The laboratory revisited: Academic science and the responsible development of nanotechnology

NanoEthics

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 167-176

  Doubleday, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Nanoscience; Nanotechnology; Science and technology studies; Upstream engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 34748848002     PISSN: 18714757     EISSN: 18714765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11569-007-0017-4     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Royal Society & RAE (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. Royal Society and RAE, London
2. Macnaghten P, Kearnes M, Wynne B (2005) Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: What role for the social sciences? Sci Commun 27:1-24
3. Doubleday R (2007) Risk, public engagement and reflexivity: Alternative framings of the public dimensions of nanotechnology. Health Risk Soc 9:211-227
4. Jasanoff S (2005) Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton
5. Irwin A (2006) The politics of talk: Coming to terms with 'new' scientific governance. Soc Stud Sci 36:299-320
6. Wilsdon J, Willis R (2004) See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. Demos, London
7. Wilsdon J, Wynne B, Stilgoe J (2005) The public value of science: Or how to ensure that science really matters. Demos, London
8. Wynne B (2006) Afterword. In: Kearnes M, Macnaghten P, Wilsdon J (eds) Governing at the nanoscale: People, policies and emerging technologies. Demos, London, pp 70-78
9. DTI (2005) Response to the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering report: "Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties". HM Government, London
10. Jackson R, Barbagallo F, Haste H (2005) Strengths of public dialogue on science-related issues. Crit Rev Int Soc Polit Philos 8:349-358
11. Joly PB, Kaufmann A (2007) Lost in translation? 'the need for "upstream engagement" with nanotechnology on trial. Science as Culture (in press)
12. Callon M (1994) Is science a public good? Sci Technol Human Values 19:395-424
13. Wynne B (1992) Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and the public uptake of science. Public Underst Sci 1:281-304
14. Wynne B (1993) Public uptake of science: A case for institutional reflexivity. Public Underst Sci 2:321-337
15. Giles J (2003) What is there to fear from something so small? Nature 426:750
16. Moore A (2004) Waiter, there's a nanobot in my martini! EMBO Rep 5:448-450