging governance landscape of nanotechnology S. Gammel, A. Lösch, A. Nordmann, Jenseits von Regulierung: Zum politischen Umgang mit der Nanotechnologie 2009 Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Berlin 97 121
88. M. Kearnes, and M. Wienroth A New Mandate? Research Policy in a Technological Society. Research Report 2011 Durham University Durham, UK
89. A. Kerr, S. Cunningham-Burley, and R. Tutton Shifting subject positions: experts and lay people in public dialogue Social Studies of Science 37 2007 385 411
90. K. Kjølberg The Notion of 'Responsible Development' in New Approaches to Governance of Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies 2010 University of Bergen Norway (PhD dissertation)
91. J. Kooiman, and S. Jentoft Meta-governance: values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices Public Administration 87 2009 818 836
92. B. Latour Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society 1987 Open University Press Milton Keynes, UK
93. B. Latour "It's Development, Stupid!" or: How to Modernize Modernization 2008 Downloaded from: http://test.espacestemps.net/articles/ itrsquos-development-stupid-or-how-to-modernize-modernization/ (01.02.13)
94. R. Lave, P. Mirowski, and S. Randalls Introduction: STS and neoliberal science Social Studies of Science 40 2010 659 675
95. R. Lee Look at mother nature on the run in the 21st century: responsibility, research and innovation Transnational Environmental Law 1 2012 105 117
96. J. Lezaun, and L. Soneryd Consulting citizens: technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics Public Understanding of Science 16 2007 279 297
97. E. Lövbrand, R. Pielke, and S. Beck A democracy paradox in studies of science and technology Science, Technology & Human Values 36 2011 474 496
98. Lund Declaration Conference: New Worlds - New Solutions. Research and Innovation as a Basis for Developing Europe in a Global Context. Lund, Sweden, 7-8 July 2009 2009 Downloaded from: http://www.vr.se/download/18. 7dac901212646d84fd38000338/1264064614339/New-Worlds-New-Solutions-Background. pdf (01.02.13)
99. M. Lynch Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge Theory, Culture & Society 17 2000 26 54
100. P. Macnaghten Researching technoscientific concerns in the making: narrative structures, public responses and emerging nanotechnologies Environment & Planning A 41 2010 23 37
101. P. Macnaghten, and J. Chilvers The future of science governance: publics, policies, practices Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 2013 (forthcoming)
102. P. Macnaghten, and J. Guivant Converging citizens? Nanotechnology and the political imaginary of public engagement in Brazil and the United Kingdom Public Understanding of Science 20 2011 207 220
103. P. Macnaghten, and R. Owen Good governance for geoengineering Nature 479 2011 293
104. P. Macnaghten, and B. Szerszynski Living the global social experiment: an analysis of public discourse on solar radiation management and its implications for governance Global Environmental Change 23 2013 465 474
105. B. Martin The origins of the concept of 'foresight' in science and technology: an insider's perspective Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77 2010 1438 1447
106. M. Michael, and N. Brown On doing scientific citizenships: reflections on xenotransplantation's publics Science as Culture 14 2005 39 57
107. C. Miller, and I. Bennett Thinking longer term about technology: is there value in science fiction-inspired approaches to constructing futures? Science and Public Policy 35 2008 597 606
108. C. Mitcham Co-responsibility for research integrity Science and Engineering Ethics 9 2003 273 290
109. A. Moore Beyond participation: opening up political theory in STS Social Studies of Science 40 2010 793 799
110. P. Morlacchi, and B. Martin Emerging challenges for science, technology and innovation policy research: a reflexive overview Research Policy 38 2009 571 582
111. F. Muniesa, and M. Lenglet Responsible innovation in finance: directions and implications R. Owen, J. Bessant, M. Heintz, Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society 2013 Wiley London 185 198
112. Nature A charter for geoengineering Nature 485 2012 415 (Editorial)
113. D. Nelkin Beyond risk: reporting about genetics in the post-Asilomar press Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 44 2001 199 207
114. Nuffield Council on Bioethics Emerging Biotechnologies: Technology, Choice and the Public Good 2012 Nuffield Council on Biotechnologies London Downloaded from: http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/sites/default/files/Emerging- biotechnologies-full-report-web-0.pdf (01.02.13)
115. R. Olson Soft geoengineering: a gentler approach to addressing climate change Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 54 5 2012 29 39
116. R. Owen Legitimate conditions for climate engineering Environmental Science and Technology 45 2011 9116 9117
117. R. Owen, and N. Goldberg Responsible innovation: a pilot study with the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Risk Analysis 30 2010 1699 1707
118. R. Owen, P. Macnaghten, and J. Stilgoe Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society Science and Public Policy 39 2012 751 760
