Emerging challenges for science, technology and innovation policy research: A reflexive overview

Research Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 571-582

  Morlacchi, Piera ^a   Martin, Ben R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63149185865     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.021     Document Type: Editorial

References (77)

1. Abbott A. Chaos of Disciplines (2001), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
2. Aghion P., David P.A., and Foray D. Science, technology and innovation for economic growth: linking policy research and practice in 'STIG systems'. Research Policy 38 (2009) this issue
3. Appadurai A. Grassroots globalization and the research imagination. Public Culture 12 (2000) 1-19
4. Appadurai A. The right to research. Globalization, Societies and Education 4 (2006) 167-177
5. Ball S. Intellectuals or technicians? The urgent role of theory in educational studies. British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (1995) 255-271
6. Bauman Z. Modernity and Ambivalence (1991), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
7. Becher T., and Trowler P.R. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines (2001), The Society for Research Into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham
8. Becker, H., 2003. Making sociology relevant to society, paper given at the meeting of the European Sociological Association in Murcia, Spain 2003 (unpaginated version retrieved from http://home.earthlink.net/∼hsbecker/relevant.html on 4 December 2007).
9. Bell D. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting (1973), Basic Books, New York
10. Bijker W. The need for public intellectuals: a space for STS. Science, Technology & Human Values 28 (2003) 443-450
11. Binks M., Starkey K., and Mahon C.L. Entrepreneurship education and the business school. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (2006) 1-18
12. Birnbaum R. Policy scholars are from Venus; policy makers are from Mars. The Review of Higher Education 23 (2000) 119-132
13. Blume S. Science policy and science policy research. Nature 228 (1970) 215-218
14. Boden R., and Epstein D. Managing the research imagination?. Globalization and Research in Higher Education 4 (2006) 223-236
15. Breen B., and Hamel G. The Future of Management (2008), Harvard Business School Press, Boston
16. Burawoy M. For public sociology. American Sociological Review 70 (2005) 4-28
17. Checkland P.B. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice (1981), Wiley, Chichester
18. Churchman C.W. The Design of Inquiring Systems (1971), Basic Books, New York
19. Cole S. World models, their progress and applicability. Futures 6 (1974) 201-218
20. Collins H.M. Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (2004) 125-143
21. Delanty G. Challenging Knowledge: The University in the Knowledge Society (2001), The Society for Research Into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham
22. Dosi G., Llerena P., and Labini M.S. The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: an illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called 'European Paradox'. Research Policy 35 (2006) 1450-1464
23. Dosi G., Malerba F., Ramello G.B., and Silva F. Information, appropriability, and the generation of innovative knowledge four decades after Arrow and Nelson: an introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change 15 (2006) 891-901
24. Faulkner A. Regulatory policy as innovation: constructing rules of engagement for a technological zone of tissue engineering in the European Union. Research Policy 38 (2009) 571-582
25. Fay B. Social Theory and Political Practice (1975), Allen and Unwin, London
26. Flyvbjerg B. Making Social Science Matter (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
27. Forrester J.W. Industrial Dynamics (1961), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
28. Forrester J.W. World Dynamics (1971), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
29. Freeman C. Malthus with a computer. Futures 5 (1973) 5-13
30. Freeman C., and Soete L. Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: what we can learn from the past. Research Policy 38 (2009) this issue
31. Frietsch R., Haller I., Vrohlings M., and Grupp H. Gender-specific patterns in patenting and publishing. Research Policy 38 (2009) this issue
32. Fuller S. The Intellectual: The Positive Power of Negative Thinking (2005), Icon Books, London
33. Freire P. Editor's introduction. In: Giroux H.A. (Ed). Teachers as Intellectuals: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Learning (Critical Studies in Education Series) (1988), Bergin & Garvey, Westport xxvii-xxviii
34. Galison P. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics (1997), University of Chicago, Chicago
35. Godin B. The linear model of innovation: the historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology, and Human Values 31 (2005) 639-667
36. Goldstone R.L. The complex systems sea-change in education. The Journal of Learning Sciences 15 (2006) 35-43
37. Hart D. Accounting for change in national systems of innovation: a friendly critique based on the US case. Research Policy 38 (2009) this issue
38. Heinze T., Shapira P., Rogers J.D., and Senker J.M. Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research. Research Policy 38 (2009) this issue
39. Hilgartner S., and Bosk C. The rise and fall of social problems: a public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology 94 (1988) 53-78
