Lab-scale intervention: Science & Society Series on Convergence Research

EMBO Reports

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 424-427

  Schuurbiers, Daan ^a   Fisher, Erik ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOENGINEERING; BIOMEDICINE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COGNITION; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GENETICS; GENOMICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; SCIENTIST; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIOLOGY; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

POLICY MAKING; RESEARCH; SCIENCE;

EID: 65549093203     PISSN: 1469221X     EISSN: 14693178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/embor.2009.80     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Balmer A, Martin P (2008) Synthetic Biology: Social and Ethical Challenges. An Independent Review Commissioned by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC). Swindon, UK: BBSRC
2. Bennett G, Rabinow P (2008) Human Practices 2007. Interfacing Three Modes of Collaboration. Houston, TX, USA: Rice University, the Connexions Project. http://cnx.org
3. Calvert J, Martin P (2009) The role of social scientists in synthetic biology. EMBO Rep 10: 194-200
4. Cohen S, Grace D (1994) Engineers and social responsibility: An obligation to do good. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 13 12-19
5. Doubleday R (2007) The laboratory revisited: Academic science and the responsible development of nanotechnology. NanoEthics 1: 167-176
6. Dubochet J (2008) Citizen biologists: The Lausanne experience. EMBO Rep 9: 5-9
7. Fisher E (2007) Ethnographic invention: Probing the capacity of laboratory decisions. NanoEthics 1: 155-165
8. Fisher E, Mahajan R (2006) Midstream modulation of nanotechnology in an academic research laboratory. In Proceedings of IMECE2006: American Society of Mechanical Engineers International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 5-10. Cchicago, IL, USA: ASME
9. Fisher E, Mitcham C, Mahajan R (2006) Midstream modulation of technology: Governance from within. Bull Sci Technol Soc 26: 485-496
10. Gorman ME, Groves JF, Shrager J (2004) Societal dimensions of nanotechnology as a trading zone: Results from a pilot project. In Discovering at the Nanoscale, D Baird, A Nordmann, J Schummer (Eds). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS
11. Guston DH, Sarewitz D (2002) Real-time technology assessment. Technol Soc 24: 93-109
12. NGI (2005) Genomics 2008-2012. Building and Utilising. The Dutch Genomics Infrastructure 2008-2012. The Hague, the Netherlands: Netherlands Genomics Initiative. www.genomics.nl
13. Rip A (2006) co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance and its ironies. In Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, J Voss, D Bauknecht, R Kemp (Eds), pp 82-100. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
14. Stegmaier P (2009) The rock 'n' roll of knowledge co-construction. An introduction to the Science & Society series on convergence research inspired by the 'Doing Society and Genomics' Workshop, 2008. EMBO Rep 10: 114-119
15. van de Poel I, Verbeek PP (2006) Ethics and engineering design. Sci Technol Human Values 31: 223-236
16. Webster A (2007) Crossing boundaries: Social science in the policy room. Sci Technol Human Values 32: 458-478