119. K. Parkhill, and N. Pidgeon Public engagement on geoengineering research: preliminary report on the SPICE deliberative workshops. Understanding Risk Group Working Paper, 11-01 2011 Cardiff University School of Psychology Cardiff Downloaded from: http://psych.cf.ac.uk/understandingrisk/docs/spice.pdf (01.02.13)
120. L. Pellizzoni Responsibility and environmental governance Environmental Politics 13 2004 541 565
121. N. Pidgeon, K. Parkhill, A. Corner, and N. Vaughan Deliberating stratospheric aerosols for climate geoengineering and the SPICE project Nature Climate Change 3 5 2013 451 457
122. T. Pinch, and W. Bijker The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other Social Studies of Science 14 1984 388 441
123. M. Polanyi The republic of science: its political and economic theory Minerva 1 1962 54 73
124. K. Popper Conjectures and Refutations 1963 Routledge and Kegan Paul London
125. W. Powell, K. Koput, and L. Smith-Doerr Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology Administrative Science Quarterly 41 1996 116 145
126. B. Prainsack, and A. Buyx Solidarity in contemporary bioethics: towards a new approach Bioethics 26 2012 343 350
127. S. Randles, and J. Youtie A trans-Atlantic conversation on responsible innovation and responsible governance H. Van Lente, C. Coenen, Little by Little: Expansions of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies 2012 Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Heidelberg 169 180
128. J. Ravetz The science of 'what-if?' Futures 29 1997 533 539
129. E. Raymond The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary 1999 O'Reilly and Associates, Inc. Sebastopol, CA
130. S. Rayner, C. Heyward, T. Kruger, N. Pidgeon, C. Redgwell, and J. Savulescu The Oxford principles Climatic Change 2013 (in press)
131. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP) 21st Report, Setting Environmental Standards 1998 The Stationery Office London
132. H. Richardson Institutionally divided moral responsibility E. Paul, F. Miller, J. Paul, Responsibility 1999 Cambridge University Press Cambridge 218 249
133. A. Rip Responsible innovation - responsible governance position statement Third Annual Conference for the Society for the Study of Nanotechnology and Emerging Technologies Tempe, AZ, 7-10 November 2011
134. A. Rip, T. Misa, and J. Schot Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment 1995 Thomson London
135. D. Robinson Co-evolutionary scenarios: an application to prospecting futures of the responsible development of nanotechnology Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 2009 1222 1239
136. M. Rogers The Pandora's Box Congress 1975 Rolling Stone Magazine
137. T. Rogers-Hayden, and N. Pidgeon Moving engagement "upstream"? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry Public Understanding of Science 16 2007 345 364
138. N. Rose Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought 1999 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
139. H. Rothstein Talking shop or talking turkey? Institutionalizing consumer representation in risk regulation Science, Technology & Human Values 32 2007 582 607
140. G. Rowe, and L. Frewer Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation Science, Technology & Human Values 25 2000 3 29
141. G. Rowe, and L. Frewer A typology of public engagement mechanisms Science, Technology & Human Values 30 2005 251 290
142. Royal Society Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty 2009 Royal Society London
143. Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties 2004 Royal Society London
144. J. Schot, and F. Geels Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 2008 537 554
145. D. Schuurbiers What happens in the lab: applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory Science and Engineering Ethics 17 2011 769 788
146. D. Schuurbiers, and E. Fisher Lab-scale intervention. Science and society series on convergence research EMBO Reports 10 2009 424 427
147. C. Selin Expectations and the emergence of nanotechnology Science, Technology & Human Values 32 2007 196 220
148. C. Selin Negotiating plausibility: intervening in the future of nanotechnology Science and Engineering Ethics 17 2011 723 737
149. A. Smith, A. Stirling, and F. Berkhout The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions Research Policy 34 2005 1491 1510
150. SPICE (Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering) The SPICE Project 2010 Downloaded from http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/∼hemh/SPICE/ SPICE.htm (01.02.13)
151. Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative (SRMGI) Solar Radiation Management: The Governance of Research 2011 The Royal Society London Downloaded from: http://www.srmgi.org/files/2012/01/DES2391-SRMGI-report-web-11112.pdf (01.02.13)
152. N. Steneck Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions Science and Engineering Ethics 12 2006 53 74
153. J. Stilgoe A question of intent Nature Climate Change 1 2011 325 326
154. J. Stilgoe Experiments in science policy: an autobiographical note Minerva 50 2012 197 204
155. Stilgoe, J.; Watson, M.; Kuo, K. From Bio to Geo: Learning from Public Engagement with new technologies. Plos Biology, submitted for publication.