40. Hughes O.E. Public Management and Administration. An Introduction (2003), Palgrave, Basingstoke
41. Jackson M.C. Critical systems thinking and practice. European Journal of Operations Research 18 (2001) 233-244
42. Johnston J. Who cares about the commons?. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 14 4 (2003) 1-41
43. Johnston J., and Goodman J. Hope and activism in the ivory tower: Freirean lessons for critical globalization research. Globalization 3 (2006) 9-30
44. Korzybski, A., 1931. A non-Aristotelian system and its necessity for rigour in mathematics and physics, Paper presented before the American Mathematical Society at the New Orleans, Louisiana, meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science December 28, 1931. Reprinted in Science and Sanity, 1933, 747-761.
45. Lane D. Social theory and system dynamics practice. European Journal of Operational Research 113 (1999) 501-527
46. Markard J., Stadelmann M., and Truffer B. Prospective analysis of technological innovation systems: identifying technological and organizational development options for biogas in Switzerland. Research Policy 38 (2009) this issue
47. Marmot M.G. Evidence based policy or policy based evidence?. British Medical Journal 328 (2004) 906-907
48. Martin, B.R., 2009. The evolution of science policy and innovation studies, TIK Working papers on Innovation Studies, No. 20080828, University of Oslo (downloadable from http://www.tik.uio.no/InnoWP/2008%20Ben%20Martin-Evolution%20of%20SPIS.p df).
49. Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J., and Behrens W.W. The Limits to Growth (1972), Universe Books, New York
50. Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J., and Behrens W.W. A response to Sussex. Futures 5 (1973) 135-152
51. Menzies K. Sociological Theory in Use (1982), Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
52. Millstone E. Science, risk and governance: radical rhetorics and the realities of reform in food safety governance. Research Policy 38 (2009) this issue
53. Mintzberg H., and Gosling J. Educating managers beyond borders. Academy of Management Learning and Education 1 (2002) 64-76
54. Morecroft J.D.W. System dynamics and microworlds for policy makers. European Journal of Operational Research 35 (1988) 301-320
55. Nelson R.R. The Moon and the Ghetto: An Essay on Public Policy Analysis (1977), WW Norton & Company, New York
56. Nelson R.R. Bounded rationality, cognitive maps, and trial and error learning. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization 67 1 (2008) 78-89
57. Nill J., and Kemp R. Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: from niche to paradigm?. Research Policy 38 (2009) this issue
58. Nowotny H., Scott P., and Gibbons M. Rethinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in the Age of Uncertainty (2001), Polity Press, Cambridge
59. Parsons T. The Structure of Social Action (1937), Free Press, New York
60. Pfeffer J., and Fang C.T. The end of the business school? Less success that meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education 1 (2001) 78-95
61. Said E. Representations of the Intellectual (Reith Lectures) (1994), Pantheon Books, New York
62. Schram S.F., and Caterino B. Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research and Method (2006), New York University Press, New York
63. Shapiro D.L., Kirkman B.L., and Courtney H.G. Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research. Academy of Management Journal 50 (2007) 249-266
64. Shove, E., 2006. Interactive Agenda Setting in Social Sciences, summary report of a series of six workshops, http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/projects/iass/files/iass_summary.pdf (downloaded from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/projects/iass/ on 4 December 2008).
65. Shove E., and Walker G. Caution! Transition ahead: politics, practice and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A 39 (2007) 763-770
66. Simon H. Administrative Behavior (1947), Macmillan, New York
67. Sismondo S. Science and technology studies and an engaged program. In: Hackett E., Amsterdamska O., Lynch M., and Wajcman J. (Eds). The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (2007), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
68. Slaughter S., and Leslie L.L. Academic Capitalism, Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University (1997), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
69. Streatfeild G. World dynamics challenged. Futures 5 (1973) 4
70. Thagard P. How Scientists Explain Disease (1999), Princeton University Press, Princeton
71. Van de Ven A.H. Engaged Scholarship (2007), Oxford University Press, Oxford
72. Weick K. Theory construction as disciplined reflexivity: tradeoffs in the 90s. Academy of Management Review 24 (1999) 797-806
73. Williams M. Social research - the emergence of a discipline?. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 3 (2000) 157-166
74. Woodhouse E., and Sarewitz D. Science policies for reducing societal inequities. Science and Public Policy 34 (2007) 139-150
75. Wyatt S., and Balmer B. What and where is the middle in science and technology studies?. Science, Technology and Human Values 32 (2007) 619-626
76. Yegorov I. Post-Soviet science: difficulties in the transformation of the R&D systems in Russia and Ukraine. Research Policy 38 (2009) this issue
77. Ziman J. Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge