Analysis, participation and power: Justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis

Land Use Policy

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 95-107

  Stirling, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Deliberation; Framing; Justification; Multi criteria appraisal; Participation; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH;

EID: 30444437743     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. A. Amendola S. Contini I. Ziomas Uncertainties in chemical risk assessment: Results of a European benchmark exercise Journal of Hazardous Materials 29 2002 347-363
2. Antunes, P., Santos, R., Videira, N., Participatory decision making for sustainable development-the use of mediated modelling techniques. Land Use Policy this issue doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.014.
3. J. Bohmann Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy 1996 MIT Press Cambridge
4. S. Brownlow S. Watson Structuring multi-attribute value hierarchies Journal of the Operational Research Society 38 1987 309-317
5. J. Burgess M. Limb C.M. Harrison Exploring environmental values through the medium of small groups (1. Theory and practice) Environment and Planning A 20 3 1998 309-326
6. D. Byrd C. Cothern Introduction to Risk Analysis: A Systematic Approach to Science-based Decision Making 2000 Government Institutes Rockville
7. Commission of the European Communities (CEC), 2000. White paper on governance, Brussels, http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/cnc/2001/com2001_0428en01.pdf.
8. Commission of the European Communities (CEC), 2003. European environment and health strategy, Brussels, http://europa.eu.int/comm/press_room/presspacks/pdf/com_en.pdf.
9. Clark, J., Burgess, J., Stirling, A., Studd, K., 2001. Local outreach: the development of criteria for the evaluation of close and responsive relationships at the local level. Environment Agency, Rio House, Bristol, R&D Technical Report SWCON 204.
10. Clark, J., 2002. Structuring deliberation in environmental decision making using a multi-criteria approach. Paper presented to the European Science Foundation workshop on "New Strategies for Solving Environmental Conflicts", Umweltforschungszentrum Leipzig-Halle, June 2002.
11. Coenen, F., Huitema, D., O'Toole Jr., L., (Eds.), 1998. Participation and the quality of environmental decision making. Environment & Policy, vol. 14. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
12. D. Collingridge The Social Control of Technology 1980 St Martins Press New York
13. D. Collingridge Critical Decision Making: A New Theory of Social Choice 1982 Pinter London
14. Davies, G., Burgess, J., Eames, M., Mayer, S., Staley, K., Stirling, A., Williamson, S., 2003. Deliberative mapping: Appraising options for addressing 'the Kidney Gap'. Final Report to Wellcome Trust, June 2003; available at: http://www.deliberative-mapping.org/.
15. C. Day R. Parnell Consensus Design: Socially Inclusive Process 2002 Architectural Press Oxford
16. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) Multi-Criteria Analysis: A Manual 2000 DETR London
17. Dryzek, J., Niemeyer, S., 2003. Pluralism and consensus in political deliberation. Paper presented to the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, 28-31 August.
18. J.S. Dryzek Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science 1990 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
19. European Participatory Technology Assessment (Europta), 2000. Participatory methods in technology assessment and technology decision making, Copenhagen; available at: www.tekno.dk.
20. H. Fineberg Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Research Council Committee on Risk Characterisation 1996 National Academy Press Washington
21. D. Fiorino Environmental risk and democratic process: A critical review Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 14 1989 501
22. F. Fischer Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise 1990 Newbury Park CA, Sage
23. F. Fischer Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices 2003 Oxford University Press New York
24. Flyvbjerg, B., 1998. Rationality and Power: Democracy in practice. (trans. S. Sampson). University of Chicago Press, 1998.
25. M. Foucault Power, Truth, Strategy 1977 Prometheus London
26. D. Gee P. Harremoes J. Keys M. MacGarvin A. Stirling S. Vaz B. Wynne Late Lesson from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1898-2000 2001 European Environment Agency Copenhagen
27. E. Goffman Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organisation of Experience 1974 Harper & Row New York
28. Â. Guimarães Pereira C. Gough B. De Marchi Computers, citizens and climate change-the art of communicating technical issues International Journal of Environment and Pollution 11 3 1999 266-289
29. J. Habermas Legitimation Crisis 1975 Beacon Press Boston
30. J. Habermas The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity 1984 Polity Cambridge
31. C. Hood Managing risk and managing blame a political science approach In: A. Weale (Ed.) Risk, Democratic Citizenship and Public Policy 2002 Oxford University Press/British Academy Press Oxford
32. T. Horlick-Jones The problem of blame In: C. Hood D. Jones (Eds.) Accident and Design: Contemporary Debates in Risk Management 1996 University College London Press London 61-71
33. A. Irwin Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development 1995 Routledge London
34. S. Joss S. Belucci (Eds.) European Participatory Technology Assessment, Participatory Methods in Technology Assessment and Technology Decision-Making 2002 Center for the Study of Democracy Westminster
35. S. Joss J. Durant Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe 1995 Science Museum London
36. B. Kasemir J. Jäger C. Jaeger M. Gardner Public Participation in Sustainability Science: A Handbook 2003 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
37. Kennedy, J.F., 1966. Speech given in Cape Town, South Africa, 7th June 1966, discussed at: http://www.noblenet.org/reference/inter.htm.
38. L. Levidow Democratising technology or technologising democracy Technology in Society 20 2 1999 211-226
39. S. Lukes Power: A Radical View 1974 Macmillan London
40. Merkhofer, M., Keeney, R., 1987. A multiattribute utility analysis of alternative sites for the disposal of nuclear waste. Risk Analysis 7 (2).