156. A. Stirling Analysis, participation and power: justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis Land Use Policy 23 2006 95 107
157. A. Stirling A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society Journal of the Royal Society Interface 4 2007 707 719
158. A. Stirling "Opening up" and "closing down": power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology Science Technology & Human Values 33 2008 262 294
159. A. Stirling Keep it complex Nature 468 2010 1029 1031
160. H. Sutcliffe A Report on Responsible Research and Innovation for the European Commission 2011 MATTER London Downloaded from: http://ec.europa.eu/ research/science-society/document-library/pdf-06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe-en. pdf (01.02.13)
161. T. Swierstra, and A. Rip Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology Nanoethics 3 2007 3 20
162. T. Swierstra, D. Stemerding, and M. Boenink Exploring techno-moral change: the case of the obesity pill Humanities, Social Science and Law 3 2009 119 138
163. H. te Kulve, and A. Rip Constructing productive engagement: pre-engagement tools for emerging technologies Science and Engineering Ethics 17 2011 699 714
164. TNS-BMRB Synthetic Biology Dialogue 2010 Sciencewise London
165. A. Toffler Future Shock 1970 Random House New York
166. M.J. van den Hoven Moral responsibility, public office and information technology I. Snellen, W. Van De Donk, Public Administration in an Information Age 1998 IOS Press Amsterdam
167. M.J. van den Hoven, G. Lokhorst, and I. van de Poel Engineering and the problem of moral overload Science and Engineering Ethics 18 2012 1 13
168. H. van Lente Promising Technology: The Dynamics of Expectations in Technological Developments 1993 Universitet Twente The Netherlands (PhD dissertation)
169. H. van Lente, and A. Rip The rise of membrane technology: from rhetorics to social reality Social Studies of Science 28 1998 221 254
170. M. van Oudheusden Questioning 'participation': a critical appraisal of its conceptualization in a Flemish participatory technology assessment Science and Engineering Ethics 17 2011 673 690
171. E. von Hippel The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process Research Policy 5 1976 212 239
172. E. von Hippel Democratizing Innovation 2005 Downloaded from: http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm (01.02.13)
173. R. Von Schomberg From the Ethics of Technology towards an Ethics of Knowledge Policy & Knowledge Assessment. A Working Document from the European Commission Services, EUR 22429, Brussels 2007 Downloaded from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/ethicsofknowledgepolicy-en.pdf (01.02.13)
174. R. von Schomberg Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation M. Dusseldorp, R. Beecroft, Technikfolgen Abschätzen Lehren: Bildungspotenziale Transdisziplinärer 2011 Vs Verlag, Methoden Wiesbaden
175. R. von Schomberg Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields 2011 European Commission Brussels Downloaded from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/ science-society/document-library/pdf-06/mep-rapport-2011-en.pdf (01.02.13)
176. R. von Schomberg On identifying plausibility and deliberative public policy Science and Engineering Ethics 17 2011 739 742
177. R. von Schomberg A vision of responsible research and innovation R. Owen, J. Bessant, M. Heintz, Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society 2013 Wiley London 51 74
178. M. Watson The Reluctant Geoengineer Blog 2011 Downloaded from: http://thereluctantgeoengineer.blogspot.co.uk/ (01.02.13)
179. S. Weart Scientists with a secret Physics Today 29 1976 23 30
180. B. Williams Moral Luck 1981 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
181. R. Williams, and D. Edge What is the social shaping of technology? Research Policy 25 1996 856 899
182. J. Wilsdon, and R. Willis See-Through Science 2004 Demos London
183. L. Winner Autonomous Technology: Technics Out of Control as a Theme in Political Thought 1977 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
184. L. Winner The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology 1986 University of Chicago Press Chicago
185. S. Wright Legitimating genetic engineering Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 44 2001 235 247
186. B. Wynne Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and the public uptake of science Public Understanding of Science 1 1992 281 304
187. B. Wynne Public uptake of science: a case for institutional reflexivity Public Understanding of Science 2 1993 321 337
188. B. Wynne Risk and environment as legitimatory discourses of science and technology: reflexivity inside-out? Current Sociology 50 2002 459 477
189. B. Wynne Seasick on the third wave? Subverting the hegemony of propositionalism Social Studies of Science 33 2003 401 418
190. B. Wynne Risk as globalizing discourse? Framing subjects and citizens M. Leach, I. Scoones, B. Wynne, Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement 2005 Zed Books London and New York
191. B. Wynne Lab work goes social, and vice-versa: strategising public engagement processes Science and Engineering Ethics 17 2011 791 800
192. B. Wynne Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science-hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genetics 9 2006 211 220