41. Messner, F., Zwirner, O., Karkuschke, M., Participation in multicriteria decision support for the resolution of a water allocation problem in the Spree River Basin. Land Use Policy this issue doi:10.1016/ j.landusepol.2004.08.008.
42. E. Millstone P. van Zwanenberg Food safety and consumer protection in a globalised economy Swiss Political Science Review 6 3 2000 109-118
43. B. Misztal Trust in Modern Societies 1996 Polity Press Cambridge
44. Munda, G., Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies. Land Use Policy this issue doi:10.1016/ j.landusepol.2004.08.012.
45. R. Munton Deliberative democracy and environmental decision-making In: F. Berkhout M. Leach I. Scoones (Eds.) Negotiating Environmental Change New Perspectives from Social Science 2003 Edward Elgar Cheltenham pp. 109-136
46. Norese, M., ELECTRE III as a support for waste incineration participatory decision making. Land Use Policy this issue doi:10.1016/ j.landusepol.2004.08.009.
47. J. O'Neill Ecology, Policy and Politics Human Well-being and the Natural World 1993 Routledge London
48. O. O'Neill A Question of Trust The BBC Reith Lectures 2002 2002 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
49. H. Owen Open Space Technology: A User's Guide second ed 1997 Berrett-Koehler San Francisco
50. J. Petts Evaluating the effectiveness of deliberate processes waste management casestudies Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44 2 2001 207-226
51. Petts, J., Leach, B., 2000. Participation and consultation by the environment agency: Literature review. Draft Environment Agency R & D Technical Report, E2-030.
52. J. Rawls A Theory of Justice 1971 The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge
53. J. Rawls Political Liberalism 1993 Columbia University Press New York
54. J. Rawls The idea of public reason revisited The University of Chicago Law Review 64 1997 765-807
55. O. Renn T. Webler P. Wiedemann Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse 1995 Kluwer Dordrecht
56. Renn, O., Participatory processes for designing environmental policies. Land Use Policy this issue doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.005.
57. N. Rescher Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus 1993 Clarendon Press Oxford
58. G. Rowe L.J. Frewer Public participation methods: An evaluative review of the literature Science, Technology and Human Values 25 2000 3-29
59. R. Sclove Democracy and Technology 1995 Guilford Press New York
60. Scoones, I., Thompson, J. (Eds.), 2003. Prajateerpu E-Forum on Participatory Processes for Policy Change. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London; available at: http://www.iied.org/sarl/e_forum/summary.html.
61. A. Seligman The Problem of Trust 1997 Princeton University Press Princeton
62. Smith, A., Stirling, A., Berkhout, F., 2004. Agency and power in the governance of sustainable technology transitions. Paper delivered to German Environment Ministry Conference on 'Innovation, Sustainability and Policy'. Kloster Seeon, Bavaria, 24th May 2004.
63. C. Spash Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: The case of wetland recreation Ecological Economics 34 2 2000 195-215
64. Stagl, S., Multicriteria evaluation and public participation: The case of UK energy policy. Land Use Policy this issue doi:10.1016/ j.landusepol.2004.08.007.
65. A. Stirling S. Mayer A novel approach to the appraisal of technological risk Environment and Planning (C) 19 2001 529-555
66. A. Stirling Multicriteria mapping mitigating the problems of environmental valuation? In: J. Foster (Ed.) Valuing Nature Economics, Ethics and Environment 1997 Routledge London
67. A. Stirling Risk at a turning point? Journal of Risk Research 1 2 1998 97-110
68. A. Stirling Risk, uncertainty and precaution some instrumental implications from the social sciences In: F. Berkhout M. Leach I. Scoones (Eds.) Negotiating Change 2003 Elgar Cheltenham
69. A. Stirling Opening up or closing down analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology In: M. Leach I. Scoones B. Wynne (Eds.) Science, Citizenship and Globalisation 2004 Zed London
70. Striegnitz, M., Conflicts over coastal protection in a national park: mediation and negotiated law making. Land Use Policy this issue doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.006.
71. T. Sundqvist P. Soderholm A. Stirling Electric power generation valuation of environmental costs In: C.J. Cleveland (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Energy 2004 Academic Press San Diego
72. UK Nuclear Industry Radioactive Waste Executive (Nirex) Deep Repository Project-Preliminary Environmental and Radiological Assessment and Preliminary Safety Report 1989 Nirex London
73. United Nations (UN), 1999. Report of the Secretary-General on the work of the Organization. General Assembly, New York; available at: http://www.un.org/Docs/SG/Report99/toc.htm.
74. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 1998. Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters, Aarhus; available at: http://www.unece.org/env/pp/.
75. van den Hove, S., Between consensus and compromise: Acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches. Land Use Policy this issue doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.09.001.
76. Wakeford, T., Shakespeare, T., 2003. Teach Yourself Citizen's Juries: A manual for planning, implementing and campaigning with jury techniques. Policy, Ethics and Life Science Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Newcastle.
77. T. Wakeford A Comparison of Deliberative Processes. PLA Notes 40 2001 IIED London
78. Wittmer, H., Rauschmayer, F., How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts? Land Use Policy this issue doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.09.003.
79. B. Wynne The rhetoric of consensus politics: A critical review of technology assessment Research Policy 4 1975 108-158
80. B. Wynne Risk Management and Hazardous Waste: Implementation and the Dialectics of Credibility 1987 Springer Berlin
81. Wynne, B., 1992. Uncertainty and environmental learning: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change 111-127.
82. Zurita, L., Consensus conference method in environmental issues: relevance and strengths. Land Use Policy this issue doi:10.1016/ j.landusepol.2004.09.002.